Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Questioning Diagnosis?


Carolina

Recommended Posts

Carolina Contributor

Hi all. I've posted here before but quick summary is that my 11yo was diagnosed with IBD (Crohn's or UC to be determined, not uncommon to be unclear in kids when caught early and confined to colon only). This diagnosis is absolutely correct, no question based on scopes. Her Celiac Panel came back as high (over 100) on tTG IgA and negative or weak positives on the others. She had no known reaction to gluten ever. The tests/scopes were done after 2 bloody diarrhea/abdominal cramp flare-ups that led to the IBD diagnosis. The Pediatric GI that performed the scopes thought the Celiac was a false positive from the IBD. We switched to a female GI and she thought it was correct. My daughter has been on a drug for the IBD and a gluten-free diet for 6 months and is doing great. I plan to stick with a gluten-free diet regardless, but I still have a little nagging doubt and would love to know for sure. She is very compliant at this age, but I can easily see where being a 'silent Celiac' could be an issue as a teen/young adult especially when there is no adverse reaction.

This has all come up again because we went to a friends house that has Celiac a couple weeks ago. Another friend brought a homemade pie that was supposed to be gluten-free. It was based on ingredients, but must have been a cross-contamination issue. My friend was throwing up and sick for days and my daughter was fine. I realize some are more effected than others but it just always keeps me guessing based on the fact that she's never seemingly had a reaction, her first GI thought it was a false positive, and Crohn's can also cause villi atrophy. Her Celiac bloodwork was re-tested 5 months out, all her weak positives were negative and the over 100 was 33. I am not sure this really means anything in regards to whether the diagnosis is correct or not? Is there anything else that can be done to confirm one way or another. I know there are genetic tests. We have no known family with the disease and the immediate family was tested and all negative. Again, we plan to remain gluten-free regardless as it is beneficial to IBD and anyone really, it's purely my desire to have a definitive answer.

ETA: Coming back to add in one other thing in case it is helpful. Initial GI did the Celiac panel, we went into scopes thinking this would just be confirmation. After scopes GI said it was "unremarkable" as far as Celiac. I was surprised when we got the biopsy results back and it said "diffuse villous atropy" but again Crohn's can also cause that. 

 

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

I think that the “proof” she has celiac disease was her very high TTG result at diagnosis and during follow-up testing it has declined dramatically on the gluten-free diet.  The TTG can be elevated due to other illnesses, like Crohn’s but that elevation is usually barely positive and not a result over 100 from my research (I am not a medical doctor).  

I probably told you about my niece who has Crohn’s (celiac disease ruled out for now).   She has none of the classic Crohn’s symptoms which really threw her parents off.  It continues to throw her doctor off too (her 4th GI).  She does not have any daily symptoms.  She does get an occasional flare  ( every few months) that can last less than 24 hours.  Yet the damage seen on the pill camera was dramatic.   In the beginning she had to remind her doctor that she has no daily pain.  Nothing.   We are hoping that nothing changes for her.  It did make it difficult for her and for her parents to decide to do the Crohn’s treatment (biologic) when she was symptom free.  She had to rely on the lab results and not her symptoms.

In your daughter’s case, I would have her stay the course because I think she probably has both.  But let’s say she does not have celiac disease.  That recent small study out of Scripps in San Diego  with IBD patients on an AIP diet (which is gluten-free) going into remission was amazing.  That alone, would keep me on the diet (to avoid Crohn’s progression).  

Finally, I had no GI symptoms at the time I was diagnosed.  I seriously think symptoms can ebb and flow.  Is she on any medications for Crohn’s that might also help avoid any upper GI symptoms?  Why didn’t she react to that pie?  Perhaps it is because she has a healed small intestine while your celiac friend is an adult who might still have intestinal damage (probably yes, if she takes risks like accepting a gluten-free pie baked by a non-celiac! ).  

 

 

Carolina Contributor

Yes, we plan to stay the course. She is doing so well that I definitely don't want to change a thing! I have googled the heck out of this topic but there is so little out there. Again, this is just for knowings sake for the years ahead when she may be tempted to stray if that were to happen. It would also just offer more clarity to any IBD symptoms that crop up instead of always guessing. I did wonder about the blood test or if there were other ways (patchiness if that exists or quality of the villi) that lead them to a Celiac versus Crohn's diagnosis based on the villi presentation. My friend is actually hypervigilant, I was honestly shocked she ate the pie. That is definitely not her norm. I wouldn't think the Crohn's med is helping much, it is formulated so that the coating dissolves at a certain pH so it gets to where it needs to be in the colon. I wondered when I was talking to my husband, if they were to scope her again down the road and she still had villi atrophy despite declining blood work, would that tell us that she was one of the Celiacs that don't recover or that the atrophy was the Crohn's all along. She will have many more scopes in the years ahead to stay on top of the IBD piece. So many questions as you can see. :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,467
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    addisoncarol1615
    Newest Member
    addisoncarol1615
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.2k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rebeccaj
    • jimmydee
    • robingfellow
      The Celebrity brand Luncheon Loaf (found at dollar tree, distributed by Atalanta Corporation) is gluten free according to the distributor. I emailed their customer service line for information on the ingredients, and they contacted the vendor and followed up with me that the "starch" ingredient I was worried about is corn and potato. It should be safe.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @jimmydee! Celiac disease is an autoimmune disorder, meaning the consumption of gluten triggers a response by the immune system that causes the body to attack it's own tissue. Celiac disease has a genetic base that requires some kind of trigger for the genes to be turned on. We know that there are two primary genes responsible for providing the potential to develop celiac disease and we know that about 40% of the population carries one or both of these genes. However, only about 1% of the population actually develops celiac disease. So, that tells us that something more than just having the genes is necessary in order to develop celiac disease. Something must trigger those genes to wake up and produce the active disease. It's that "something" that we are struggling to understand and that is somewhat of a mystery. But there is a growing body of evidence pointing to the culprit being a disruption of the proper balance of microorganisms in the gut. Apparently, the microorganisms that live in our intestines produce chemicals that regulate the size of the openings in the mucous lining of our small bowel. A disruption in the healthy balance of this microorganic community causes an increase in the size of the openings in the mucous lining. This in turn allows protein fragments from the food we eat that are larger than normal to invade the mucous lining where they are detected as threats by the immune system. This is what is happening with gluten for those with celiac disease. The attack in the mucous lining of the small bowel by the immune system on these incompletely broken down gluten components causes inflammation and, over time, as we continue to consume gluten, it damages the mucosal lining of the small bowel which results in the loss of efficiency of nutrient absorption. This mucosal lining is made up of millions of tiny finger like projections that create an enormous surface area for the absorption of nutrients when healthy. The "wearing down" of these millions of finger-like projections due to celiac inflammation greatly reduces the surface area and thus the ability to absorb nutrients. This in turn typically results in numerous health issues that have a nutrient deficiency base. But the answer to the question of why there seems to be an epidemic of celiac disease in recent years may not be simple. It may have many facets. First, we don't know how much of this epidemic is real and how much is apparent. That is, how much of what we perceive of as a dramatic increase in the incidence of celiac disease is simply due to greater awareness and better detection methods? Celiac disease is not new. There is evidence from ancient writings that people suffered from it back then but they did not have a name for it. And it wasn't until WW2 that gluten was identified as the cause of celiac disease. Current thinking on what is causing imbalance in gut biology has put forth a number of causes including overuse of antibiotics and pesticides, environmental toxins, fluoridation of drinking water, preoccupation with hygiene and sanitation, and the western diet. https://www.celiac.com/celiac-disease/theories-on-the-growing-prevalence-of-celiac-disease-and-gluten-sensitivity-over-the-last-half-century-video-r6716/?tab=comments#comment-25345 All this to say that I doubt your UTI or the low dose aspirin had anything to do with the onset of your celiac disease. It was probably just coincidence unless the UTI was the stress trigger that activated the celiac potential genes. The onset of celiac disease an happen at any stage of life and many people report it following a period of illness. But what is interesting about your low dose aspirin theory is that aspirin is in a class of medications known as NSAIDs (Non Steroidal Anti Inflammatory Drugs). Scientific studies have shown that long term use of NSAIDs can damage the villous lining of the small bowel in the same way as celiac disease.  The other thing I wish to point out is that unless you have actual testing done for celiac disease, you can't be sure if you have celiac disease or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). They share many of the same symptoms, the difference being that NCGS doesn't damage the lining of the small bowel. There is no test for NCGS, celiac disease must first be ruled out. NCGS is 10x more common than celiac disease. The antidote for both is a gluten free diet.
    • julie falco
      BRAND NAME: NOT BURGER PLANT-BASED PATTIES  A product I came across labeled gluten-free bought it when I got home I read the back ingredients further to notice that it says gluten with a line going through it u will see in the attached pics.     The label says down below that it is processed in a facility that also processes "WHEAT".  I tried to put this on the Gov. website as false advertisement but couldn't do it.  Maybe on here at least the word can get out to others not to purchase anything gluten-free without throughly reading the whole label....It won't let me upload 2 pics.  says to contact manager.   The products name is Not Burger    INGREDIENTS: Water, Pea Protein, Coconut Oil, Sunflower Oil, Natural Flavors, Bamboo Fiber, Less than 2% of: Methylcellulose, Dried Yeast, Rice Protein, Salt, Cocoa Powder Processed with Alkali, Psyllium Husk, Potato Fiber, Red Beet Juice Powder (color), Chia Protein Concentrate, Spinach Powder.   Manufactured in a facility that also processes wheat and soy.          MANUFACTURED FOR: The NotCompany, Inc, 438    Treat Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110.
×
×
  • Create New...