Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gluten Challenge? Opinions Appreciated:)


EricaP

Recommended Posts

EricaP Newbie

Hi guys.  I know this has been asked a lot and there is probably no true answer, but wanted your opinions anyway. 

My sister has celiacs and I have the DQ8 gene.  I was having a lot of stomach issues earlier in the year and then went on a keto diet (pretty much no gluten) for a couple weeks and felt amazing.  I then decided to get tested for celiacs.  I ate gluten only one week and tested negative. My doctor did order me another blood test and it has been 9 weeks on gluten now.  Should I wait the whole 12 weeks? 

At this point would cutting out gluten for only 2 weeks, followed by 9 weeks of heavy (believe me all kinds of stuff) gluten be a safe bet of not producing a false negative? 

Seven years back I had tested positive on Enterolab, but I got a blood test & endoscopy and it showed negative.

Also for you kaiser people have you had any luck getting a referral for endoscopy without positive blood tests?  Would they order more than the IGG and IGA?  I didn't even ask because from what I've read I've seen they typically don't.

Thanks so much!! 

 

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



EricaP Newbie

Also not that it matters, but have had low iron on and off last 2 years. Just another reason why I’m testing. 

cyclinglady Grand Master
19 hours ago, EricaP said:

Hi guys.  I know this has been asked a lot and there is probably no true answer, but wanted your opinions anyway. 

My sister has celiacs and I have the DQ8 gene.  I was having a lot of stomach issues earlier in the year and then went on a keto diet (pretty much no gluten) for a couple weeks and felt amazing.  I then decided to get tested for celiacs.  I ate gluten only one week and tested negative. My doctor did order me another blood test and it has been 9 weeks on gluten now.  Should I wait the whole 12 weeks? 

At this point would cutting out gluten for only 2 weeks, followed by 9 weeks of heavy (believe me all kinds of stuff) gluten be a safe bet of not producing a false negative? 

Seven years back I had tested positive on Enterolab, but I got a blood test & endoscopy and it showed negative.

Also for you kaiser people have you had any luck getting a referral for endoscopy without positive blood tests?  Would they order more than the IGG and IGA?  I didn't even ask because from what I've read I've seen they typically don't.

Thanks so much!! 

 

 

Welcome!  

With a sister who has celiac disease, you are at a much higher risk of developing it.  I would go for the complete 12 weeks.  Why?  Because doctors recommend anywhere from six to 12 weeks for the blood tests, but there has not been many long term studies to back up the claims.  Best to play it safe.  It sounds like you are not suffering too much (I had no GI symptoms and just anemia when I was diagnosed).  Ask your PCP to run the full panel, including  the DGP and EMA tests.  Why?  Not all celiacs test positive to the TTG, like me!  If your Kaiser doc refuses, please ask if you can be referred to a GI and select one who handles celiac patients.  Some celiacs are even seronegative!  In that case, going to an endoscopy is necessary.  Keep in mind that you might just be developing it or know that if everything negative now, you can still develop it in the future.  First-degree relatives should get tested every few years even if there are no symptoms.  

What if your PCP refuses even after you show him the printed data supporting your claims (and the ones I made...so hit Dr. Google)? Get to another PCP or put your request in writing  via the patient portal or a registered letter.  Be nice.  Support your claims.  Ask for the full panel or to be referred to a GI.  In writing, they have to respond.  

I do know that the TTG catches most celiacs, but not all.  If celiac disease is still suspected, you should move to the next series of celiac tests.  Unfortunately, to keep costs down, Kaiser just orders the TTG for initial screening.  You have to get around that.  I found that out when family  went in for testing and they had Kaiser.  

Advocate for your health!  Document!  Save and print all test results and maintain file.  

Take care!  

EricaP Newbie

Thank you so much for your very well thought out answer.  You're right, I'm just going wait 12 weeks because although I feel like crap, it is not horrible like I know it is for some people. How anemic were you? I ask because I have had low iron on and off 12 ferritin (22+ normal) 37 iron (normal 50 and above), and 10 transferrin saturation (14 is normal) have been my lowest. 

I know this is not crazy low and what happens is I do respond to iron pills. After a year of taking iron my levels became normal again, so the dr. advised me to stop taking the pills and within 6 months my levels dropped below normal again.  

I had to start taking  iron again and now my levels are back to normal. The doctor said she would do an endoscopy if I didn't respond to the iron and clearly I have.  But the thing is I know if I quit taking the iron again my levels will just drop. This has been going on for two years lol and Kaiser doesn't really think it's abnormal.

I guess my question is would someone with celiac even respond to iron pills, or would it just stay low?  Thanks so much!  I've been kind of a  lurker on here for awhile and have noticed you are always so helpful!! 

cyclinglady Grand Master

My lowest ferritin was a 2, but I typically always reponded to iron supplements.  Enough to make many doctors happy.    My periodic bouts with low iron was attributed to heavy periods, but what did I know?  I would take the iron, be fine and then eventually my iron would drop.  I processed iron but did not absorb enough to store it.   My hemoglobin though remained normal (at least for me) since have Thalassemia (a genetic anemia).  My hemoglobin is usually just out of range.  It really dropped when I started into menopause.  Low iron, Thals, and 30 day periods can make you very anemic.  No amount of iron then could catch me up like it did in the past.  My GYN wanted to do a hysterectomy, but I declined.  My PCP blamed my Thals.  When I hit 50, I asked for a cancer screening colonoscopy (like all my friends were getting!).  My new GI looked at my chart and told me that I probably had celiac disease.  I scoffed.  I had no GI issues.  Besides, I did not want celiac disease.  My hubby had been gluten free for 12 years and I knew exactly what it was like.  Ugh!  But my blood test was positive as was my biopsy and the rest is history.  My anemia resolved within months of being gluten free and I stopped those 30 day killer periods.  If only the hot flashes would cease!  

Keep advocating!  Do the research and show your PCP (or one of the GPS who do same day appointments), but follow-up in writing.  Kaiser will respond to written requests.  Be nice!  If push comes to shove, go outside of Kaiser and get the blood tests.  Some states allow you to go to the lab directly.  If that is not an option, ask a friend to refer you to their physician who will order the tests.   I do not think it will come to that.  I think that many PCPs really are not knowledgeable about celiac disease.  My own PCP has only two other celiac patients who are not gluten-free compliant.  (She must think I am OCD about gluten).  She deals with some 2,000 patients.  I do not know how she keeps up.  My old PCP was Korean and never even suspected celiac disease.   He also monitored me for the first few years after my diagnosis and ordered all my follow-up testing based on data I gave him (some doctors are willing to learn).  

Got to go!  I hope this helps and that I did not ramble on.  

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,648
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    kawalla50
    Newest Member
    kawalla50
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.3k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      This article has some detailed information on how to be 100% gluten-free, so it may be helpful (be sure to also read the comments section.):    
    • Scott Adams
      Here is a category of study summaries on the relationship of Type 1 diabetes and celiac disease: https://www.celiac.com/celiac-disease/celiac-disease-amp-related-diseases-and-disorders/diabetes-and-celiac-disease/ This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
    • RMJ
      How frustrating! The Endomysium antibody result is usually given as a titer, 1:5, or 1:10, or 1:20.  This indicates how far the serum can be diluted and still give a positive result. It could be going down but the way they show the results you can’t tell. If you click on the “view trends” button on an electronic version of the results does it show any additional information?
    • misslemon
      Hi, I'm hoping to get some advice on how to handle Mass as a new Catholic.  I'm looking to take the Mass for the first time in March.  I've been told that the church has a "low gluten" option that is 0.01% gluten.  Is this safe, especially to do every week?   I also read that taking the wine instead could be more of a problem if it gets contaminated with regular crumbs.   I found this information online:  "The Benedictine Sisters of Perpetual Adoration in Clyde, Missouri, have developed a Communion host that is extremely low in gluten. The host is made from gelatinized wheat starch. The Sisters report the hosts test to a level of 0.01% gluten. At that level, the lowest that could be tested, no gluten was detected. This means that there is less than 0.01% gluten in one of these hosts. The Secretariat for the Liturgy of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops has stated that these hosts meet the requirements of the Code of Canon Law (924 §2) and may be validly used at the celebration of the Eucharist with permission of the person's pastor. The Catholic with celiac disease can now fully participate in Holy Communion with the whole parish family. Catholic celiacs may choose to receive consecrated wine at a regular communion station if their parish offers communion under both species. There is greater risk for contamination using this option. The fraction rite may allow small, yet dangerous crumbs to be in the cup." Thank you for any guidance!
    • Jenn D
      My son was diagnosed with Celiac Disease is April 2023. His ttg antibody was over 100 at the time of diagnosis. Now it is at 3 (which is considered negative), but his endomysium antibody iga is still coming up positive. There is no specific number just positive or negative so I'm not sure if he's getting better or not. I'm getting nervous that something else is going on and I was just looking for some advice or an understanding what this "postive" actually means. He gets tested every 6 months. Thank you so much for any responses😊 Attached is a picture of his bloodwork from August 2024
×
×
  • Create New...