Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Confused as how to proceed


meycita

Recommended Posts

meycita Rookie

My 7 year old son got tested for celiac at my request, since he was showing symptoms of gluten intolerance: abdominal pain, constipation, eczema, irritability and behavior issues. He's also very slim but not anemic. He also has ADHD and the nurse practitioner who manages his ADHD meds (which is not his pediatrician) order the blood work. His IGA was 145 with a reference range of 41-368 so he's not IGA deficient. His TTG IGG was 12 with a <6 reference range and his TTG IGA was 4 with a <4  reference range. After the results were back, the NP referred me to a GI. I took the first available appt at children's hospital and got an appt. with a GI nurse practitioner. She ordered the endoscopy which he had last week and called me with the results 2 days later. She had said during our consultation that he could go gluten-free right after the scope based on his symptoms and blood work. Fast forward to Friday when she called me to tell me his biopsy was negative and his scope was good, that he's not Celiac based on the biopsy and that he could continue eating gluten. When I asked her why his blood work was positive, she said " I don't know, but that's not to say he won't develop Celiac 2 years from now, but for now he doesn't have it and can continue eating gluten". 

I completely disagree and based on everything that I've read, false positives are pretty rare, and it could be that his intestines haven't been damaged yet. I don't know if I should go and talk to his pediatrician about it, bring him up to date on everything and see how we should proceed, or if I should get a second opinion from a GI and not a GI NP (no offense to nurse practitioners). We already started him gluten-free and I plan to keep him on the diet to see if his symptoms improve, but I would like to get answers if he's really celiac and if not, then why was his blood work positive. Any advice?

IMG_7854 2.webp


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master
1 hour ago, meycita said:

My 7 year old son got tested for celiac at my request, since he was showing symptoms of gluten intolerance: abdominal pain, constipation, eczema, irritability and behavior issues. He's also very slim but not anemic. He also has ADHD and the nurse practitioner who manages his ADHD meds (which is not his pediatrician) order the blood work. His IGA was 145 with a reference range of 41-368 so he's not IGA deficient. His TTG IGG was 12 with a <6 reference range and his TTG IGA was 4 with a <4  reference range. After the results were back, the NP referred me to a GI. I took the first available appt at children's hospital and got an appt. with a GI nurse practitioner. She ordered the endoscopy which he had last week and called me with the results 2 days later. She had said during our consultation that he could go gluten-free right after the scope based on his symptoms and blood work. Fast forward to Friday when she called me to tell me his biopsy was negative and his scope was good, that he's not Celiac based on the biopsy and that he could continue eating gluten. When I asked her why his blood work was positive, she said " I don't know, but that's not to say he won't develop Celiac 2 years from now, but for now he doesn't have it and can continue eating gluten". 

I completely disagree and based on everything that I've read, false positives are pretty rare, and it could be that his intestines haven't been damaged yet. I don't know if I should go and talk to his pediatrician about it, bring him up to date on everything and see how we should proceed, or if I should get a second opinion from a GI and not a GI NP (no offense to nurse practitioners). We already started him gluten-free and I plan to keep him on the diet to see if his symptoms improve, but I would like to get answers if he's really celiac and if not, then why was his blood work positive. Any advice?

IMG_7854 2.webp

He could go back on gluten and get the rest of the panel (EMA and DGP) because it can be easy to miss damage areas in the small intestine which is vast — like the size of a tennis court.  An elevated TTG could be another illness like Crohn’s, so just tuck that away for now.  

I would suggest getting a copy of the GI report and the pathologist’s report.  You should have it in hand when you consult with his PED and possibly another GI.  Make sure that enough tissue samples were taken (more than six and in the recommended areas). 

meycita Rookie

Would the result be inaccurate if he was to get the blood work on Wednesday (exactly a week after going gluten-free)? I don't know how long the antibodies take to leave the body once you start the diet.

pschwab Enthusiast

Another route to take could be genetic testing. If he has the gene that could push them to test further to see if he’s actually triggered the celiac, and if he doesn’t have the gene celiac is ruled out and you can pursue other reasons for his condition. It’s not cheap though so keep that in mind as well.

cyclinglady Grand Master
3 hours ago, meycita said:

Would the result be inaccurate if he was to get the blood work on Wednesday (exactly a week after going gluten-free)? I don't know how long the antibodies take to leave the body once you start the diet.

One week should be okay.   I read once once (and now I can not find my source) that in as little as two weeks antibodies can be reduced significantly on a gluten free diet — for SOME people.   Of course there are others like me who took a year or more to reduce my antibodies.   

 

cyclinglady Grand Master

Get the pathologist’s report.  Make sure his GI took enough tissue samples!

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,468
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Carrie mordkowitz
    Newest Member
    Carrie mordkowitz
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.2k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rebeccaj
    • jimmydee
    • robingfellow
      The Celebrity brand Luncheon Loaf (found at dollar tree, distributed by Atalanta Corporation) is gluten free according to the distributor. I emailed their customer service line for information on the ingredients, and they contacted the vendor and followed up with me that the "starch" ingredient I was worried about is corn and potato. It should be safe.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @jimmydee! Celiac disease is an autoimmune disorder, meaning the consumption of gluten triggers a response by the immune system that causes the body to attack it's own tissue. Celiac disease has a genetic base that requires some kind of trigger for the genes to be turned on. We know that there are two primary genes responsible for providing the potential to develop celiac disease and we know that about 40% of the population carries one or both of these genes. However, only about 1% of the population actually develops celiac disease. So, that tells us that something more than just having the genes is necessary in order to develop celiac disease. Something must trigger those genes to wake up and produce the active disease. It's that "something" that we are struggling to understand and that is somewhat of a mystery. But there is a growing body of evidence pointing to the culprit being a disruption of the proper balance of microorganisms in the gut. Apparently, the microorganisms that live in our intestines produce chemicals that regulate the size of the openings in the mucous lining of our small bowel. A disruption in the healthy balance of this microorganic community causes an increase in the size of the openings in the mucous lining. This in turn allows protein fragments from the food we eat that are larger than normal to invade the mucous lining where they are detected as threats by the immune system. This is what is happening with gluten for those with celiac disease. The attack in the mucous lining of the small bowel by the immune system on these incompletely broken down gluten components causes inflammation and, over time, as we continue to consume gluten, it damages the mucosal lining of the small bowel which results in the loss of efficiency of nutrient absorption. This mucosal lining is made up of millions of tiny finger like projections that create an enormous surface area for the absorption of nutrients when healthy. The "wearing down" of these millions of finger-like projections due to celiac inflammation greatly reduces the surface area and thus the ability to absorb nutrients. This in turn typically results in numerous health issues that have a nutrient deficiency base. But the answer to the question of why there seems to be an epidemic of celiac disease in recent years may not be simple. It may have many facets. First, we don't know how much of this epidemic is real and how much is apparent. That is, how much of what we perceive of as a dramatic increase in the incidence of celiac disease is simply due to greater awareness and better detection methods? Celiac disease is not new. There is evidence from ancient writings that people suffered from it back then but they did not have a name for it. And it wasn't until WW2 that gluten was identified as the cause of celiac disease. Current thinking on what is causing imbalance in gut biology has put forth a number of causes including overuse of antibiotics and pesticides, environmental toxins, fluoridation of drinking water, preoccupation with hygiene and sanitation, and the western diet. https://www.celiac.com/celiac-disease/theories-on-the-growing-prevalence-of-celiac-disease-and-gluten-sensitivity-over-the-last-half-century-video-r6716/?tab=comments#comment-25345 All this to say that I doubt your UTI or the low dose aspirin had anything to do with the onset of your celiac disease. It was probably just coincidence unless the UTI was the stress trigger that activated the celiac potential genes. The onset of celiac disease an happen at any stage of life and many people report it following a period of illness. But what is interesting about your low dose aspirin theory is that aspirin is in a class of medications known as NSAIDs (Non Steroidal Anti Inflammatory Drugs). Scientific studies have shown that long term use of NSAIDs can damage the villous lining of the small bowel in the same way as celiac disease.  The other thing I wish to point out is that unless you have actual testing done for celiac disease, you can't be sure if you have celiac disease or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). They share many of the same symptoms, the difference being that NCGS doesn't damage the lining of the small bowel. There is no test for NCGS, celiac disease must first be ruled out. NCGS is 10x more common than celiac disease. The antidote for both is a gluten free diet.
    • julie falco
      BRAND NAME: NOT BURGER PLANT-BASED PATTIES  A product I came across labeled gluten-free bought it when I got home I read the back ingredients further to notice that it says gluten with a line going through it u will see in the attached pics.     The label says down below that it is processed in a facility that also processes "WHEAT".  I tried to put this on the Gov. website as false advertisement but couldn't do it.  Maybe on here at least the word can get out to others not to purchase anything gluten-free without throughly reading the whole label....It won't let me upload 2 pics.  says to contact manager.   The products name is Not Burger    INGREDIENTS: Water, Pea Protein, Coconut Oil, Sunflower Oil, Natural Flavors, Bamboo Fiber, Less than 2% of: Methylcellulose, Dried Yeast, Rice Protein, Salt, Cocoa Powder Processed with Alkali, Psyllium Husk, Potato Fiber, Red Beet Juice Powder (color), Chia Protein Concentrate, Spinach Powder.   Manufactured in a facility that also processes wheat and soy.          MANUFACTURED FOR: The NotCompany, Inc, 438    Treat Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110.
×
×
  • Create New...