Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

What Exactly Measures an IGA Deficiency?


bmarsh28

Recommended Posts

bmarsh28 Rookie

Hi all, quick question. What levels of total IGA deem an "IGA Deficiency?" I've had a hard time finding research on what it is (is it lower than the range used? is it just low on the scale within the range used?) This is assuming that the total IGA is tested in the comprehensive celiac panel. For example, I am a 99 on a range of 87-352. In my opinion that would be low, but is it only considered low or deficient if it's below the range? Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master
14 minutes ago, bmarsh28 said:

Hi all, quick question. What levels of total IGA deem an "IGA Deficiency?" I've had a hard time finding research on what it is (is it lower than the range used? is it just low on the scale within the range used?) This is assuming that the total IGA is tested in the comprehensive celiac panel. For example, I am a 99 on a range of 87-352. In my opinion that would be low, but is it only considered low or deficient if it's below the range? Thanks!

for testing for Celiac, that is not a low number at all. My understanding is that the test & ranges were developed for another reason but found to have a use with Celiac testing.  

Open Original Shared Link

bmarsh28 Rookie
22 minutes ago, kareng said:

for testing for Celiac, that is not a low number at all. My understanding is that the test & ranges were developed for another reason but found to have a use with Celiac testing.  

Open Original Shared Link

Thanks for the response! I suppose I am a bit confused by the answer. I have been confirmed as having early celiac, or at least some form of latent celiac (high TTG IGG, and biopsy Marsh I, with genetic indicators) and I was looking to find a reason why my IGG was so high, but not my IGA, and my primary care physician was claiming an IGA deficiency because of some of the marked symptoms I had experienced in the past related to IGA deficiency but then my GI doc was saying I wasn't IGA deficient, so I was just curious who was right and what the numbers really mean.

cyclinglady Grand Master

From my research IgA deficiency is defined at a number close to zero.  Your result is fine for celiac disease testing which is mostly used as a control test for the IgA tests (DGP, TTG).  Who knows why you tested the way you did?   If you find out, please share.   I test positive to only the DGP IgA (even in follow-up testing) and I had a Marsh Stage IIIB and my IgA is the opposite — extremely high.    

  • 2 months later...
pupppy Apprentice

I'm confused as well-isn't your IGA on the low end of the range?

kareng Grand Master
1 hour ago, pupppy said:

I'm confused as well-isn't your IGA on the low end of the range?

They wouldn’t be deficient if they are still in the normal range.  But this test and it’s range was not developed for Celiac disease.  So the ranges aren’t relevant to Celiac.  That’s why the deficient for Celiac testing is different then the range printed on the test result. 

pupppy Apprentice
5 minutes ago, kareng said:

They wouldn’t be deficient if they are still in the normal range.  But this test and it’s range was not developed for Celiac disease.  So the ranges aren’t relevant to Celiac.  That’s why the deficient for Celiac testing is different then the range printed on the test result. 

Yes, I understand it has nothing to do with celiac-it measures how much iga your body makes to validate the test. I agree he is not iga deficient because it is in the normal range. What I am saying is, since it is in the low end of normal, it could throw off the results somewhat and give a negative ttg iga.

I meant this as an explanation to why his ttg igg was positive, and his biopsy was positive


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master
2 minutes ago, pupppy said:

Yes, I understand it has nothing to do with celiac-it measures how much iga your body makes to validate the test. I agree he is not iga deficient because it is in the normal range. What I am saying is, since it is in the low end of normal, it could throw off the results somewhat and give a negative ttg iga.

I meant this as an explanation to why his ttg igg was positive, and his biopsy was positive

But , if you read the link, the numbers need to be much lower to effect Celiac testing. 

pupppy Apprentice
5 minutes ago, kareng said:

But , if you read the link, the numbers need to be much lower to effect Celiac testing. 

Well that link is wrong, every testing algorithm I've read stated that if your iga is below the range they order igg tests, and if any result is positive or equivocal proceed to biopsy. There is selective iga deficiency which is <1 mg/dl, and partial iga deficiency which is above that but below age matched ranges. I don't know where they got 20 mg/dl from-it is an extremely random cutoff and they don't cite any sources. So I don't trust that. 

I have seen samples that are slightly below the range for total iga, and test negative for ttg iga.

Open Original Shared Link

kareng Grand Master

I am probably still going to go with the Celiac experts who interpret these blood tests over the laboratory.  

pupppy Apprentice
1 hour ago, kareng said:

I am probably still going to go with the Celiac experts who interpret these blood tests over the laboratory.  

It's not just quest, it's also mayoclinic, the American College of Gastroenterology, ARUP labs, and most algorithms out there. Partial iga deficiency still counts as iga deficiency. As long as it's below the range, the standard is to order igg tests

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

 

edit: I am not trying to say your source isn't experts. They could be right, but even so if the iga is low then igg tests should still be ordered just in case. Better to catch everybody than gamble on the results (potentially false negative)

cyclinglady Grand Master

I would like to add that if my GI had followed the American GI Association guidelines or many other algorithms (like you linked and I also share those links), my diagnosis would not have been caught.  I am not IgA deficient, yet I have NEVER (I am tested annually) had a positive on the TTG or EMA.  I only test positive to the DGP IgA.  I am biopsy confirmed with symptoms resolution (e.g. anemia) and my last endoscopy/biopsies revealed healthy, healed villi.  

The original OP had a normal Immunoglobulin A (IgA) result (within range). It was enough to validate the IgA tests she was given and used to help diagnose celiac disease.  Does everyone get all available celiac testing? Some celiacs are seronegative.  Some test oddly on the blood tests (like me).  Some are IgA deficient.  In those cases, going directly to biopsy can help determine a diagnose.  Unfortunately, many people do not have the financial resources, have insurance constraints (like some insurance only allows the TTG for screening) or a celiac-savvy doctor. 

Not everything follows a standard.  We are all unique.  This adds to the complexity of receiving a celiac disease diagnosis.  I wish it was more clear cut!  

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,827
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Michael P.
    Newest Member
    Michael P.
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      71.3k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      First, the IGA score of 415 probably refers to what we call "Total IGA" rather than a specific IGA test for celiac disease per se. Physicians should always order this test along with other IGA tests to look for IGA deficiency. Total IGA checks for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, then other IGA tests will be artificially low and false negatives can result. You didn't included a scale along with the raw test score for the total IGA so I can't say for sure but it looks a little on the high side. Can you post back and include the scale for that? Or, was there a qualitative comment that came with that one like "High"? So, the long and short of this one is that it is not a test for celiac disease per se. A high value for total IGA can indicate other health problems, however and you may want to google that. Your TTG-IGA is barely out of the normal range and likely indicates some hidden gluten contamination in your life. If you eat out, you can expect to get some gluten even when you order the gluten free items from the menu since most eateries don't guard against cross contamination. They cook their gluten free food on the same surfaces and in the same pots and pans as their gluten free food and handle them with the same utensils. It is also possible to be getting some gluten from meds, pills and oral hygiene products.  But one thing I don't understand. How can you assume your test values are fluctuating when you don't mention that you have any other lab result score to compare the recent ones to? You were 10 when that was done. How long ago was that. If you haven't been tested since then, what do you have for comparison to say there is fluctuation? This might be helpful: and this:  
    • PA Painter
      I have non celiac sensitivity. I used to eat oatmeal with no problem. It causes a three day nightmare just as if it were wheat now. I seem to be an extremely sensitive case though.
    • thejayland10
      Hello,  I was diagnosed around age 10 with Celiac via endoscopy. I have been on a gluten-free diet ever since and have been taking my gluten-free diet way more seriously then I used to for the last 5 years. I only eat out at dedicated gluten-free places or make food at home.     I had not had blood work done for celiac since diagnosis and I checked in with a GI doctor as my primary care isn't a specialist. I was very surprised to see my IGA was 415 and my TTG IGA was 16 (Lab said over 15 is positive for antibody). My Endomysial Antibody SCR was negative and all my vitamin levels were normal.  I am meeting with a dietician next week but I am a bit stressed with these results now wondering if I have been somehow wearing gluten without knowing or if something else is going on.   Is it normal for IGA and TTG IGA to fluctuate like this ? 
    • AdelaW
      Thank you so much! I appreciate it, I was thinking the same thing so I guess it's just waiting for the biopsy results now! Thanks again!
    • trents
      Well come to the forum @AdelaW! One positive celiac blood antibody test with flattened villi in the small bowel would strongly support a diagnosis of celiac disease. There are some other medical problems that could cause these things but the odds of this being the case are very small when compared to the likelihood of celiac disease being the culprit.
×
×
  • Create New...