Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Possible DH? And next steps?


HappyCamper8

Recommended Posts

HappyCamper8 Newbie

Hi, everyone! Was just wanting to get an opinion on my symptoms and story. I am relatively unfamiliar with DH. 

I am a 28 year old female with hypothyroidism, and have been experiencing intense stress over the last 6 months. About 9 days ago, my right shoulder started to itch and there was a very mild rash (my husband said that it looked like a "food allergy" rash). Pretty itchy, but it hung around for an hour then disappeared. Then 6 hours later it came back and then disappeared. It kind of ebbed and flowed like this for a few days- each time hanging around a little bit more and getting bigger. It started looking more like hives (welt-type red raised areas, but also little circular spots coming out from it). The most unbelievable itchiness. Poison ivy times 100. About 4 days after that, spots appeared on my right inner elbow, and then a few days later on my left inner elbow. I was desperate because I wouldn't be able to see the doctor for another 4 days, and the creams and stuff I was using helped some with the itch, but didn't seem to do anything for the rash. There was some very minor blistering but not a ton. 

I stopped eating gluten Thurs night, and over the weekend the rash is finally starting to improve. I don't know if this is a coincidence or what, but the doctor I saw today said to keep staying off gluten for a couple weeks, reintroduce it, and see if the rashes come back. 

Does this sound and look like DH? Also, is this plan from the doctor reasonable as far as finding out whether this is DH? How soon after eating something with gluten does a reaction typically happen? 

Thanks for your help! 

Screenshot_20180709-172219~2-432x330.png


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



squirmingitch Veteran

This is not a good plan for finding out if this is dh. 

FIRST:

ALL celiac testing requires the patient to be on a full gluten diet, not a gluten light diet & not a gluten free diet & not a, "I only went gluten free for a couple weeks & then started right back eating it for 3 days" diet. THIS INCLUDES DH BIOPSIES!

I get so pissed with these doctors who tell the person to try going gluten free & see what happens. Makes me want to pull my hair out!!!!! If one had gone gluten free & then wants to be tested for celiac, they have to do what's called a gluten challenge:

Open Original Shared Link

 

NOTE:

60% of those with dh test negative on the celiac serum panel. If you suspect dh, the easiest, best way to get a dx is to get a dh biopsy

Here's a whole bunch of links for you:

Open Original Shared Link   

9 times out of 10 the dermatologist will do the biopsy wrong & take it right on top of a lesion. Take someone with you to make sure it's done correctly b/c they like to take it from areas where you can't see what they're doing such as your back.

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

DH can come & go whether one is on a gluten free diet or not. You see, the antibodies are deposited under the skin & they are vexing as hell -- I swear they have a mind of their own. It takes time for them to all get out of your skin -- varies with each person; and until that time, the dh can wax & wane. 

 

Ging Contributor

Fascinated by your response, squirmingitch (and what a great handle.)  I'm very lucky that my tests (biopsy and bloodwork) all came back positive since I now know the biopsy was done incorrectly.  They took that whole little blister.  That was done by a dermatologist that has some familiarity with DH.  He actually has asked to use my case for teaching.  Here's hoping he gets it right!  Ha ha.

Now I'm also seeing a GI.  He mentioned doing a gluten challenge and I know he saw the look on my face that basically said 'you've got to be kidding' because he backed off for now in hopes of finding something definitive with endoscopy, etc.  The blood test he did was negative which I understand can be the case for DH sufferers and I'm also on a gluten free diet as of a couple months now.  

Here's my question - is there any need to do a gluten challenge?  Frankly, I'm scared to death to do one as I've had one outbreak that manifested on my face.  I get the usual elbows, shoulders, hairline, knees, etc, but the one on the face was right under the eye and quite visible - looked like someone bit me in shape.  I don't want any permanent discoloration or scarring on my face if possible and that was just from a tiny bit of cross contamination I think.  Though from what you've said, maybe preexisting?  

Too much to learn - seems like all I do is research and get a bit more info and a lot more confused info... :).  

Appreciate your time and any help,

Ging

squirmingitch Veteran

Ging, I'm confused. In the first paragraph you say your biopsy & blood work came back positive yet in the 2nd paragraph,, you say the blood test was negative. ??????

If you had a positive dh biopsy then you don't need any other testing. A positive dh biopsy is a dx of celiac.  See:

Open Original Shared Link

I think you're very lucky to have had the incorrectly performed biopsy turn up positive!!!! It must have been that new that there were undamaged areas the pathologist could find in the area on the margins where the patterning had not been destroyed. 

Again, if you had a positive dh biopsy then you have a dx of celiac & there is no need for an endoscopy to confirm. For endoscopic biopsy, the challenge time you have to eat gluten is 2 weeks but I wouldn't do it come hell or high water! That's me personally. It's not that I fear an endoscopy, it's eating gluten that I fear. 

However, to answer your questions concerning scarring....... I have not had any PERMANENT scarring & I had some horrid, horrid outbreaks and I had outbreaks that occurred on the same areas over & over & over & over again. They will turn sort of brownish or purplish & then with time, they fade & get lighter & lighter until they just disappear. I have read where some people have white spots but I have only had purple or brown ones. Yes, the ones on your face could have been cc or pre-existing. That's what's so mind boggling with this stuff! It's really hard to be sure a lot of times so you end up chasing your tail or feeling like it anyway.

Ging Contributor

Thank you for the reassurance!  I find the amount of information mindboggling and there's so much anecdotal evidence... .  Nice to know that the chances of scarring/permanent discoloration are slight.

I apologize for the confusion on the test results.  The dermatologist got the positives and now the GI doctor has run his own blood test that came back negative.  I wondered if that might be the case when he decided to draw blood - as you said, I felt very lucky that the first round of testing with the dermatologist was clearly positive.

I think I'll tell the GI's office that the endoscopy is off.  If there's no need, there's no need, and why go through a procedure to no purpose?  

And the antibodies linger in the tissue?  Good grief.  How do you figure out when you've had cc?  How do you plan your Glamour Shots? :D  I do think I'm beginning to see a bit of a time frame when I've had some contamination - I confess though, that I really feel overwhelmed.  The reams of information and tantalizing bits of commentary that suggest new avenues to research (and worry about) are never-ending.  The doctor has said nothing about iodine, vitamin deficiencies, or any other complications.  I suppose I'll learn in time and with everyone here so willing to help it will be an easier time than trying to do it alone.

Thank you again so very much!  I'll keep an eye out for more informative links like you gave - those were great.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - MI-Hoosier replied to MI-Hoosier's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      4

      Test uncertainty

    2. - Heather Hill replied to Heather Hill's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Does this definitely suggest Coeliac Disease?

    3. - trents replied to MI-Hoosier's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      4

      Test uncertainty

    4. - MI-Hoosier replied to MI-Hoosier's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      4

      Test uncertainty

    5. - trents replied to MI-Hoosier's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      4

      Test uncertainty


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,254
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    brigette
    Newest Member
    brigette
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.8k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • MI-Hoosier
      Thanks again. My mom was diagnosed over 50 years ago with celiac so grew up watching her deal with the challenges of food. I have been tested a few times prior due to this but these results have me a bit stunned. I have a liver disease that has advanced rapidly with no symptoms and an allergy that could be a contributing factor that had no symptoms. I guess I’ll call it lucky my Dr ordered a rescreen of a liver ultrasound from 5 years ago that triggered this or I would likely have tripped into cirrhosis. It’s all pretty jarring.
    • Heather Hill
      Many thanks for your responses, much appreciated.  The tests did include tTg IgA and all the other markers mentioned.  I also had sufficient total IgA so if I'm reading the Mayo clinic thing correctly, I didn't really need the anti-deaminated gliadin marker? So, if I am reading the information correctly do I conclude that as all the other markers including tTg IgA and DGP IgG and tTg IgG and EMA IgA are all negative, then the positive result for the immune response to gliadin, on it's own, is more likely to suggest some other problem in the gut rather than Coeliac disease? Until I have a view from the medics (NHS UK) then I think I will concentrate on trying to lower chronic inflammation and mend leaky gut, using L glutamine and maybe collagen powder. Thank you for your help so far.  I will get back in touch once I have a response, which sadly can take quite a long time.   Kindest Heather Hill 
    • trents
      To put this in perspective, most recent pretest "gluten challenge" guidelines for those having already been eating reduced gluten or gluten free for a significant time period is the daily consumption of 10g of gluten (about the amount in 4-6 slices of wheat bread) for a minimum of two weeks leading up to the day of testing (antibody or biopsy). And I would certainly give it more than two weeks to ensure a valid test experience. Short answer: If it were me, yes, I would assume I have celiac disease and launch full bore into gluten-free eating. I think the tTG-IGA is reliable enough and your score is solid enough to make that a reasonable conclusion. Here is an article to help you get off to a good start. It's easy to achieve a reduced gluten free state but much more difficult to achieve consistency in truly gluten-free eating. Gluten is hidden in so many ways and found in so many food products where you would never expect to find it. For example, soy sauce and canned tomato soup (most canned soups, actually), pills, medications, health supplements. It can be disguised in terminology. And then there is the whole issue of cross contamination where foods that are naturally gluten free become contaminated with gluten incidentally in agricultural activities and manufacturing processes: Eating out at restaurants is a mine field for those with celiac disease because you don't know how food is handled back in the kitchen. Gluten free noodles boiled in the same water that was used for wheat noodles, eggs cooked on the same griddle that French toast was, etc.  
    • MI-Hoosier
      Thank you for the response and article. I was placed on the Mediterranean diet and been on that now for about 3 weeks. While not gluten free I am eating very little bread or anything with gluten ie a slice of whole wheat bread every couple days so assume that would cause issues now with a biopsy.  With the condition my liver is in I am unsure moving back to higher bread consumption is ideal.  In this scenario would my test results be enough to assume positive Celiac and just move forward gluten free?
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @MI-Hoosier! You are operating on a misconception about your "mixed" test results. You only had two celiac disease diagnostic tests run out of six that could have been ordered if your doctor had opted for a complete celiac panel. It is perfectly normal to not test positive for all possible celiac disease diagnostic tests. That is why there is more than one test option. It is the same way with other diagnostic testing procedures for many or most other diseases. Generally, when diagnosing a condition, a number of different tests are run and a diagnosis is arrived at by looking at the total body of evidence. The tTG-IGA test is the centerpiece of celiac disease blood antibody testing and the one most commonly ordered by doctors. You were strongly positive for that test. It was not an unequivocal result, IMO.  Having said that, it is standard procedure to confirm a positive celiac disease blood antibody test result with an endoscopy/biopsy which is still considered the gold standard of celiac disease diagnosis. Had your tTG-IGA been 150 or greater, your doctor many have opted out of the endoscopy/biopsy. The absence of GI distress in the celiac disease population is very common. We call them "silent celiacs". That can change as damage to the lining of the small bowel worsens. Elevated liver enzymes/liver stress is very common in the celiac population. About 18% of celiacs experience it. I was one of them. Persistently elevated liver enzymes over a period of years in the absence of other typical causes such as hepatitis and alcohol abuse was what eventually led to my celiac disease diagnosis. But it took thirteen years to get that figured out. Within three months of going gluten free my liver enzymes were back into normal range. Thank goodness, there is more awareness these days about the many long fingers of celiac disease that are not found in the classic category of GI distress. Today, there have been over 200 symptoms/medical conditions identified as connected to celiac disease. It is critical that you not begin a gluten free diet until your endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel is over. Doing so before that procedure will invalidate it because it will allow healing of the small bowel lining to begin. Here is a link to an article covering celiac disease blood antibody testing:  
×
×
  • Create New...