Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Prolamin


maggie paedae

Recommended Posts

maggie paedae Newbie

Prolamine is the storage proteins of grain. The endosperm  contains  levels of prolamin and glutelin. It is how the seed becomes a plant. When these two portions of the storage grain come together we get gluten. The prolamin in wheat is call gliadin (there are at least 4 types of gliadin). Prolamins in other grains are as follows, barley (hordein), rye (secallin), corn (zein) sorghum (kafirin) oats (avenin) Rice (orzenin).Gliadin is the most study of all the prolamin. We know that gliadin will activate Zonulin and cause leaky gut. we also know that it causes anti-bodies to tTg and compromises the tight junction predisposing you to  autoimmune disease. So knowing this why are we still sticking to the legal definition of gluten free that has been influence by the food industry of no wheat, barley or rey and 20ppm?

A celiac or anyone wanting to maintain gut integrity , which is 90% of your immune system needs to be grain free in order to truly be gluten free. a 10ppm amount of gluten can have an adverse effect on the gut lining of a celiac. Please read the labels if it contain any grain at all (rice,corn) it is not gluten free.  This information is available to us all in the intenet.   


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master
5 hours ago, maggie paedae said:

Prolamine is the storage proteins of grain. The endosperm  contains  levels of prolamin and glutelin. It is how the seed becomes a plant. When these two portions of the storage grain come together we get gluten. The prolamin in wheat is call gliadin (there are at least 4 types of gliadin). Prolamins in other grains are as follows, barley (hordein), rye (secallin), corn (zein) sorghum (kafirin) oats (avenin) Rice (orzenin).Gliadin is the most study of all the prolamin. We know that gliadin will activate Zonulin and cause leaky gut. we also know that it causes anti-bodies to tTg and compromises the tight junction predisposing you to  autoimmune disease. So knowing this why are we still sticking to the legal definition of gluten free that has been influence by the food industry of no wheat, barley or rey and 20ppm?

A celiac or anyone wanting to maintain gut integrity , which is 90% of your immune system needs to be grain free in order to truly be gluten free. a 10ppm amount of gluten can have an adverse effect on the gut lining of a celiac. Please read the labels if it contain any grain at all (rice,corn) it is not gluten free.  This information is available to us all in the intenet.   

I think you are confusing our common usage of the word “gluten” with the more technical usage of the word “ gluten”.  In the case of Celiac , we use the word gluten to mean the gluten found  in wheat, rye and barley.  Not the gluten in corn, for example.  Corn and rice are “ gluten free” For a Celiac.  

trents Grand Master

Ditto to what kareng said. And there is no evidence that I know of that other grains cause the same villi damaging auto immune reaction that the gluten of wheat, barley and rye produce in celiacs. There is still some controversy surrounding oats, however.

  • 2 years later...
Kl3m Newbie

Hi,

I'm new, but I'm getting informed as much as I can because I might be intolerant to gluten (self observation).

As I understand it, like Kareng said, there are two words "gluten". One is the generic term used for proteins in cereals and pseudo-cereals, and the other is the technical biochemistry term for the association of prolamine and gluteline (and water).

As I'm starting to freak out (I'm French, not eating Wheat is already a major sin here), to know what graisn I can or can't (or 'd better not) eat. And I happen to like Mills and rice.

But from what I read, prolamine is the toxic fraction of gluten, and Rice and Mills all contain prolamine.

So here is my question (sorry for the delay) :

Are prolamines the real danger here, in itself (like, if a coeliac person eats prolamine alone, will they die ?) or are prolamines toxic only once in a gluten formation ?, hence explaining why other cereals other than wheat, barley, rye and some cultivars of oat are dangerous if they do not contain glutelines ?

Thanks

trents Grand Master

Are you asking these questions because you think you might have Celiac Disease or because you think you might just be gluten intolerant? They are two different conditions.

Scott Adams Grand Master

Also, I gliadin is the toxic portion of wheat that we generally refer to as "gluten." The sequence is also in rye and barley. 

Oats are complicated as there are verities that some celiacs react to, even if they are not contaminated by wheat, rye or barley, and oats are often contaminated. Some people can eat certified gluten-free oats, while others cannot.

ch88 Collaborator
11 hours ago, Kl3m said:

Are prolamines the real danger here, in itself (like, if a coeliac person eats prolamine alone, will they die ?) or are prolamines toxic only once in a gluten formation ?, hence explaining why other cereals other than wheat, barley, rye and some cultivars of oat are dangerous if they do not contain glutelines ?

Rice corn and other such grains (excluding wheat, rye, barely and possibly oats) are safe to eat if someone is Celiac. A lot of foods contain prolamines (they are seed storage proteins) but they are still thought to be safe if you are celiac. 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,199
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    johnkelley.kj
    Newest Member
    johnkelley.kj
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.2k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Because you have significantly reduced your gluten intake over a considerable amount of time, it is likely that you will test negative on the antibody tests. However, if the $112 for the Quest test is not a burden, it wouldn't hurt to try. It tests for total IGA (to ascertain if you are IGA deficient) and tTG-IGA. If total IGA is deficient, it can result in false negatives in other IGA tests. The tTG-IGA is the single most popular test ordered by physicians. The Quest test is not a complete celiac panel by any means (refer to the linked article above) but it might be a good place to start. Personally, I think you know enough to conclude that you need to get serious about avoiding gluten, whether you have celiac disease or NCGS. Human nature being what it is, however, many people seem to need an official diagnosis of celiac disease in order to stay on the bandwagon. Otherwise, they seem to rationalize cheating on the gluten-free diet. And there is this misconception out there that NCGS is inconvenient and uncomfortable but not harmful so it's okay to cheat. The more we learn about gluten-related disorders the more they seem to not fit into our neat little black and white categories. By the way, celiac disease is not a food allergy. It is classified as an autoimmune disorder.
    • More2Learn
      These responses are all extremely helpful, ty.  Really good reminder about omega 6.  I also know I'm low in zinc; I took the zinc test where I drank it on a spoon and couldn't taste it.  To that end, I try to eat a lot of oysters.  I do think it would be a good idea to get the blood test.  Two questions: 1-  Is there any reason you wouldn't recommend that I just buy and take a test like this as a first step? 2- I've been somewhat gluten free since ~Jan 2023 (technically organic, gluten free, soy free, light on dairy).  I eat a lot of meat, vegetables, rice -- a common breakfast for me is three eggs and a sausage link, and I can't remember the last time I had a sandwich or bread.  However, because in my mind I didn't think I had an allergy, and I more was doing gluten free to avoid artificially iron-enriched foods, I do make exceptions.  I'll eat breaded calamari.  When my Dad visits, I split mozzarella sticks with him because he loves them so much.  I'll eat the "gluten sensitive" items at a restaurant and if they asked, "is cross contamination ok?",  I always said yes.  Based on that, since I never probably fully eliminated gluten, but it was significantly reduced... is that good enough to take the blood test?  Because the pain in my side gets SO bad (really sometimes I can't function, and I absolutely thought I was dying), I am hesitant to do the gluten challenge.  Would it make sense to take the test, and if it's negative, then consider doing the challenge and seeing if I can deal with eating the bread every day? Thanks again!
    • Yaya
      For me, with osteoporosis, Celiac and more than 1 heart condition, the slower, safer route is preferable.  I'm on 5 meds per day.  Too much of anything can disturb absorption of this or that. Have a Happy Thanksgiving.  I'm gone for a few days.  
    • Wheatwacked
      It took me 2015 to 2021 at 10,000 IU a day to get to 80 ng/ml. In 2019 I was still only 47 ng/ml The highest it has reached is 93.  Tested every 3 months.     While a one time massive dose can be used to quickly raise vitamin D levels, its effects only last three months.  Because vitamin D is stored in fat, an obese person would require more to raise blood level.     Effect of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation on Volumetric Bone Density and Bone Strength   The point of higher vitamin D is for the mental health and immune system requirements.  Also this study included supplementing calcium.  "Research suggests that women with low levels of vitamin D have a higher risk of breast cancer. Vitamin D may play a role in controlling normal breast cell growth and may be able to stop breast cancer cells from growing." This information is provided by Breastcancer.org. https://www.breastcancer.org/risk/risk-factors/low-vitamin-d-levels Higher vitamin D levels have been consistently associated with reduced risks of colorectal cancer https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/diet/vitamin-d-fact-sheet  
    • RMJ
      You can search here for certified gluten free olive oil GFCO productfinder
×
×
  • Create New...