Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help interpreting son's blood work


Booiegirl

Recommended Posts

Booiegirl Rookie

Hoping somebody can help me - I am confused.  I have celiac disease, as does my sister and nephew.  OUr house has been gluten free for 7 years so my children eat very little gluten (only outside the home at friends etc).  However, since Xmas my 13 year old son has been eating lunch at school more regularly so would have had been eating more gluten than he had previously (although still not every day etc.).  He also had a really hard winter with infections, sick, headaches, no energy, losing interest in his sports etc.  I thought maybe it was his age but then in the spring he told me he had been having some diarhea and bloating.  And all of a sudden his increased ingestion of gluten dawned on my so I started to wonder if he had celiac disease.  So from mid June until he had bloodwork the start of August I tried to ensure that he was eating gluten consistently and daily.  He definately would have bloating (my other kids said he looked pregnant!) and was tired, but it was inconsistent.  His blood work results are as follows:

EOS % high 4.9% (normal below 4%)

TTG high 19.5 (normal below 14) 

IgG normal 12.07 (normal 6.5-15.2)

IgA normal 1.76 (normal 0.95 - 3.59)

IgM normal 0.89 (normal 0.46-3.04)

Originally our family doctor called with TTG results, said positive for celiac and given family history amd his symptoms we both felt comfortable forgoing scope (due to lenght of time it would take to get - just don't want him to have to keep eating gluten if it is making him feel crappy).  However, when she called GI doctor he was reluctant to not do scope and prescribe lifelong gluten free diet for my son based on "weak positive" ttg.  Our doctor said she did explain family history and that our house had been gluten free but he wanted the IgG, IgA and IgM results (to see if weak positive was result of those - but those came back normal).  I suspect lower TTG levels are simply due to length of time that he has been ingesting gluten, but clearly I could be wrong!  (also in googling high EOS - one of causes "could be celiac" - could also be other things but of course I though that was interesting) So, my questions are:

1. I always understood that a positive for TTG is positive - am I correct in thinking the lower ttg level could be result of not having ingested gluten consistently for a very long period of time?

2.  What else could cause high TTG?

3.  How would you interpret blood work results?

Just don't know if I should have him go gluten free, or keep eating it while we wait on referral etc. Just I hate to see him feeling crappy if gluten is the cause, and it would be so easy to fix.  But also don't want to assume that is the case if it isn't!  Grr.  So confused!

 

Thanks for any help you are able to provide!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



tessa25 Rising Star

A high TTG should lead to a gastroenterologist doing an endoscopy to verify a celiac diagnosis. Find a better gastroenterologist.

cyclinglady Grand Master
(edited)

 A TTG positive does warrant a a biopsy, but since your family has a strong celiac disease history, I can see why your GP would rather skip this step.  I also understand the GI’s position as well.  Not because of a lifelong restriction of gluten, but it is nice to have a firm diagnosis (for school/university) and a benchmark of damage for future follow-up testing.  The TTG can be elevated due to other illnesses.  Just because you are celiac does not mean he has it.  It could be something else like Crohn’s.  You could see if your GP can run the EMA and DGP IgA versions to help your case of avoiding the endoscopy.

It sounds like that endoscopy can not be done quickly (insurance or where you live).  Maybe call daily to see if there have been cancellations?   You might also  consider having your son go gluten free and then back on gluten two to four weeks prior to the endoscopy.  Do this next summer!  If he has celiac disease he is mostly going to be miserable.  

I hope it works out.  

 

Edited by cyclinglady
frieze Community Regular
On 8/16/2018 at 12:11 PM, cyclinglady said:

 A TTG positive does warrant a a biopsy, but since your family has a strong celiac disease history, I can see why your GP would rather skip this step.  I also understand the GI’s position as well.  Not because of a lifelong restriction of gluten, but it is nice to have a firm diagnosis (for school/university) and a benchmark of damage for future follow-up testing.  The TTG can be elevated due to other illnesses.  Just because you are celiac does not mean he has it.  It could be something else like Crohn’s.  You could see if your GP can run the EMA and DGP IgA versions to help your case of avoiding the endoscopy.

It sounds like that endoscopy can not be done quickly (insurance or where you live).  Maybe call daily to see if there have been cancellations?   You might also  consider having your son go gluten free and then back on gluten two to four weeks prior to the endoscopy.  Do this next summer!  If he has celiac disease he is mostly going to be miserable.  

I hope it works out.  

 

i understand CL point, BUT,,, he is at an age were major growth should be expected, and you might not get that back if you keep him on gluten, even small amounts at school.  if he is a reasonably mature 13 year old i would have a sit down with him and explain the situation, perhaps he would elect to wait till he is older, and grown.

cyclinglady Grand Master
6 hours ago, frieze said:

i understand CL point, BUT,,, he is at an age were major growth should be expected, and you might not get that back if you keep him on gluten, even small amounts at school.  if he is a reasonably mature 13 year old i would have a sit down with him and explain the situation, perhaps he would elect to wait till he is older, and grown.

Great advice!  It is so hard to determine the best course of action.     I worry about this very issue with my 17 year old who is due to be retested.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to Florence Lillian's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      1

      Gluten-Mimicking Proteins that can affect some Celiac individuals.

    2. - Scott Adams replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Second chance

    3. - Scott Adams replied to elisejunker44's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Schar's products contain wheat!

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,602
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Dale S
    Newest Member
    Dale S
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
      Thank you for sharing your experience, Florence. It’s important to clarify, though, that proteins like zein in corn, panicin in millet, and kafirin in sorghum are not considered gluten and have not been shown to trigger the same autoimmune intestinal damage seen in celiac disease. Some people with celiac disease do report symptoms with certain gluten-free grains, oats, or other foods, but that reflects individual intolerance or sensitivity—not a proven “gluten-mimic” effect that damages the small intestine. Certified gluten-free oats are considered safe for most people with celiac disease, though a small subset may react to avenin. If specific foods consistently cause symptoms for you, it makes sense to avoid them personally, but it’s helpful for readers to know that these foods are still medically classified as gluten-free and generally safe for the broader celiac community.
    • Scott Adams
      It’s true that awareness of celiac disease can vary among physicians, particularly outside of gastroenterology, and many patients end up educating their own providers. Reaching out to someone you trusted for 25 years makes sense if you felt heard and supported. That said, celiac disease management often benefits from a team approach, including a knowledgeable primary care provider and, when needed, a gastroenterologist or dietitian familiar with gluten-related disorders. Advocating for yourself is not unreasonable—it’s part of managing a chronic condition. If your current provider relationship isn’t working, it’s appropriate to seek care where you feel respected and properly supported.
    • Scott Adams
      I understand why that feels concerning. Some Schär products use specially processed wheat starch that has had the gluten removed to meet strict gluten-free standards (under 20 ppm in the U.S. and EU), which is why they can legally and safely be labeled “gluten free” for people with celiac disease. However, wheat must still be listed in the ingredients and allergen statement because it is derived from wheat, even though the gluten protein has been removed. For individuals with a true wheat allergy, these products are not appropriate—but for those with celiac disease, properly tested gluten-free wheat starch is considered safe under current medical guidelines. That said, it’s completely reasonable to prefer products made without wheat starch if that gives you greater confidence, and clearer front-of-package communication could certainly help reduce confusion for shoppers.
    • elisejunker44
      I have enjoyed Schar's gluten free products for years. However, some items Do contain Wheat and are not clearly labeled on the front. Indeed the package states 'gluten free' on the front, and it is not until you read the ingredient label that one see's wheat as the first ingredient. Some celiacs may be willing to take a chance on this 'gluten free wheat', but not me. I strongly feel that the labeling for these wheat containing products should be clearly labeled on the front, with prehaps a different color and not using the 'no gluten symbol on the front. The products are not inexpensive, and also dangerous for my health!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.