Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Safest gluten free oats


CeliacMommaX2

Recommended Posts

CeliacMommaX2 Enthusiast

We are reintroducing oats for my 8 year old.  We cut gluten-free oats after her TTG remained elevated after 1 1/2 years of being strictly gluten-free.  What are the safest oats to give her?  I'm nervous with all the talk of the "mechanically separated" processes.

Thank you!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

This is just my opinion and I do NOT consume oats for these reasons:

1) the whole gluten free mechanical vs. dedicated field grown (purity oats) issue that is not resolved. 

Open Original Shared Link

2) new evidence of all children being exposed to pesticides from oats.  

Open Original Shared Link

3) Personally, I have diabetes and limiting my carbs or saving them to be consumed in vegetable form is better for me. I avoid all grains for this reason (but have been known to cheat, but never with gluten).  

I do buy oats for my non-celiac daughter, but just for porridge. Those oats are organic and I can feel better that her pesticide exposure is limited but not perfect.  I do not buy cereal, cookies, or cereal bars unless they are organic for her and gluten free In case hubby snags one and he has been gluten-free for 18 years.  

How do you know if you are getting mechanically sourced oats in your gluten free cereal bars?  You don’t unless it is stated on the box.  Believe me, General Mills made a huge capital investment in that mechanical sorting machine.    They need to sell oats to anyone in order to recoup that cost.  Easy to avoid the controversial gluten-free Cheerios, but what about all the new gluten free cereal bars and cookies that have hit the market lately?     Certified gluten-free might be your best bet.  At least they are tested.  Or consider making your own cereal bars from purity organic oats.   Easy to make and freeze little servings.  Customize to your own taste.  

These are my personal opinions.  I am sure other members have much to contribute.  

Finally, this person just responded to an article on celiac.com.  She states that she has been glutened more in the last decade than the first two decades.  I bring this up because we have been gluten free for 20 years and I can attest that there has been an explosion of gluten-free products in the market.  Good or bad for celiacs?  

https://www.celiac.com/celiac-disease/miscellaneous-information-on-celiac-disease/additional-celiac-disease-concerns/has-the-gluten-free-food-craze-made-things-worse-for-people-with-celiac-disease-r4605/?tab=comments#comment-17375

 

Ennis-TX Grand Master

I second avoiding them period, heck I insist on avoiding grains period....I feel so much better on a paleo diet and using nut meal porridge over grain based.
If you insist look up Open Original Shared Linkand go the organic route. The company has celiac in the family and ONLY grows oats on they own farms, use their own equipment for harvesting, transporting, processing, and packaging. No CC chances as gluten free only oats are all they grown and handle, they test in addition I think it was 3 times per lot. Open Original Shared Link

apprehensiveengineer Community Regular

IMHO, none.

Evidence for the safety of avenin (the protein in oats that is similar to gluten in wheat) in oats is patchy. Yes, there are some feeding studies (from Europe) that show that people seemed to tolerate eating pure oats well, but I have some major concerns about these studies:

  • large drop-out rates from these studies that were not investigated (authors don't know if these people had a symptom relapse/intestinal damage!)
  • follow-up surveys from participants indicated that many stopped eating oats after the study (again, not investigated - possibly concerning since it could have been to do with relapse)
  • participant bias (people who are less symptomatic are more likely to volunteer for feeding studies - these people may not be representative of the general celiac population)
  • endoscopy/blood testing may not be sensitive to capture low level damage that could occur - barley used to be a controversial grain because it caused patchy/no damage in some celiacs
  • some feeding studies showed that while no intestinal damage was detected, blood tests showed increases in non-specific inflammatory markers (possibly worrisome!)
  • it has been shown from cells harvested from celiacs that the immune system can react/bind to avenin - possibly some variability depending on genotype and oat cultivar?

I realize my opinion is "controversial" because some countries have decided to allow oats to be included in gluten-free foods. However, we must remember that safety regulations (whether that's food, vehicles, bridges, houses) are informed by science, not the other way around. Regulators devise rules based on what the scientific consensus of risk is, and what is realistically achievable from a cost/reality perspective (which sometimes involves compromises). This is how we got 20 ppm as a standard - there is nothing magic about 20 ppm in scientific studies about celiac disease, it was just chosen as a compromise between the scientific ideal (as close to 0 gluten as possible) and what is realistically achievable (current testing limits, cost to manufacturers, standards in other countries).

IMHO the science for oat safety is weak, and it was a mistake to "legalize" oats at this stage. Companies are pushing them on people without having to disclose what is said in all studies (even the optimistic ones): celiacs consuming pure oats should limit intake to 1 serving/day, and not do so unless monitored closely by an MD, and that some celiacs do have a reaction to avenin that is similar to wheat/barley/rye. Do you think many celiacs consuming oats are following those rules or even aware of those important points? I doubt it.

Some may disagree with my take, but it is up to you to decide based on evidence. If you do decide to go with oats, stick with purity protocol ones and ensure your daughter has frequent follow-ups to ensure she is tolerating them - damage can occur in absence of symptoms. I've linked some review articles (analyzing various individual studies based on their strengths/weaknesses) for you to consider:

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

 

 

 

RMJ Mentor

After I finally got all my antibody levels down to the normal ranges I asked my GI if I could eat oats. She said I could try pure oats for 6 months then recheck antibodies.  I got the type Ennis recommended above.  Antibodies still ok after 6 months.  I love my morning oatmeal!

Ennis-TX Grand Master

One other thing to mention, I think studies found that 10% of celiacs react to oats regardless? I found I could not have any, now if that is UC related, blood sugar, or antibody I do not know. But I did use the ones I mentioned before in my bakery and sometimes used to have them before I changed to paleo.

Beverage Rising Star

I love oatmeal too, but it reacts in my body the same as wheat rye or barley.  I tried many brands of the certified and cleanest and all that, all the same.  To me, not worth the risk, the protein is too similar to the other bad guys.

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



apprehensiveengineer Community Regular
1 minute ago, Beverage said:

I love oatmeal too, but it reacts in my body the same as wheat rye or barley.  I tried many brands of the certified and cleanest and all that, all the same.  To me, not worth the risk, the protein is too similar to the other bad guys.

 

Same. I used to eat oatmeal every single day, sometimes twice a day... so believe me when I say that I wanted oats to work very badly!

It's convenient for packed meals/traveling, and nutritionally quite good. I was very disappointed when I did the oat challenge... the results were unambiguously bad after only 2 days and I had to stop because I was so sick. It took me about 3 weeks to recover physically (iron probably got trashed - too exhausted to function), and resulted in a horrific DH outbreak. Those are not symptoms you can attribute to increased fibre intake.

One of the oats trial papers speculates that some people who experienced GI symptoms with oats might be unaccustomed to the extra dietary fibre. While this might be plausible, there wasn't really any scientific proof for this claim... yet many people/companies ran away with it.

Ennis-TX Grand Master

I did want to bring up some hope for people here on what I found for my "Oatmeal" fix.
Miracle Noodles makes a Konjac rice, rinse it, boil it, rinse again, then dry it out a bit in a hot skillet then boil in a bit of nut milk and thicken with nut butter or flour. THEN add in 10-20drops of Oatmeal Flavor from oooflavors. The stuff is oat free, gluten free and completely artificial flavored but gives your a bit of nostalgia with that texture and flavor...not a ringer but it does give some satisfaction. I find pulsing the mix with a hand blender to give a bit more of a "quick oats" texture was nice. I made my own version based off this Open Original Shared Link

PS
Oh if you can have carbs, look up "Congee" you make it with rice does great in a crockpot over night, second best thing to oatmeal. Add in the oooflavors oatmeal flavor for the dead ringer.

apprehensiveengineer Community Regular

Good hint @Ennis_TX. I've never seen that product, but I'm sure it would be great especially for cookies. Though I think the taste might scare me at first.

I usually make grits (corn or rice) and put the same stuff in that I would when I made oatmeal - peanut butter, honey, berries, nuts, seeds etc. You can also get quinoa flakes, but I've had issues with the brands available to me as they also make gluten-free oat products (contamination seems to cause issues for me).

Ennis-TX Grand Master
3 hours ago, apprehensiveengineer said:

Good hint @Ennis_TX. I've never seen that product, but I'm sure it would be great especially for cookies. Though I think the taste might scare me at first.

I usually make grits (corn or rice) and put the same stuff in that I would when I made oatmeal - peanut butter, honey, berries, nuts, seeds etc. You can also get quinoa flakes, but I've had issues with the brands available to me as they also make gluten-free oat products (contamination seems to cause issues for me).

Fun list for you imagination
Open Original Shared Link
Cookie fun
Open Original Shared Link
Cereal Fun
Open Original Shared Link

I have used them only recently changing over form Capella flavors...Capella was good but they were VERY inconsistent with concentrations. This company gave more options, and was bragged on by 2 companies at the local gluten free expo. They assured me all their flavors were gluten, corn and nut free....I got a evil grin when they said the corn bread was corn free and the wheat bread was wheat free.....fake flavors to fill the need for stuff we can not eat.....THANK GOD. Amusing how chemist can mix up chemical compounds to match the flavors of foods without actually using them....I mean I am all for natural organic but bless they guys that came out with this stuff.

CeliacMommaX2 Enthusiast

Thank you for all of the input everyone!  I really want to make oats work being a busy mom of 4 little ones (2 with celiac).  But maybe I need to re-think the risk.  :(  I wish there were healthy breakfast options that were quick/easy to prepare (and that my kids would eat)!  I'm tired!  ?

Ennis-TX Grand Master
12 minutes ago, CeliacMommaX2 said:

Thank you for all of the input everyone!  I really want to make oats work being a busy mom of 4 little ones (2 with celiac).  But maybe I need to re-think the risk.  :(  I wish there were healthy breakfast options that were quick/easy to prepare (and that my kids would eat)!  I'm tired!  ?

Cold Cereals like Cereal School, Julian Pro Granola, Nuco Coconut Crunch for healthy options, chex for carb loads.
You can do hot Congee (overnight rice in a crock pot with a 1:6 or 1:8 ratio of dry rinsed rice to water or almond milk) Add in sweetener/fruit/nut butters stir and serve in the morning.
Cream of wheat ironically makes Cream of Rice Gluten Free

Copied some options from the hot cereal list on the 4 quarter gluten free product list
Granola/Cereal/Hot Cereal
Open Original Shared Link
*^ While I normally make my own nut meal porridge for on the go I use these.

Open Original Shared Link
Open Original Shared Link
^Grain free Granola and Nut based hot cereal/porridge

Open Original Shared Link
*^Low Carb Sugar Free Grain free Cereal


Open Original Shared Link
Open Original Shared Link
*^Coconut Based Cereal that is pretty low carb one of my new favorites

Open Original Shared Link
^Chex a simple and easy go to for gluten free Cereal

Open Original Shared Link
^Grain Free Cereals, think Strawberry, chocolate and Plain O shaped cereal and different versions of kids cereals all grain free using a bean base. they also have granola.

Open Original Shared Link
^Now this is a funny one from the makers of the poison cream of wheat, we now have cream of rice for a simple instant rice gruel, and they certify it gluten free.
Granola also refer to above links for MyGerbs, Udis
Cereal also refer to Vans,
 

Beverage Rising Star

I'm a big fan of eggs, great protein for the brain and especially for young kids. 

Make a bunch of little egg cups using a muffin tin (one that has never seen gluten of course), and store them in the freezer that you can get out and microwave real quick.  Spray cup with olive oil, a little gluten-free ham or turkey bacon or something like that, crack an egg in each cup, S&P, and bake them.  Let cool and freeze in big baggies or container.  I'm sure there are lots of recipes you can find on the internet.  You can work in some veggies, depending on their likes, I use broccoli, spinach, green beans, zucchini, bell pepper, cubed cooked potato, anything left over.  Later when you are sure they can tolerate cheese, you can put a few sprinkles on top, but for now, I'd leave that off until there is healing. 

My other fav breakfast is egg tacos, basically the same stuff, left over veggies, a little gluten-free meat, and scrambled eggs, corn tortillas heated in a pan until golden, and hot sauce.  You can make a big batch for several people quite easily, but I don't think the tacos is something that can be frozen ahead.

Good luck!

seerwatch77 Apprentice
On 11/6/2018 at 9:53 AM, apprehensiveengineer said:

Same. I used to eat oatmeal every single day, sometimes twice a day... so believe me when I say that I wanted oats to work very badly!

It's convenient for packed meals/traveling, and nutritionally quite good. I was very disappointed when I did the oat challenge... the results were unambiguously bad after only 2 days and I had to stop because I was so sick. It took me about 3 weeks to recover physically (iron probably got trashed - too exhausted to function), and resulted in a horrific DH outbreak. Those are not symptoms you can attribute to increased fibre intake.

One of the oats trial papers speculates that some people who experienced GI symptoms with oats might be unaccustomed to the extra dietary fibre. While this might be plausible, there wasn't really any scientific proof for this claim... yet many people/companies ran away with it.

If you look up the Wikipedia article for gluten, it classifies the avenin in oats as a gluten. However, I read a paper (I'll link it if I can find it again) detailing the reactivity of celiacs to various glutens, including avenin.

The short version is:

Avenin has a similar structure to gliadin (wheat), hordein (barley), and secalin (rye), but those three are much more similar to each other than avenin is. So the antibodies for one of them will react to the other two proteins, but avenin is different enough that most of the time they won't. Some people do react and develop the same type of antibodies to avenin as the other glutens and thus it causes the same damage.

Disclaimer: the above is from memory so I might be wrong on some of the details.

The Canadian Celiac Association has a statement on oats mentioning both the dietary fiber part AND the celiac reaction to oats, as well as guidelines on how to introduce oats into a gluten-free diet and discussing how the safety of mechanically sorted oats is not well backed up by science. In Canada, they forced Cheerios to remove the gluten-free claim because of it.

lyfan Contributor

Picking safe oats is like picking safe anything, really. I'm not a great oats eater so I can't recommend brands to you, but I have seen some that state on the packaging that they are grown in an exclusive field--no crop rotations, so no wheat contamination possible in the crops. And then processed in a gluten-free facilty, where NO wheat products are handled, so again there is no cross-contamination possible.

 Go online, look at places like Thrive Market, you'll find various brands that state their gluten "free" basis. There's a freeze-dried meal company (PackIt Gourmet) which has an incredibly honest statement, that they prepare "Gluten friendly" products, but since they can't certify the sources, and they keep their kitchens clean but again, they aren't subjecting them to lab tests, that their "Gluten friendly" products shouldn't have any gluten in them--but they can't swear that. I call that honesty.

 If the product, or the vendor, doesn't expressly say their entire operation is certified gluten-free and doesn't handle any wheat...then there's always a chance of cross-contamination. (Which really means that someone just hasn't been doing a proper job of cleaning, doesn't it? Do you want to buy anything from a company that can't clean their equipment?)

If you want to "trust but verify" then using something like a NIMA tester to actually test some of the oatmeal would be very much worth the time. Expensive for one shot use, but not unreasonable to use as a way to check the goods from one particular vendor from time to time. If the vendor flunks, even once? Scratch off that vendor, they have a problem.

apprehensiveengineer Community Regular
6 hours ago, seerwatch77 said:

If you look up the Wikipedia article for gluten, it classifies the avenin in oats as a gluten. However, I read a paper (I'll link it if I can find it again) detailing the reactivity of celiacs to various glutens, including avenin.

The short version is:

Avenin has a similar structure to gliadin (wheat), hordein (barley), and secalin (rye), but those three are much more similar to each other than avenin is. So the antibodies for one of them will react to the other two proteins, but avenin is different enough that most of the time they won't. Some people do react and develop the same type of antibodies to avenin as the other glutens and thus it causes the same damage.

Disclaimer: the above is from memory so I might be wrong on some of the details.

The Canadian Celiac Association has a statement on oats mentioning both the dietary fiber part AND the celiac reaction to oats, as well as guidelines on how to introduce oats into a gluten-free diet and discussing how the safety of mechanically sorted oats is not well backed up by science. In Canada, they forced Cheerios to remove the gluten-free claim because of it.

This is good for people to know (I was already aware of this, but you explained it well!). My hypothesis  is that some of the difference is from the variations in HLA DQ genes. It has been shown that T-cells from people with 2.5 vs. 8 vs. 2.2 vs. others grab on to different parts of the "gluten molecule" (usually gliadin in the studies). For this reason, the vaccine that's in clinical trials right now will only work for DQ 2.5 people.

It might be plausible that this could explain why some react to avenin to different extents, and perhaps why some seem to react to barley and rye more/less than others. I know that I seem to react a lot more strongly to oats and barley than other folks. Unfortunately, my area is not molecular biology/genetics, so I can't do much more than speculate (and hope for studies!).

Here's the link to the CCA oat challenge guidelines/other safety comments, which I did follow in 2015: Open Original Shared Link

As I said before, I don't buy the fibre thing. It was a speculative comment in the discussion, which is an opinion, not a fact. They were trying to explain why some people who ate oats seemed to experience GI symptoms in absence of positive bloods/endoscopy. Could be true, but also could be true that the sensitivity of the tests they did were not sufficient to capture low-level damage that occurred during the relatively short-term of the studies. Without testing other high fibre foods to see if the effect was similar (not done as far as I am aware), there is no scientific basis for that comment.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,915
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Nana Lonnie
    Newest Member
    Nana Lonnie
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Jack Common
      Hello! I want to share my situation. I had symptoms like some food intolerance, diarrhea, bloating, belching one year ago. I thought I could have celiac disease so I did the blood tests. The results were ambiguous for me so I saw the doctor and he said I needed to do tests to check whether I had any parasites as well. It turned out I had giardiasis. After treating it my symptoms didn't disappear immediately. And I decided to start a gluten free diet despite my doctor said I didn't have it. After some time symptoms disappeared but that time it wasn't unclear whether I'd had them because of eliminating gluten or that parasite. The symptoms for both are very similar. Giardiasis also damages the small intestine. The only way to check this was to start eating bread again as I thought. Now about my results.   These are my first test results (almost a year ago) when I had symptoms: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 0.5 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 3.0 is normal) The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 6.6 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 3.0 is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.91 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) IgA Endomysial antibody (EMA) - < 1:10 titer (for the lab I did the tests < 1:10 titer is normal) IgG Endomysial antibody (EMA) - < 1:10 titer (for the lab I did the tests < 1:10 titer is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgA - 0.3 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 6.0 is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 46.1 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 6.0 is normal)   Then I didn't eat gluten for six months. Symptoms disappeared. And I started a gluten challenge. Before the challenge I did some tests. My results: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 0.5 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 28 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   During the challenge I ate 6 slices of wheat bread. After the challenge my results are: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.31 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgA - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 2.13 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   To be sure I continued consuming gluten. I ate a lot each day. Two months after I did the tests again. My results I got today are: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 0.7 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.62 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 25.6 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   Nowadays I didn't have any symptoms except tiredness but I think it's just work. I think it was this parasite because two years ago, for example, and before I didn't have these symptoms and I always ate gluten food. But I'm still not sure especially because the Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG results are sometimes high. What do you think? @Scott Adams
    • Jack Common
      My old results (almost a year ago) are: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 0.5 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 3.0 is normal) The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 6.6 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 3.0 is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.91 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) IgA Endomysial antibody (EMA) - < 1:10 titer (for the lab I did the tests < 1:10 titer is normal) IgG Endomysial antibody (EMA) - < 1:10 titer (for the lab I did the tests < 1:10 titer is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgA - 0.3 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 6.0 is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 46.1 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 6.0 is normal)   Then I didn't eat gluten for six months and after I started a gluten challenge. Before the challenge I did some tests. My results: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 0.5 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 28 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   During the challenge I ate 6 slices of wheat bread. After the challenge my results are: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.31 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgA - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 2.13 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   To be sure I continued consuming gluten. I ate a lot each day. Two months after I did the tests again. My results I got today are: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 0.7 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.62 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 25.6 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   I didn't have any symptoms now except tiredness but I think it's just work. I'm not IgA deficient as you can see so I don't need to do this Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG test. But I do because it's sometimes not in the normal range. What do you think this time? I think I don't have celiac disease. But this test... 
    • Wheatwacked
      @plumbago, I found a good PDF on cholesterol:  Unlocking the mysteries of VLDL: exploring its production, intracellular trafficking, and metabolism as therapeutic targets I just started it, but it may have answers for us, with whacky cholesterol.  The pharmaceuticals don't seem to be interested in anything but statins.   "The nicotine in tobacco causes a decrease in the HDL cholesterol level. " Maybe you should start smoking? 🤪 I have high LDL and low HDL.  It is genetic mutations in the LDLR, APOB, PCSK9, or LDLRAP1 genes. My whole family is on statins for Familial Hyperliperdemia except me.  December I had ultrasound and cat scan for Carotid Artery blockage and both sides are above 85% blockage.  I started on Atorvastatin and that made me weaker than ever, even with CoQ10.  I asked for and got prescription for 2000 mg/day Nicotinic Acid B3 and in the 3 weeks my numbers changed. I am feeling realy good lately.  Stronger and more flexible.  Sleeping better.  Getting roto router (TCar) as soon as I get clearance from a cardiologist.  I expect that by my next blood panels in April to be even better. I am beginning to believe that like vitamin D where the RDA only accounts for preventing Rickets, the RDA for B3 is way underestimated.   From Oct 22 to Jan 17: A1c from 13.5 to 10.2 eGFR from 55 to 79 Triglyeride from 458 to 362 Total cholesterol from 245 to 264 HDL from 27 to 44 VLDL from 84 to 68 LDL from 134 to 154
    • plumbago
      I have taken thiamine on and off (just not at this exact moment), and I’m not sure it's made any difference. Yes, I almost always “fast” (12 hours NPO) for blood tests, as do a great many other Americans, so I tend to think that’s not it. All I can say is that the mystery continues. I could do some speculating here…well, heck, let me go ahead and speculate now: The lab ranges we all see on our reports are more or less the averages of Americans who have had those blood tests. Now, it’s up to you and me whether or not to think of the average American as healthy. I can make arguments both ways, more often than not, on the negative. My point here is that maybe the current range of HDL is somewhat skewed (ie, low), and maybe just maybe my super high (plus 100s) HDL results are not something to worry about; the range just needs updating. Why do I say this? Because pre-celiac disease diagnosis, my HDL values were in the normal range, but post celiac disease diagnosis, my HDL levels are way above average. See where I’m going? My trusty guidebook on celiac disease, Recognizing Celiac Disease by Cleo Libonati, RN, BSN, says that HDL increases after being on the gluten free diet. Or can increase, I guess. Then again, it could be something else. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ In thinking of going to a cardiologist, I sort of fear that he/she will be dismissive of a link to celiac disease, treated celiac disease, and would not therefore be considering all possibilities. @trents I'm sorry you've been diligently working on your numbers to no effect. That must be frustrating. LDL is a world that is far better understood than HDL, so for you there's maybe less "mystery." Familial hypercholesterolemia is for sure something that can be tested. Outside of that, you're right, genetics can determine a general pattern.
    • trents
      Well, I have the opposite problem. My LDL has been moderately high for years. I eat healthy and exercise regularly but can't seem to move that meter. I used to be on a statin (and my doctors want me to go back on one) and it brought both HDL and LDL down but the ratios never changed. I think a lot of that cholesterol stuff is just baked into the genes.
×
×
  • Create New...