Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help understanding test results


meolson13

Recommended Posts

meolson13 Newbie

My 4 yo daughter is suspected of having celiac. We have a consult coming up at the end of the month with a pediatric GI specialist but our pediatrician called them to see if we can get her in for biopsy sooner since she has been pretty symptomatic. I'm confused by her test results. I do have a call into my pediatrician as well but she has been out for a family funeral. Her first test, the ttga one was pretty straight-forward. She had a result of 100, which I understand is pretty high? We just got her EMA test and I thought our doctor and nurse had told me it was positive, so I'm confused on it. I pasted it below. What's throwing me off is the Negative > = 1:320 part. Does that mean the EMA was negative? I appreciate any insight as I want to understand her results before rushing her in for an endoscopy/biopsy and am new to all of this. (Worried mama.)

EMA TITER BLOOD IGA Negative >=1:320  
Comment: A positive serum IgA endomysial antibody indicates the 
presence of gluten sensitivity, as is seen in individuals 
with celiac disease, dermatitis herpetiformis and other 
gluten-sensitive disorders. Correlation with the clinical 
presentation and consideration for other diagnostic tests 
for gluten sensitivity and gluten sensitive enteropathy is 
recommended.A positive serum IgA endomysial antibody 
indicates the presence of gluten sensitivity, as is seen in 
individuals with celiac disease, dermatitis herpetiformis 
and other gluten-sensitive disorders. Correlation with the 
clinical presentation and consideration for other 
diagnostic tests for gluten sensitivity and gluten 
sensitive enteropathy is recommended. 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GFinDC Veteran
(edited)

This thread has some discussion about the EMA titer.

https://www.celiac.com/forums/topic/66463-endomysial-ab-iga-screen/

Yes, the IGA test sounds high.  The lab should provide a results range to match them up against.  It only takes one positive antibody to have celiac disease.  Although there are different types of antibodies, IgG, IgA etc, all of them can cause damage.

The endoscopy is used to confirm damage to the villi lining of the small intestine.  She may have trouble digesting dairy also.  Lactaid pills or lactaid milk may help that issue.

Other people in the family may have or may develop celiac disease also.  The genes for celiac are passed down on one or both sides of the family.  Having the genes doesn't make you have celiac.  But it makes you susceptible to possibly developing celiac  at some point in life.

Edited by GFinDC
cyclinglady Grand Master

She has a very elevated TTG that is indicative of celiac disease and should be confirmed by obtaining iintestinal  biopsies.  Not positive in the EMA?  Me too.  I did not even have a positive on the TTG.  I tested positive on the DGP IgA.  My biopsies revealed some moderate to severe patches of damage. 

Keep her on gluten until the endoscopy. THIS IS CRITICAL!  Do NOT go gluten free yet!  All celiac testing requires you to be on a full gluten diet.  

I know that is is all scary for both of you.  Your best defense is research!  Look for local celiac groups.   Did you know there is a special celiac camp?  I wanna go!  

Seriously, hang in there.  My daughter does not have celiac disease, but if she had a positive on her blood test, I would not hesitate to have her get the biopsy.  It is nice to have a baseline established and a firm diagnosis.  

 

frieze Community Regular

The ANA is not negative.  if you look closely at the top of the lab report, i suspect you will see headings such as "normal"  and "result".   negative being normal, and your daughter's number under results.   if you can, scan it in and bring here.

meolson13 Newbie

Thank you to those that replied. I heard back from her pediatrician, and yes, her EMA test was positive. I guess the formatting was just messed up so that's why it looked confusing. Apparently it was positive and our pediatrician said that she tests positive with a high titer, > 1:320. I don't know if they just stopped it at that point or what but it sounds like it really doesn't matter as between her TTGA value of 100 and the one on her EMA that she has celiac disease. They are trying to expedite our endoscopy and biopsy so we can get her off gluten since she is so symptomatic. We've probably cut it back more than we should. It's so hard to give her food that makes her sick. The nurse at the pediatric speciality GI clinic told me that if we lived in Europe, her test results would be high enough to skip a biopsy as they have just changed the diagnostic criteria in Europe for children but that here in the U.S. they still use the biopsy as the final test. I'm hopeful we can get her in soon so we have a better understanding of what we are dealing with. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,575
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Ahorne
    Newest Member
    Ahorne
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com, @Rejoicephd! 1. "Gluten Free" does not equate to "contains no gluten". According to FDA advertising regulations, it means it cannot contain more than 20ppm of gluten. This is a good standard for most in the celiac community but not good enough for those on the sensitive end of the spectrum. If you find the "Certified Gluten Free" symbol on a package that is even better, indicating that there is no more than 10ppm of gluten.  2. When you are choosing "gluten free" items from a restaurant, realize that it only means gluten is not an intentional ingredient. It does not rule out CC (Cross Contamination) caused by those cooking and preparing the food back in the kitchen who may be cooking it on the same surfaces or in the same pots/pans as they are gluten containing food items and handling it with the same utensils they are handling gluten-containing food. 3. About 8% of celiacs react to the protein avenin in oats as they do the protein gluten in wheat/barley/rye. In addition, some cultivars of oats actually contain the protein gluten. Many celiacs also react to the protein casein in dairy products as they do gluten or they are lactose intolerant. Eggs, soy and corn are also common "cross reactors" in the celiac community but oats and dairy are the most common.
    • Rejoicephd
      Hi everyone! I was diagnosed with celiac a year ago (they confirmed it on endoscopy following a positive TTG antibody and positive genetic test). I thought the gluten free diet thing wasn’t going to be that hard of an adjustment, but man was I wrong. I’m a year in and still having issues in terms of accidentally glutening myself and getting super sick (I’m starting to think I need to just bring my own food everywhere I go). And also even when I am eating foods that say they are gluten free, I’m still dealing with an upset stomach often. My GI doc said I should avoid dairy as well, and the internal medicine doc said my gut microbiome might be messed up from all of this. I’m just looking for some answers/ideas/tips on what additional things I can do to feel better. Do you all do avoid additional categories of foods beyond just gluten to help alleviate symptoms? Thanks! 
    • trents
      If your total IGA is low then the values for the other IGA tests cannot be trusted. They will be depressed. Celiacs who have the DQ2 gene typically are on the more sensitive side as opposed to those who only have the DQ8. But keep in mind that having either or both of those genes does not equate to having celiac disease as 40% of the general population have one or the other and only about 1% of the general population develops active celiac disease. Genetic typing can be used for ruling it out, however. Because of the low total IGA, symptoms and the possession of the DQ2 gene, my suggestion would be for you to go seriously gluten free for a few months and see if your symptoms improve. It may be the only way you can ascertain if you are gluten intolerant because of the low total IGA.
    • Cat M
      Ah ok, I just saw didn’t even post the DGP IgA at all. 😫 I started with itching and hives Jan 2024, been taking a ton of meds and on Xolair and even that is not providing total relief. The other primary symptoms: intermittent but worsening abdominal pain, diarrhea and bloating. This summer I am just exhausted. I uploaded my 23andMe data to genetic lifehacks and discovered quite a few variations, including DQ2, MTHFR, VDR and I have always had very low ferritin, vitamin D and B12. I still think that mast cell disease makes the most sense, but latest labs show I am barely in range for thiamine, zinc and vitamin A, so the GI stuff feels more important to figure out than the hives right now. I did SIBO testing this morning. TTG IGA <2   0-3 is negative TTG IGG  3   0-5 is neg DGP IGA 21    20-30 is weak positive DGP IGG 4    0-19 is negative Although total IGA is not resulted, there is a footnote stating it was low and the reason they ran IGG.  
    • Scott Adams
      This is an interesting case. A positive tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibody with a negative endomysial antibody (EMA) and normal duodenal histology can present a diagnostic challenge, especially in an asymptomatic patient. While the absence of villous atrophy and negative EMA suggest that the likelihood of active celiac disease is low at this time, such serological discordance may still warrant monitoring. Some individuals may be in the early stages of celiac disease, often referred to as potential celiac disease, particularly if they carry the HLA-DQ2 or DQ8 haplotypes. HLA typing can be quite helpful in this situation; a negative result would virtually rule out celiac disease, whereas a positive result may justify periodic follow-up to monitor for evolving disease. The risk of progression to overt celiac disease is not well defined but appears to be higher in children, those with a family history, or those with autoimmune conditions. In this case, routine follow-up including repeat serology and consideration of symptoms or new risk factors over time would be a reasonable and cautious approach. For people with celiac disease hidden gluten in their diets is the main cause of elevated Tissue Transglutaminase IgA Antibodies (tTG-IgA), but there are other conditions, including cow's milk/casein intolerance, that can also cause this, and here is an article about the other possible causes:      
×
×
  • Create New...