Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

DH biopsy


weebl

Recommended Posts

weebl Apprentice

About two weeks in to my gluten challenge. I guess you could say it's going well. 

It has gotten easier psychologically to eat foods containing gluten, and I have managed to include significant gluten in each meal, each day. 

Reaction in terms of my suspected DH has been as expected, and the rash and itchiness is back in full force. 

Some Googling seems to indicate that the ATTG blood test in this province actually contains most if not all of the full Celiac panel. So that is good. But I also know with DH, I will still likely test negative. 

I have a December appointment booked with my family doctor. I plan on going to the lab for blood work 1 week prior (and plan to stay on gluten until after I see my doctor). 

I also requested that I have a biopsy done and this is where I need help. 

Those who have had it, is it always a punch biopsy? Is there an authoritative source online I can print off regarding the proper procedure to my doctor? (I suspect he will have already looked into that, but I don't want to leave it to chance). 

Lastly, once my appointment is done, do I go gluten-free again at that point or should I wait for the biopsy? Assuming of course the blood work didn't come back positive, in which case the biopsy will be unnecessary. 

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



squirmingitch Veteran

https://celiac.org/about-celiac-disease/related-conditions/dermatitis-herpetiformis/

I would also print this out & bring it b/c the diagnostic criteria in regards to dh & celiac changed in 2012. Since then, all that is required is a positive dh biopsy -- no further testing is needed.

http://www.cureceliacdisease.org/faq/can-a-skin-biopsy-for-dermatitis-herpetiformis-dh-confirm-celiac-disease-or-is-an-endoscopy-still-needed/

 

squirmingitch Veteran

BTW, you don't have to kill yourself with gluten. A bowl of pasta or a slice of bread or a couple of crackers each day is enough. You don't have to eat gluten at every meal. Remember, every time you eat gluten, those antibodies are being deposited under your skin. Once there, they are like little grenades just sitting until something triggers them to explode so don't eat any more gluten than what it takes to get the job done.

Also, you could read this for when the time comes & you go gluten free again. The Newbie 101 which is pinned to the top of the Coping section. This will help you to stay safe, explain what kitchen items you need to replace & which you don't. 

weebl Apprentice

Thanks. Anxiously awaiting my appointment now. 

squirmingitch Veteran
On 11/21/2018 at 6:50 PM, weebl said:

Lastly, once my appointment is done, do I go gluten-free again at that point or should I wait for the biopsy? Assuming of course the blood work didn't come back positive, in which case the biopsy will be unnecessary. 

 

Sorry, I missed answering your last question there. Keep eating gluten until the biopsy is done. 

Hang in there!

  • 4 years later...
Jacki Espo Rookie

Can anyone share a source that you must be eating gluten for the skin punch biopsy to be useful? My derm disagreed with me.  Did the biopsy and of course it came back negative bc I have been gluten free since Dec. 

Can anyone direct me to a source? Thanks.

trents Grand Master

It's just logical. DH is the epidermal expression of celiac disease. No gluten, no inflammation and so no antibodies.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Wheatwacked Veteran

A skin biopsy is the first step in diagnosing DH. Direct immunofluorescence of clinically normal skin adjacent to a lesion shows granular IgA deposits in the upper dermis. Histology of lesional skin may show microabscesses containing neutrophils and eosinophils. However, histology may reveal only excoriation due to the intense itching that patients experience.  https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/professionals/clinical-tools-patient-management/digestive-diseases/dermatitis-herpetiformis

The key here is the biopsy has to be adjacent to a lesion, not the lesion itself. Has your dermatologist diagnosed other cases of DH? In the end if GFD relieves the symptoms do you care what the doctors think?

Dermatitis Herpetiformis: An Update on Diagnosis and Management IgA deposits persist in the dermis for at least a few years after adherence to a GFD, so the DH diagnosis can be confirmed afterwards without returning to a normal gluten-containing diet if necessary.

Jacki Espo Rookie
3 hours ago, Wheatwacked said:

I couldn't agree more.  My body is not going near gluten ever again. The only reason I'm on this search at this stage is to ensure it's not something else happening that I'm missing in my body.  My dermatologist did take skin adjacent to a lesion but he was adamant and I did not need to be eating gluten for the test to be accurate. 

15 hours ago, trents said:

It's just logical. DH is the epidermal expression of celiac disease. No gluten, no inflammation and so no antibodies.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,264
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Tara Hannigan
    Newest Member
    Tara Hannigan
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.8k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Sorry but I don't have specific recommendations for doctors, however, starting out with good multivitamins/minerals would make sense. You may want to get your doctor to screen you for where you different levels are now to help identify any that are low, but since you're newly diagnosed within the past year, supplementation is usually essential for most celiacs.
    • trents
      Yes, I can imagine. My celiac journey started with a rejection of a blood donation by the Red Cross when I was 37 because of elevated liver enzymes. I wasn't a drinker and my family doctor checked me for hepatitis and I was not overweight. No answers. I thought no more about it until six years later when I landed a job in a healthcare setting where I got annual CMP screenings as part of my benefits. The liver enzymes were continually elevated and creeping up every year, though they were never super high. My primary care doc had no clue. I got really worried as your liver is pretty important. I finally made an appointment with a GI doc myself and the first thing he did was test me for celiac disease. I was positive. That was in about 1996. After going on a gluten-free diet for three months the liver enzymes were back in normal range. Another lab that had gotten out of whack that has not returned to normal is albumin/total protein which are always a little on the low side. I don't know what that's about, if it's related to the liver or something else like leaky gut syndrome. But my doctors don't seem to be worried about it. One thing to realize is that celiac disease can onset at any stage of life. There is a genetic component but there is also an epigenetic component. That is, the genetic component is not deterministic. It only provides the potential. There needs also to be some health or environmental stressor to activate the latent gene potential. About 40% of the population have the genetic potential to develop celiac disease but only about 1% actually do.
    • cristiana
      Hello @Heather Hill You are most welcome.  As a longstanding member and now mod of the forum, I am ashamed to say I find numbers and figures very confusing, so I rarely stray into the realms of explaining markers. (I've self-diagnosed myself with dyscalculia!)  So I will leave that to @Scott Adams or another person. However as a British person myself I quite understand that the process with the NHS can take rather a long time.  But just as you made a concerted effort to eat gluten before your blood test, I'd advise doing the same with eating gluten before a biopsy, in order to show if you are reacting to gluten.  It might be worth contacting the hospital or your GPs secretary to find out if they know what the current waiting time is. Here is a page from Coeliac UK about the current NHS recommendations. https://www.coeliac.org.uk/information-and-support/coeliac-disease/getting-diagnosed/blood-tests-and-biospy/#:~:text=If you remove or reduce,least six weeks before testing. Cristiana  
    • MI-Hoosier
      Thanks again. My mom was diagnosed over 50 years ago with celiac so grew up watching her deal with the challenges of food. I have been tested a few times prior due to this but these results have me a bit stunned. I have a liver disease that has advanced rapidly with no symptoms and an allergy that could be a contributing factor that had no symptoms. I guess I’ll call it lucky my Dr ordered a rescreen of a liver ultrasound from 5 years ago that triggered this or I would likely have tripped into cirrhosis. It’s all pretty jarring.
    • Heather Hill
      Many thanks for your responses, much appreciated.  The tests did include tTg IgA and all the other markers mentioned.  I also had sufficient total IgA so if I'm reading the Mayo clinic thing correctly, I didn't really need the anti-deaminated gliadin marker? So, if I am reading the information correctly do I conclude that as all the other markers including tTg IgA and DGP IgG and tTg IgG and EMA IgA are all negative, then the positive result for the immune response to gliadin, on it's own, is more likely to suggest some other problem in the gut rather than Coeliac disease? Until I have a view from the medics (NHS UK) then I think I will concentrate on trying to lower chronic inflammation and mend leaky gut, using L glutamine and maybe collagen powder. Thank you for your help so far.  I will get back in touch once I have a response, which sadly can take quite a long time.   Kindest Heather Hill 
×
×
  • Create New...