Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Nutrition on Fasano Diet for DH


Alaskaguy

Recommended Posts

Alaskaguy Enthusiast

Hello All,

I wanted to share with you some information that I have learned about my nutrition while on the Fasano Gluten Contamination Elimination Diet (https://bmcgastroenterol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-230X-13-40) for alleviation of my dermatitis herpetiformis.

Because I have started on this diet not for any gut-related problems, but specifically for DH, I am not only adhering to the strict guidelines of the diet as laid out by Dr. Fasano and his team, but am also avoiding or severely restricting any foods high in iodine as well, which can aggravate DH.  So I am therefore ALSO eliminating all dairy products (which I already did six or seven months ago), all seafoods of any kind (both fish and, above all, seaweeds), and will be restricting my egg consumption to two or three a week, along with eliminating my multivitamin (which, like almost all of them, contains 100% of the US RDA for iodine, 150 ug.)  In addition, I am choosing to avoid all dried beans, peas and lentils, although they are allowed on the Fasano Diet, due to the potential for cross-contamination with gluten-containing grains.

So, this leaves me with not an awful lot of foods to chose from.  My starches are white potatoes and sweet potatoes, with lesser amounts of white rice, yuca (cassava root), and plantains (cooking bananas).  My proteins are limited to (lean) unprocessed beef, chicken, turkey and pork.  And with vegetables (which must be fresh, whole and unprocessed), I need to totally avoid asparagus, spinach, rhubarb, broccoli and cauliflower (due to high iodine content), and carefully limit my intake of green leafy vegetables.  All fresh fruits are OK, as are nuts in the shell.  Avocados are a particularly good source of a number of otherwise limited nutrients --- don't overlook them!

Well, after eight days now on this diet, I was curious just how it might stack up nutritionally, as I could imagine that I might be missing some important nutrients.  So for three days I actually recorded the weight and type of each food that I ate, representing what I expect would be a good cross-sectional sample of my diet going forward, then added up all the nutrients in those foods, as listed on the very useful website NutritionData.Self.com --- https://nutritiondata.self.com/facts

For most nutrients, I am actually not doing bad at all.  Despite eating meat every day (which was not my norm before this), my protein intake is not at all high, but I seem to be getting just marginally enough protein.  The same goes  for fats, although it almost feels like I am using MORE in the last week than before.  But where I am falling noticeably low is in a few key vitamins. Most of them are good to very good (A, C, K, Thiamin, Riboflavin, Niacin), but my Vitamin K intake is around 65% of the RDA, and both my Vitamin E and Folic Acid intakes are only around 50% of the RDA.  The bad ones are Vitamin D intake, now exactly zero (as it is admittedly for many people), and Vitamin B12, where I hover around 10% of the RDA.  Calcium and Magnesium are also low --- about 75% for magnesium, but only 26% for calcium.

I realized that on this restricted diet I would be low on Calcium, Magnesium and Vitamin D, so I did already buy and start using a supplement from Costco that contains each of those three nutrients.  I would have thought with the daily meat intake that I'd be fine for Vitamin B12, but while that vitamin is only found in animal products, it is not very high in lean meats --- more so in eggs, dairy products, organ meats and seafood.  So I may have to take a supplement for B12 as well, although it is true that most people store several years worth of B12 in their liver, which however diminishes with age.

The upshot here is that I would HIGHLY recommend for anyone going on the Fasano Elimination Diet to seek out the assistance of a dietician in formulating a properly balanced diet, particularly if they are also further restricting certain foods that are allowed on the Fasano Diet for other and more individual-specific reasons,   The work and effort I put in just to analyze my three days diet was rather extensive, and I don't know how many others would have the patience and wherewithal to do that.  But even as a rather nutritionally aware person, I was still surprised by a few of the nutritional 'holes' that my current diet contains.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



RMJ Mentor

Very interesting, thank you for posting.

  • 4 weeks later...
Iiv Explorer

Thanks, I don't know if I have DH.. I just know that my rashes goes hand in hand with gluten/ grain derived things. But I'm definitely gonna mind iodine a lot more! 

Just a thought for you on vitamins. I cannot eat solid D-vitamins on pills, if they contain dextrin (derived from barley or wheat, but no need to tell on label). That is enough to evoke my rash on some patches. Not as bad as pure wheat, but still very annoying. 

So, perhaps you ought to mind your vitamins too? 

I'm guessing that you are having issues getting rid of your rashes, hence severe rashes and worse than mine. So, I'm thinking that if I cannot, perhaps you can't either? 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,574
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    kerrie98
    Newest Member
    kerrie98
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      If your total IGA is low then the values for the other IGA tests cannot be trusted. They will be depressed. Celiacs who have the DQ2 gene typically are on the more sensitive side as opposed to those who only have the DQ8. But keep in mind that having either or both of those genes does not equate to having celiac disease as 40% of the general population have one or the other and only about 1% of the general population develops active celiac disease. Genetic typing can be used for ruling it out, however. Because of the low total IGA, symptoms and the possession of the DQ2 gene, my suggestion would be for you to go seriously gluten free for a few months and see if your symptoms improve. It may be the only way you can ascertain if you are gluten intolerant because of the low total IGA.
    • Cat M
      Ah ok, I just saw didn’t even post the DGP IgA at all. 😫 I started with itching and hives Jan 2024, been taking a ton of meds and on Xolair and even that is not providing total relief. The other primary symptoms: intermittent but worsening abdominal pain, diarrhea and bloating. This summer I am just exhausted. I uploaded my 23andMe data to genetic lifehacks and discovered quite a few variations, including DQ2, MTHFR, VDR and I have always had very low ferritin, vitamin D and B12. I still think that mast cell disease makes the most sense, but latest labs show I am barely in range for thiamine, zinc and vitamin A, so the GI stuff feels more important to figure out than the hives right now. I did SIBO testing this morning. TTG IGA <2   0-3 is negative TTG IGG  3   0-5 is neg DGP IGA 21    20-30 is weak positive DGP IGG 4    0-19 is negative Although total IGA is not resulted, there is a footnote stating it was low and the reason they ran IGG.  
    • Scott Adams
      This is an interesting case. A positive tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibody with a negative endomysial antibody (EMA) and normal duodenal histology can present a diagnostic challenge, especially in an asymptomatic patient. While the absence of villous atrophy and negative EMA suggest that the likelihood of active celiac disease is low at this time, such serological discordance may still warrant monitoring. Some individuals may be in the early stages of celiac disease, often referred to as potential celiac disease, particularly if they carry the HLA-DQ2 or DQ8 haplotypes. HLA typing can be quite helpful in this situation; a negative result would virtually rule out celiac disease, whereas a positive result may justify periodic follow-up to monitor for evolving disease. The risk of progression to overt celiac disease is not well defined but appears to be higher in children, those with a family history, or those with autoimmune conditions. In this case, routine follow-up including repeat serology and consideration of symptoms or new risk factors over time would be a reasonable and cautious approach. For people with celiac disease hidden gluten in their diets is the main cause of elevated Tissue Transglutaminase IgA Antibodies (tTG-IgA), but there are other conditions, including cow's milk/casein intolerance, that can also cause this, and here is an article about the other possible causes:      
    • Scott Adams
      Have you tried to start a gluten-free diet since your diagnosis in 2019?
    • trents
      Welcome to celiac.com, @Wamedh Taj-Aldeen! Just curious, what is your relationship to the patient? Are you the attending physician? A medical student? A consulted physician? Was a total IGA test ordered? Some physicians are under the dated and mistaken impression that such is only necessary in young children. If total IGA is low, other IGA antibody numbers will be artificially depressed. By the way, it is not unusual to have a positive TTG-IGA and a negative EMA. Are the TTG-IGA numbers borderline high or unequivocally high? There are other diseases and medical conditions that can cause elevated TTG-IGA numbers besides celiac disease but when this is the case, the numbers are usually not dramatically elevated. It can also be the case that villous damage was patchy and affected areas were missed during the biopsy. Or, onset of celiac disease was very recent and villous atrophy has not yet progressed to the point of detectability.  We also have occasional anecdotal reports in this online community of positive antibody testing with negative histology, as you report. But we also know that gluten intolerance can manifest itself apart from enteropathy. It can damage other organ systems. Many celiacs are of the "silent" type, meaning there is an absence or a relative absence of symptoms until the disease has become advanced and there is significant damage to the villous lining or other organ systems. But to answer your questions: 1. I would definitely pursue a routine follow-up and recheck of the antibodies. And, I would order a complete celiac panel including total IGA and IGG stuff in say, six months. Sooner if symptoms manifest. 2. It is impossible to say what is the risk of the future development of over celiac disease. I refer you back to my #1 above concerning rechecking.  3. I would definitely pursue HLA DQ2/DQ8 typing as it can be used as a rule out for celiac disease, though not quite with 100% dependability. I hope my thoughts prove helpful to you.
×
×
  • Create New...