Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Success with homeopathy for DH or any type of rash?


Kamaka

Recommended Posts

Kamaka Newbie

Has anyone had success with homeopathy? 

-if you have had success with homeopathy for DH or any type of burning itching skin rash, was the treatment acute (for immediate relief consisting of multiple doses) or constitutional (usually only one dose for up to a year or more), and what remedy was used? How long did symptoms flare up before going away/what was the time frame? Can you eat gluten again?

- I already went through the search engine and nothing of use came up because they didn't give any detail about remedy used, duration, or long term results.

-If you don't believe in homeopathy or don't know what it is, with all due respect, please don't reply in this thread. I'm DESPERATELY looking for answers and don't wish to debate the validity of vibrational healing or medicine, of which there are many kinds that work whether one believes in them or not. Anyone that has a deep understanding of vibrational laws, quantum physics and the behavior of water, (all subjects that are not commonly studied by the average medical doctor or scientist) know this to be true. Please don't try to use homeopathy without consulting a professional and then claim it doesn't work. Many foods, substances and electrical fields render it useless and treatment requires diligent compliance from the patient to be effective. Like many natural therapies, it often causes symptoms to get much worse for an extended period of time before getting better. Western doctors are not very adept at recognizing detoxing symptoms or a healing crisis. 

 

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master

If you actually have DH, you have to stop eating gluten to stop the antibodies. Then it can take a while for it to clear up.  So I can understand trying to find something that helps it go away or at least feel better until

it does.   But, for people with DH/ Celiac, you shouldn’t start eating gluten after the DH finally clears up or it will just come back.  

cyclinglady Grand Master

What Karen said is true.  Dermatitis Herpetiformis (DH) is celiac disease.  The only known treatment for celiac disease or DH is a gluten free diet.  Our DH forum members have stated that a very strict diet is required.  They often do not eat out and avoid processed foods, even gluten free foods.  This seems to be a good strategy until the rash is under control.   It can also take a very long time to heal on a gluten free diet as antibodies have to work their way out of the skin.  Be patient.  

Consider browsing through the DH section for member tips on how to survive this awful rash.  Not sure if homeopathy has been used to provide any relief from symptoms.  Again, DH is celiac disease and avoiding gluten is the only treatment.  There is Dapsone, a prescription drug that can help, but there can be serious side effects.  

  • 2 weeks later...
apprehensiveengineer Community Regular

Homeopathy is a placebo, and doesn't do anything. Anyone who tells you otherwise is a quack making a buck off of it. It is quite literally "active ingredients" (I use liberally - none of the active ingredients have any plausible mechanism of action) diluted to such an extent that there is not one single molecule of the active substance remaining in whatever pill you take: https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/homeopathy/homeopathy-delusion-through-dilution

It is unfortunate that pseudoscience practitioners prey upon people with chronic illnesses, for whom there is often not a good evidence-based medical treatment, or for which the treatment is difficult (ie. strict GFD). Don't waste your life waiting for a magic carpet because the bus is late. Until a proven cure or treatment becomes available, a serious GFD is all you can do.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to shell504's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      4

      Should I get a second opinion?

    2. - shell504 replied to shell504's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      4

      Should I get a second opinion?

    3. - trents replied to filippa's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      5

      Mistakenly eating gluten

    4. - trents replied to shell504's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      4

      Should I get a second opinion?

    5. - shell504 replied to shell504's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      4

      Should I get a second opinion?


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,883
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Vara
    Newest Member
    Vara
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      71.3k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      I would ask the GI doc about the elevated IGA score of 401. That one is what we commonly refer to as "total IGA" and also known as "Immunoglobulin A (IgA)". It could be nothing but it can also indicate some other health issues, some of them serious in nature. I would google potential causes for that if I were you. Also, if there is a chance the GI doc will want to do more testing for celiac disease, either antibody testing or an endoscopy with biopsy, you should not cut back on gluten consumption until all celiac disease testing is done. Otherwise, you will invalidate the testing.
    • shell504
      Hello. I apologize. I didn't know there wasn't a standard.  The standard listed  for the IGA is normal range 47-310.  The others were all listed as <15.0 u/l is antibody not detected and 15> antibody is detected.  And the negative one the standard is negative.  It is a normal PCP dr. I do have a second opinion appt scheduled with a GI specialist in 2 weeks. Honestly, I haven't cut out gluten at all. I just switched to whole fibers and everything has been getting better. She wanted to do the test just to check, which I was fine with. We'll see what the GI dr says. Thank you for commenting. 
    • trents
      It is also possible that since eating the fries you have been glutened again during the week. I would double check the food in your cupboard and reread the ingredient lists. Food companies can and do change their formulations from time to time such that something that used to be gluten free is no more. What I am saying is, don't assume the distress you are experiencing comes from one incident of glutening. There could, coincidentally, be another one on it's heels. 
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @shell504! The IGA 401mg/dl is not a test for celiac disease per se but a check to see if you are IGA deficient. People who are IGA deficient will produce celiac blood test antibody scores that are artificially low which can result in false negatives for the individual antibody tests such as the TTG IGA. You did not include reference ranges along with the test scores and since each laboratory uses custom reference range scales, we cannot comment with certainty, but from the sheer magnitude of the IGA score (401) it does not look like you are IGA deficient. And since there are no annotations indicating that the other test scores are out of range, it does not appear there is any antibody evidence that you have celiac disease. So, I think you are warranted in questioning your physician's dx of celiac disease. And it is also true that a colonoscopy cannot be used to dx celiac disease. The endoscopy with biopsy of the small bowel is the appropriate procedure for diagnosing celiac disease. But unless there is a positive in the antibody testing, there is usually no justification for doing the endoscopy/biopsy. Is this physician a PCP or a GI doc? I think I would ask for a second opinion. It seems as though this physician is not very knowledgeable about celiac disease diagnositcs. Having said all that, it may be that you suffer from NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) rather than celiac disease. The two gluten disorders share many of the same GI symptoms. The difference is that NCGS does not damage the villous lining of the small bowel as does celiac disease. NCGS is 10x more common than celiac disease. The antidote for both is complete abstinence from gluten. Some experts believe NCGS can be a precursor to the development of celiac disease. There is not test for NCGS. Celiac disease must first be ruled out. So, if it becomes apparent that gluten is causing distress and testing rules out celiac disease, then the diagnosis would be NCGS. Hope this helps. 
    • shell504
      I apologize i can't figure out how to get the picture on here.  Results were: IGA 401mg/dl Deamidated Gliadin IGG. <1.0 Deamidated Gliadin IGA. <1.0 Tissue Transglutaminase IGA AB. <1.0 Endomysial IGA. Negative.  Is she just going based off of the IGA alone? And because that is elevated, it's positive? The test states: "Results do not support a diagnosis of celiac disease." 
×
×
  • Create New...