Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Son's Blood Test Negative

CMCM

Recommended Posts

CMCM Rising Star
CMCM
Posted

My 19 year old son just had a physical, and since he was getting a cholesterol test done I decided what the heck, get the gluten antibody/gluten sensitivity test done too. The doc left a message and said his test was negative.

I didn't totally suspect my son might have celiac, but he does seem to have digestive issues of a strange, familiar nature, and since he regularly eats gluten I figured this blood test would possibly be useful. Celiac is in the family (his grandmother, my mom), and I'm pretty suspicious that I have it (I just sent off my Enterolab test but don't have results yet). I wanted to test my son so we'd know about this early in life rather than later, such as with me (I'm 56).

My question is, should I take his negative results as 100% conclusive that he does NOT have any kind of gluten sensitivity?? I do plan to contact the doctor tomorrow to get specifics on the numbers on the test.

Thanks...

Carole

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Guest nini
Guest nini
Posted
My question is, should I take his negative results as 100% conclusive that he does NOT have any kind of gluten sensitivity?? I do plan to contact the doctor tomorrow to get specifics on the numbers on the test.

Thanks...

Carole

NO... the blood tests are only part of the puzzle... many people have had negative blood tests and still tested positive with the biopsy. Even if he were to have the biopsy and it was negative, that still is not 100% conclusive. The testing isn't perfect. The most accurate test IMHO is to try the diet and see if the symptoms improve or go away on the gluten-free diet. And that is with being 100% gluten free, no cheating allowed, trying the diet for at least 3-6 months... most people notice improvements within the first couple of weeks but it takes a good 3-6 months at least to see a real difference... at that point if the person wanted to reintroduce gluten and do a "gluten challenge" they could monitor any return of symptoms... That to me is the most conclusive test... does a person improve on the gluten free diet and then get sick with the reintroduction of gluten? The blood tests and the biopsies are only 100% if they are positive...

Jnkmnky Collaborator
Jnkmnky
Posted

Did Enterolab do the blood test, or did your dr do the lab work? Also, I am neg for celiac disease as are two of my kids, but we are all gluten free after I read the book Dangerous Grains. Link below. I'm neg for celiac disease, but found relief of what was dxed as endometriosis when I went gluten-free. I think gluten may be just a flat out harmful product to put in a human body.

CMCM Rising Star
CMCM
Posted
  • Author
Did Enterolab do the blood test, or did your dr do the lab work? Also, I am neg for celiac disease as are two of my kids, but we are all gluten free after I read the book Dangerous Grains. Link below. I'm neg for celiac disease, but found relief of what was dxed as endometriosis when I went gluten-free. I think gluten may be just a flat out harmful product to put in a human body.

No, just a regular lab. The doc did a blood order for his cholesterol, and added on a "celiac panel" at my request. That later had to be clarified to "gluten antibody and gluten sensitivity" test. Who knows what was actually done, I'll find that out today. No one ever seems to know anything much about all this. I just took advantage of the situation because it was the end of the year and my son's deductible was met for the year and as he was doing the other routine test, I thought I'd throw this one in just to see what it showed.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,400
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    alideva
    Newest Member
    alideva
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Celiac pain relief

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      Hope you're feeling better.   I use a combination of Thiamine, Cobalamine, and Pyridoxine (Vitamins B 1, B12, and B6) for pain relief.  Together these vitamins together have pain killing effects (analgesic).  They are water soluble, so the body can easily excrete any excess.  They are safe to take.   Hope this helps.   Mechanisms of action of vitamin B1 (thiamine), B6 (pyridoxine), and B12 (cobalamin) in pain: a narrative review https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35156556/
    • trents
      Oats gluten free?

      By trents · Posted

      I did some research on what exactly is gluten . . . what defines it.  "The term gluten usually refers to the elastic network of a wheat grain's proteins, gliadin and glutenin primarily . . . " "The types of grains that contain gluten include all species of wheat (common wheat, durum, spelt, khorasan, emmer and einkorn), and barley, rye, and some cultivars of oat" (emphasis mine) "The storage proteins in other grains, such as maize (zeins) and rice (rice protein), are sometimes called gluten, but they do not cause harmful effects in people with celiac disease." (emphasis mine) From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluten What I found most interesting is that some cultivars of oats contain gluten. Could this explain, in part at least, the controversy surrounding oats? I mean, depending on the source, it could indeed sometimes include gluten and cause a celiac reaction.
    • Scott Adams
      Oats gluten free?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Your point about the limitations of current testing is valid, but the idea of "molecular mimicry" with rice and corn glutens is less clear. While corn contains zein, which can trigger reactions in some celiac patients, rice is generally considered safe and lacks proteins structurally similar to gluten. The term "molecular mimicry" is often overused and not well-supported in the context of all grains. While your experience with corn is noteworthy, extending this to all grains, including rice, may not be scientifically justified. Testing and research should indeed improve, but claims about all grains causing similar reactions need more evidence.
    • trents
      My Adult daughter is blaming me for her "possible" Celiac disease.

      By trents · Posted

      I think Scott speaks truth. And I think there is more to this than the prospect of her having celiac disease. If it wasn't this issue, I'm betting it would be another. 
    • Scott Adams
      My Adult daughter is blaming me for her "possible" Celiac disease.

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      So one does need a specific inherited gene in order to develop celiac disease, so in some way I suppose anyone with celiac disease could take the negative approach of blaming their parents for getting it, however, it also takes some other environmental trigger, such as a specific virus or other factor, and this part is not necessarily caused by the parents. Around 40% of people have the genes to get celiac disease, but only around 1% actually get it.  In any case, we could all go through life complaining about all sorts of different wrongs supposedly caused by our parents, however, it's probably a lot more healthy for everyone to try to deal with life in a more positive way and instead move forward. For most people it's probably far more important to maintain positive family relationships in life than it is to try to attach blame to family members for getting any disease. 
×
×
  • Create New...