Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Testing First-Degree Relatives


cyclinglady

Recommended Posts

cyclinglady Grand Master

Did you all see this article on first-degree relatives?  Mayo found that 44% of first-degree relative had celiac disease even if asymptomatic.  That is stunning! 

https://www.news-medical.net/news/20190822/Mayo-Clinic-Study-Calls-For-Screening-Of-Family-Members-Of-Celiac-Disease-Patients.aspx

How many family members have you been able to convince to get tested?  For me, only three have done it so far and they were negative.    


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master

Yes.  scary stuff!

RMJ Mentor

Only 1 of 3 has been tested and he was negative.  Father wouldn’t be willing to give up bread anyway (plus he is 95 with no symptoms). The brother who is an MD hasn’t done it.

kareng Grand Master

My 2 boys have both been tested twice and negative.

 But my sister and brother won’t unless there is an issue .  But my brother told me that they looked into Celiac when his wife was having issues and found that the only way to test for Celiac was an autopsy after you died.  ?

My niece has had at least one of her kids  tested a couple of times.  He was having some issues and it may have been FODMAPs because a lower FODMAP diet for a while got him back on track.  

cyclinglady Grand Master

RMJ, an MD and he has not been tested!  Wow!  Maybe you should share this article.  I get an elderly person not wanting to be tested.  

Some of my siblings have refused.  The idea of giving up bread seems horrible to them.  My kid has been tested twice.    Full panel because of the easy I test (only DGP IgA positive).  I had her retested because she was heading off to college.  

I did find that most screenings involve just the TTG.  So, some of those relatives might have actually been positive.  I hope they will  retest some day.  

My niece was tested several times, but it turns out that she has Crohn’s.  She knows that she might develop celiac disease some day.  

RMJ Mentor

My MD brother goes very strictly by official guidelines published by recognized medical organizations.  The American College of Gastroenterology says that in asymptomatic first degree relatives testing should be “considered.”  They “recommend” in first degree relatives with possible symptoms.  (I personally think that being very skinny and eating a lot could be a symptom).

My gastroenterologist says I have to have a colonoscopy every five years because my other brother had a certain type of polyp.  MD brother only does it every 10 years because the guidelines say 5 years IF first degree relative had that type of polyp before age 60.  Other brother’s polyp was found a few months after he turned 60. I’m sure it was there before he turned 60!

I don’t try to change either brother’s mind.

Beverage Rising Star

I finally got my sister to get tested, it took a few years to get her to ask for it when she goes in for her annual blood tests.  She has diverticulitis, hiatal hernia, food gets stuck all the time (been to emergency several times for it), unknown causes of diarrhea (just something she ate but doesn't know what, "something spicy" "certain spices" "other people's food" yada yada).... and the doctor resisted and said "BUT YOU DON"T HAVE ANY SYMPTOMS".  ARGH!!!  Anyway, got the test done and the doc didn't do the full panel, that was a low positive, doc says not celiac's.  So that was negative and now I can't get her to do it again.  So frustrating.  She's one of those people that avoids confrontation at all costs, so I guess it's amazing she insisted on the test the one time.  


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,984
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    henrygreen
    Newest Member
    henrygreen
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Okay, it does make sense to continue the gluten challenge as long as you are already in the middle of it. But what will change if you rule it out? I mean, you have concluded that whatever label you want to give the condition, many of your symptoms improved when you went gluten free. Am I correct in that? According to how I understand your posting, the only symptom that hasn't responded to gluten free eating is the bone demineralization. Did I misunderstand? And if you do test positive, what will you do different than you are doing now? You have already been doing for years the main thing you should be doing and that is eating gluten free. Concerning how long you should stay on the gluten challenge, how many weeks are you into it already?
    • WildFlower1
      I mean that I will be re-taking the celiac blood test again while I am currently on the gluten challenge right now, but not sure how many weeks more to keep going, to ensure a false negative does not happen. Thank you.
    • WildFlower1
      Thank you for your help, I am currently in the middle of the gluten challenge. A bit over 6 weeks in. At 4 weeks I got the celiac blood tests and that is when they were negative. So to rule out the false negative, since I’m in the middle of the gluten challenge right now and will never do this again, I wanted to continue consuming gluten to the point to make sure the blood tests are not a false negative - which I did not receive a firm answer for how many weeks total.    My issue is, with these blood tests the doctors say “you are not celiac” and rule it out completely as a potential cause of my issues, when the symptoms scream of it. I want to rule out this 30 year mystery for my own health since I’m in the middle of it right now. Thank you!
    • trents
      I am a male and had developed osteopenia by age 50 which is when I finally got dx with celiac disease. I am sure I had it for at least 13 years before that because it was then I developed idiopathic elevated liver enzymes. I now have a little scoliosis and pronounced kyphosis (upper spine curvature).  All of your symptoms scream of celiac disease, even if the testing you have had done does not. You may be an atypical celiac, meaning the disease is not manifesting itself in your gut but is attacking other body systems. There is such a thing as sero negative celiac disease. But you still have not given me a satisfactory answer to my question of why do you need a differential dx between celiac disease and NCGS when either one would call for complete abstinence from gluten, which you have already been practicing except for short periods when you were undergoing a gluten challenge. Why do you want to put a toxic substance into your body for weeks when, even if it did produce a positive test result for celiac disease, neither you or your doctors would do anything different? Regardless of what doctors are recommending to you, it is your body it is affecting not theirs and they don't seem to have given you any good justification for starting another gluten challenge. Where you live, are doctors kings or something?
    • WildFlower1
      Sorry to put it clearly, at 15, infertility started (tried to word it nicely) meaning menstruation stopped. Which is in correlation to celiac I mean. Thank you. 
×
×
  • Create New...