Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Food Allegerns


sillyyak

Recommended Posts

sillyyak Enthusiast

How does one know if they allergic to potato, banana, tomato, rice -- apart from feeling sick after, I am hearing a lot about how if you have sprue you could have other food intolerances as well.. How does one find out about other food intolerances.. are there specific tests for this?

I am new to sprue and food intolerance issues. Please help! Thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Claire Collaborator

There are differences of opinion regarding food intolerances.

I will share my experience for what that is worth. 15 years ago I went the 'testing' route - this after 10 years of total misery with no medical help. Traditional skin allergy testing had shown that I was not allergic to anything!

These tests were done by Immuno Labs and identified a host of reactive foods. In many cases, I knew they were right on. Every possible bean on earth was identified - and I already knew that to be true. Wheat, Barley and Rye and yeast were identified (unfortunately for me only the grain itself was identified and not the gluten in the grain). They were not looking at gluten much 15 years ago.

I had doubts about many of the other identified foods. I have had the test three times. Each time I had the same feeling - they are wrong about some of these. I self tested the ones that didn't seem likely to me.

A Naturopathic doctor that I visisted recently told me that he doesn't advise these tests anymore because of the high number of false positives. He did say that he believes that they do rightly identify the culprits but with false positives in the results it gets confusing.

I agree about the false positives but I am not completely set against the testing. It does identify a of group of reactive foods. Some of these will strike a cord right away - you will know that particular good 'bothers' you. The ones on the list that are in doubt are the ones you put to the test. You remove each 'doubtful' from your diet for a week to two weeks. Then you start eating it again. Your body will tell you if that food really is reactive for you or not. If it is not, add it back into your diet. If it is, banish it. Continue this process for each food that you find 'doubtful'.

Will these intolerances go away? For some people, some of them do and some don't. For me, none of the truly reactive ones ever stopped being so. The doubtfuls are in my diet with no apparent problem. I do find that if I eat too much of any one food it will eventually become a reactive food for me.

Many labs give these tests. I like Immuno Labs because they give you an option to get specific - i.e. not just eggs but whether it is the whites, yolks or both.

As I said, there are differing opinions about these tests. Some people definitely feel they are a waste of time and money. I think they are a starting place - just test out the ones that you have doubts about.

Good luck. Claire

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Merika Contributor

There are several labs around the country - us biotek, great smokies, york allergy, and I can't remember the others.

I think they are useful and did one a year ago. Might redo it this year.

The other option is to do a total elimination diet. To get some info on that, start at www.askdrsears.com . Basically, you only eat a few basic staples for a few weeks to get a baseline, then add in one food group a week and see what happens. Of course, if you're allergic to one of your first foods, you may be stumped.

sorry to be vague, it's late and I should be in bed, lol

Merika

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      124,706
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    WentK
    Newest Member
    WentK
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      There are some causes besides celiac disease for elevated tTG-IGA, such as cow's milk protein, some other bowel diseases, NSAIDs, a certain blood pressure med and parasitic infections but the chances of that being true are not very high compared to the cause being celiac disease. And even with CMP (Cow's Milk Protein) most of those cases involve people who already have celiac disease.   
    • cristiana
      Hi @Schellee94,  it is good to know that you have found this a helpful thread.  Do let us know how you get on! Cristiana
    • trents
      Did you purchase it thinking it was gluten free? The company doesn't advertise it as such do they? Barley is not one of the eight main allergens that the FDA requires to be posted in the allergen info. Wheat is but not barley. But good catch. We don't see many products with barley and rye as ingredients and it is easy to get lazy, not really read the detailed ingredient list and to just go straight for the allergen list.
    • TraceyG
      @Wheatwacked thank you for checking in about choline. I do meet me recommended amount on a plant-based diet already, per my nutritionist. Thankfully, I am not intolerant to soy and the cruciferous veggies I enjoy! 
    • TraceyG
      @Wheatwacked thanks for your input. I am fully committed to being gluten-free if I truly have celiac disease.  I suppose my question is more so wondering if that blood test means I definitely have celiac disease. I had one doc look at the results and tell me to ignore them if I don’t have the classic celiac symptoms. The next doc (a few months later, when viewing the same results) said the results were suspicious and might mean gluten sensitivity, but then had her nurse call me later the same day to say I actually have celiac disease based on the results. So my care team seemed a little unsure. It sounds like, from this forum, that the general consensus is any abnormal blood results indicate celiac.
×
×
  • Create New...