Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Few Symptoms After Eating Gluten Again


kokoann(sara)

Recommended Posts

kokoann(sara) Newbie

Hello All,

I am new here to celiac.com, but not so new to problems with gluten.

I have exhibited classic gluten intolerance symptoms for many many years and am now finally catching on. About four years ago I was tested as being allergic to wheat only to help lesson some of my symptoms; mucus in stool, bloating, cramps, gas, low iron, low energy, bruises, nasea etc. It wasn't until three months ago that I decided to go gluten free. This made all the difference and never felt so good. Soooo, I just saw a gi dr. and he wants me to go back on the gluten diet for a little while to get accurate test results. Its been 6 days that I have been eating gluten again and am having very little symptoms if any. Is this normal? Does it sometimes take the gluten time to work its way back into some celiacs and give full blown symptoms?

Thanks,

Sara


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nettiebeads Apprentice

The fact that you are exhibiting some symptoms means you are having problems with gluten. The disease has 200 symptoms, and all of them can have a wide range of effects. I don't know why drs insist on getting a "medical" dx. You responded to the diet challenge. That's all it took for my gp to dx me 9 yrs ago. And I've never questioned the dx since any time I ate gluten I got so so sick. But my responses to gluten have changed over the years - less D, more C, now aches that I didn't have before in my major muscles. If gluten is poison to us with celiac disease, why do drs insist on us eating it to get a test? And the tests aren't 100% reliable either. My two cents; I do want you to be as healthy as possible. Just keep in mind that the tests can't rule out celiac, but definitely can rule it in.

Annette

Bonnie Explorer

Sara, I have been gluten-free for 9 months.

I did a challenge after 3 months with 2 slices of ordinary white bread. Immediate symptoms - was as sick as a dog for 10 days. However, my GI wanted to do a biopsy so I went back onto gluten for a couple of days - not bread but small amounts of gluten in puddings, sausages etc. I never had any immediate symptoms and I thought this was wonderful, that there had been some mistake and I can obviously eat small amounts of gluten. Hah! A week later my arms starting aching to the point where I couldn't lift them, the headaches and brain fog were back, looked 6 months pregnant.

So for me, it depends on the amount I eat and smaller amounts must build up in my system and then cause symptoms.

Well I stopped right there. I don't need a biopsy and I'm not willing to deliberately make myself ill when its so obvious my body doesn't tolerate gluten.

From your history, I don't think you need any further proof either!

However, some people need medical proof so whatever you decide, good luck and let us know the test results!

Yvonne

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,390
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Ozz lock
    Newest Member
    Ozz lock
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      If you have been eating the gluten equivalent of 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily for say, 4 weeks, I think a repeat blood test would be valid.
    • englishbunny
      it did include Total Immunoglobin A which was 135, and said to be in normal range. when i did the blood test in January I would say I was on a "light' gluten diet, but def not gluten free.  I didn't have any clue about the celiac thing then.  Since then I have been eating a tonne of gluten for the purpose of the endoscopy....so I'm debating just getting my blood test redone right away to see if it has changed so I'm not waiting another month...
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @englishbunny! Did your celiac panel include a test for "Total IGA"? That is a test for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, other IGA test resultls will likely be falsely low. Were you by any chance already practicing a reduced gluten free diet when the blood draw was done?
    • englishbunny
      I'm upset & confused and really need help finding a new gastro who specializes in celiac in California.  Also will welcome any insights on my results. I tested with an isolated positive for deamidated IGA a few months ago (it was 124.3, all other values on celiac panel <1.0), I also have low ferritin and Hashimotos. Mild gastro symptoms which don't seem to get significantly worse with gluten but I can't really tell... my main issues being extreme fatigue and joint pain. The celiac panel was done by my endocrinologist to try and get to the bottom of my fatigue and I was shocked to have a positive result. Just got negative biposy result from endoscopy. Doctor only took two biopsies from small intestine (from an area that appeared red), and both are normal. Problem is his Physician's Assistant can't give me an answer whether I have celiac or not, or what possible reason I might have for having positive antibodies if I don't have it. She wants me to retest bloods in a month and says in the meantime to either "eat gluten or not, it's up to you, but your bloodwork won't be accurate if you don't" I asked if it could be I have early stage celiac so the damage is patchy and missed by only having two samples taken, and she said doctor would've seen damaged areas when performing endoscopy (?) and that it's a good sign if my whole intestine isn't damaged all over, so even if there is spotty damage I am fine.  This doesn't exactly seem satisfactory, and seems to be contrary to so much of the reading and research I have done. I haven't seen the doctor except at my endoscopy, and he was pretty arrogant and didn't take much time to talk. I can't see him or even talk to him for another month. I'm really confused about what I should do. I don't want to just "wait and see" if I have celiac and do real damage in the meantime. Because I know celiac is more that just 'not eating bread' and if I am going to make such a huge lifestyle adjustment I need an actual diagnosis. So in summary I want to find another doctor in CA, preferably Los Angeles but I don't care at this stage if they can do telehealth! I just need some real answers from someone who doesn't talk in riddles. So recommendations would be highly welcomed. I have Blue Shield CA insurance, loads of gastros in LA don’t take insurance at all 😣
    • trents
      Okay, Lori, we can agree on the term "gluten-like". My concern here is that you and other celiacs who do experience celiac reactions to other grains besides wheat, barley and rye are trying to make this normative for the whole celiac community when it isn't. And using the term "gluten" to refer to these other grain proteins is going to be confusing to new celiacs trying to figure out what grains they actually do need to avoid and which they don't. Your experience is not normative so please don't proselytize as if it were.
×
×
  • Create New...