Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

It's Time To Riot....


DragonQueen

Recommended Posts

DragonQueen Explorer

hello all fellow celiacs! On another message board there has been uproar about a new book called "Talk to the Hand" by Lynne Truss. This book supposedly talks about rudeness in our society but in chapter 5 Lynnne Truss wrote the following statements in her book:

"I now can't abide many, many things, and am actually always on the lookout for more things to find completely unacceptable. Whenever I hear of someone being 'gluten intolerant' or 'lactose intolerant', for example, I feel I've been missing out. I want to be gluten intolerant too.

I mean, how much longer do we have to put up with that gluten crap?"

GLUTEN CRAP!!!! :angry::angry::angry:

other people are goin to this link Open Original Shared Link

to write bad reviews. Now do you get my plan? if we all write bad reviews then her book won't sell as good *evil grin*


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Carriefaith Enthusiast
I mean, how much longer do we have to put up with that gluten crap
She actually said that in her book!?! That's very disappointing.
VegasCeliacBuckeye Collaborator

Here is my amazon review I wrote:

I apologize to Ms. Truss for being born.

I apologize for existing in Ms. Truss' perfect world. Many of us are "imperfect" enough to have food intolerance and allergies. How silly of us to unite and demand options at restaurants and grocery stores. We should have tucked our proverbial tails between our legs, accepted the "poisons" that malevolently affect our lives. That way, Ms. Truss would not need to live in this new-age culture that fosters honest disclosures regarding food ingredients.

Perhaps if all of us annoying-allergy-fostering-heathens apologize to Ms. Truss for asking for simple meal choices and a healthy environment to flourish (as she obviously is), then maybe society can step forward. I never thought someone would label my medical condition as a nuisance in their life. Is she really mad that restaurants and grocery stores offer gluten free selections? Is she mad that food manufacturers are required to disclose what is in their products? I wish my life encountered as few obstacles as Ms. Truss's -- Imagine, a life so trivial and void of obstacles that one actually has to belittle a portion of the population due to being diagnosed with a genetic disease. Perhaps it would do Ms. Truss some good to research Celiac Disease before she comments on the subject.

While she's at it, why doesn't she criticize deaf people for not being able to hear and handicapped people for being so slow?

Madam, congratulations on offending several million people.

elonwy Enthusiast

Open Original Shared Link

Go to this link. You're reading the paragraph wrong. Granted it took me a couple minutes, but shes talking about wanting to be Gluten INTOLERANT so she can be pissed at gluten. NOT that gluten intolerant people bug her. Its a very subtle semantic thing.

She says: I want to be gluten intolerant too.

Then she says "I mean, how much longer do we have to put up with that gluten crap?" AS IF she's stepped into the shoes of a gluten intolerant person. Its a play on words. We should not be offended by it.

It does take about three reads to not be pissed off by it though.

Elonwy

celiac3270 Collaborator

People on the Listserv have been writing letters for days.

VegasCeliacBuckeye Collaborator

I guess Elonwy is right...

I read it a few more times -- she seems to be playing on the word "Intolerance" -- the parity between being intolerant (towards something -- getting angry, frustrated) and food intolerance (not being able to digest it).

It is worded poorly, but I understand her humor now -- I retracted my statement on Amazon.

Boy, we Celiacs can fly off the handle pretty easily, huh? (Bronco blushing and embarrassed)...

Unfortunately for the author, she may have underestimated how "hyper-sensitive" we Celiacs can be about our disorder (sometimes Passive-Aggresive -- :)

Sorry about that...

Canadian Karen Community Regular

My first impression upon reading the paragraph was that she wanted to know how much longer did we have to put up with that gluten crap in our food in general (as in, get rid of the gluten in mainstream food)....

I could be wrong, but that was my interpretation.......

Karen


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



DragonQueen Explorer

I dissagree elonwy,

Why would she be talking about how it's hard for celiacs and about how much we have to put up with gluten crap in a book she wrote about RuDeNeSS!

It seems a little random to put that in a book of rudeness. I think miss lynn thinks of it as another one of those fabs, like a low carb diet.

Thats my interprentation about it, I could be wrong but still......

elonwy Enthusiast

Thank you bronco bux. You helped describe the play on words better than I did, I was fighting to figure out how to say that.

I think the basic crux is that its written as if someone were speaking it ( with an accent no less), which makes it harder to interpret, so it is something easliy misconstrued, but I definitly feel it is not a deliberate attack on celiacs, so won't take it as such.

Its like if George Carlin were British... and female. Weeeiird.

Elonwy

Rachel--24 Collaborator

Hmmm...after reading it I kinda think she did not mean it as an attack on Celiacs. I do see how it can easily be misinterpreted though. I wonder, with all these peple writing letters, if she will come out and say what she meant....exactly.

Carriefaith Enthusiast
I wonder, with all these peple writing letters, if she will come out and say what she meant....exactly.
I hope she will because I'm interested to know what she meant by that statement.
Rusla Enthusiast

I have read this many times. It seems to me what she is saying is that she wants to be lactose and gluten intolerant because she wants to be able to say she is and get special treatment. By her saying 'how much longer do we have to put up with the gluten crap', sounds like she is saying she is tired of hearing it . It keeps sounding to me like she is indicating that we have a choice, like being Vegan.

celiac3270 Collaborator

Yeah, I agree with Kayla/Rusla/broncobux... in a book about rudeness, I can't help but think that she thinks we have a choice and that we are making excuses to get special treatment.

VegasCeliacBuckeye Collaborator

Maybe I will buy it and clear up the madness...

key Contributor

I am sorry, but I have to agree. In a book called, "talk to the hand" about rudeness. It sure sounds like she is being rude to me. I read it to my husband too and he thought that she was being rude.

Haven't read the book or any other context that statement was made in, but just my opinion.

MOnica

WGibs Apprentice

I'm with elonwy on this one and I'll try a slightly different way of explaining it.

She is admitting to being a person who enjoys being against all kinds of things. She's intolerant of lots of behaviors that she classifies as rudeness. She embraces her intolerances and wants more. So, when she hears that some people also have gluten or lactose intolerance, she's jealous because she so enjoys being intolerant of things that she wishes she could be against gluten and lactose too. She's missing out.

Now, she may be somewhat insensitive to how "not fun" it is to have food intolerances, but I don't think she is outright insulting them or claiming that they don't exist.

I haven't read the book, so this is just an interpretation based on her sentence construction. The George Carlin comparison is pretty good -- she's not nearly as funny, but it is the sort of thing he might do a joke on.

tiredofdoctors Enthusiast

I wrote a scathing note to both the publisher and agent. I then sent a copy it to KatiUsa's e-mail -- I really stink at the internet, but know how to cut & paste to make a new message. I'm hoping she will post it so that you can read it. It is brutally honest, but to the point.

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

I am posting this for someone who could not get this on here:)

am writing with regard to Lynne Truss' book, Talk to the Hand. She lists her pet peeves, and among them, lists "gluten intolerance". Additionally, in an effort to be humorous, she says that she wants to be gluten intolerant. Please convey to Ms. Truss that she certainly doesn't want that -- ever.

You see, I don't have Celiac disease -- I've been tested, biopsied, been poked prodded and had tubes placed where they were never meant to be placed. I do, however have "Autoimmune Cerebellar Disease", which is also known as "Gluten Ataxia".

Gluten intolerance is an autoimmune response in the body. Your body sees gluten as foreign, and begins producing antibodies. Unfortunately, my body has produced additional antibodies, and the gluten began destroying the cerebellum of my brain approximately three years ago. It also started destroying my retinas. I went from being a vibrant, energetic Physical Therapist who owned her own clinic to a person who can't get out of the bathtub by herself. I'm in a wheelchair now, have developed double vision in one eye, night blindness and color blindness. Additoinally, I have developed more sequelae from this disease than either of you would ever care to hear.

Obviously, I have made my point. I am insulted, at minimum, that a disease which has devastated my life was taken so lightly. I often hear that "ignorance is bliss", but in this case, ignorance was callous and definitely NOT funny. I hope that in the future, Ms. Truss' editor will provide her better service.

Sincerely,

Lynne Ellingsworth-Wagner, PT

fisharefriendsnotfood Apprentice
I am posting this for someone who could not get this on here:)

am writing with regard to Lynne Truss' book, Talk to the Hand. She lists her pet peeves, and among them, lists "gluten intolerance". Additionally, in an effort to be humorous, she says that she wants to be gluten intolerant. Please convey to Ms. Truss that she certainly doesn't want that -- ever.

You see, I don't have Celiac disease -- I've been tested, biopsied, been poked prodded and had tubes placed where they were never meant to be placed. I do, however have "Autoimmune Cerebellar Disease", which is also known as "Gluten Ataxia".

Gluten intolerance is an autoimmune response in the body. Your body sees gluten as foreign, and begins producing antibodies. Unfortunately, my body has produced additional antibodies, and the gluten began destroying the cerebellum of my brain approximately three years ago. It also started destroying my retinas. I went from being a vibrant, energetic Physical Therapist who owned her own clinic to a person who can't get out of the bathtub by herself. I'm in a wheelchair now, have developed double vision in one eye, night blindness and color blindness. Additoinally, I have developed more sequelae from this disease than either of you would ever care to hear.

Obviously, I have made my point. I am insulted, at minimum, that a disease which has devastated my life was taken so lightly. I often hear that "ignorance is bliss", but in this case, ignorance was callous and definitely NOT funny. I hope that in the future, Ms. Truss' editor will provide her better service.

Sincerely,

Lynne Ellingsworth-Wagner, PT

That is an amazing letter. As an aspiring writer, I have to say that if I ever have to write a complaint letter I will refer back to this one. It's really well written.

I hope you get a good reply! :)

-Jackie :)

Guest BERNESES

This is what I posted on amazon.

I am extemely disappointed in Lynne Truss. I have previously used her book in my college writing class, but when I saw the comment about gluten-intolerance, I reconsidered. I HOPE that the comment was made in jest, but either way it misrepresents what it is like to have Celiac's disease. Taken out of context, as it will be, it makes us look like a bunch of whining, inconvenient people who choose this way of life. Hardly the case, Ms. Truss. I suggest that in the future, you research a subject before poking jabs at it. That's what good writers do.

tiredofdoctors Enthusiast

Jackie -- thank you for the compliment :) -- I tried to convey (rage), anger, disappointment, but in a way which would be accepted rather than just glossed over. Unfortunately, to date I have not received a reply from either the publisher nor the agent. I will give them approximately three additional days, then ask them as to why they have chosen to ignore my e-mail. :P Will keep you updated . . . Lynne

endrun Newbie

JOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY. Most Americans have heard of him. He suffered Celiac Disease. The family didn't want any of his medical history revealed and did not do so until 2002, when the truth came out in the biography "An Unfinished Life" by Boston University Professor Robert Dallek.

There is sadly in my view, an unwritten rule about using these facts even in the Celiac Community to advance the cause. To me to compound the inexcusable withholding of the medical information of a public figure for so long by the family, an information blackout that tended to thwart further the general awareness of Celiac in the United States, the family still wants the lowly American Peasantry under its continued spell to kowtow to whatever it wishes regarding the use of the man's memory in a carefully controlled manner, despite its lapse in letting such "cats out of the bag" such as the fact that Jack Kennedy took heavy doses of many medications as President among which were Psychotropics.

I understand the use of Psychotropics because one's brain does not function correctly when one is failing to absorb adequate nutrition. Most Celiacs also know that very possibly they can live out their entire lives without an affirmative diagnosis from a medical professional. And Celiacs know the fact of lower functioning in the absence of affirmative diagnosis.

Affirmative diagnosis loomed much larger for me in my life than perhaps for others due to the fact that as a child I faced incarceration upon a locked mental ward for five weeks while in the fifth grade, two years banishment from my (Catholic) Elementary School, and one year required to ingest the Psychotripic Thorazine. That started in the year 1968 but had the Kennedy family decided to beat the five year mark since Jack's sad death in Dallas, perhaps I might have been spared some of that experience(on second thought, mmm nah wouldn't have been spared that). I was treated thenceforth by my parents as a mentally ill individual with all the privileges of nonpersonhood attached thereto. As such at 49 today I live alone on government assistance with no prospect of betterment either in my past or in my future. There are many resentments I have toward my situation but none so strong as my resentment of the Catholic church and its power, a part of which were the Kennedy family and their power. I do however think and believe that Jack, if he could speak, would tell us that there is no problem using his name to make progress in Celiac awareness and so forth and in fact I think he would find it an honor, unlike his overprotective heirs, cousins, and etc.

The news media in this country continues, if they pursue the facts here at all, along the lines of "Well JFK had Addison's Disease, which is a serious life-threatening condition." IS Addison's Disease a serious, life-threatening condition? Yes. Did Jack Kennedy have Addison's Disease? No. He had Celiac Sprue, without any question. And he suffered more by his medical mistreatments and misdiagnoses than from any other source.

I believe personally the Celiac community SHOULD come together toward filing a class action lawsuit against the Kennedy family of Hyannis, Massachussetts, for illegally withholding JFK's medical information, information which normally should have been in the public domain and should have been in this domain much sooner. The Kennedy family has of course fought tooth and nail against release of his Assassination materials such as autopsy photos, which is relatively speaking to the issue of Celiac Sprue, well within their rights to do. Contrary to the entire American Myth surrounding the life and death of JFK, JFK lost his life as a result of one man shooting a rifle at him as his limo passed through downtown Dallas Texas on Nov. 22, 1963. The motive for the killing MAY have included his support for the repeal of the oil depletion allowance, a law that was passed cutting into oil profits especially in Texas, but the carrying out of his murder was exactly according to how the government through the Warren Commission described it, which is, fairly simple Physics of bullets from a rifle. There is in fact nothing notable more to that part of it contrary to the cottage industry of literature which has helped persuade the American People that there was something more dastardly or extensively conspiratorial to the entire matter.

I have in fact written a book underscoring the fact that JFK had Celiac Sprue. I have been accused on other websites of promoting my book or myself but the simple fact of the matter is I wish to promote THE TRUTH FIRST toward getting us in the Celiac community the recognition we all deserve.

As in many support groups online and elsewhere, people can disagree over strategies toward common goals--reasonable people may do this and there is nothing wrong with this. It is my sincere hope however that the institutional divisions with the Celiac community will dissipate and that whether anyone thinks I am nuts for proposing such legal action as noted above or personally offended via some idea of an ideal that most likely never was although the media presented it to the public that it was, I am fine with people disagreeing and not wishing to pursue my suggestions. I only ask that anyone else please strive to be as tolerable with me over any disagreement anyone might have with me as I will certainly strive to do for you as a fellow Celiac.

THANK YOU!!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,170
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Melissa27
    Newest Member
    Melissa27
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      So, you have three symptoms of a gluten-related disorder: weight loss, brain fog and lose stools. Of the three, the lose stools that firm up when you cut back on gluten is the only symptom for which you have reasonable cause to assume is connected to gluten consumption since the other two persist when you cut back on gluten. But since you do not have any formal test results that prove celiac disease, you could just as easily have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). In fact, what testing you have had done indicates you do not have celiac disease. NCGS shares many of the same symptoms of celiac disease but does not damage the lining of the small bowel as does celiac disease. There is no test for it. A diagnosis for NCGS depends on first ruling out celiac disease. It is 10x more common than celiac disease. Some experts feel it can be a precursor to the development of celiac disease. Eliminating gluten is the antidote for both. What muddies this whole question are two things: 1. Lack of official diagnostic data that indicates celiac disease. 2. Your persistence in consuming gluten, even though in smaller amounts. Your anxiety over the insomnia seems to outweigh your anxiety over the weight loss which prevents you from truly testing out the gluten free diet. What other medical testing have you had done recently? I think something else is going on besides a gluten disorder. Have you had a recent CBC (Complete Blood Count) and a recent CMP (Complete Metabolic Panel)? You say you don't believe you have any vitamin and mineral deficiencies but have you actually been tested for any. I certainly would be concerned with that if I was losing weight like you are despite consuming the high amount of calories you are.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @AndiOgris! Recently upgraded guidelines for the "gluten challenge" recommend the daily consumption of at least 10g of gluten for at least 2 weeks to the day of testing to ensure valid testing, either for the antibody testing or the endoscopy/biopsy. 10g of gluten is roughly the amount found in 4-6 slices of wheat bread. So, there is a question in my mind as to whether or not your gluten consumption was intense enough to ensure valid testing the second time around. And was the tTG-IGA the only antibody test that was run? That is far from a comprehensive celiac panel. Concerning your negative biopsy, there is the possibility of patchy damage that was missed due to inadequate sampling as you alluded to. There is also the possibility that the onset of your celiac disease (if you have it) was so new that there had not yet been time to accumulate damage to the small bowel lining. Your total lack of symptoms at the time of diagnosis would seem to support this idea. Having said all that, and this is my informal observation from reading many, many posts like yours over the years, I wonder if you are on the cusp of celiac disease, crossing back and forth across that line for the time being. My suggestion would be to keep a close eye on this for the time being. Watch for the development of symptoms and request a more complete celiac panel a year from now. Here is an article that discusses the various antibody tests that can be run for celiac disease. Note: The EMA test is kind of outdated and expensive. It has been replaced by the tTG-IGA which measures the same thing and is less expensive to run.  
    • SaiP
      Hi, yes. Much more solid and firm, as opposite to diarrhea like when on gluten.
    • AndiOgris
      Hi all I have had a very confusing year with celiac disease (or perhaps not as it turns out) and wondered if anyone can help me make sense of it? My mother was diagnosed with celiac disease (in her 70s) a couple of years ago. I am in my early 40s and did not have any symptoms, but I took a blood test in November 2023 and it came back positive (TTG IGA 23.4 U/ml - normal range is below 7 U/ml). I was referred for a gastroscopy to confirm, which was scheduled for October 2024 (I use the UK health service, things move slowly!). The gastroscopy found no evidence of celiac disease.  My gastroenterologist has asked me to retake the blood test, and it just came back negative (TTG IGA 1.6 U/ml - normal range is below 7 U/ml). Given the long wait between my initial positive blood test and my gastroscopy, I reduced my gluten intake but never avoided it fully. In the 6 weeks before the gastroscopy and the second blood test, I made sure to eat at least two slices of bread a day as recommended, and often I had significantly more.  So what's going on? I understand that false positives are very rare for celiac blood tests, and usually associated with other serious diseases which I am fairly sure I don't have (my health is generally very good). After the negative biopsy, I thought that (i) either they did not take enough samples, or (ii) I have "potential celiac disease". But now that the second blood test has come back negative, I'm running out of plausible explanations...  Can anyone make sense of this? I have not spoken to my gastroenterologist yet - I wanted to get a better sense of where I am beforehand so that I can ask the right questions. Under the UK system, specialist doctors can be very hard to get hold of, so I need to make the most of my time with him! Thanks!        
    • trents
      Do you mean that your stools firmed up when you began to cut gluten from your diet?
×
×
  • Create New...