Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Pioneer gravy packet


Jherm21

Recommended Posts

Jherm21 Community Regular

I bought pioneer gravy packet from my local Kroger. It’s Sunday today so I cannot call the manufacturer of this company. I seen the packet had the certified gluten free symbol on it and I poured it into my crockpot. I went to throw the packet out and said I should look at the ingredients. I saw “autolyzed yeast extract” from what I remember from my nutritionist a few years ago she said look out for this ingredient it could be barley. Does anyone know if this is safe. If it’s certified gluten free? 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



NNowak Collaborator

This is what I found:

Yes, autolyzed yeast is gluten-free. Carefully read the label because, even though autolyzed yeast is gluten-free, “autolyzed yeast extract” is made from barley and is not gluten-free.
Jherm21 Community Regular

Yikes! Oh no. Yea it definitely says autolyzed yeast extract. I wonder how come they can get it certified by the GIG if they put this in the ingredients. That’s totally unfair. Guess I will just have to eat something else for dinner. Thanks for the response

Ennis-TX Grand Master

Hmm bit of a hit and miss thing GFWD had something else on another company using Yeast Extracts on stuff and had a news article on it. This is one of those things I would like to ask her to see about testing as it is in a odd grey area. You really should contact pioneer and request the source of the yeast extract. The grey area comes from yeast extract sometimes coming from brewers yeast from barley and barley is not in the top allergens and does not have to listed as a allergen. At least this is what I got from it.
https://www.glutenfreewatchdog.org/news/yeast-extract-confusion-made-worse-by-the-lack-of-manufacturer-transparency/

Jherm21 Community Regular

I hate grey areas lol. Ennis would this be enough to believe it’s safe? https://pioneerbrand.com/our-products/gluten-free/

mbrookes Community Regular

I thought the law was that to be marked "gluten free" the product has to test to under 20 ppm. In that case, it would be safe for all but the most extremely sensitive people. 

cyclinglady Grand Master

Having a certified gluten-free label should insure that the products are around 10 ppm or less.  

https://www.verywellfit.com/certified-gluten-free-products-562767

I think that would assure you that the yeast used in this product is safe for celiacs.  


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GFinDC Veteran

The rule is they can't label a product gluten-free if the ingredients started out as gluten grains.  That's why gluten removed beers can't be labeled gluten-free even though the brewers claim they are.  So your autolyzed yeast extract should be gluten-free by the rules.  Autolyzed yeast extract is a euphenism / another name for monosodium glutamate.  Yeast extract sounds less chemically and artificial than monosodium glutamate.  So they use the term to avoid putting off health conscious consumers.

NNowak Collaborator
Besides the limit of gluten to 20 ppm, the rule permits labeling a food “gluten-free, if the food does not contain:
  • An ingredient that is any type of wheat, rye, barley, or crossbreeds of these grains,
  • An ingredient derived from these grains that has not been processed to remove gluten, or,
Jul 16, 2018
kareng Grand Master

The website says they are using the GIG certification standards.  So it is tested at less than 10 ppm ( I think that’s GIG, you could check).  This appears to be a big company - not something you get at the farmers market .  I would think this is a very safe product.  

NNowak Collaborator

I never go along with the gluten-free labeling on a package for this specific reason. It may be safe to consume for most, but may also result in health issues for some. When a Celiac or NCGS is trying to heal, or prevent complications (ie. miscarriage) it is irresponsible to slap a gluten-free label on a product to target a segment of consumers. Fundamentally, I have an issue with the government deciding what’s safe for me and how a company can label a product. If it has any level of gluten in it, the product is not gluten-free. 

cyclinglady Grand Master
3 hours ago, NNowak said:

I never go along with the gluten-free labeling on a package for this specific reason. It may be safe to consume for most, but may also result in health issues for some. When a Celiac or NCGS is trying to heal, or prevent complications (ie. miscarriage) it is irresponsible to slap a gluten-free label on a product to target a segment of consumers. Fundamentally, I have an issue with the government deciding what’s safe for me and how a company can label a product. If it has any level of gluten in it, the product is not gluten-free. 

But most labeled gluten free products are in fact gluten free.  This is based on the Gluten Free Watchdog Reports.  The GFW tests products that are requested by her subscribers.  It is like a tiny Consumer Reports.  The GFW takes no donations from any manufacturers.  The founder, Trisha Thompson has celiac disease and is a dietician.  She works with the FDA and reports any foods that she finds labeled gluten-free, but are not actually gluten free.  Over the years, over 98% (maybe it was 99%) of the products she has tested (labeled or just no gluten ingredients) to be gluten free.  The lowest number the test equipment can go is 5 ppm.  

I trust gluten free labels.  Do I purchase them?  Yes.  Do I use them all the time?  No, because I prefer non-processed or minimally processed foods.  But sometimes, while on the go and in a pinch, they are sure handy to have.  Twenty years ago, it was a real pain.  I did a lot of baking for my Hubby back then.  Not to mention that commercial processed foods were like cardboard.  Things have improved indeed!  

I consider myself to be very strict celiac.  It is because if my celiac disease flares, so do my other autoimmune diseases.  If I just had celiac disease, I might be a little more relaxed.  In know I sound like a broken record, but two years ago I had a celiac flare up (off the charts antibodies), the flu, a cold and a tooth infection.  I was a wreak.  I did not recover.  I had hives that erupted daily every afternoon.  My GI wanted to scope me, but I refused.  I went on the Fasano diet.  Finally, one year later, I had a repeat endoscopy.  Celiac disease healed.  I was doing a great job of avoiding gluten.  But gastric biopsies revealed autoimmune gastritis.  That was the cause of my misery.  I really have no control over other illnesses.  

Here is the kicker.  My antibodies were still very elevated the day that I had my repeat endoscopy.  Yet, my GI assured me that he went in deep and the magnification of his scope even revealed healthy villi as did the pathologist’s report.  Still trying to figure that one out.  But our research finds that all celiac research centers admit that the antibodies testing was only designed to help diagnose and not monitor diet.  

Not everything is due to celiac disease.

If a woman who has celiac disease is pregnant, I would encourage her to eating as few non-processed foods as possible.  I would encourage anyone to do this.  We eat way too many chemicals in my opinion.  Fake food.  

Would I buy this gravy mix?  Heck no.  Just the MSG is enough to make me cringe, but I would not worry about gluten.  I make gravy from scratch.  Just like my mom and grandmothers did.  Some drippings, add more butter, grease or oil (you can never have too much fat in my opinion), a little starch, seasonings (even as simple as salt and pepper), water (maybe) and cook it down.  Cast iron rocks!  

You just have to find your own way.  Believe me, I can be very paranoid knowing that those head-to-toe hives might come back.  Weeks of consuming mushy stew or soup is no picnic either.  I really trust all gluten free marked processed foods.   Scarier is trying to eat out.   The guy in the kitchen?  No way.  I worked in food service back in college.  Yikes!  (Reading reviews written by celiacs about a restaurant helps you make a safe and informed decision).  

I hope this helps! 

 

 

Jherm21 Community Regular

Yes our Gluten Free Products are made in a Facility that follow FDA guidelines- The production line is in a gluten free environment.

 

As for the Yeast Extracts-we would have to contact the supplier.

 

Seems legit. No worries right? Is there a need to follow up as far as the autolyzed yeast extract. I mean my roast is left overs now but for future reference. I don’t usually make things in packets. But I am busy for the holidays school kids work. You know the deal. 

kareng Grand Master
48 minutes ago, Jherm21 said:

Yes our Gluten Free Products are made in a Facility that follow FDA guidelines- The production line is in a gluten free environment.

 

As for the Yeast Extracts-we would have to contact the supplier.

 

Seems legit. No worries right? Is there a need to follow up as far as the autolyzed yeast extract. I mean my roast is left overs now but for future reference. I don’t usually make things in packets. But I am busy for the holidays school kids work. You know the deal. 

That’s an odd answer, isn’t it?  We follow guidelines, etc but don’t know what is in our ingredients?  
 

I got a gluten-free gravy mix - McCormicks i think.  Looks like it has “ yeast extract”.  

Ennis-TX Grand Master
47 minutes ago, Jherm21 said:

As for the Yeast Extracts-we would have to contact the supplier.

.....hey seen that before then low and behold it was spent brewers yeast, but also seen it come up to be safe. But how the hell do you not know the source of such a ingredient?!

I am paranoid and iffy with companies, but I also have a really random corn allergy and pretty severe whey allergy. I have to email and ask the source on everything then sometimes gamble on if the end product contains the offending proteins. (some stuff I use might be derived from corn but processed in a way that removes the proteins that trigger the allergic reaction I have, I find Erythritol is normally safe while fiber/starches are hit and miss if I react)

ON gravy, I would never use a packet, between unknown ingredients, fillers, and carbs not worth it. I normally make mine by tampering egg yolks into a simmered down base, or I use a bit of coconut flour sometimes both....but I can not have carbs. NOW my father still uses my old method to make the gravy for the community thanksgiving dinner and uses a bit of potato starch and mixes it in with the turkey drippings and chicken broth...heck they feed this gluten free gravy to 300-400 people each year and no one knows lol.

Jherm21 Community Regular

They emailed back with this response......

No barley present in their yeast extract. 

 

That was it. 

cyclinglady Grand Master

So safe to eat.  

Jherm21 Community Regular

Thank you!! 

  • 4 years later...
Firechick1967 Newbie

I have very recently been diagnosed with celiac and just had the pioneer gluten-free gravy and had a bad reaction.  It is the only thing I e had in two days that wasn’t ‘natural’

Scott Adams Grand Master

Welcome to the forum @Firechick1967, it might be too late for this but this article may be helpful:

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      5

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

    2. - Scott Adams replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy

    3. - Ginger38 replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      5

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

    4. - Mari replied to Jmartes71's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      18

      My only proof

    5. - Ginger38 replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,472
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    kygirlsusan
    Newest Member
    kygirlsusan
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      As recommended by @Flash1970, you may want to get this: https://www.amazon.com/Curist-Lidocaine-Maximum-Strength-Topical/dp/B09DN7GR14/
    • Scott Adams
      For those who will likely remain gluten-free for life anyway due to well-known symptoms they have when eating gluten, my general advice is to ignore any doctors who push to go through a gluten challenge to get a formal diagnosis--and this is especially true for those who have severe symptoms when they eat gluten. It can take months, or even years to recover from such a challenge, so why do this if you already know that gluten is the culprit and you won't be eating it anyway?  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS--but those in this group will usually have negative tests, or at best, elevated antibodies that don't reach the level of official positive. Unfortunately test results for celiac disease are not always definitive, and many errors can be made when doing an endoscopy for celiac disease, and they can happen in many ways, for example not collecting the samples in the right areas, not collecting enough samples, or not interpreting the results properly and giving a Marsh score.  Many biopsy results can also be borderline, where there may be certain damage that could be associated with celiac disease, but it just doesn't quite reach the level necessary to make a formal diagnosis. The same is true for blood test results. Over the last 10 years or so a new "Weak Positive" range has been created by many labs for antibody results, which can simply lead to confusion (some doctors apparently believe that this means the patient can decide if they want more testing or to go gluten-free). There is no "Weak Negative" category, for example. Many patients are not told to eat gluten daily, lots of it, for the 6-8 week period leading up to their blood test, nor asked whether or not they've been eating gluten. Some patients even report to their doctors that they've been gluten-free for weeks or months before their blood tests, yet their doctors incorrectly say nothing to them about how this can affect their test, and create false negative results. Many people are not routinely given a total IGA blood test when doing a blood screening, which can lead to false negative interpretations if the patient has low IGA. We've seen on this forum many times that some doctors who are not fully up on how interpret the blood test results can tell patients that the don't need to follow a gluten-free diet or get more testing because only 1 of the 2 or 3 tests done in their panel is positive (wrong!), and the other 1 or 2 tests are negative.  Dermatologists often don't know how to do a proper skin biopsy for dermatitis herpetiformis, and when they do it wrongly their patient will continue to suffer with terrible DH itching, and all the risks associated with celiac disease. For many, the DH rash is the only presentation of celiac disease. These patients may end up on strong prescriptions for life to control their itching which also may have many negative side effects, for example Dapsone. Unfortunately many people will continue to suffer needlessly and eat gluten due to these errors in performing or interpreting celiac disease tests, but luckily some will find out about non-celiac gluten sensitivity on their own and go gluten-free and recover from their symptoms. Consider yourself lucky if you've figured out that gluten is the source of your health issues, and you've gone gluten-free, because many people will never figure this out.    
    • Ginger38
      It has been the most terrible illness ever! Going on 3 weeks now… I had chicken pox as a kid… crazy how much havoc this dormant virus has caused after being reactivated! No idea what even caused it to fire back up. I’m scared this pain and sensitivity is just never going to improve or go away 
    • Mari
      OKJmartes. Skin and eyes. Also anxiety and frustration. I have read that Celiacs have more skin problems than people who do not have Celiacs. I take increased levels of Vit. D3, very high levels of B12 and an eating part of an avocado every day. KnittyKitty and others here can add what they take for skin health. A Dermatologist might identify the type of skin condition. By eyes you may mean eyesight problems not just irritated, red eyes. It is not very difficult to get a diagnosis of which eye condition is affecting your vision but much more difficult to find an effective remedy. The ophthalmologists I have seen have been only a little helpful. There seems to have been some advances in eye treatments that most of them are completely ignorant of or just won't add to their treatment plans.  Forcertain you may as well buy some remedy from a facebook ad but that is obviously risky and may actually damafe your eyes. However it is known that certain supplements , taken at the effectivelevels do help with eyesight. Two of them are Luten and zanthamin (spelling?)and certain anti-oxidants such as bilberry..    Hope this helps.
    • Ginger38
      I refused to do the gluten challenge for a long time because I knew how sick I would be: I have always had and still have positive antibodies and have so many symptoms my  GI was 💯 sure I would have a positive biopsy. I didn’t want to make myself sick to get a negative biopsy and be more confused by all this.  He couldn’t guarantee me a negative biopsy meant no celiac bc there may not be damage yet or it’s possible to miss biopsies where there’s damage but he was so sure and convinced me I needed that biopsy I went back on gluten. It was a terrible experience! I took pictures of the bloating and swelling and weight gain during the challenge. I gained 9 pounds, looked pregnant, was in pain , couldn’t work or function without long naps and the brain fog was debilitating. And in the end he didn’t get a positive biopsy… so I wish I had never wasted my time or health going through it. I haven’t been truly straightened  out since and I am currently battling a shingles infection at 43 and I can’t help but wonder if the stress I put my body under to try and get an official diagnosis has caused all this. Best of luck to you - whatever you decide. It’s not a fun thing to go through and I still don’t have the answers I was looking for 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.