Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Chance of false positive?


Phosis

Recommended Posts

Phosis Explorer

So here is my story...I am 33, started having really bad digestive issues after a flu early last year. Indigestion, cramps, diarrhea. My stomach has always been sensitive, but this was a whole new mess, and so I want to multiple appointments with my GP, including blood work that I didn't know was looking for celiac (my mother is celiac as well) The doctor determined I had IBS. And after a few months, the issues subsided for the most part, though I would still have indigestion sometimes when having coffee, and the occasional bout of loose stools. I also believe my stomach processes are highly tied to stress.

I had things mostly under control from about august last year until october this year. The only thing that developed during that time was lactose intolerance, which seems to worsen as time goes on. And occasionally, very fatty foods will cause me issues as well, and send me to the bathroom fairly urgently.

Anyways, in October, things were normal, but I had a bad bout of diahrea after some food that didn't sit right (which I can't even remember now) and there was some blood. I was sent for a colonoscopy, and it was determined that it was a hemmy - everything else was clear. But my GI doctor noted that I had a positive TtG IgA test of 25, and that she thought I may have celiac so I was scheduled for an endoscopy.

Well, the stress of this sent my system into overdrive, and I have been dealing with a lot of indigestion issues. During the endo, it was discovered that I had a Schatzki Ring, but visually, no other issues were seen. Biopsies were taken.

Given my issues and bloodwork, is it likely that my results are negative? I am still waiting for biopsies, and she has still ordered me to eat gluten free. I do notice my symptoms are beginning to calm down a little after a week, but it could also be due to my stress levels decreasing. I can be a bit of a hypochondriac in the sense that I obsess over symptoms and that sends me into a tail spin and gets me worried about other more deadly things. But if there was no damage visible during endocsopy, I am now wondering what the diagnosis will be...

Thanks


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ennis-TX Grand Master

First this disease is genetic, if your mother has it then you can develop it at any point in your life, many find a illness or bout of stress activated the gene.
Lactose intolerance is common with this disease as the tips of the villi produce the enzymes to break it down. So as it progresses many lose the ability to digest lactose, it does sometimes come back with healing.
You had positive blood test on one test, even if your biopsies come back clean you should consider a full panel or going gluten free anyway and seeing how many issues resolve.
Biopsies, your intestines splayed out have the area of a tennis court...they are taking tiny biopsies and looking under a microscope. If your damage is patchy still then they might miss it.

Now on the bright side, anxiety, indigestion, loose stools, and D are all known symptoms of celiac, and many if not all could resolve in 6 months to a year of a gluten free diet (assuming your not exposed often)

Phosis Explorer

Thank you for the response. I have been looking it up and I did test positive, and it seems like false negatives are not very common. I will make sure even if the results are negative that they keep looking for reasons, but it sounds like I am on the right track to stay on a gluten free diet as it does seem to be having some effect. This makes me feel much better actually talking to someone else. 

cyclinglady Grand Master

If your GI used an older scope, your small intestine might look just fine (like mine did).  But the proof is in the biopsies.  There is a chance that damage areas could be missed as Ennis suggested.  I think your GI is most likely diagnosing you a bit early with a family history and a positive TTG.  But for those who are reading this response, you should wait until you get the biopsy results before going gluten free.  Lab results can get misplaced or damaged.  Who would want to go back on gluten if they had to do a repeat blood test or biopsies?  Not me!  Celiacs tend to react even more, once you have gone gluten free.  

New Mayo study shows that 44% of first-degree relatives (parents, siblings, kids) have celiac disease even if symptom free!  

https://www.news-medical.net/news/20190822/Mayo-Clinic-Study-Calls-For-Screening-Of-Family-Members-Of-Celiac-Disease-Patients.aspx

Phosis Explorer

Thanks.

My problem is I work a full time job and just to manage the systems properly, going gluten free seems to have been a necessary change. It was so bad I missed a week and a half of work. While I am certainly still having issues, things seem to be calming down significantly for me now. But who knows what will happen going forward!

cyclinglady Grand Master
(edited)
1 hour ago, Phosis said:

Thanks.

My problem is I work a full time job and just to manage the systems properly, going gluten free seems to have been a necessary change. It was so bad I missed a week and a half of work. While I am certainly still having issues, things seem to be calming down significantly for me now. But who knows what will happen going forward!

I would be shocked if your biopsies do not show damage.  Not with a mother with celiac and an elevated TTG.  Not sure of  the lab range. If it is slightly above the normal range, an elevated TTG could be attributed to another illness like Crohn’s.  My niece had celiac disease firmly out (full blood panel: TTG, DGP, EMA) and biopsies.  Still having issues, her fourth GI ordered a pill camera and found damage beyond the reach of both scopes.  She knows she can still develop celiac disease and should be re-screened.  Just like my kid who has been screened twice in the last six years, but does not have celiac disease as of now.   

Feeling good so soon on the gluten-free diet tells you so much.  Gluten is not for you.  

Edited by cyclinglady
Phosis Explorer

An update: my doctor confirmed celiac. I do not have all the details in front of me but "total vilious atrophy" or something like that. And also chronic gastritis. H pylori biopsy negative. Had extensive bloodwork checking liver pancreas and gallbladder and no issues there or anywhere else. So it looks like I have my answer.

I am mostly okay with it. I don't like that my family will have to deal with asome of the necessary lifestyle changes. But I have always looked at food as fuel and never really been motivated to eat out of pleasure. That said I realize I probably have a long difficult road of adjustment, specifically due to things such as cross contamination. So the annoyance factor is certainly high. Plus of course I am still uncomfortable and there are many food sensitivities I have developed that I need to tread lightly around.

Either way here we are!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

Welcome to the club that you never wanted to join! ? At least take comfort knowing you have a diagnosis.  So many people do not know.  ?

Research is your best defense.?  Learn all that you can about avoiding gluten.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,569
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    DeanaP
    Newest Member
    DeanaP
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Cat M
      Ah ok, I just saw didn’t even post the DGP IgA at all. 😫 I started with itching and hives Jan 2024, been taking a ton of meds and on Xolair and even that is not providing total relief. The other primary symptoms: intermittent but worsening abdominal pain, diarrhea and bloating. This summer I am just exhausted. I uploaded my 23andMe data to genetic lifehacks and discovered quite a few variations, including DQ2, MTHFR, VDR and I have always had very low ferritin, vitamin D and B12. I still think that mast cell disease makes the most sense, but latest labs show I am barely in range for thiamine, zinc and vitamin A, so the GI stuff feels more important to figure out than the hives right now. I did SIBO testing this morning. TTG IGA <2   0-3 is negative TTG IGG  3   0-5 is neg DGP IGA 21    20-30 is weak positive DGP IGG 4    0-19 is negative Although total IGA is not resulted, there is a footnote stating it was low and the reason they ran IGG.  
    • Scott Adams
      This is an interesting case. A positive tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibody with a negative endomysial antibody (EMA) and normal duodenal histology can present a diagnostic challenge, especially in an asymptomatic patient. While the absence of villous atrophy and negative EMA suggest that the likelihood of active celiac disease is low at this time, such serological discordance may still warrant monitoring. Some individuals may be in the early stages of celiac disease, often referred to as potential celiac disease, particularly if they carry the HLA-DQ2 or DQ8 haplotypes. HLA typing can be quite helpful in this situation; a negative result would virtually rule out celiac disease, whereas a positive result may justify periodic follow-up to monitor for evolving disease. The risk of progression to overt celiac disease is not well defined but appears to be higher in children, those with a family history, or those with autoimmune conditions. In this case, routine follow-up including repeat serology and consideration of symptoms or new risk factors over time would be a reasonable and cautious approach. For people with celiac disease hidden gluten in their diets is the main cause of elevated Tissue Transglutaminase IgA Antibodies (tTG-IgA), but there are other conditions, including cow's milk/casein intolerance, that can also cause this, and here is an article about the other possible causes:      
    • Scott Adams
      Have you tried to start a gluten-free diet since your diagnosis in 2019?
    • trents
      Welcome to celiac.com, @Wamedh Taj-Aldeen! Just curious, what is your relationship to the patient? Are you the attending physician? A medical student? A consulted physician? Was a total IGA test ordered? Some physicians are under the dated and mistaken impression that such is only necessary in young children. If total IGA is low, other IGA antibody numbers will be artificially depressed. By the way, it is not unusual to have a positive TTG-IGA and a negative EMA. Are the TTG-IGA numbers borderline high or unequivocally high? There are other diseases and medical conditions that can cause elevated TTG-IGA numbers besides celiac disease but when this is the case, the numbers are usually not dramatically elevated. It can also be the case that villous damage was patchy and affected areas were missed during the biopsy. Or, onset of celiac disease was very recent and villous atrophy has not yet progressed to the point of detectability.  We also have occasional anecdotal reports in this online community of positive antibody testing with negative histology, as you report. But we also know that gluten intolerance can manifest itself apart from enteropathy. It can damage other organ systems. Many celiacs are of the "silent" type, meaning there is an absence or a relative absence of symptoms until the disease has become advanced and there is significant damage to the villous lining or other organ systems. But to answer your questions: 1. I would definitely pursue a routine follow-up and recheck of the antibodies. And, I would order a complete celiac panel including total IGA and IGG stuff in say, six months. Sooner if symptoms manifest. 2. It is impossible to say what is the risk of the future development of over celiac disease. I refer you back to my #1 above concerning rechecking.  3. I would definitely pursue HLA DQ2/DQ8 typing as it can be used as a rule out for celiac disease, though not quite with 100% dependability. I hope my thoughts prove helpful to you.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @dominiqueccms! Unfortunately, your story is all too common. Some older physicians are dismissive when it comes to gluten intolerance disorders and have this attitude like, "It's the latest fad disease." My advice to you is to get another doctor who has more current knowledge in this area and will take this seriously. In the meantime, this might be helpful: In six months to a year you would do well to get your antibody numbers rechecked to see if you are succeeding in your efforts to eat gluten free. Do you have the numbers from the original testing?
×
×
  • Create New...