Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

IBS diagnosis due to negative biopsy.


Catusha

Recommended Posts

Catusha Newbie

Hi, looking for input and thoughts! 

Late 2016 I developed persistent D and other gastrointestinal symptoms. A GP assumed it was an infection and put me on Flagyl for 10 days. However I had recurrent symptoms for almost 6 months before I went to another GP. In that time I had followed a fairly low FODMAP diet as I found that it didn't irritate my symptoms. I also have never been a big bread or pasta eater too, so I may have been inadvertently avoiding gluten already for 1-2 months before I saw this next GP. She ordered the basic tests and coeliac came back negative. I believe she did ask me if I was consuming gluten at the time and because I wasnt consciously avoiding it I told her I was consuming gluten  (hindsight is 20/20!). 

She referred me to a specialist who did a gastroscopy and colonoscopy with biopsies, all of which were fine. By this stage I think I was definitely accidentally gluten free and the specialist did not ask me about this. So the official diagnosis was post-infectious IBS. He did a spate of hydrogen methane breath tests which showed that I was sensitive to lactose and sorbitol. I managed my symptoms alone after this, mostly by staying low FODMAP (and gluten-free). 

2 years later and I have been living overseas for a while in a country where bread consumption is high. My symptoms haven't been as under control as they were in my home country because of the difference in diet and food staples and accessibility of special health foods. 

In the past 6 months I have been diagnosed with B12 deficiency (not pernicious anaemia though), hypothyroidism (doesn't seem to be autoimmune related though),  low vitamin D, slightly low red blood cell count, ESR of 26, and have suffered anxiety and depression and been prescribed medication for this (first time ever). There were also symptoms associated with the hypothyroidism that have crossover with coeliac. 

There is something niggling in the back of my mind that perhaps my IBS diagnosis wasn't correct because upon reflection I realised I wasn't consuming much (if any) gluten when going through testing and to this day my preference is to avoid such things because of the associated feelings afterwards. 

My question is, is it worth doing a challenge and requesting a blood test?  Am I just in my head about this and should accept the IBS diagnosis? Has anyone else had false negatives? 

Thank you! 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

Hi!  

Only you can decide whether or not a gluten challenge is right for you.  One to two slices of bread (or equivalent) per day for 8 to 12 weeks for the blood tests.  If you are going to do it, please insist on the entire celiac blood panel (TTG, EMA and DGP).  Why?  Because I tested positive to only the DGP IgA and that includes several follow-up tests.  My diagnosis would not have been caught if my GI had not ordered the entire panel (biopsies confirmed diagnosis).  

If you choose not to do the challenge, you will need to determine if you want to stay gluten free or not.  It sounds like it will not be easy, but it can be done.  

False negatives?  I have seen plenty of members who report this.  I wish more doctors were aware that a full gluten diet is critical for all celiac disease testing.  

I wish you well.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,037
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Lcd
    Newest Member
    Lcd
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • kate g
      Ive read articles that there is stage 2 research being conducted for drugs that will limit damage to celiacs through cross contamination- how close are they to this will there be enough funding to create a mainstream drug? 
    • cristiana
      Hi @Karmmacalling I'm very sorry to hear you are feeling so unwell.  Can you tell us exactly what sort of pain you are experiencing and where the pain is?  Is it your lower abdomen, upper abdomen etc?  Do you have any other symptoms? Cristiana
    • trents
      The NIH article you link actually supports what I have been trying to explain to you: "Celiac disease (celiac disease) is an autoimmune-mediated enteropathy triggered by dietary gluten in genetically prone individuals. The current treatment for celiac disease is a strict lifelong gluten-free diet. However, in some celiac disease patients following a strict gluten-free diet, the symptoms do not remit. These cases may be refractory celiac disease or due to gluten contamination; however, the lack of response could be related to other dietary ingredients, such as maize, which is one of the most common alternatives to wheat used in the gluten-free diet. In some celiac disease patients, as a rare event, peptides from maize prolamins could induce a celiac-like immune response by similar or alternative pathogenic mechanisms to those used by wheat gluten peptides. This is supported by several shared features between wheat and maize prolamins and by some experimental results. Given that gluten peptides induce an immune response of the intestinal mucosa both in vivo and in vitro, peptides from maize prolamins could also be tested to determine whether they also induce a cellular immune response. Hypothetically, maize prolamins could be harmful for a very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients, especially those that are non-responsive, and if it is confirmed, they should follow, in addition to a gluten-free, a maize-free diet." Notice that those for whom it is suggested to follow a maize-free diet are a "very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients". Please don't try to make your own experience normative for the entire celiac community.  Notice also that the last part of the concluding sentence in the paragraph does not equate a gluten-free diet with a maize-free diet, it actually puts them in juxtaposition to one another. In other words, they are different but for a "limited subgroup of celiac disease patients" they produce the same or a similar reaction. You refer to celiac reactions to cereal grain prolamins as "allergic" reactions and "food sensitivity". For instance, you say, "NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing" and "IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. I need to remind you that celiac disease is not an allergy, it is an autoimmune disorder. Neither allergy testing nor food sensitivity testing can be used to diagnose celiac disease. Allergy testing and food sensitivity testing cannot detect the antibodies produced by celiac disease in reaction to gluten ingestion.  You say of me, "You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant . . ." Gluten intolerance is synonymous with celiac disease. You must be referring to gluten sensitivity or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). Actually, I have been officially diagnosed with celiac disease both by blood antibody testing and by endoscopy/positive biopsy. Reacting to all cereal grain prolamins does not define celiac disease. If you are intent on teaching the truth, please get it straight first.
    • Bebygirl01
      Perhaps you would still like to answer the questions I posed on this topic, because that is all I asked. I am curious to know the answers to those questions, I do not care about the background of Dr. Osborne as I am more aware of the situation than you are, and he is also one of the best known authors out there on Celiac disease. But did you even bother to read the three Research Papers I posted by NIH? You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant and not yet reacting to all glutens aka grains, but I AM one of those who react to ALL the glutens, and again, that is one of the two questions I originally posted on this matter. NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing. I started with the failed FDA explanation of what Gluten Free is and I stayed sick and got even sicker. It wasn't until I came across NIH's papers and went off all grains that I realized that in fact, I am Celiac and reacting to all the glutens. IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. Those who are just getting started with learning about grains etc., can take it easy by just being "grain free' and eating a lot of meat, vegetables, etc. or whole foods as God has intended, without buying so called gluten free garbage out there that is making them sick and the whole reason they are not better. I tried the stupid gluten free garbage and it didn't work, and that will make anyone want to give up, it is better to teach the entire truth and let the patient decide, rather than give them misinformation and lies.
    • Nicola McGuire
      Thank you so much I will speak to the doctor for dietician apt . Thank you for your advice Beth much appreciated 
×
×
  • Create New...