Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Do I need to know if my gluten intolerance is celiac?


Zohre

Recommended Posts

Zohre Newbie

I discovered I have gluten intolerance more than a year ago. I went to an alargy sepecialist when I realized something was not right with my body. I had problem digesting and my skin got flushed a lot. At the time, I thought my problem was with dairy. The specialist was dismissive of my symptoms and didn't take it seriously. He told me I was "probably" intolerant to lactose and needed to try different types of dairy and see which ones cause problem. I did as he said and cut off most dairy products. My symptoms got better but didn't go away completely. Then I heard that a lot of people with digestion issues have gluten intolerance. Since I didn't have a good experience with going to the doctor, I decided to test on my own. I cut off gluten and it was like I was an other person. I had symptoms I didn't even know were symptoms; horrible joint paint, muscle ache, headaches, fetigue. My digestion got a lot better and my skin improved a lot, not only the flushing got better but the acne on my back and shoulders started to heal. After a couple of weeks I had some oatmeal (I didn't know oats needed to be certified gluten free to be safe for consumption.) I had some for dinner and then breakfast the next morning and at about noon, all hell broke loose. I became foggy and tired all of a sudden and then my ancle started hurting so bad I could hardly walk and the pain started traveling through my body. That's how I knew for sure I had gluten intolerance.

The other change I noticed after going without gluten for a few months is that my period cycle changed back to how it used to be when I was a young girl.

I know I was rambling, but my question is this: Is it important for me to know if my gluten intolerance is celiac or non-celiac? Does it really make a difference?

For doing the test, they say you have to consum gluten for at least a month and I don't really want to do that. I don't think I can take the symptoms and I know that amount of gluten will have long term affects on my health.

Is DNA testing a solid option?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master

DNA testing only excludes Celiac because just having a gene for Celiac doesn’t mean you have Celiac.  It has to be “ turned on”.  So about 30% of people have a gene related to Celiac - but only about 1% actually have Celiac.  
 

If you don’t want to do a 12 week gluten challenge for a blood test- I would say “don’t”.  Just stay very gluten-free.  From things I have seen- there will be better  tests in the years to come,  that won’t need as much of a challenge.  

GFinDC Veteran

The gluten challenge done before celiac testing is 12 weeks for the blood antibody testing and 2 weeks for the endoscopy test.  The challenge requires eating a certain amount of gluten each day.  A single slice of wheat bread is generally considered enough.  But they do have a formula that goes by body weight to determine the gluten amount required.  Most doctors want people to have both positive blood antibodies and positive endoscopy results before they will diagnose celiac disease.

As Karen said, celiac testing may improve in the future.  Then it may be easier to find out if a person is celiac or NCGS (non-celiac gluten sensitive).  The treatment is the same though.  If your body can't tolerate eating gluten, then don't eat it!

Welcome to the forum! :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,994
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    DawnMaureen
    Newest Member
    DawnMaureen
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Okay, it does make sense to continue the gluten challenge as long as you are already in the middle of it. But what will change if you rule it out? I mean, you have concluded that whatever label you want to give the condition, many of your symptoms improved when you went gluten free. Am I correct in that? According to how I understand your posting, the only symptom that hasn't responded to gluten free eating is the bone demineralization. Did I misunderstand? And if you do test positive, what will you do different than you are doing now? You have already been doing for years the main thing you should be doing and that is eating gluten free. Concerning how long you should stay on the gluten challenge, how many weeks are you into it already?
    • WildFlower1
      I mean that I will be re-taking the celiac blood test again while I am currently on the gluten challenge right now, but not sure how many weeks more to keep going, to ensure a false negative does not happen. Thank you.
    • WildFlower1
      Thank you for your help, I am currently in the middle of the gluten challenge. A bit over 6 weeks in. At 4 weeks I got the celiac blood tests and that is when they were negative. So to rule out the false negative, since I’m in the middle of the gluten challenge right now and will never do this again, I wanted to continue consuming gluten to the point to make sure the blood tests are not a false negative - which I did not receive a firm answer for how many weeks total.    My issue is, with these blood tests the doctors say “you are not celiac” and rule it out completely as a potential cause of my issues, when the symptoms scream of it. I want to rule out this 30 year mystery for my own health since I’m in the middle of it right now. Thank you!
    • trents
      I am a male and had developed osteopenia by age 50 which is when I finally got dx with celiac disease. I am sure I had it for at least 13 years before that because it was then I developed idiopathic elevated liver enzymes. I now have a little scoliosis and pronounced kyphosis (upper spine curvature).  All of your symptoms scream of celiac disease, even if the testing you have had done does not. You may be an atypical celiac, meaning the disease is not manifesting itself in your gut but is attacking other body systems. There is such a thing as sero negative celiac disease. But you still have not given me a satisfactory answer to my question of why do you need a differential dx between celiac disease and NCGS when either one would call for complete abstinence from gluten, which you have already been practicing except for short periods when you were undergoing a gluten challenge. Why do you want to put a toxic substance into your body for weeks when, even if it did produce a positive test result for celiac disease, neither you or your doctors would do anything different? Regardless of what doctors are recommending to you, it is your body it is affecting not theirs and they don't seem to have given you any good justification for starting another gluten challenge. Where you live, are doctors kings or something?
    • WildFlower1
      Sorry to put it clearly, at 15, infertility started (tried to word it nicely) meaning menstruation stopped. Which is in correlation to celiac I mean. Thank you. 
×
×
  • Create New...