Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

gluten-free Graham Crackers!


Nantzie

Recommended Posts

Nantzie Collaborator

One of the things I've been missing a lot was graham crackers. Love graham crackers and frosting. And the thought of never being able to have s'mores again... Ugh...

So I decided to figure out what the heck was in them to see if there was any hope of someday figuring out a recipe for them.

When I looked up "graham flour" it turned out all it was was whole wheat flour, just coarsely ground. So nothing terribly special about that. I always thought it was some special type of grain.

Then, the other day, I decided to try making cookies with the Pamela's Baking Mix and saw that it had almond meal in it, giving it a wonderful texture, and a great, slightly nutty taste, and I thought that it would be a perfect flour mix to use for trying out graham crackers.

Then I came across the Nabisco Honeymaid Graham Crackers recipe from Top Secret Recipes. So I decided to try those. www.topsecretrecipes.com Go to Recipes, then View by Brand - Nabisco.

I subsituted Pamela's Ultimate Baking and Pancake Mix for all three cups of the flours.

I put in the salt, baking soda and baking powder the recipe called for, without realizing that Pamela's already has all that in the mix. So it turned out slightly salty, but not by much because graham crackers have a surprising amount of salt in them anyway. They also turned out really crispy and not crumbly at all. The texture was more crisp than a graham cracker, but I'd bet that was more due to my adding the extra salt, baking soda and baking powder than it was a flaw of the recipe.

When you're mixing the flour into the shortening/sugar/honey, it will end up being a bunch of crumbs. (Kind of like making pie crust, if I remember that process right...) Then, as you add the water, it pulls together into a dough. Cut WAY back on the water though. I only added 1/4 cup and it went way past dough and into paste. So I'd add it a tablespoon at a time until you get a workable dough.

Instead of trying to make graham cracker squares, I just made them old school -- Roll a ball of dough about the size of a pecan. Put it on a greased baking sheet. Take a glass, dip it in sugar, and flatten the ball of dough into the desired thickness. You'll get a flat, round cookie with rough edges. When they're baked the roughness pulls together because of the dough spreading a little, and you'll end up with perfectly round cookies.

Baking time for me was only 13 minutes, rather than the 20-25 minutes called for in the recipe.

They turned out SO good.

Nancy


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



tarnalberry Community Regular

nice. congrats on the success, and thanks for letting us know!

jenvan Collaborator

i used to adore graham crackers...will have to try this! thanks!

Becky6 Enthusiast

Thanks for sharing!! I LOVE graham crackers and miss them!!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,265
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Planter
    Newest Member
    Planter
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.2k
    • Total Posts
      71.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      No. That is, unless the dietician themself has a gluten disorder or is managing a close family member who does and therefore is immersed in it daily so as to be up on the nuances of eating gluten free. Otherwise, they just give you very general information which you can get online.  
    • trents
      Yes, a very cryptic and uninformative lab result report indeed! But it does seem like this is typical for the UK. It's almost like the "professionals" in that healthcare system don't want you to try and figure anything out for yourself.
    • xxnonamexx
      Thanks for the explanation. Do you think a dietician is required? I see people ask about getting one but what now will they help with besides charge you to say start away from gluten.
    • trents
      Wow! I think the answers to your questions seem obvious to me but I'll oblige you. It's invasive because they are running a scope into an orifice and down through much of your body. Any procedure that invades the body is invasive. It's expensive because you are paying a trained professional (a doctor) to do it, plus nurses and an anesthesiologist plus you are using expensive equipment. It may not be expensive to you, depending on your insurance plan, but it is expensive as far as the health insurer is concerned. It involves some risk because you would be put under anesthesia and because there is always the danger of tearing something with the scope on the way down through your esophagus, stomach and into your small bowel.    
    • RMJ
      Maybe your followup is for the elevated total IgA, and not for celiac. It is strange not to have a numerical result for the tissue transglutaminase. I hope you get answers in the followup with your GP.
×
×
  • Create New...