Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Press Reporting -- Soy-based Foods Bad For Us!


ms-sillyak-screwed

Recommended Posts

ms-sillyak-screwed Enthusiast

-


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mommida Enthusiast

Finally main stream reporting on this subject!! Hopefully more people will do some more research on the subject.

L

jerseyangel Proficient

That's what I thought this AM when I saw it on the news. At least they are admitting that soy is not the "miracle food" that they always wanted us to believe it was.

Jnkmnky Collaborator

That's why I keep the soy link in my signature. I hate soy. Worse than gluten to remove from your diet!

lonewolf Collaborator

I think soy is pretty close to poison in anything more than small amounts. A teaspoon of soy sauce in a recipe might be okay, but I think mainstream research will start showing that all these people who eat large amounts of it are having problems. I know for me that drinking soy milk really exacerbated my joint pain when I had arthritis. And it can block the absorption of nutrients, which can cause troubles that might not be easily traced to the soy. Good info on the dangers of soy can be found at www.westonaprice.org.

Liz

  • 2 months later...
ms-sillyak-screwed Enthusiast

I was just surfing th net lookinf for soy free chocolate and found this I'd like to share with you.

Open Original Shared Link

mmaccartney Explorer

Wow, I am shocked at your interpretation of this article.

The article does not indicate in any way that soy is "bad for you"! Quite the contrary it indicates that earlier claims of the benefits of soy were incorrect. In fact the article points out that soy is good for you!!

"Soy proteins and isoflavones don't have any major health benefits other than soy protein products are generally good foods," said Dr. Frank Sacks, a professor of nutrition at the Harvard School of Public Health in Boston who led the committee. "They're good to replace other foods that are high in cholesterol."

Still, the Heart Association statement notes that soy products like tofu, soy butter, soy nuts and some soy burgers should be heart-healthy because they contain a lot of polyunsaturated fats, fiber, vitamins and minerals and are low in saturated fat.

Nutrition experts say soy-based foods still are good because they often are eaten in place of less healthy fare like burgers and hot dogs. But they don't have as much direct benefit as had been hoped on cholesterol, one of the top risk factors for heart disease.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



VydorScope Proficient
That's why I keep the soy link in my signature. I hate soy. Worse than gluten to remove from your diet!

There is no link in your signaturre...

jerseyangel Proficient

Back in Jan. when she made that statement, it was still in her signature--I remember, because I went to the link and read it :D Personally, if I could tolerate soy, I would include some in my diet. As it is, I can use soy lechitan in dark chocolate and the soy oil in Smart Balance. I just can't use soy protein, milk or flour--I get GI problems from those. :(

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular

Um, Ms Sillyak, I didn't see anything in the article that indicates that soy is BAD--did you leave something out by mistake?

Guest BERNESES

I don't like soy either (9it makes me feel ill) but I wonder about the prevalence of soy in the Asian countries where it really has some remarkable effects. I wonder if it's the way we PROCESS it (like everything else) that accounts for some of us having problems with it.

For example, I ate edamame (I LOVE it!) and feel fine but if I eat Tropical Source gluten free dairy free chocolate or soy milk or bars, I feel ill. Does anyone else do OK with pure soybeans but not processed soy?

Rusla Enthusiast

Soy is not bad for you unless you are allergic or have a sensitivity to it. Regular soy sauce is primarily salt and gluten. I love tofu but hate soy milk. If anyone thinks anything is a miracle cure for anything they are not all there. I know what is bad for me and what is not. Just like everyone else knows what is bad for them and what is not or what they do or don't like. But there is no way that article says soy is poison, it just says that it is not all it is hyped up to be but that is the same with anything they tout as being the greatest cure all.

They tout eating beef with all it's mad cow, hormones and dyes and none of that is good for anyone, least of all me. As for veggie burgers, nothing says they have to be made out of soy. Most veggie burgers that you buy in a store have gluten in them. Tofu is like any other protein, I think too much of anything is bad for you. I do not eat tofu every day or even every week but I love it with stir fry veggies. I like soy ice cream and have no problems with it but soy milk I find bitter and disagreeable but all milk to me is that way.

Guest BERNESES
Soy is not bad for you unless you are allergic or have a sensitivity to it. Tofu is like any other protein, I think too much of anything is bad for you.

I agree! Completely.

ms-sillyak-screwed Enthusiast

-

tiredofdoctors Enthusiast

Funny thing is, my kids grew up eating Tofu, not even knowing it!! Had allergy testing done as an adult (hadn't had it done for YEARS) and I'm REALLY allergic to soy! "It's like my mother used to always say . . . Little Roseanne Rosannadanna, it's always something . . . .." (Gilda Radner)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - captaincrab55 replied to sillyyak52's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      Family education

    2. - trents replied to SaiP's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      11

      Dangerously underweight, Perfect gluten free and insomnia

    3. - trents replied to AndiOgris's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      False blood test positive?

    4. - SaiP replied to SaiP's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      11

      Dangerously underweight, Perfect gluten free and insomnia

    5. - AndiOgris posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      False blood test positive?


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,172
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Melissa27
    Newest Member
    Melissa27
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • captaincrab55
      Welcome sillyyak52,  I'm not sure of your age or if you live with your parents.  Is there a nurse in your family or friend of the family that may be able to explain your diagnoses?  You can get a second opinion by taking your lab results to another GI Doctor.   Good Luck!
    • trents
      So, you have three symptoms of a gluten-related disorder: weight loss, brain fog and lose stools. Of the three, the lose stools that firm up when you cut back on gluten is the only symptom for which you have reasonable cause to assume is connected to gluten consumption since the other two persist when you cut back on gluten. But since you do not have any formal test results that prove celiac disease, you could just as easily have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). In fact, what testing you have had done indicates you do not have celiac disease. NCGS shares many of the same symptoms of celiac disease but does not damage the lining of the small bowel as does celiac disease. There is no test for it. A diagnosis for NCGS depends on first ruling out celiac disease. It is 10x more common than celiac disease. Some experts feel it can be a precursor to the development of celiac disease. Eliminating gluten is the antidote for both. What muddies this whole question are two things: 1. Lack of official diagnostic data that indicates celiac disease. 2. Your persistence in consuming gluten, even though in smaller amounts. Your anxiety over the insomnia seems to outweigh your anxiety over the weight loss which prevents you from truly testing out the gluten free diet. What other medical testing have you had done recently? I think something else is going on besides a gluten disorder. Have you had a recent CBC (Complete Blood Count) and a recent CMP (Complete Metabolic Panel)? You say you don't believe you have any vitamin and mineral deficiencies but have you actually been tested for any. I certainly would be concerned with that if I was losing weight like you are despite consuming the high amount of calories you are.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @AndiOgris! Recently upgraded guidelines for the "gluten challenge" recommend the daily consumption of at least 10g of gluten for at least 2 weeks to the day of testing to ensure valid testing, either for the antibody testing or the endoscopy/biopsy. 10g of gluten is roughly the amount found in 4-6 slices of wheat bread. So, there is a question in my mind as to whether or not your gluten consumption was intense enough to ensure valid testing the second time around. And was the tTG-IGA the only antibody test that was run? That is far from a comprehensive celiac panel. Concerning your negative biopsy, there is the possibility of patchy damage that was missed due to inadequate sampling as you alluded to. There is also the possibility that the onset of your celiac disease (if you have it) was so new that there had not yet been time to accumulate damage to the small bowel lining. Your total lack of symptoms at the time of diagnosis would seem to support this idea. Having said all that, and this is my informal observation from reading many, many posts like yours over the years, I wonder if you are on the cusp of celiac disease, crossing back and forth across that line for the time being. My suggestion would be to keep a close eye on this for the time being. Watch for the development of symptoms and request a more complete celiac panel a year from now. Here is an article that discusses the various antibody tests that can be run for celiac disease. Note: The EMA test is kind of outdated and expensive. It has been replaced by the tTG-IGA which measures the same thing and is less expensive to run.  
    • SaiP
      Hi, yes. Much more solid and firm, as opposite to diarrhea like when on gluten.
    • AndiOgris
      Hi all I have had a very confusing year with celiac disease (or perhaps not as it turns out) and wondered if anyone can help me make sense of it? My mother was diagnosed with celiac disease (in her 70s) a couple of years ago. I am in my early 40s and did not have any symptoms, but I took a blood test in November 2023 and it came back positive (TTG IGA 23.4 U/ml - normal range is below 7 U/ml). I was referred for a gastroscopy to confirm, which was scheduled for October 2024 (I use the UK health service, things move slowly!). The gastroscopy found no evidence of celiac disease.  My gastroenterologist has asked me to retake the blood test, and it just came back negative (TTG IGA 1.6 U/ml - normal range is below 7 U/ml). Given the long wait between my initial positive blood test and my gastroscopy, I reduced my gluten intake but never avoided it fully. In the 6 weeks before the gastroscopy and the second blood test, I made sure to eat at least two slices of bread a day as recommended, and often I had significantly more.  So what's going on? I understand that false positives are very rare for celiac blood tests, and usually associated with other serious diseases which I am fairly sure I don't have (my health is generally very good). After the negative biopsy, I thought that (i) either they did not take enough samples, or (ii) I have "potential celiac disease". But now that the second blood test has come back negative, I'm running out of plausible explanations...  Can anyone make sense of this? I have not spoken to my gastroenterologist yet - I wanted to get a better sense of where I am beforehand so that I can ask the right questions. Under the UK system, specialist doctors can be very hard to get hold of, so I need to make the most of my time with him! Thanks!        
×
×
  • Create New...