Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

When is the best time to get an Upper Endoscopy after a postive blood test?


GFKerry

Recommended Posts

GFKerry Newbie

Greetings all!

New to the group so not sure if this has been covered somewhere in the thousands of posts.

I was diagnosed through a blood test with Celiac in October. My GE said that he'd like to do a scope but had me scheduled at the end of February. From my reading and understanding, the upper scope should be done soon after diagnosis and while still eating gluten. I will have been gluten-free for almost 5 months by the time of the scope. I'm wondering if I should skip the scope and an unneeded medical procedure or to go ahead and just get it done. I'm feel pretty good now after cutting the gluten and working on regenerating my gut health. Thanks in advance for your thoughts on this.

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GFinDC Veteran

Hi,

You are correct, the endoscopy should be done soon after the positive blood tests.  But it seldom is.  I don't think there is any point in doing the endoscopy after being gluten-free for 5 months.  Instead, you could start eating gluten again and get an endoscopy after 2 weeks.  That's if you really need a firm diagnosis.  Otherwise just stay gluten-free for the rest of your life and don't stress your body by a doing a gluten challenge.

Fenrir Community Regular

You'd be wasting your money on that scope if you are gluten-free for 5 months, there's a pretty goo chance it would come up negative even if you were a celiac at that point. 

Scott Adams Grand Master

I agree, 2 weeks eating gluten likely isn’t enough time...2 months would be the minimum but for some people that isn’t enough time.

Bluesapphire57 Newbie

I was told specifically to not go gluten free until the endoscopy was done. 

GFKerry Newbie
27 minutes ago, GFinDC said:

Hi,

You are correct, the endoscopy should be done soon after the positive blood tests.  But it seldom is.  I don't think there is any point in doing the endoscopy after being gluten-free for 5 months.  Instead, you could start eating gluten again and get an endoscopy after 2 weeks.  That's if you really need a firm diagnosis.  Otherwise just stay gluten-free for the rest of your life and don't stress your body by a doing a gluten challenge.

Thank you! Looks like I need a new GE!

cyclinglady Grand Master

If getting an endoscopy, you would need to consume gluten daily (1 to 2 slices of bread or equivalent) for two weeks:

https://www.cureceliacdisease.org/faq/what-is-a-gluten-challenge/

https://www.beyondceliac.org/celiac-disease/the-gluten-challenge/

The challenge is much much longer (8 to 12 weeks) when getting the blood test, but you already have a positive.  

Was that your GP/PCP or a GI (Gastroenterologist)?  Whoever it was is NOT celiac savvy.  Scary.  If a doctor can not google it, what other diagnosis is he missing?  Yikes!  


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,390
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Ozz lock
    Newest Member
    Ozz lock
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      If you have been eating the gluten equivalent of 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily for say, 4 weeks, I think a repeat blood test would be valid.
    • englishbunny
      it did include Total Immunoglobin A which was 135, and said to be in normal range. when i did the blood test in January I would say I was on a "light' gluten diet, but def not gluten free.  I didn't have any clue about the celiac thing then.  Since then I have been eating a tonne of gluten for the purpose of the endoscopy....so I'm debating just getting my blood test redone right away to see if it has changed so I'm not waiting another month...
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @englishbunny! Did your celiac panel include a test for "Total IGA"? That is a test for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, other IGA test resultls will likely be falsely low. Were you by any chance already practicing a reduced gluten free diet when the blood draw was done?
    • englishbunny
      I'm upset & confused and really need help finding a new gastro who specializes in celiac in California.  Also will welcome any insights on my results. I tested with an isolated positive for deamidated IGA a few months ago (it was 124.3, all other values on celiac panel <1.0), I also have low ferritin and Hashimotos. Mild gastro symptoms which don't seem to get significantly worse with gluten but I can't really tell... my main issues being extreme fatigue and joint pain. The celiac panel was done by my endocrinologist to try and get to the bottom of my fatigue and I was shocked to have a positive result. Just got negative biposy result from endoscopy. Doctor only took two biopsies from small intestine (from an area that appeared red), and both are normal. Problem is his Physician's Assistant can't give me an answer whether I have celiac or not, or what possible reason I might have for having positive antibodies if I don't have it. She wants me to retest bloods in a month and says in the meantime to either "eat gluten or not, it's up to you, but your bloodwork won't be accurate if you don't" I asked if it could be I have early stage celiac so the damage is patchy and missed by only having two samples taken, and she said doctor would've seen damaged areas when performing endoscopy (?) and that it's a good sign if my whole intestine isn't damaged all over, so even if there is spotty damage I am fine.  This doesn't exactly seem satisfactory, and seems to be contrary to so much of the reading and research I have done. I haven't seen the doctor except at my endoscopy, and he was pretty arrogant and didn't take much time to talk. I can't see him or even talk to him for another month. I'm really confused about what I should do. I don't want to just "wait and see" if I have celiac and do real damage in the meantime. Because I know celiac is more that just 'not eating bread' and if I am going to make such a huge lifestyle adjustment I need an actual diagnosis. So in summary I want to find another doctor in CA, preferably Los Angeles but I don't care at this stage if they can do telehealth! I just need some real answers from someone who doesn't talk in riddles. So recommendations would be highly welcomed. I have Blue Shield CA insurance, loads of gastros in LA don’t take insurance at all 😣
    • trents
      Okay, Lori, we can agree on the term "gluten-like". My concern here is that you and other celiacs who do experience celiac reactions to other grains besides wheat, barley and rye are trying to make this normative for the whole celiac community when it isn't. And using the term "gluten" to refer to these other grain proteins is going to be confusing to new celiacs trying to figure out what grains they actually do need to avoid and which they don't. Your experience is not normative so please don't proselytize as if it were.
×
×
  • Create New...