Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Diagnosis?


Jan Meindfak

Recommended Posts

Jan Meindfak Apprentice
(edited)

Hey all! 

After dealing with GI problems for years, 4 months ago I decided to finally start doing something about it and find a cause. My TTG IGA came back positive (90 with <20 meaning positive), but EMA IGA and IGG negative, which has left me with solid dose of uncertainty. Genetic test showed HLA DQ 2.5 positive, but I'm still not convinced. Currently awaiting for biopsy results, but I'm also sceptical about it since doc took only one sample! 

Apart from intestinal sensations over last weeks I've started having terrible knees and back pain, making me feel like a 100 year old, and I'm in my early 20's. 

My question to you, experienced good people, is can it be something else than celiac, and TTG could've been just false positive, or is it just straight road down to celiac disease diagnosis from here?

Edited by Jan Meindfak
Typo

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GFinDC Veteran
(edited)

Hi Jan,

It only takes one positive antibody to cause celiac damage.  So having a negative on other types of antibodies doesn't mean anything.  So, if your endoscopy shows celiac type damage then you have celiac disease.

You may have celiac even if the endoscopy doesn't show it as the damage may not be advanced enough to detect right now. 

Edited by GFinDC
Fenrir Community Regular

With a positive TTG IgA it's about a 98% chance you have a celiac disease but there is a 2% chance you could have a false positive caused by another autoimmune disease. That's why they do the biopsies, you don't want to have an incorrect DX of celiac disease when you may have another autoimmune disease that may require a different treatment.

cyclinglady Grand Master

I only tested positive to the DGP IgA, yet had intestinal damage.  I never had a positive TTG IgA, TTG IgG or EMA even in many follow-up blood tests.   It is a shame that your GI took only one biopsy when the American GI Association and celiac research centers recommend several and in specific locations.  Did your GI tell you why he or she took only one?  

Fenrir Community Regular
13 minutes ago, cyclinglady said:

I only tested positive to the DGP IgA, yet had intestinal damage.  I never had a positive TTG IgA, TTG IgG or EMA even in many follow-up blood tests.   It is a shame that your GI took only one biopsy when the American GI Association and celiac research centers recommend several and in specific locations.  Did your GI tell you why he or she took only one?  

Yeah, one sample isn't good. Should be at least four, but eight would be better. 

Jan Meindfak Apprentice
1 hour ago, cyclinglady said:

I only tested positive to the DGP IgA, yet had intestinal damage.  I never had a positive TTG IgA, TTG IgG or EMA even in many follow-up blood tests.   It is a shame that your GI took only one biopsy when the American GI Association and celiac research centers recommend several and in specific locations.  Did your GI tell you why he or she took only one?  

No, he didn't, and he told me that after, so I couldn't do anything about it. It wasn't the same guy who had ordered endoscopy unfortunately. But there's no way I'm doing it again!

So what do You suggest? Start a gluten-free diet and test for antibodies in 3 months? Because I get conflicting information, as dietician today said 90 with positive over or equal 20 isn't really a lot. But that genetic test seems to be a little more than coincidence, does it?

cyclinglady Grand Master

About 30 to 35% of the population carries the genes that could, I repeat, could develop into celiac disease.  The genetic test just helps rule out celiac disease.  It can not diagnose it.  But with a very positive TTG and a positive genetic test, odds are you probably have celiac disease, but you should wait for your biopsy (pathologist’s report)  and consult with your doctor.  Get and maintain all your medical records.  It is your right.  

To answer your question, yes, you can go gluten free and re-test.  If your TTG is decreasing, you are probably on the right track.  Know that it can take a year for the TTG to normalize.   If your joint issues do not resolve (and that can take months to a year), know that you can have more than one autoimmune disorder or another concurrent illness.  But it is common for celiacs to have joint issues.  


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Jan Meindfak Apprentice
10 hours ago, cyclinglady said:

About 30 to 35% of the population carries the genes that could, I repeat, could develop into celiac disease.  The genetic test just helps rule out celiac disease.  It can not diagnose it.  But with a very positive TTG and a positive genetic test, odds are you probably have celiac disease, but you should wait for your biopsy (pathologist’s report)  and consult with your doctor.  Get and maintain all your medical records.  It is your right.  

To answer your question, yes, you can go gluten free and re-test.  If your TTG is decreasing, you are probably on the right track.  Know that it can take a year for the TTG to normalize.   If your joint issues do not resolve (and that can take months to a year), know that you can have more than one autoimmune disorder or another concurrent illness.  But it is common for celiacs to have joint issues.  

Thank you. I'll do some extra tests to rule out any other possible disorders, and start a diet. I'll check back in when biopsy results come and I consult them with a doc (don't have too much trust to scrubs though anymore). 

  • 3 weeks later...
Jan Meindfak Apprentice

Yep, I've just come back from GI doc, and it's celiac. Tested for RF which came positive, so I'm seeing a rheumie tomorrow. 

Anyway, I've officially joined gluten free club :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,734
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Sandra McCann
    Newest Member
    Sandra McCann
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      I would agree. The tests do not indicate you have celiac disease. So, if you are convinced that when you eliminate gluten from your diet your symptoms improve, I would conclude you have NCGS.
    • Jack Common
      My old results are: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 0.5 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 3.0 is normal) The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 6.6 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 3.0 is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.91 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) IgA Endomysial antibody (EMA) - < 1:10 titer (for the lab I did the tests < 1:10 titer is normal) IgG Endomysial antibody (EMA) - < 1:10 titer (for the lab I did the tests < 1:10 titer is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgA - 0.3 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 6.0 is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 46.1 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 6.0 is normal)   Then I didn't eat gluten for six months and after I started a gluten challenge. Before the challenge I did some tests as RMJ had suggested to do. My results: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 0.5 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 28 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   As trents suggested I ate 6 slices of wheat bread before the tests during the challenge. My results: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.31 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgA - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 2.13 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   As I can understand I don't have celiac disease.
    • trents
      So it sounds like Global Foods has adopted the FDA standard for "gluten free" advertising.
    • cvernon
      Agreed, I am disappointed in the recent GFCO findings as well and definitely don't hold them in as high of a regard as I used to. I did find on the Global Foods website after posting that their required ppm limit is 20ppm, which isn't as low as I had hoped. I'll email and report back. Thx.
    • trents
      Never heard of them. They give an email address so if I were you I would contact them and ask those questions. It would be wonderful if they had tighter requirements than GFCO in the sense of more frequent batch testing and even random testing. Recent news articles on this forum from back in this summer have revealed that GFCO is letting us down.
×
×
  • Create New...