Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Celiac Disease/gluten Sensitivity Vs. Lupus


Chap

Recommended Posts

Chap Newbie

Hi,

I saw my PCP in November 2005, complaining of debilitating fatigue. He ran blood test (only a partial) for Lupus or other connective tissue disorder. He called me two days later and said that he thinks he's found the reason for my extreme fatigue. My test results were as follows:

1. ANA (Anti-Nuclear Anti-Bodies) 1:160 - the norm is 1:40

2. SED/ESR Rate 45 - the norm is 1 - 15 - He says that it indicates inflammation in my body, and the presence of a chronic illness.

3. The CBC (Complete Blood Count) for all red blood cell indices were either high or low. My Total Red Blood Cell Count was low. However, though all the counts were either high/low, they were just slightly out of the limits. The only White Blood Cell Count out of limits was a high EOS. The rest of the white blood cell indices were normal, including the Total White Blood Cell Count. He Positively diagnosed me with Lupus, or some other connective tissue disorder. He then prescribed prednisone for the inflammation. He then referred me to a Rheumatologist for treatment.

HOWEVER, I had a very thorough interview and Examination by the Rheumatologist. She was very attentive, alert, and seemed very knowledgeable. At the end of the exam/interview, she said, "I don't think you have Lupus at all." "I think you have a Wheat Allergy, called Celiac Disease." I was surprised at her preliminary diagnosis, but had run out of time and did not get to ask her why Celiac Disease instead of Lupus. However, she stated that she would run a FULL Lupus Panel just to be safe, and she ran tests for TgG, TgA, and the Anti-Glut (can't spell it). She also order blood work for my liver, kidneys, etc., though I had no complaints.

I'll get test results in three weeks from today. However, out of curiousity, I was wondering if anyone can enlighten me as to why she seemed so positive about Celiac vs. Lupus:

Was it the High EOS? (Indicates a response to Allergies - I looked it up)

Was it because I used to get rashes on my elbows, and have them on my feet now?

Was it the white outline of my gums? (I do need dental work, which I'll be getting in March).

Was it because the fatigue started 30 years ago, and got slowly worst, to be point of being debilitating 30 years later?

Just curious. I'll get the test results in three weeks anyway. Just wondering if anyone else's physicians had commented on any of the above when being diagnosed, or while being in the process of being diagnosed. I have no GI symptoms whatsoever.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nettiebeads Apprentice

I think you have a very good Rhuemy. Celiac is called the great imitator of diseases. It sounds like the supposed lupus hasn't acted or progressed like it normally should. And also, Celiac is closely identified with other conective diseases ie RA. People with untreated celiac have malabsorption issues and that is what leads to many misdiagnosis - the body isn't getting the nutrients it needs to be totally healthy and so manifests the lack of proper nutrition in many many ways. So if indeed you have celiac (and I wouldn't be surprised) the gluten-free diet is the only answer. No drugs, prescriptions, or other things are necessary. But what is great is that the body will begin to heal itself as soon as the offending item (gluten) is eliminated. I'm sure you wouldn't mind an end to the crushing, debilitating fatigue you've experienced for most of your life.

Keep us posted, please!

Annette

Nancym Enthusiast

Celiac is also linked to autoimmune diseases like Lupus. Sometimes getting off the foods you're intolerant to can make those diseases go into remission. You are lucky to have a good rheumy!

Chap Newbie

Thanks for the replies, (Nancy and Nettie). Especially about my having found a very good Rheumatologist. That was my feeling also. Even if she isn't able to pinpoint my problem, at least I feel I've gotten a good shot at it by someone who tried their best, and is extremely knowledgeable in what she does. I've seen at least 20 - 30 docs in my lifetime for annual physicals, minor illnesses, etc., and I always felt that their minds were partially on me, and partially on the line of other patients they are scheduled to see, or have seen. With this lady, I felt that there was no one else in the room other than her and I, her attention was completely on me and my issue, and I could see the "wheels turning in her head." Just my gut feeling. Anyway, I'll get more information at my next appointment in early March.

nettiebeads Apprentice

Have you tried the gluten-free diet? Has your RA dr. ordered the celiac blood panel? Just because you don't have the GI symptoms of celiac disease doesn't mean that damage hasn't been done. There are 200 symptoms of celiac and then there are those who are asymptomatic. If the bloodwork has been done, or if it isn't going to be done, why don't you try the gluten-free diet for 2 weeks and see how you feel - if there is any lessening of the fatigue and other lupus symptoms. It wouldn't hurt, and could actually help. Just a thought.

Annette

Nancym Enthusiast

I'm about to see a rheumatologist too, first time for me. I was just dx'd with gluten sensitivity and I autoimmune issues in my history. I've been on a diet that is similar to the Paleo diet and my symptoms have been really good for awhile. I have been suspecting Lupus for myself too. But... we shall see.

Chap Newbie
Thanks for the replies, (Nancy and Nettie). Especially about my having found a very good Rheumatologist. That was my feeling also. Even if she isn't able to pinpoint my problem, at least I feel I've gotten a good shot at it by someone who tried their best, and is extremely knowledgeable in what she does. I've seen at least 20 - 30 docs in my lifetime for annual physicals, minor illnesses, etc., and I always felt that their minds were partially on me, and partially on the line of other patients they are scheduled to see, or have seen. With this lady, I felt that there was no one else in the room other than her and I, her attention was completely on me and my issue, and I could see the "wheels turning in her head." Just my gut feeling. Anyway, I'll get more information at my next appointment in early March.

Hi Nettie;

Yes, my doc (Rheumy) has ordered the three tests that I think is considered the "Celiac Panel" - The IgG, IgA, and the Anti-emdomyial, I think it's called. The results will be back in three weeks. Oh, and she told me not to change my diet, or anything else until I see her in three weeks. I wondered why, did a bit of research, and I found that if the blood serology is positive, which makes a diagnosis about 90 percent for Celiac, then a biopsy (Endoscopy) is then done to firm up the diagnosis to 100 percent. If a person goes gluden-free before the biopsy, then it could affect the results of the biopsy. She didn't explain this to me, but I was able to figure this out from reading about Celiac disease. However, it has been hard to keep eating wheat, rye, barley, and oats for the past three weeks, if this is in fact the reason for my "unwellness". I've read that a lot of people simply can't stand not knowing, and do try a gluten-free diet between the positive bloodwork and the biopsy, thereby possibly causing the biopsy not to be reliable. So, I'm just going to "tough it out" until the testing is done. I want to be as sure as possible that I do, or do not have Celiac. Oh, and I was reading today that it only takes 0.1 gram of gluden to cause a reaction in a person with Celiac - that's 1/48th of one slice of bread! Amazing.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Known1 replied to Known1's topic in Introduce Yourself / Share Stuff
      16

      Diagnosed Marsh stage 3C in January 2026

    2. - HectorConvector replied to HectorConvector's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      319

      Terrible Neurological Symptoms

    3. - HectorConvector replied to HectorConvector's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      319

      Terrible Neurological Symptoms

    4. - HectorConvector replied to HectorConvector's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      319

      Terrible Neurological Symptoms

    5. - knitty kitty replied to HectorConvector's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      319

      Terrible Neurological Symptoms

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,589
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Ozibella
    Newest Member
    Ozibella
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Known1
      @knitty kitty Holy smokes, that Life Extension B-Complex is burning me up.  My multi-vitamin already has 25mg of Niacin.  The b-complex adds another 100mg on top of that.  My face, neck, and ears look like the Cardinal I use for my profile pic.  I have been on the b-complex for 10-days now and it seems to get a bit worse with each passing day.  I think I am going to drop down to taking 1/2 of the serving size.  In other words, 1 capsule instead of 2.  Hopefully dropping to one does the trick. Have you noticed any side effects from that B-complex?  It is WAY over the daily recommended values: Thanks for your time, Known1
    • HectorConvector
      Evidence from normoglycaemic studies shows that healthy people peak at ~1 hour, and they then return to baseline in 2–3 hours, not 1. CGM shows normal post-meal rises even in metabolically healthy subjects. Clinical tests use the 2-hour value to judge normal glucose clearance. Therefore the 1-hour-back-to-fasting claim contradicts both physiology and clinical diagnostic standards.
    • HectorConvector
      I'm not sure what you're referring to as "normal" here - and is this something your doctor has mentioned (in bold)? As that isn't what any study or official information says. According to diabetes UK and the British Heart Foundation, normal fasting blood sugar is 4.9-5.4mmol/L. Normal by 2 hours from the start of a meal is anywhere below 7.8mmol/L. Random (more than 2 hours after a meal) should be below 5.6mmol/L.  Not in any study of normoglyceamic individuals does blood sugar go down to less than 5.4mmol/L one hour from the start of a meal, and I don't see such numbers being considered a limit for one hour post prandial in any official definition of normal blood sugar ranges anywhere. It is basically impossible even for the most metabolically healthy individual to have a blood sugar level anything like a fasting number 1 hour only after eating a high carb meal. This is also why medical standards use the 2-hour postprandial value, not 1 hour. Blood sugar normally spikes at about 1 hour after a high carb meal.  For example this study shows that young, healthy normoglycaemic people experience a 1hr peak blood sugar level of about 6.5-7mmol/L before which the 2hr number returns to about 4.7mmol/L, slightly higher than the fasting number of that morning. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2769652/?utm_source=chatgpt.com Even a normal person isn't going to be seeing essentially fasting blood sugar numbers after any meal except for one with 0 carbohdrates contents.
    • HectorConvector
      My skin biopsy and MRI scan shows no signs of any type of nerve damage. Nothing consistent with demylination or peripheral nerve damage. On the contrary, the nerve function from the skin biopsy proved better than normal. I don't get any pins and needles or have any loss of nerve function. It's pain only.  Thiamin I take is 100mg a day in tablet. I used to test blood sugar a lot in the past, and it never correlated directly with the nerve pain. It has only correlated with increased exercise and stress. The after eating getting worse thing happens when the blood flow is directed to the stomach for digestion away from the peripheral areas, which is normal, but central sensitization has caused normal sensations to be turned into pain by the brain, according to the latest doctors, hence whey I am being referred to the pain clinic.
    • knitty kitty
      @HectorConvector, My blood glucose level would spike after I ate.  It wouldn't return to "normal" fasting blood glucose level for longer and longer.  Blood glucose level should return to normal an hour after eating.  Mine would take two hours, then three hours, then longer.  So over night fasting blood tests wouldn't necessarily be very high until they got really bad.  But the peripheral neuropathy would feel the worst while my glucose was too high.  My blood glucose meter confirmed this.   On top of all that, my Celiac disease was still undiagnosed at the time, and I was suffering from malabsorption and nutritional deficiencies.  The deficiencies in B vitamins affected not just insulin production in the pancreas, but also the nerves in my extremities.  Nerves need B vitamins to maintain the myelin sheath protecting the nerves (like the plastic coating on electrical wires) when they fire.  When the myelin sheath is not maintained, that "pins and needles" feeling starts and increases as more of the sheath is damaged.  My parathesia progressed until the "pins and needles" went from my toes all the way up to my thighs.   Without sufficient vitamins, I started slowly losing weight.  Our bodies will start using not only stored fat, but also tear down our own muscles to provide fuel for the body to stay functional.   I hope you don't have pre-diabetes or diabetes.  Most diabetics have a thiamine deficiency.   How much thiamine are you taking?  What form of Thiamine are you taking?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.