Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gluten Intolerant Vs. Celiac

Guest cassidy

By Guest cassidy
in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms

Recommended Posts

Guest cassidy
Guest cassidy
Posted

I had a negative blood test and negative biopsy (5 weeks gluten free), so I may not have Celiac. I know I have a 100% positive result from the diet, so I know there is a reason that I can't eat gluten. After about 7 weeks gluten free I really feel great. No more gas, bloating, D, stomach pain after eating, brain fog, shakiness, irritability, headaches.

My question is that when people are talking about how long it takes for their symptoms to go away after going gluten free, does it take longer if you have Celiac versus a gluten intolerance? If you have Celiac, then you have intestinal damage that has to heal (right?). If you are intolerant, do you have any damage that has to heal, or do you just get better because you aren't constantly feeding your body something that it can't process?

I am wondering if there are other things that I didn't realize are symptoms, and may go away over time, if I still need to heal. Like Gerd, I know people have said it is related. My gerd hasn't gotten any better so I don't know if mine is related. I'm wondering if after a year gluten free if it will just go away (I know that no one can predict this)?

Also, do people who are intolerant have different symptoms than those that have Celiac. I know most people have the usual abdominal symptoms, but the other the not-so-common symptoms like teeth with enamel problems (I had that) and gerd?

None of this will change my dedication to my diet, but I'm curious.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Rachel--24 Collaborator
Rachel--24
Posted
.

My question is that when people are talking about how long it takes for their symptoms to go away after going gluten free, does it take longer if you have Celiac versus a gluten intolerance? If you have Celiac, then you have intestinal damage that has to heal (right?). If you are intolerant, do you have any damage that has to heal, or do you just get better because you aren't constantly feeding your body something that it can't process?

You can have Celiac and not have much intestinal damage or none at all. This could be the case if you are only in the beginning stages of the disease....damage may not have occurred yet or it may have been at a minimun alllowing you to heal quickly. Gluten Intolerance can cause intestinal damage but will not flatten the villi like what is seen in Celiac. Gluten intolerance can cause leaky gut and still lead to malabsorption and other food intolerances.

I am wondering if there are other things that I didn't realize are symptoms, and may go away over time, if I still need to heal. Like Gerd, I know people have said it is related. My gerd hasn't gotten any better so I don't know if mine is related. I'm wondering if after a year gluten free if it will just go away (I know that no one can predict this)?

It may or may not go away. Only time will tell.

Also, do people who are intolerant have different symptoms than those that have Celiac. I know most people have the usual abdominal symptoms, but the other the not-so-common symptoms like teeth with enamel problems (I had that) and gerd?

Symptoms alone cannot determine whether you have Celiac or an intolerance. The symptoms can be caused by either. You can always get gene testing to determine if you carry a Celiac gene. This still wont tell you if you have Celiac or not but if you did carry a gene and are symptomatic when eating gluten it would be safe to assume that continuing to consume gluten will eventually lead to Celiac....if it hasnt already.

tiredofdoctors Enthusiast
tiredofdoctors
Posted

I agree with Rachel. I'm gluten intolerant, but because I produce other antibodies against perkinje cells, it is affecting the my brain, eyes and the nerves in my hands & feet. I'm celiac negative, but it just affects me in a different way, so I'm WAY gluten-free.

Felidae Enthusiast
Felidae
Posted
My question is that when people are talking about how long it takes for their symptoms to go away after going gluten free, does it take longer if you have Celiac versus a gluten intolerance? If you have Celiac, then you have intestinal damage that has to heal (right?). If you are intolerant, do you have any damage that has to heal, or do you just get better because you aren't constantly feeding your body something that it can't process?

Also, do people who are intolerant have different symptoms than those that have Celiac. I know most people have the usual abdominal symptoms, but the other the not-so-common symptoms like teeth with enamel problems (I had that) and gerd?

I had many of the same symptoms as you and they eventually went away on the gluten-free diet. I don't know if I have celiac, but I am definitely gluten intolerant. It took about four months before I had normal bms, even though I had great improvements in all of my symptoms immediately. At four months I had to eliminate all dairy also. And, at six or seven months I would say I was as normal as a person can be. So, it may take time, but it is so worth it.

I had severely receding gums for the past six years and I also had a bad dentist who said don't worry about it. My current and great dentist mentioned something about my enamel, I don't remember what it was. My gums seem to have slowed their recession. My hair was falling out, not anymore. I had migraines and anxiety (probably due to constant D), not anymore.

Claire Collaborator
Claire
Posted

I will drop in here and add comments to follow Lynne's.

A new GI recently told me what I have been thinking (out loud a lot) that gluten intolerance and celiac are two sides of the same coin. You can have intestinal damage with gluten intolerance and there are diagnosed celiacs who have none. The doctor felt that one day these two genetic disorders will be considered the same thing. Goodness, even celiacs don't all have the same symptoms.

Like Lynne, I have the neurological problems. I do not have the Celiac genes. However this new GI specialist was quick to point out that there are other genes being identified with celiac that are not yet being tested - so all a negative test proves is that you don't have the genes that are currently available for testing.

I recently went through SCA testing - but only 9 out of 26 possibles can be tested, I was negative for the 9.

Note that the gluten intolerance seems to be more correlated to neurological disorder than does celiac - though that is not a complete exclusion of celiac in neuro problems.

I get the small intestine biopsy at the end of this month. Hopefully if there was any damage it will not have healed. That takes upwards to two years. Then of course, if I am gluten intolerant, there may be no damage and without it no doctor will diagnose Celiac. I will be in the same spot as I was with the SCA. Claire

tiredofdoctors Enthusiast
tiredofdoctors
Posted

The up-side to your story, though, Claire, is that you are a reasonable, educated person, and you know your body VERY WELL. So, regardless of what "label" they are going to paste onto your chart, in your heart, you know that you're gluten intolerant, given the symptoms that you have. I have so much admiration for you -- for your knowledge, for your perserverance, and for your ability to continue to remain objective about a VERY emotional issue. You are remarkable. And that's really all you need to remember . . .

Guest cassidy
Guest cassidy
Posted

My mother has dh, so I'm wondering the odds of being gluten intolerant, versus celiac since I know that celiac is genetic, and I don't know if intolerance is. I don't know if that would be a weird coincidence or not, but I did have a negative blood test and biopsy. I guess I'm still on the right track with being gluten-free and I look forward to feeling even better over time.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Claire Collaborator
Claire
Posted
My mother has dh, so I'm wondering the odds of being gluten intolerant, versus celiac since I know that celiac is genetic, and I don't know if intolerance is. I don't know if that would be a weird coincidence or not, but I did have a negative blood test and biopsy. I guess I'm still on the right track with being gluten-free and I look forward to feeling even better over time.

Gluten intolerance is also genetic. I wrote in another thread that my new GI specialist believes that gluten intolerance and celiac are just different manifistations of the same inherited disorder. Someday, hopefully, it will be defined that way. This subject is mentioned in Dangerous Grains. Claire

The up-side to your story, though, Claire, is that you are a reasonable, educated person, and you know your body VERY WELL. So, regardless of what "label" they are going to paste onto your chart, in your heart, you know that you're gluten intolerant, given the symptoms that you have. I have so much admiration for you -- for your knowledge, for your perserverance, and for your ability to continue to remain objective about a VERY emotional issue. You are remarkable. And that's really all you need to remember . . .

Thank you, cheer leader!

I really would like a diagnosis - especially if this is a genetic problem. I will never get one family member to be tested without a solid diagnosis. I probably won't get many to be tested anyway - even with one. I raised ostriches! Imagine that - me who wants to know every detail - has children who don't want to know anything unless it is happy news or the Steelers won. Claire

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,390
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Ozz lock
    Newest Member
    Ozz lock
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Negative biopsy and seeking doctor recs in Los Angeles

      By trents · Posted

      If you have been eating the gluten equivalent of 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily for say, 4 weeks, I think a repeat blood test would be valid.
    • englishbunny
      Negative biopsy and seeking doctor recs in Los Angeles

      By englishbunny · Posted

      it did include Total Immunoglobin A which was 135, and said to be in normal range. when i did the blood test in January I would say I was on a "light' gluten diet, but def not gluten free.  I didn't have any clue about the celiac thing then.  Since then I have been eating a tonne of gluten for the purpose of the endoscopy....so I'm debating just getting my blood test redone right away to see if it has changed so I'm not waiting another month...
    • trents
      Negative biopsy and seeking doctor recs in Los Angeles

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @englishbunny! Did your celiac panel include a test for "Total IGA"? That is a test for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, other IGA test resultls will likely be falsely low. Were you by any chance already practicing a reduced gluten free diet when the blood draw was done?
    • englishbunny
      Negative biopsy and seeking doctor recs in Los Angeles

      By englishbunny · Posted

      I'm upset & confused and really need help finding a new gastro who specializes in celiac in California.  Also will welcome any insights on my results. I tested with an isolated positive for deamidated IGA a few months ago (it was 124.3, all other values on celiac panel <1.0), I also have low ferritin and Hashimotos. Mild gastro symptoms which don't seem to get significantly worse with gluten but I can't really tell... my main issues being extreme fatigue and joint pain. The celiac panel was done by my endocrinologist to try and get to the bottom of my fatigue and I was shocked to have a positive result. Just got negative biposy result from endoscopy. Doctor only took two biopsies from small intestine (from an area that appeared red), and both are normal. Problem is his Physician's Assistant can't give me an answer whether I have celiac or not, or what possible reason I might have for having positive antibodies if I don't have it. She wants me to retest bloods in a month and says in the meantime to either "eat gluten or not, it's up to you, but your bloodwork won't be accurate if you don't" I asked if it could be I have early stage celiac so the damage is patchy and missed by only having two samples taken, and she said doctor would've seen damaged areas when performing endoscopy (?) and that it's a good sign if my whole intestine isn't damaged all over, so even if there is spotty damage I am fine.  This doesn't exactly seem satisfactory, and seems to be contrary to so much of the reading and research I have done. I haven't seen the doctor except at my endoscopy, and he was pretty arrogant and didn't take much time to talk. I can't see him or even talk to him for another month. I'm really confused about what I should do. I don't want to just "wait and see" if I have celiac and do real damage in the meantime. Because I know celiac is more that just 'not eating bread' and if I am going to make such a huge lifestyle adjustment I need an actual diagnosis. So in summary I want to find another doctor in CA, preferably Los Angeles but I don't care at this stage if they can do telehealth! I just need some real answers from someone who doesn't talk in riddles. So recommendations would be highly welcomed. I have Blue Shield CA insurance, loads of gastros in LA don’t take insurance at all 😣
    • trents
      Oats gluten free?

      By trents · Posted

      Okay, Lori, we can agree on the term "gluten-like". My concern here is that you and other celiacs who do experience celiac reactions to other grains besides wheat, barley and rye are trying to make this normative for the whole celiac community when it isn't. And using the term "gluten" to refer to these other grain proteins is going to be confusing to new celiacs trying to figure out what grains they actually do need to avoid and which they don't. Your experience is not normative so please don't proselytize as if it were.
×
×
  • Create New...