Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

How Many Of You Decided You Had Problems Despite Negative Tests?

munchkinette

Recommended Posts

jerseyangel Proficient
jerseyangel
Posted

They talked about it in Dangerous Grains. I believe it's called the rectal challenge.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


penguin Community Regular
penguin
Posted
They talked about it in Dangerous Grains. I believe it's called the rectal challenge.

Well that sounds like fun :o

Maybe I'll start saying "I'd rather have a rectal challenge" instead of "I'd rather have a root canal"

Considering I am so terrified that I have to be heavily drugged at the dentist, I'd probably rather have the wheat up my butt :rolleyes:

Rachel--24 Collaborator
Rachel--24
Posted
Well that sounds like fun :o

Maybe I'll start saying "I'd rather have a rectal challenge" instead of "I'd rather have a root canal"

Considering I am so terrified that I have to be heavily drugged at the dentist, I'd probably rather have the wheat up my butt :rolleyes:

LMAO :lol::lol:

Yeah the test is mentioned in Dangerous Grains but I dont know of anyone whos actually had that test done.

Ummm...hello...who would pick that test? :blink: I'd rather have the biopsy again and again.

jerseyangel Proficient
jerseyangel
Posted

yea--as if the gas and the frequent bathroom visits weren't embarassing enough.......

munchkinette Collaborator
munchkinette
Posted
  • Author

I just finished Dangerous Grains yesterday. I was wondering who would get the rectal challenge instead of the enterolab. The book came out in 2002, so maybe enterolab has gotten more popular since then. (?)

I'm still waiting for my blood test results. I'm also waiting for a reply from my doctor about doing other tests, but I think she's waiting for the blood test before she responds... she normally only takes 2-3 days. (My hospital has a great deal- for $60/year you can email your doctor with questions and get real answers within a few days. Otherwise you get stuck in voicemail purgatory forever.)

CMCM Rising Star
CMCM
Posted
I just finished Dangerous Grains yesterday. I was wondering who would get the rectal challenge instead of the enterolab. The book came out in 2002, so maybe enterolab has gotten more popular since then. (?)

I'm still waiting for my blood test results. I'm also waiting for a reply from my doctor about doing other tests, but I think she's waiting for the blood test before she responds... she normally only takes 2-3 days. (My hospital has a great deal- for $60/year you can email your doctor with questions and get real answers within a few days. Otherwise you get stuck in voicemail purgatory forever.)

Why not just do the Enterolab stool test? It supposedly picks up much more than the blood tests do...with the added plus that you don't have to be currently stuffing yourself with gluten to get an accurate test. I think a lot of us make this diagnosis thing more difficult than it has to be. And let's face it....doctors with their traditional and often not very up to date knowledge of how to test for celiac are generally not "cutting edge" with the diagnosis of celiac. My mom was told for years and years that her symptoms were "all in her head" and she nearly died because of it.

penguin Community Regular
penguin
Posted

I suggested testing for celiac to my Dr. Actually, I was sneakier and said food allergies/intolerances and she said the celiac panel. She was willing to test, but kind of apprehensive. When the results came back with the IgG high, she put me on the diet. I think in the time between that test and my follow up appointment, she did some research because when I said I had the classic symptoms of celiac at my first appointment, she said the symptoms are the same as most other chronic stomach problems. When I went back for the follow up, she was convinced I had it. It's all about finding a Dr. that will work with you, I just got lucky.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


CMCM Rising Star
CMCM
Posted
I suggested testing for celiac to my Dr. Actually, I was sneakier and said food allergies/intolerances and she said the celiac panel. She was willing to test, but kind of apprehensive. When the results came back with the IgG high, she put me on the diet. I think in the time between that test and my follow up appointment, she did some research because when I said I had the classic symptoms of celiac at my first appointment, she said the symptoms are the same as most other chronic stomach problems. When I went back for the follow up, she was convinced I had it. It's all about finding a Dr. that will work with you, I just got lucky.

You are very lucky to have a doctor who was open to the idea, and when realizing she didn't know a lot she actually went to find out about it. Unfortunately, a lot of doctors don't bother with it!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,390
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Ozz lock
    Newest Member
    Ozz lock
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Negative biopsy and seeking doctor recs in Los Angeles

      By trents · Posted

      If you have been eating the gluten equivalent of 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily for say, 4 weeks, I think a repeat blood test would be valid.
    • englishbunny
      Negative biopsy and seeking doctor recs in Los Angeles

      By englishbunny · Posted

      it did include Total Immunoglobin A which was 135, and said to be in normal range. when i did the blood test in January I would say I was on a "light' gluten diet, but def not gluten free.  I didn't have any clue about the celiac thing then.  Since then I have been eating a tonne of gluten for the purpose of the endoscopy....so I'm debating just getting my blood test redone right away to see if it has changed so I'm not waiting another month...
    • trents
      Negative biopsy and seeking doctor recs in Los Angeles

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @englishbunny! Did your celiac panel include a test for "Total IGA"? That is a test for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, other IGA test resultls will likely be falsely low. Were you by any chance already practicing a reduced gluten free diet when the blood draw was done?
    • englishbunny
      Negative biopsy and seeking doctor recs in Los Angeles

      By englishbunny · Posted

      I'm upset & confused and really need help finding a new gastro who specializes in celiac in California.  Also will welcome any insights on my results. I tested with an isolated positive for deamidated IGA a few months ago (it was 124.3, all other values on celiac panel <1.0), I also have low ferritin and Hashimotos. Mild gastro symptoms which don't seem to get significantly worse with gluten but I can't really tell... my main issues being extreme fatigue and joint pain. The celiac panel was done by my endocrinologist to try and get to the bottom of my fatigue and I was shocked to have a positive result. Just got negative biposy result from endoscopy. Doctor only took two biopsies from small intestine (from an area that appeared red), and both are normal. Problem is his Physician's Assistant can't give me an answer whether I have celiac or not, or what possible reason I might have for having positive antibodies if I don't have it. She wants me to retest bloods in a month and says in the meantime to either "eat gluten or not, it's up to you, but your bloodwork won't be accurate if you don't" I asked if it could be I have early stage celiac so the damage is patchy and missed by only having two samples taken, and she said doctor would've seen damaged areas when performing endoscopy (?) and that it's a good sign if my whole intestine isn't damaged all over, so even if there is spotty damage I am fine.  This doesn't exactly seem satisfactory, and seems to be contrary to so much of the reading and research I have done. I haven't seen the doctor except at my endoscopy, and he was pretty arrogant and didn't take much time to talk. I can't see him or even talk to him for another month. I'm really confused about what I should do. I don't want to just "wait and see" if I have celiac and do real damage in the meantime. Because I know celiac is more that just 'not eating bread' and if I am going to make such a huge lifestyle adjustment I need an actual diagnosis. So in summary I want to find another doctor in CA, preferably Los Angeles but I don't care at this stage if they can do telehealth! I just need some real answers from someone who doesn't talk in riddles. So recommendations would be highly welcomed. I have Blue Shield CA insurance, loads of gastros in LA don’t take insurance at all 😣
    • trents
      Oats gluten free?

      By trents · Posted

      Okay, Lori, we can agree on the term "gluten-like". My concern here is that you and other celiacs who do experience celiac reactions to other grains besides wheat, barley and rye are trying to make this normative for the whole celiac community when it isn't. And using the term "gluten" to refer to these other grain proteins is going to be confusing to new celiacs trying to figure out what grains they actually do need to avoid and which they don't. Your experience is not normative so please don't proselytize as if it were.
×
×
  • Create New...