Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Positive Wheat Antibodies, Not Celiac


bonnieo

Recommended Posts

bonnieo Rookie

I have been reading this forum to try to understand if my 7-year-old son could have celiac disease. His doctor suggested that it was possible based on his symptoms and ordered blood work. As most of you know, it takes about a week for the results to come back. When you're talking about a sick child...a week is an awfully long time. Here's a summary of what happened and the doctor's interpretation of the blood test results:

1st blood draw (wheat and milk allergy tests ordered); stop consuming dairy, keep consuming wheat

symptoms improve

Results of 1st blood draw (1 week later) show positive for IGG and IGA -- indicates possible celiac

Doctor ordered 2nd blood draw for more specific wheat antibodies

Results of 2nd blood draw (another week later) show negative for TTG and endomysial iga -- indicates not celiac. But this didn't make sense to me after reading the Enterolab and Dr. Fine articles referred to throughout this forum. I was concered that my son was "glutent sensitive" but not yet celiac. From the information presented on those sites, I had the [incorrect] understanding that wheat antibodies only show up in the blood stream if one is "gluten sensitive" (keep reading for an explanation why they might be there even if one is not "gluten sensitive"). I'm not sure if I misunderstood the Enterolab information or if it is incorrect/misleading.

4 days later the results of the milk allergy (casein) finally came through -- strong positive. It took 19 days for a test that normally takes a week.

So the doctor's conclusion is that my son is allergic to casein (that means milk and anything that is made with milk). His


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mat4mel Apprentice

That is very interesting.. I asked once before it anybody knew what other reasons there could be for an elevated IgG and IgA.. nobody could answer me. This is very frustrating b/c my 2 yr old did not have the other tests you are talking about, and everyone is telling me that she has Celiac simply on the two antigliadin antibodies being high.

She has been gluten free for almost a week and is still having stomach cramps and diarrhea. I have been *very* careful and there is no way she could have gotten any gluten. I have suspected some sort of food allergies and asked several people if they could be causing her diarrhea, but nobody will give me an answer. I can't get into the allergist until October, and the GI dr appt is not until July. My regular pediatrician doesn't seem to have any idea what he's doing, just told me to try the gluten free diet and see if it helps.

She has also been off casein as well this week. I am frustrated I can't get clear answers, and now your post makes me wonder. I am glad your son does not have Celiac. You must be so relieved.

Mel

bonnieo Rookie

Here's what worked for us:

When we went to the pediatrician to discuss my son's issue, I took a detailed write-up describing my son's on-going symptoms. The doctor took me very seriously. I know it's difficult to talk to the doctor when you're trying to keep a two-year-old from touching everything in the exam room. If your child has serious, chronic problems, the doctor should help you get to the right specialist as soon as possible. It may be helpful to have another adult with you to take care of your daughter while you talk to the doctor. The doctor may not understand how serious you think the problem is. If you do your best to communicate with the doctor and you still feel like your child is not getting the prompt attention she needs, I would go to another doctor.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,033
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    BigMamaBex5
    Newest Member
    BigMamaBex5
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • kate g
      Ive read articles that there is stage 2 research being conducted for drugs that will limit damage to celiacs through cross contamination- how close are they to this will there be enough funding to create a mainstream drug? 
    • cristiana
      Hi @Karmmacalling I'm very sorry to hear you are feeling so unwell.  Can you tell us exactly what sort of pain you are experiencing and where the pain is?  Is it your lower abdomen, upper abdomen etc?  Do you have any other symptoms? Cristiana
    • trents
      The NIH article you link actually supports what I have been trying to explain to you: "Celiac disease (celiac disease) is an autoimmune-mediated enteropathy triggered by dietary gluten in genetically prone individuals. The current treatment for celiac disease is a strict lifelong gluten-free diet. However, in some celiac disease patients following a strict gluten-free diet, the symptoms do not remit. These cases may be refractory celiac disease or due to gluten contamination; however, the lack of response could be related to other dietary ingredients, such as maize, which is one of the most common alternatives to wheat used in the gluten-free diet. In some celiac disease patients, as a rare event, peptides from maize prolamins could induce a celiac-like immune response by similar or alternative pathogenic mechanisms to those used by wheat gluten peptides. This is supported by several shared features between wheat and maize prolamins and by some experimental results. Given that gluten peptides induce an immune response of the intestinal mucosa both in vivo and in vitro, peptides from maize prolamins could also be tested to determine whether they also induce a cellular immune response. Hypothetically, maize prolamins could be harmful for a very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients, especially those that are non-responsive, and if it is confirmed, they should follow, in addition to a gluten-free, a maize-free diet." Notice that those for whom it is suggested to follow a maize-free diet are a "very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients". Please don't try to make your own experience normative for the entire celiac community.  Notice also that the last part of the concluding sentence in the paragraph does not equate a gluten-free diet with a maize-free diet, it actually puts them in juxtaposition to one another. In other words, they are different but for a "limited subgroup of celiac disease patients" they produce the same or a similar reaction. You refer to celiac reactions to cereal grain prolamins as "allergic" reactions and "food sensitivity". For instance, you say, "NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing" and "IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. I need to remind you that celiac disease is not an allergy, it is an autoimmune disorder. Neither allergy testing nor food sensitivity testing can be used to diagnose celiac disease. Allergy testing and food sensitivity testing cannot detect the antibodies produced by celiac disease in reaction to gluten ingestion.  You say of me, "You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant . . ." Gluten intolerance is synonymous with celiac disease. You must be referring to gluten sensitivity or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). Actually, I have been officially diagnosed with celiac disease both by blood antibody testing and by endoscopy/positive biopsy. Reacting to all cereal grain prolamins does not define celiac disease. If you are intent on teaching the truth, please get it straight first.
    • Bebygirl01
      Perhaps you would still like to answer the questions I posed on this topic, because that is all I asked. I am curious to know the answers to those questions, I do not care about the background of Dr. Osborne as I am more aware of the situation than you are, and he is also one of the best known authors out there on Celiac disease. But did you even bother to read the three Research Papers I posted by NIH? You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant and not yet reacting to all glutens aka grains, but I AM one of those who react to ALL the glutens, and again, that is one of the two questions I originally posted on this matter. NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing. I started with the failed FDA explanation of what Gluten Free is and I stayed sick and got even sicker. It wasn't until I came across NIH's papers and went off all grains that I realized that in fact, I am Celiac and reacting to all the glutens. IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. Those who are just getting started with learning about grains etc., can take it easy by just being "grain free' and eating a lot of meat, vegetables, etc. or whole foods as God has intended, without buying so called gluten free garbage out there that is making them sick and the whole reason they are not better. I tried the stupid gluten free garbage and it didn't work, and that will make anyone want to give up, it is better to teach the entire truth and let the patient decide, rather than give them misinformation and lies.
    • Nicola McGuire
      Thank you so much I will speak to the doctor for dietician apt . Thank you for your advice Beth much appreciated 
×
×
  • Create New...