Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

'eat What You Want' Pill Caution


Claire

Recommended Posts

Claire Collaborator

This article refers to the Zonulin research we have all heard so much about. Claire

'EAT WHAT YOU WANT' PILL CAUTION

The pill makes the gut less ’leaky’ Experts advise caution about claims of a pill that could enable people with diabetes and coeliac disease to eat foods that are normally off-limits.

People with coeliac disease need to avoid wheat and diabetics sugary foods to manage their medical conditions.

Researchers at the University of Baltimore say a pill that makes the gut more watertight could allow these patients to eat whatever they want, says a BBC report.

But the early studies were on rats and experts questioned the implications.

MORE @: Open Original Shared Link


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Guest Viola

I think I would put that pill down to the "If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is" file.

I sure wouldn't trust my health to any pill that hasn't had at least five or ten years of testing.

penguin Community Regular

I don't see how that would be good in any way shape or form. I can only imagine the side effects and long term effects of a more "watertight" intestine. Besides, if you have an autoimmune disorder, how would that stop the reaction? It doesn't make any sense to me.

Aren't there more important things to research than a get-out-of-jail-free card for diabetics and celiacs? It's not a cure, it's like lactaid or something. Only worse. Ephedrine.

Boo.

plantime Contributor

Every drug has side effects. What will they be for this one? How much worse than celiac will they be? Why should I pay a lot of money for a pill, when I can control the problem by watching what I eat? And, as Chelse said, how would it stop the reaction? Thanks, but no thanks. This pill is not for me.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

I would never touch this pill. For one thing I presented for years with the neurological symptoms, over 30, before the gut problems hit. Gluten is also absorbed by the mucus membranes, the reason many countries do a rectal challange and biopsy, will this pill prevent the mucosal lining of the mouth, esophagus and stomach and rectum from absorbing? Will it only relieve the gut symptoms? Why does our society think we need a pill anyway? Just stop putting this toxic substance in everything, it's not like there are not alternitives, after all.

chrissy Collaborator

if this drug, with time and testing, proves itself to really work and be safe---i'd jump at the chance to get it for my kids!!

christine

Ursa Major Collaborator

Chrissy, the problem is, that many drugs the FDA considered to be perfectly safe for years were anything but safe, in fact, in many cases, they were killing people. I don't think ANY pills are completely safe, they all have side effects. If you have an illness that would kill you unless you take a certain drug, then the side effects are unavoidable, and you would take the drug anyway, of course. But Celiac disease would only (possibly) kill you if you eat gluten containing foods. There are many foods that are naturally gluten free, and more and more food is available that mimics 'normal' food, that is gluten free also. By the time your kids are grown, it will likely even be easier to find gluten free foods than it is now.

Personally, I'd rather stick to a diet that is sure to have no side effects, unless you want to consider being healthy a side effect! ;)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Firegirl43 Contributor

I think I would ralther stick to the diet I take enough pills as it is already :)

Guest BERNESES

I'd take it only before trying foods that hadn't been prepared by me or had the potential to make me react only because I am so sensitive (no gluten free foods unless they are processed in a dedicated facility). I would however NOT opt to take it if it were an every day thing. At least not until it had been around for awhile and I definitely would still stay gluten-free.

jerseyangel Proficient

I would not take it so I could eat a "normal" diet that contained gluten. I would consider it, however, for situations where I could be accidently glutened thru CC. Even then, it would depend on what the side effects were, and anything else I would learn about it.

VegasCeliacBuckeye Collaborator

If that were the case, I still probably wouldn't take it.

The gluten-free diet keeps my weight pretty stable and my health good...

If I could have all the "gluten stuff" again, I would gain 30 pounds in the first month -- haha

Seriously...

pixiegirl Enthusiast

In my opinion its impossible for me to say I will or I won't. I take a wait and see attitude with this, however I travel all the time, a few times a month at least and I'd welcome something that I could take occasionally when I'm forced to eat in restaurants I'm not sure of. There have been a few times I've gotten gluten this way and I'm sick for a long time, really badly for a week and a funky stomach for 2 weeks. So if it was safe and if it worked I might use it for a stop gap measure.

After reading about wheat and how much its changed over 1000's of years (it in no way resembles the plant it use to be) I honestly don't feel its good for anyone. I'm happy with my celiac diet I eat much healthier then I ever did before. But again, if I could use something here and there it would be nice.

I personally think that "soon" medical researchers will learn how to "turn off" our celiac gene. the advances being made in gene research has the potential to fix us. Now the question is: What does soon mean? I don't think it means next year or even 5 years from now, but I do believe its in my lifetime (I'm 51).

Best, Susan

VydorScope Proficient
I would not take it so I could eat a "normal" diet that contained gluten. I would consider it, however, for situations where I could be accidently glutened thru CC. Even then, it would depend on what the side effects were, and anything else I would learn about it.

Exactly.. I would still eat gluten-free, but if wanted to go out to eat ANYPLACE it be nice to have some chance at protection.

happygirl Collaborator

I heard Dr. Paterson, the CEO of Alba Therapeutics, speak at a GIG group this past week.

In terms of side effects---he said that study participants experienced little to no side effects. He said participants who had the placebo actually had a higher rate of side effects.

In terms of the leaky guy, etc.....it was fascinating to hear him talk about it. I had never fully understood it until I heard him explain it and show pictures. (the pictures probably helped---but they have some on their website that are helpful). I'll try to explain how he presented it.

We have cells that act as barriers. Previously, researchers thought that the connectors between the cells were more like permanent fences, not letting anything through. Based on research by Dr. Fassano at the University of Maryland, they discovered that they are not fences, but more like gates that can open and close. Dr. Fassano identified "zonulin" which they believe is the "gate" opener and closer. Increased zonulin leads to the opening of the gates. In particular, research done by Dr. Fassano has found that Celiac patients have higher levels of zonulin, which "opens" the barriers. When these gates are opened, the gluten gets through. For people with Celiac, then the autoimmune response occurs.

The purpose of the AT-1001 is to stop the overexpression of zonulin, which in effect, would keep the gates closed, therefore not allowing gluten to permeate the gut, which would prevent the autoimmune reaction from ever occurring. The press release is being issued Monday that states that Phase 1 of the actual testing (on non Celiacs and Celiacs) was successful. It prevented the autoimmune reaction from happening. Their hypothesis was supported.

He believes that the leaky gut/zonulin is a key, if not the key, component of many other autoimmune disorders, including Type 1 diabetes, and potentially Rheumatoid Arthritis and MS (and others). Increased levels of zonulin have been found in Type 1 Diabetes patients, as well.

The pill would be taken like a lactaid---with/before meals that may/do contain gluten (as opposed to popping one each morning.)

Hope this helps shed more light on it.

Guest BERNESES

Laura- Tthank you! That actually sounds pretty darn hopeful. Think of it as a gluten condom :P .

tarnalberry Community Regular

Given that zonulin is there for a reason, I think it would still be the sort of thing that I would take only when going out in case of contamination. There are lots of meds designed to 'correct' things in the body that do their job quite well, but because almost everything in the human body is a multitasker, the drugs have unexpected consequences as well. I get a lot of those, and get tired of them ;-)

chrissy Collaborator

laura----i re-read the original article that was posted-----it referred to the pill helping people that are "prone" to celiac or diabetes. i am wondering if that was referring to people who have the genetic disposition, without already having the disease. did he indicate if it would be in the best interest of these people to also use this drug to avoid the disease from being turned on in the first place?

christine

Guest Viola
Laura- Tthank you! That actually sounds pretty darn hopeful. Think of it as a gluten condom :P .

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

happygirl Collaborator

Chrissy--From what he spoke about at the meeting, this drug is designed for diagnosed Celiacs (i.e., not gluten intolerant, gluten sensitive, only Celiacs). He did not address the role of of this drug in people who might be at a higher risk (those with the gene, family history, etc.) I also do not know if this exact pill will work for other auto-immune disorders, or if it more of the idea of how it would work but it needs to be tweaked?

The other thing is that Celiacs do not have to take the drug, obviously...but that it would be taken like a lactaid (when one wants to eat gluten or there is a risk of cc).

Basically, the way he presented it, the way they are approaching this....Celiac is just a stepping stone to potentially understanding many other autoimmune disorders.

chrissy Collaborator

that could really simplify things for celiacs (after i just started a thread about it not being as hard as people think LOL!!) you could just carry it in your purse for those times when your choices are limited or questionable.

christine

plantime Contributor

I was told that celiac is caused by a lack of a specific digestive enzyme, and that the resulting reaction is what causes the intestinal wall to be super-permeable. Stopping the permeability of the intestinal wall is not going to stop the celiac reaction. I will need to see a WHOLE LOT more research on this before I will consider such a pill to be viable.

happygirl Collaborator

Dessa, I think that there are various theories out there right now about what causes Celiac, hence, the various angles that research is taking. I believe there is research looking at the enzymes as well.

"Stopping the permeability of the intestinal wall is not going to stop the celiac reaction." Although the research on zonulin is in its early stages, the results of the Phase 1 testing say that it does stop the celiac reaction from occurring, according to Dr. Fassano and Dr. Paterson. From what Dr. Paterson said, this is a new way to not only look at Celiac, but other autoimmune disorders. He showed us slides of Celiacs (untreated, with blunted villi) vs. slides of normal villi, that were "stained" to show the zonulin....which was markedly higher in Celiacs. AT-1001, based in INITIAL studies, stopped the overexpression of zonulin, hence keeping the "gates"/tight junctions closed....therefore not letting gluten pass, preventing the autoimmune cells from attacking it.

I think that one of his reasons for coming to speak at this GIG meeting was to begin to provide Celiacs with understandable information, based on their theory of Celiac and autoimmune disorders. He said it will be 2-5 years before a drug is available, so hopefully in that time, their studies will continue to support this, and information will be made available so that we can all make our individual decisions. I thought it was really interesting that Dr. Paterson's father has Celiac, and both Dr. Paterson and Dr. Fasano's wives have autoimmune disorders. I think that it is potentially pretty cool that research on Celiac might open doors to change the way autoimmune disorders are studied and treated.

Whatever the cause/reason for the Celiac reaction, I am encouraged by the research that I saw!

VydorScope Proficient

Did they give any time frame for future testing/etc?

Guest BERNESES

I'm just glad that there's research going on! That is something to be very optimistic about. I think many people are hesitant because we've all had some bad experiences with doctors, medications, etc. (some of us worse than others) but at least someone is looking at what is going on and maybe ways to stop it.

VydorScope Proficient
I'm just glad that there's research going on! That is something to be very optimistic about. I think many people are hesitant because we've all had some bad experiences with doctors, medications, etc. (some of us worse than others) but at least someone is looking at what is going on and maybe ways to stop it.

I completely agree.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,170
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Melissa27
    Newest Member
    Melissa27
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      So, you have three symptoms of a gluten-related disorder: weight loss, brain fog and lose stools. Of the three, the lose stools that firm up when you cut back on gluten is the only symptom for which you have reasonable cause to assume is connected to gluten consumption since the other two persist when you cut back on gluten. But since you do not have any formal test results that prove celiac disease, you could just as easily have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). In fact, what testing you have had done indicates you do not have celiac disease. NCGS shares many of the same symptoms of celiac disease but does not damage the lining of the small bowel as does celiac disease. There is no test for it. A diagnosis for NCGS depends on first ruling out celiac disease. It is 10x more common than celiac disease. Some experts feel it can be a precursor to the development of celiac disease. Eliminating gluten is the antidote for both. What muddies this whole question are two things: 1. Lack of official diagnostic data that indicates celiac disease. 2. Your persistence in consuming gluten, even though in smaller amounts. Your anxiety over the insomnia seems to outweigh your anxiety over the weight loss which prevents you from truly testing out the gluten free diet. What other medical testing have you had done recently? I think something else is going on besides a gluten disorder. Have you had a recent CBC (Complete Blood Count) and a recent CMP (Complete Metabolic Panel)? You say you don't believe you have any vitamin and mineral deficiencies but have you actually been tested for any. I certainly would be concerned with that if I was losing weight like you are despite consuming the high amount of calories you are.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @AndiOgris! Recently upgraded guidelines for the "gluten challenge" recommend the daily consumption of at least 10g of gluten for at least 2 weeks to the day of testing to ensure valid testing, either for the antibody testing or the endoscopy/biopsy. 10g of gluten is roughly the amount found in 4-6 slices of wheat bread. So, there is a question in my mind as to whether or not your gluten consumption was intense enough to ensure valid testing the second time around. And was the tTG-IGA the only antibody test that was run? That is far from a comprehensive celiac panel. Concerning your negative biopsy, there is the possibility of patchy damage that was missed due to inadequate sampling as you alluded to. There is also the possibility that the onset of your celiac disease (if you have it) was so new that there had not yet been time to accumulate damage to the small bowel lining. Your total lack of symptoms at the time of diagnosis would seem to support this idea. Having said all that, and this is my informal observation from reading many, many posts like yours over the years, I wonder if you are on the cusp of celiac disease, crossing back and forth across that line for the time being. My suggestion would be to keep a close eye on this for the time being. Watch for the development of symptoms and request a more complete celiac panel a year from now. Here is an article that discusses the various antibody tests that can be run for celiac disease. Note: The EMA test is kind of outdated and expensive. It has been replaced by the tTG-IGA which measures the same thing and is less expensive to run.  
    • SaiP
      Hi, yes. Much more solid and firm, as opposite to diarrhea like when on gluten.
    • AndiOgris
      Hi all I have had a very confusing year with celiac disease (or perhaps not as it turns out) and wondered if anyone can help me make sense of it? My mother was diagnosed with celiac disease (in her 70s) a couple of years ago. I am in my early 40s and did not have any symptoms, but I took a blood test in November 2023 and it came back positive (TTG IGA 23.4 U/ml - normal range is below 7 U/ml). I was referred for a gastroscopy to confirm, which was scheduled for October 2024 (I use the UK health service, things move slowly!). The gastroscopy found no evidence of celiac disease.  My gastroenterologist has asked me to retake the blood test, and it just came back negative (TTG IGA 1.6 U/ml - normal range is below 7 U/ml). Given the long wait between my initial positive blood test and my gastroscopy, I reduced my gluten intake but never avoided it fully. In the 6 weeks before the gastroscopy and the second blood test, I made sure to eat at least two slices of bread a day as recommended, and often I had significantly more.  So what's going on? I understand that false positives are very rare for celiac blood tests, and usually associated with other serious diseases which I am fairly sure I don't have (my health is generally very good). After the negative biopsy, I thought that (i) either they did not take enough samples, or (ii) I have "potential celiac disease". But now that the second blood test has come back negative, I'm running out of plausible explanations...  Can anyone make sense of this? I have not spoken to my gastroenterologist yet - I wanted to get a better sense of where I am beforehand so that I can ask the right questions. Under the UK system, specialist doctors can be very hard to get hold of, so I need to make the most of my time with him! Thanks!        
    • trents
      Do you mean that your stools firmed up when you began to cut gluten from your diet?
×
×
  • Create New...