Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Emma Update


Guest tracey and emma

Recommended Posts

Guest tracey and emma

Hi everyone i am sorry i do not seem to have a lot of time so do not come on line very oftern!

Since christmas emma has been completely Gluten free. so for about 10-11weeks now. She had no significant signs of celiac on her endoscopy that they could see to the eye, except for the biopsys that came back with limphodes being a small problem in her intestene, which lead them to belive she possibly had the beginings of celiac disease.

did a blood test to prove negetive but our consultan says that the test is 100% correct even for the beginings of celiac disease.

But ........after being on this diet for 6weeks no change at all and then a few weeks ago she starts to tolerate milk at a higher volume through the G-tube, and at an increased rate per-hour. which is amasing.

and now she is putting on weigh faster than she has ever done. and looking really good.

diohrea that she had, has stopped and except for one server episoded of retching 3 weeks ago where she blacked out, and went blue she is a differanct child.

but like i said bloods were negative. have any of you guys come across a simular thing and course of events? or is this unusual???? and does it have to be celiac disease or could she just have a wheat allergie or are they the same thing?

thanks for your help

tracey


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



chrissy Collaborator

i am assuming you mean lymphocytes? that is all that showed in one of my girls biopsies---but she had positive blood work.

christine

lovemyboy Rookie
Hi everyone i am sorry i do not seem to have a lot of time so do not come on line very oftern!

Since christmas emma has been completely Gluten free. so for about 10-11weeks now. She had no significant signs of celiac on her endoscopy that they could see to the eye, except for the biopsys that came back with limphodes being a small problem in her intestene, which lead them to belive she possibly had the beginings of celiac disease.

did a blood test to prove negetive but our consultan says that the test is 100% correct even for the beginings of celiac disease.

But ........after being on this diet for 6weeks no change at all and then a few weeks ago she starts to tolerate milk at a higher volume through the G-tube, and at an increased rate per-hour. which is amasing.

and now she is putting on weigh faster than she has ever done. and looking really good.

diohrea that she had, has stopped and except for one server episoded of retching 3 weeks ago where she blacked out, and went blue she is a differanct child.

but like i said bloods were negative. have any of you guys come across a simular thing and course of events? or is this unusual???? and does it have to be celiac disease or could she just have a wheat allergie or are they the same thing?

thanks for your help

tracey

Hi

Our blood work was negative and we took our son off anyway and he has put on lots of weight and seems to be eating alot better. Not sure which type he had though. Sounds like I would keep her on the diet if she has improved that much.

key Contributor

Blood work is not accurate in small children. My son had negative blood work and responded massively to the diet! So if she is doing great, don't listen to what they are telling you. LIsten and look with your own eyes at how well your Emma is doing! Isn't that proof. It was with our son!

Monica

Becky6 Enthusiast

My daughters blood work was neg but she has turned around 100% from being gluten-free since dec 1st.

Nic Collaborator

My son also had positive blood work but only showed lymphcytes in biopsy. He has been gluten free for 10 months. I just got done telling my sister on the phone that I think he is getting a bit chubby. Big turn around from last year .

taweavmo3 Enthusiast

My two boys (2 and 7) both tested negative, but have responded well to the diet. My youngest was very lactose intolerant before, if he had even traces of dairy he would have diarrhea and awful diaper rashes. Now he's been gluten free for around 6 weeks, and can tolerate all the diary he can eat! I do have a daughter also, 4, who did test positive on both blood work and biopsy.....but now that I've seen the positive results in my boys who tested negative, I don't really put much stock in the current testing for now.

If Emma is thriving.......just keep her on the diet. Don't let doctors tell you to do anything different. I've heard our ped ask why I would "put my kids through that" if they weren't really sick, like it's some sort of cruel punishment. Alot of doctors don't really have a clue what it's like to live gluten-free, it's really not that bad. And there is still LOADS of gluten-free junk the kids can have, so they aren't really deprived of kid friendly food. My 7 year old actually made the choice himself to go on the diet, just based on how much better he felt. That spoke volumes to me!

Take care, and I hope Emma continues to thrive!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Guest nini

the blood tests are extremely unreliable in children and for the Dr. to tell you that a negative result was 100% accurate is a load of crap.

My daughter's blood test was negative, she did not have the biopsy, but had a miraculous turn around on the gluten-free diet. I am convinced she is Celiac and so was her pediatrician. Trust your instincts that she responds very well to the gluten-free diet and that is all you need to know. Don't listen to those Dr.s that tell you she can't have Celiac because of a blood test. They are just ignorant. Sorry, but it's true. There are sooooo many stories of the blood tests being innacurate in children (and even adults) they can only be 100% IF they are positive for it. Not if they are negative. They can miss the early stages, they aren't trained to look for the early stages. They are trained that Celiac is extremely rare, they will probably NEVER see it in their practice, and they are only trained to look for the final stages of the disease where so much damage has been done to the intestines that the body is not absorbing ANY nutrients. Also, a lot of Dr.s will refuse to even consider Celiac, especially if they already have it in their minds that there is either something else wrong that requires surgery or medication OR they are convinced it's all in the patient's head (or the parent's).

Glad to hear she is doing better. Give it time, keep her 100% gluten-free, and I'm sure you will see some miracles! My daughter is now a thriving happy and healthy soon to be six year old. She does not feel deprived of any goodies or yummy food.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,886
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Old Soul Elder
    Newest Member
    Old Soul Elder
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • plumbago
      Yes, well, that's what we have been told, probably ever since the different types of cholesterol were identified. It's what most of our primary care providers are still telling us, it's what the commercials tell us. But researchers (up until now at any rate) have been learning a great deal about HDL. Nevertheless, the universe of what we still don't know about HDL is vast. And since I can sustain only a 35% level of understanding when I hear lectures on HDL, I will have to nutshell my layperson's understanding, which is that at this time, it's possible or likely that HDL-C levels are best understood as U-shaped, that there's a sweet spot right there in the dip of the "U" and anything before or after is not ideal. This is why I said what I did earlier about the "good" and the "bad" being oversimplifications. The research has long since moved on. There's a lot of talk about how the focus should be on functionality, that you want to make sure that all that HDL is performing how it should be. And now, that's it, I've exhausted my ability to explain my understanding of HDL!
    • Nicbent35
      Hi, I have a 3 1/2 year old daughter..I would say she has had tantrums since even before she was a year old. Challenging but not extreme. Lately, her behavior had gotten extreme. Just so angry, yelling mean hateful things, completely defiant, was causing a lot of disruption in our house, I felt like I had lost the little girl I knew, we were baffled.   Something just didn’t seem right to me, I have been researching and read about how gluten can sometimes affect kids behavior. I took her off gluten a week ago tomorrow. The next couple days after I took her off gluten the days were much easier. About 4 days in she had one of the worst days I’ve seen her have tho. I kept on with it tho and the past two days she has been angelic. Is this common that if it is gluten that she could still have a bad day like that a few days after taking her off of it? Should I try to reintroduce it at some point to see if it’s really a gluten intolerance? I’m not gonna lie, if she continues with the great behavior she’s had the past couple days I will probably be scared to reintroduce it but don’t want her to have to avoid gluten if it’s not necessary. Anyone have advice? 
    • trents
      But HDL is considered to be the "good" cholesterol, right?
    • plumbago
      Since some time between 2010 and 2014, my HDL-C has been going up and you might even say elevated. The last time I could find in my records that my HDL was normal was in 2014 when it was 67. Last week, it was 101, and it’s been 88 and above since about 2015. A significant life event happened in 2010 when I was diagnosed with Celiac disease and in May of that year began a gluten free diet. An informal perusal of a previously posted topic on HDL on this forum shows that a lot of members responding had high normal or high levels of HDL, so it doesn’t seem to be that unusual. But because my HDL numbers have been so high for so long, I am now officially concerned enough that I will probably reach out to a cardiologist who specializes in lipids. I would like to know if I should have a genetic test, as a specific genetic mutation can be one reason for high HDL numbers. I will also ask if he/she thinks a cardiac work up including a coronary artery calcium score should be considered. I think by now most of us are done with the ridiculous good and bad cholesterol labels; the amount of what we don’t know about HDL is quite large. For me my questions include is it a matter of production or an inability to clear HDL, and are the high levels having an effect on my vasculature (or a result of a less than optimal vasculature)? My last TSH level was normal, so it's likely not a thyroid issue. I also take B12 regularly. I’ve read that niacin can cause HDL levels to go up, but B12 is not niacin, and I could find no definitive link between robust B12 supplementation and abnormally high HDL levels. Any input is appreciated! Plumbago
    • Scott Adams
      @Mynx, how long have you been gluten-free? I ask because many newly diagnosed celiacs react to many things, and often think their reactions are caused by gluten, when in fact, they are really caused by a combination of a sensitive gut due to damage, as well as additional food intolerance/leaky gut issues to other foods which may be temporary until their villi heal.
×
×
  • Create New...