Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Confused: Endoscopy with 10 biopsies taken?


Haveaniceday

Recommended Posts

Haveaniceday Apprentice

Just before beginning my endoscopy the specialist told me he would be taking 4 biopsies (first and second portions of the duodenum), during the procedure he ended up taking 10, including at the bulb. However visually everything is within normal parameters.

I am just really curious as to why the Dr would have suddenly opted to take so many biopsies with everything looking normal. I can understand 6 or even 8, but 10 is over double what was intended and obviously the fewer that can be taken the lesser the risk of complications after.

I am not worried about confirmation of diagnosis neither is my doctor, my blood work markers were in the high positive range across the tests in the panel, and I have direct relatives with celiac. (26/f)

 

Thanks!

*I am not too anxious about any possible result, purely just really curious about what would motivate that


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GFinDC Veteran

Hi,

My guess is the GI didn't see clear evidence of celiac damage visually through the endoscope.  So he / she may have taken more biopsy samples from various spots hoping to get an area that will show damage under a microscope.  Sometimes damage is severe enough to see through the endoscope with the naked eye.  Sometimes a microscope is needed to see it.  If the damage was clear they could get a biopsy from a damaged spot easily.  When it's not real clear its a guessing game to decide where to take a biopsy sample.

The endoscope can only reach about 5 feet into the small intestine.  So it can't see or sample the remaining 17 feet.  There may be more damage further in or not.  I think most of the time samples are examined in a lab and and the results sent to the doctor.  That process seems to run about 7 to 10 days.  You should keep eating gluten until they give you the test results and tell you to go gluten-free or not.  There have been cases where labs lose samples or contaminate them by accident and the the tests have to be redone.  So it's better to wait to go gluten-free until you know the lab results are back.  Going off gluten and then going back on for more testing can be real unpleasant.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,073
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    David Croft
    Newest Member
    David Croft
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      @KRipple, thank you for the lab results from your husband's celiac disease blood antibody testing. The lab result you share would seem to be the tTG-IGA (Tissue Transglutaminase IGA) and the test result is in excess of 10x normal. This is significant as there is an increasing tendency for physicians to grant a celiac disease diagnosis on the basis of antibody testing alone when the scores on that particular test exceed 10x normal. This trend started in the UK during the COVID pandemic when there was tremendous pressure on the medical system over there and it has spread to the USA. The tTG-IGA is the centerpiece of celiac disease blood antibody testing. All this to say that some doctors would grant a celiac disease diagnosis on your husband's bloodwork alone and not feel a need to go forward with an endoscopy with biopsy. This is something you and your husband might wish to take up with his physicians. In view of his many health issues it might be wise to avoid any further damage to his small bowel lining by the continuing consumption of gluten and also to allow healing of such to progress. The lining of the small bowel is the place where essentially all of our nutrition is absorbed. This is why celiac disease when it is not addressed with a gluten free diet for many years typically results in additional health problems that are tied to nutritional deficiencies. The millions and millions of tiny finger-like projections that make up the nutrient absorbing surface of the small bowel lining are worn down by the constant inflammation from gluten consumption. In celiac disease, the immune system has been tricked into labeling gluten as an invader. As these finger-like projections are worn down, the efficiency of nutrient absorption becomes more and more compromised. We call this villous atrophy.   
    • KRipple
      Thank you so much! And sorry for not responding sooner. I've been scouring the hospital records and can find nothing other than the following results (no lab info provided): Component Transglutaminase IgA   Normal Range: 0 - 15.0 U/mL >250.0 U/mL High   We live in Olympia, WA and I will be calling University of Washington Hospital - Roosevelt in Seattle first thing tomorrow. They seem to be the most knowledgeable about complex endocrine issues like APS 2 (and perhaps the dynamics of how APS 2 and Celiacs can affect each other). His diarrhea has not abated even without eating gluten, but that could be a presentation of either Celiac's or Addison's. So complicated. We don't have a date for endoscopy yet. I will let my husband know about resuming gluten.    Again, thank you so much for sharing your knowledge with me!
    • Jmartes71
      Ginger is my best friend, it helps alot with tummy issues..
    • aattana
      Hi Phosphone, did you ever figure out what elevated your DGP?  I am in the same boat. 
    • trents
      Scott makes a good point about the prednisone. It has a general suppressing effect on the immune system. Don't misunderstand me. In view of your husband's several autoimmune afflictions, it would seem to be an appropriate medication therapy but it will likely invalidate endoscopy/biopsy test results for celiac disease.
×
×
  • Create New...