Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help Decoding Blood Test and Unserstanding


MissMegan

Recommended Posts

MissMegan Newbie

Hello! I was hoping someone would be able to explain a little more to me about the recent blood results I have received. 

Long story short, I am a female in my mid twenties, I lost 30 pounds in the span of three months with no explanation (5'6" 128lbs in February of 2020, down to 98lbs in April of 2020). I have since gained a few pounds over the last year, but not much, I now rest around 101/102lbs. I was tiny before, and now I am extremely underweight. I am eating normally and have been, no changes in exercise, no explanation. I noticed I started having typical GI issues related to Celiac, went to four different doctors who kept telling me I had an eating disorder (which I am eating the exact same as I always have and have not changed any exercise patterns) which was very frustrating because I knew something was wrong, but no one was taking me seriously. Finally one doctor decided to test me for Celiac and we got a positive result back on one of the tests and I now have to get an EGD and colonoscopy done (they want to look for multiple things at the same time for a biopsy from what I understand). However, no one has really explained anything to me so I have been trying to do my own research. (They tested me for other things such as diabetes, thyroid, etc. and nothing was positive except the celiac panel). 

These were the tests run and the results (picture of test and result numbers listed below):

  • Antigliadin Abs, IgA; Antigliadin Abs, IgG; t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA; t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgG; Immunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum
  • image.png.bb56675cbb0d3b4060aca2c7f157558d.png

The only thing that came back positive was the t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgG at a score of (7) which is scored as a weak positive. What does this mean? Is this also affected also by the amount of gluten that is consumed (I do not eat much to begin with because I picked up that it was gluten that was giving me issues and I have been reading that you have to eat a good amount of gluten to be able to get a solid positive test).

What does it mean that the TTG-IGG came back positive, but the TTG-IGA came back negative? And that none of the other ones came back positive? I've also been reading about sensitivities and specificities of the blood tests, but don't entirely understand what that means if someone can help explain that as well. 

Thank you all so much ahead of time, I really appreciate your help to help me understand the beginning of this journey!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master

The TTG is the most specific for celiac disease but it is not the most sensitive of the test battery you had run. Given that, if the TTG is positive I would think that is a strong indicator that you have celiac disease. The guideline for daily gluten consumption in order to get valid blood antibody tests is eating 1-2 slices of wheat bread (or the equivalent) for 8 weeks and for the endosocopy/biopsy, that amount of gluten for at least two weeks up to the day of testing. Since your consumption of gluten has been minimal I would suspect that it resulted in lower values than it would have if you had been consuming normal amounts of gluten prior to.

Scott Adams Grand Master

Welcome to the forum @MissMegan! I agree with @trents that your results would likely have been higher had you followed the testing protocol and eaten gluten daily before the test. It's astounding how many doctors, and now computer systems like the one Kaiser has and I use, that don't properly inform you of the requirements necessary to avoid false negative results with these blood tests. It seems like much of this could be programmed into computer systems that won't allow the appointment to be scheduled unless the patient has complied, or would at least send out an automated email when such an appointment is scheduled.

In any case, you need to eat gluten daily for at least two weeks before the biopsy, and I would not worry about it, it is routine and no big deal:

 Perhaps ask your gastro if they will be taking at least 4 samples, which is the current recommendation. 

MissMegan Newbie
18 hours ago, trents said:

The TTG is the most specific for celiac disease but it is not the most sensitive of the test battery you had run. Given that, if the TTG is positive I would think that is a strong indicator that you have celiac disease. The guideline for daily gluten consumption in order to get valid blood antibody tests is eating 1-2 slices of wheat bread (or the equivalent) for 8 weeks and for the endosocopy/biopsy, that amount of gluten for at least two weeks up to the day of testing. Since your consumption of gluten has been minimal I would suspect that it resulted in lower values than it would have if you had been consuming normal amounts of gluten prior to.

Thank you!

MissMegan Newbie
16 hours ago, Scott Adams said:

Welcome to the forum @MissMegan! I agree with @trents that your results would likely have been higher had you followed the testing protocol and eaten gluten daily before the test. It's astounding how many doctors, and now computer systems like the one Kaiser has and I use, that don't properly inform you of the requirements necessary to avoid false negative results with these blood tests. It seems like much of this could be programmed into computer systems that won't allow the appointment to be scheduled unless the patient has complied, or would at least send out an automated email when such an appointment is scheduled.

In any case, you need to eat gluten daily for at least two weeks before the biopsy, and I would not worry about it, it is routine and no big deal:

 Perhaps ask your gastro if they will be taking at least 4 samples, which is the current recommendation. 

Thank you so much! I will be calling and asking about the samples and to follow up on the protocol because they never told me about the gluten challenge or to purposefully continue to eat it. Would it be worthwhile to do the gluten challenge and have them redo the blood work or is that unnecessary at this point? This is all so crazy and new, but I'm glad that after a year of going back and forth with doctors, someone finally took me seriously and we are starting to get an answer!

Scott Adams Grand Master

You should definitely ask your doctor about a possible re-do of the blood test, but personally I don't think it's necessary (but if the doctors are willing to do it, why not?). The positive result is very specific for celiac disease, so I would just be sure she's eating a slice of wheat bread daily for at least two weeks before the biopsy. Should the biopsy be negative, to me it still would mean that she's likely in the non-celiac gluten sensitivity category, and should go gluten-free.

jkc830 Newbie

I also have similar test results, and am confused by the information I am finding online (my appt w/ my doctor isn't until next week). I did not alter my diet prior to testing, but was not specifically eliminating gluten. I definitely eat gluten daily (likely equivalent to 2 pieces of bread), if not at ever meal.

Serum Immunoglobulin A is high at 427 (so not IgA deficient)

Tissue transglutaminase IgG is very high at 34 , but tTG IgA is within normal range at 1

HLA DQ2 Positive

All other markers were within normal range:

ENDOMYSIAL ANTIBODY SCR (IGA) W/REFL TO TITER - Negative

Cultivated Wheat IgE - <0.10 (class 0)

Wheat IgE - <0.10 (class 0)

Gluten IgE - <0.10 (class 0)

Gliadin AB IgA - 7 

Gliadin AB IgG - 4 

----------------------------

From most of what I have read, tTg IgG is only relevant if you are Serum IgA deficient, which I am not.  I know my doctor will decode this for me soon, but I'd love some insight before then. 

Thank you.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Scott Adams Grand Master

@jkc830 Welcome to the forum. This article will be helpful:

 

  • 4 months later...
MissMegan Newbie
On 3/4/2021 at 1:33 PM, Scott Adams said:

You should definitely ask your doctor about a possible re-do of the blood test, but personally I don't think it's necessary (but if the doctors are willing to do it, why not?). The positive result is very specific for celiac disease, so I would just be sure she's eating a slice of wheat bread daily for at least two weeks before the biopsy. Should the biopsy be negative, to me it still would mean that she's likely in the non-celiac gluten sensitivity category, and should go gluten-free.

Hello again! I wanted to come back and ask a question since I had the EGD done. The biopsies were negative, and they gave me no answers other than "it's not celiac" and no further guidance. Since the blood test was positive, and the EGD was negative, would this mean there is a strong likelihood that I am non-celiac gluten sensitive? I still have issues with most anything that contains gluten, and I'm sure there is hidden gluten in many things I am eating. Is the best method to figure this out to completely go gluten-free and see if my body reacts well to it? I have gained a few more pounds over the year, I sit around 105 now, but I am still severely underweight and it seems like nothing I am doing is helping me to gain any weight back. 

Thank you so much for all of your helpful guidance, I really appreciate it!

RMJ Mentor

You could go strictly gluten free, see if you feel better, and see if the antibody levels go down. Celiac damage can be uneven and the surface area of the intestine is large. The doctor might have missed it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,685
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Janahawk
    Newest Member
    Janahawk
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.3k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Thanks for the additional information. I was thinking of asking you if your daughter was taking methylated vitamins since she has the MTHFR gene but you beat me to it. To answer the question you posed in your original post, as I explained, celiac disease does not damage the colon but the lining of the small bowel. If the damage is pronounced enough and the doc doing it is experienced, yes, the damage done to the lining of the small bowel can be spotted with the naked eye.
    • cameo674
      I could not locate the correct Gary Brecka video where he explains the methylation process and specifically states things about how people with the MTRR homozygous gene mutation are known to suffer from heartburn due to a weakened valve/sphincter where the esophagus and the stomach connect.  My brother had the youtube video sent to him from 10x health which is probably why I cannot locate it.     I will have read up on mast cell activation.  I do not know anything about it.  Tums is my preferred gerd treatment.  I always figured a little extra calcium could not hurt me.  
    • cameo674
      Trents: Due to a genetic mutation, my daughter has inherited from both parents she cannot process the Folic Acid provided in the fortified American grains.   An MD told her to avoid eating fortified grains.   My daughter makes the assumption that unless she makes the food item, that the baker used a fortified grain so she has been limiting her gluten intake since 2020.   Her Psychiatrist was who tested her for MTHFR gene issue because she suffers from depression and severe anxiety. The Psychatrist also instructed my daughter to supplement with a methylated version of folate once she knew my daughter was homozygous, because the methylated version bypasses the mutated gene step so her body can absorb it.  Low folate absorption impacts serotonin and dopamine production.  My husband and I also both have two other homozygous gene mutations that interfere with vitamin absorption: MTRR and VDR taq.  The first interferes with B-12 absorption which requires us to take a methylated B-12 vitamin and the second with Vitamin D absorption so we have to take higher doses to stay within normal levels.   My brother, who has the exact same gene mutations, went through 10x health genetic testing for vitamin supplements (paid by his employer) and received a huge report saying the same things about which types of supplements had to be taken.  Gary Brecka does videos on how these gene mutations impact the vitamin absorption pathways.       If my brother had not gotten his testing through work, he would never would have started his supplement journey.  His testing is what triggered my getting functional health testing that tested similar biomarkers to his.  Again the celiac testing was an add-on test that I did off the cuff.  
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @growlinhard1! If eliminating gluten from your diet makes significant improvement in your symptoms then there are two possibilities. Either you have celiac disease (aka, gluten intolerance) or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity, aka, gluten sensitivity). The difference is that celiac disease is an autoimmune disorder that creates inflammation and, over time, damages the lining of the small bowel which inhibits nutrient absorption whereas NCGS does not damage the lining of the small bowel. They share many of the same symptoms. At the end of the day, the antidote for both is to abstain from foods that contain wheat, barley or rye, the three gluten-containing grains. Some countries supply stipends and healthcare benefits for those with an official celiac diagnosis. If you live in the USA that does not apply. The main reasons for seeking an official celiac diagnosis are psychological and social. Many people have a hard time not falling off the gluten free bandwagon without an official diagnosis. They find it easy to rationalize it all away as being temporary or due to something else. When you have an official diagnosis, you tend to take gluten-free eating more seriously. Socially, family and friends are more likely to respect and attempt to comply with your need to eat gluten free if you have an official diagnosis of celiac disease. Your physician is more likely to take you seriously as well if you have an official diagnosis because there are typically other health problems that are spinoffs which develop from celiac disease in time. One autoimmune disease invites others. There are no tests for NCGS. Celiac disease must first be ruled out. We do have specific tests for celiac disease. By the way, some experts believe that NCGS can transition into celiac disease. If your endoscopy/biopsy is only a month away, I would encourage you to stick it out and go back on gluten to get an official diagnosis. You still have time to get a valid test result if you start back on gluten now, 10g of gluten daily which is about the amount found in 4-6 slices of wheat bread.
    • BoiseNic
      I have the same problem. No matter what I eat, I seem to get a break out every 1 to 2 months. I do not do oats, citrus fruits, apples, onions and other foods also, as those cause reactions. The only time I have zero problems is when I fast. The only staple grain I have is quinoa, as that doesn't seem to cause me issues. I have linked mine to a microbiome imbalance. I am currently on month 3 of Skinesa. It's supposed to take 3 months before seeing results. I guess we'll see.
×
×
  • Create New...