Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Normal endoscopy?


adm818

Recommended Posts

adm818 Rookie

I’m waiting on my biopsy results, but my doctor said from what he saw during the endoscopy, everything looks normal. I know some people say that the biopsy could still come back positive, but I’m wondering if that’s actually common? Do most people with celiac have visible villi blunting during the endoscopy? Or is it more common than I think for the endoscopy to look normal but the biopsy be positive? 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Scott Adams Grand Master

Celiac disease, almost by definition, involves villi damage, although they are now diagnosing celiac disease more often via blood test results alone. In the past villi damage was basically a pre-requisite to a diagnosis.

After much learning over 25 years, I like to think that villi damage is the end stage of celiac disease, and doctors should use blood tests in most cases to diagnose it, rather than let it reach the stage where villi damage occurs. Blood tests now have the ability to diagnose celiacs before they end up with villi damage (some people would argue that CD still requires this damage, and I'm happy to take up this argument with anyone).

Did you get a celiac disease blood panel done? If so, can you share the results? Were you eating gluten, at least a slice of wheat bread, daily for at least two weeks before your endoscopy? For a blood test you need to eat gluten daily for at least 6 weeks for the test results to be valid.

adm818 Rookie

I have been gluten free for about 5 years, but I ate plenty of gluten for a solid 3 weeks prior to the endoscopy. My doctor wanted to go straight to the endoscopy instead of doing bloodwork so I didn’t have to keep eating gluten and feeling sick.  

Scott Adams Grand Master

If you are still eating gluten-free I would still request a blood test. As mentioned, some celiacs don't have villi damage, or the gastro doctor doesn't take a biopsy in the right area, and the blood results should actually be done in order to diagnose CD.

adm818 Rookie
1 hour ago, Scott Adams said:

If you are still eating gluten-free I would still request a blood test. As mentioned, some celiacs don't have villi damage, or the gastro doctor doesn't take a biopsy in the right area, and the blood results should actually be done in order to diagnose celiac disease.

Got it - thank you. I will ask for a blood test at my follow up appt to be safe.

Scott Adams Grand Master

Please let us know how it goes. Feel free to share the results with us.

MADMOM Community Regular
On 3/25/2021 at 8:20 PM, adm818 said:

I’m waiting on my biopsy results, but my doctor said from what he saw during the endoscopy, everything looks normal. I know some people say that the biopsy could still come back positive, but I’m wondering if that’s actually common? Do most people with celiac have visible villi blunting during the endoscopy? Or is it more common than I think for the endoscopy to look normal but the biopsy be positive? 

i asked for an endoscopy not knowing what i had - my GI symptoms were mild - i began feeling pinching under my ribs and near my belly button - that would not go away - my GI saw mild blunting and then did blood work which confirmed celiac disease 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



adm818 Rookie

Just got my biopsy results today - they came back negative! However, after speaking more with the doctor, I’m nervous 3 weeks eating gluten again wasn’t long enough to show up? He said if I was having symptoms, it would show up if I had celiac, and he also said there was no need for bloodwork. 
 

The doctor also told me I should be able to tolerate gluten in small amounts without getting sick, but that is NOT my experience. 
 

Can gluten sensitivity come with very severe symptoms? And is 3 weeks eating gluten enough for the biopsy to be accurate? 

Scott Adams Grand Master

3 weeks of eating a slice of wheat bread each day should be enough for a biopsy, however I don't agree that you should not get a blood test. In fact, the blood test should always be done before a biopsy, and you need to eat gluten daily for at least 6-8 weeks before a blood test.

adm818 Rookie
50 minutes ago, Scott Adams said:

3 weeks of eating a slice of wheat bread each day should be enough for a biopsy, however I don't agree that you should not get a blood test. In fact, the blood test should always be done before a biopsy, and you need to eat gluten daily for at least 6-8 weeks before a blood test.

I agree with you and am seeking a second opinion regarding the blood test. That said, what would the blood test tell me if the biopsy was clear? 

Scott Adams Grand Master

You can read more about endoscopy results here, but there is a possibility that they took samples in the wrong areas, or didn't take enough samples:

Many people get positive blood test results, which means they are having an autoimmune reaction, or are sensitive to gluten, but have a negative biopsy. It's always a good idea to do the blood test, and blood test results are being used more and more now to diagnose celiac disease without a biopsy.

plumbago Experienced

Also, do you know about allergies? Could you have a wheat allergy? Celiac is an intolerance to gluten. At least it's some good news from the scope and biopsy, but yes, as advised previously, get that blood test (the order actually is, blood test first). Get the complete Celiac panel, not just one or two. Good luck. Let us know.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,791
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    BeckiM
    Newest Member
    BeckiM
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      71.2k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • fritz2
      I just felt more poorly all of the time.  I did notice that on Sundays when we usually had pancakes for breakfast I felt worse but my mom blamed the eggs and milk so we switched to soy and quit using eggs.  (this was over 60 years ago).  The symptoms changed some, but I still didn't feel very good and the constipation diarrhea cycle didn't change much either.  No doctor ever suggested wheat issues and I had never heard of it.  After the head/neck cancer chemo and radiation 30 years ago, the RA like trouble with painful joints and entire area of my body inflamed to the touch, a doctor decided I had fibromyalgia and prescribed vicodin.  That was the only pain-killer that ever worked and allowed me to go to work again.  After my grandchilds diagnosis, I looked into celiac and wondered what-if?  I asked my doctor and he suggested I try eliminating all wheat for a few weeks.  Within 10 weeks my fibro was gone.  I still had the constipation issues.  And then they discovered I had Hashimoto's from the radiation.  Only on this website have I discovered there's an issue with it and celiac.  I'd like to know more about what this issue is. I'd also like to know more about how to clear this damned swollen joint problem so I can get on with living.
    • Katya773
      Hi thank you so much for your input. It’s been very difficult to navigate this whole Celiac thing with everything that’s happened. What you said makes sense. I  have a better understanding of how my doctors NP was able to give me a diagnosis.  Yes I agree that staying gluten-free is best, I’ve been doing some research and it seems like DQ 2.5 homozygous does make folks extra sensitive to gluten even without a celiac diagnosis. My new gastroenterologist put me in touch with a nutritionist but I’ll have to inquire if they specialize in Celiac. Appreciate the advice 🙏🏼 
    • trents
      Okay, then. It definitely looks like TTG-IGA to me and your score far exceeds the 10x or greater that is becoming the new standard for official celiac disease diagnosis criteria without biopsy.  Talk to your physician about this.  
    • Pinkdoglady
      Thank you the reference range was 0.1 to 3.9
    • trents
      Do you have a reference range for the Serum Tissue Transglutimate? Different labs used different reference ranges so just giving the raw score of >100 is necessarily helpful. And the terminology they employed for that one is unusual. So, I'm not sure if they are referring to what we call "total IGA" or what we abbreviate normally as TTG-IGA? I think it is the latter and the "greater than" symbol suggests it exceeded the scale they were using. If I'm correct in this assumption, that is a very strong indicator of celiac disease and may qualify you for an official diagnosis without an endoscopy/biopsy. It is becoming increasingly common in Europe and the UK to declare an official diagnosis of celiac disease when the TTG-IGA score is 10x normal or greater. But that aside, your endomysial antibody IGA is positive and that is the most accurate test available for celiac disease. It's a more expensive test to run and isn't run as often as it used to be. It has largely been replaced with the TTG-IGA. There is no question in my mind that you have celiac disease. You might want to confer with your physician for greater clarity as well as options.  
×
×
  • Create New...