Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Seeking clarification on genetic HLA-DQ test result


Neroli D

Recommended Posts

Neroli D Rookie

My doctor ran the tTG-IgA test blood test for celiac disease as I have been getting joint pain which isn't explained by the usual blood tests for arthritis (I am 54). Prior to this I had largely cut gluten out of my diet as eating bread, pasta etc. makes me feel 'blah' (bloated, lethargic, brain fog). The first tTG-IgA test came back equivocal, so since I had already been mostly gluten free she asked me to do the 'gluten challenge' and re-test - however she only asked me to do it for 2 weeks. My 'Dr Google' research suggests that it needs to be longer? Mind you, 2 weeks was awful enough - by the end of the two weeks I was so ill I could hardly function. However, the tTG-IgA test came back equivocal again. So she decided to order the genetic test to see if it ruled out celiac disease, and also suggested that I try going totally gluten free for a month to see what happens. After a month of being totally gluten free (apart from a couple of ingredient mistakes!) I feel so much better - no more pregnant-looking belly, and no longer walking around feeling like I have a brick in my stomach, although my joint pain has not improved. When I went back for my test results, my doctor didn't seem confident in how to interpret them. The test detected HLA-DQ2 (HLA-DQ2.2 Heterozygous). After re-reading the test results a couple of times she said that this result rules out celiac disease because I only have one copy - that I would need two copies of a 'celiac gene' - one from each parent - to be able to develop celiac disease. She concluded that I am probably gluten intolerant, but cannot develop celiac disease. Again, my 'Dr Google' research suggests that although having a single copy of DQ2.2 holds low risk it doesn't completely rule out celiac disease. And I know that the genetic testing only shows 'possibility', not a diagnosis. But perhaps she is correct and it is something to do with the DQA and B Allelles - I have read a dozen articles and websites explaining the genetics including content here, but I struggle to understand the scientific terms. I only doubt my doctor's opinion because she didn't seem to understand the test result. I essentially just need to know whether it is possible to have celiac disease with just one copy of HLA-DQ2.2?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master

I have never heard that you need both copies of the celiac gene to be able to develop celiac disease. I believe that is incorrect. Certainly, with both copies of the gene you would be more likely to develop celiac disease but I can just about guarantee you that there are a lot of people with active celiac disease that only have one copy. Furthermore, there is a 44% chance that first degree relatives of someone with celiac disease will develop active celiac disease. 

For the ttg antibody blood test, or any of the other celiac antibody blood tests, you need to have been eating gluten daily for 6-8 weeks in order for the test to be valid. There are other antibody tests that can be done for celiac disease that are less specific but more sensitive than the tTG-IGA test.

But the fact is, whether you are a celiac or just gluten sensitive, many of the same risks to your health accrue from both and the antidote is the same: total abstinence from gluten.

 

knitty kitty Grand Master

Welcome to the forum!

I'm agreeing with @trents, you only need one gene for Celiac Disease.  

As I understand it, (knowledgeable others correct me if I am not correct), HLA DQ 2.2 heterozygous reacts to a smaller subset of gluten proteins than HLA DQ 2.5, but it still reacts to gluten.

In your googling, did you find this article to explain the Celiac genes?

"HLA-DQ2: The Primary Celiac Disease Gene"

https://www.verywellhealth.com/hla-dq2-the-primary-celiac-disease-gene-562569

 

CMCM Rising Star
(edited)

Your doctor is misinformed.  You need only ONE celiac gene to get celiac disease.  Also, having one gene doesn't automatically mean you WILL get celiac disease.  What is true is that having two celiac genes can perhaps make it more likely and also the severity of your reaction can be worse.  This was true of my mother and my nephew, both of whom had two celiac genes.  

I didn't understand from your post if you ONLY have the DQ2.2 gene, or if you have a DQ2  AND the 2.2 one.  Remember, you will have 2 genes, one from each parent.  You can have one DQ2 celiac gene and one gene classified as gluten sensitivity pattern such as the DQ2.2, and the one celiac gene can be triggered causing celiac disease.  Or possibly the celiac gene itself isn't triggered but due to the gluten sensitivity gene you can have most of the same huge set of symptoms caused by the celiac gene.  Either way, you must be strictly gluten free.

My sister has one DQ2 celiac gene and her second gene is the 2.2 gene.  She most definitely has celiac disease.  I have one celiac gene and one gluten sensitivity gene, and while I don't have doctor/biopsy confirmation of celiac, I sure have all the symptoms and was only helped by a strictly gluten free diet.  It doesn't matter if I have celiac or merely gluten sensitivity....I don't want to be sick so I can't eat gluten.  

My sister was told that the DQ 2.2 gene was "closer" to the DQ2 celiac gene than the other gluten sensitivity genes, but exactly how much closer is not fully understood.  Whatever the case, she must be strictly gluten free too.

Edited by CMCM
Neroli D Rookie
6 hours ago, knitty kitty said:

Welcome to the forum!

I'm agreeing with @trents, you only need one gene for Celiac Disease.  

As I understand it, (knowledgeable others correct me if I am not correct), HLA DQ 2.2 heterozygous reacts to a smaller subset of gluten proteins than HLA DQ 2.5, but it still reacts to gluten.

In your googling, did you find this article to explain the Celiac genes?

"HLA-DQ2: The Primary Celiac Disease Gene"

https://www.verywellhealth.com/hla-dq2-the-primary-celiac-disease-gene-562569

 

Thanks for the link. That seems pretty clear.  I listened to a video on the DQ2.2 gene and was totally confused by some of the finer details of how 2.2 is formed and whether it is a 'celiac' gene or not, which is why I wondered whether my doctor actually does know more about the genes than 'Dr Google'. Thanks for posting!

Neroli D Rookie
2 hours ago, CMCM said:

Your doctor is misinformed.  You need only ONE celiac gene to get celiac disease.  Also, having one gene doesn't automatically mean you WILL get celiac disease.  What is true is that having two celiac genes can perhaps make it more likely and also the severity of your reaction can be worse.  This was true of my mother and my nephew, both of whom had two celiac genes.  

I didn't understand from your post if you ONLY have the DQ2.2 gene, or if you have a DQ2  AND the 2.2 one.  Remember, you will have 2 genes, one from each parent.  You can have one DQ2 celiac gene and one gene classified as gluten sensitivity pattern such as the DQ2.2, and the one celiac gene can be triggered causing celiac disease.  Or possibly the celiac gene itself isn't triggered but due to the gluten sensitivity gene you can have most of the same huge set of symptoms caused by the celiac gene.  Either way, you must be strictly gluten free.

My sister has one DQ2 celiac gene and her second gene is the 2.2 gene.  She most definitely has celiac disease.  I have one celiac gene and one gluten sensitivity gene, and while I don't have doctor/biopsy confirmation of celiac, I sure have all the symptoms and was only helped by a strictly gluten free diet.  It doesn't matter if I have celiac or merely gluten sensitivity....I don't want to be sick so I can't eat gluten.  

My sister was told that the DQ 2.2 gene was "closer" to the DQ2 celiac gene than the other gluten sensitivity genes, but exactly how much closer is not fully understood.  Whatever the case, she must be strictly gluten free too.

Thanks for that. I don't really understand the genes - the test report lists DQ2 as 'detected' and then further down says 'Genotype present: HLA-DQ2.2 Heterozygous'. I thought that might be just identifying the type of DQ2 gene so was referring to the same thing - my ignorance of genetics is quite obvious! I am thinking I will need to seek out a doctor who is more experienced with celiac disease and gluten sensitivity - although I feel so much better being gluten free that maybe I don't need an official diagnosis. Thanks!

Scott Adams Grand Master

This article is older, but is still helpful to understand the genetics of CD, and it’s unfortunate that doctors still can’t get this right when their patient DOES HAVE the genetic markers for CD, as you do:

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Neroli D Rookie
7 hours ago, Scott Adams said:

This article is older, but is still helpful to understand the genetics of celiac disease, and it’s unfortunate that doctors still can’t get this right when their patient DOES HAVE the genetic markers for celiac disease, as you do:

 

Thank you - seems I need to find a new GP. Nothing against my current GP who is a very good doctor, but clearly not experienced in this area. Thanks again!

CMCM Rising Star
(edited)
7 minutes ago, Neroli D said:

Thank you - seems I need to find a new GP. Nothing against my current GP who is a very good doctor, but clearly not experienced in this area. Thanks again!

I suspect very few GPs know about celiac.  Even some gastroenterologists (who you would think WOULD know about it) are uninformed.  It's really hit or miss finding someone who knows more than just sketchy information about gluten sensitivity and celiac disease.  My own GP has been very honest and frank with me....and she told me at this point, I know more than she does.  Somehow, she still isn't motivated to learn more on her own, though, so that's disappointing.  I realized that for the most part, I was on my own with this.  

Edited by CMCM
trents Grand Master

I would consider printing out some factual information from studies, such as those published in the NIH journal (which are often linked on this forum) and giving handouts to the doc. If the doc is not open to receiving the information, I would look for another doc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,154
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    J. Nichols
    Newest Member
    J. Nichols
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.2k
    • Total Posts
      71.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Dora77
      It wasnt really eye catching, but they were small stains which looked like dried out liquid. I dont know if it was normal or shouldve been just completely clean. But if someone didnt pay attention, it wouldnt be noticeable.
    • RMJ
      If there were stains or particles on a drink can in an area that would either contact the drink or my lips, I would wash that can whether or not I had celiac disease.
    • Bebygirl01
      You are on the money, but I should also add that Italian, French and other countries research shows exactly what I have said. Our FDA is behind the ball when it comes to this research and I am hopeful that Kennedy can straighten this out soon, albeit he is giving the food companies too long to just remove food dyes from our foods when in fact they have to remove all that in order to sell for example, in the UK as they aren't allowed such things. The food companies and the cola companies have also changed their formulas to have just sugar in them instead of corn gluten aka high fructose corn syrup and corn starch in them. Misinformation here in America is a very dangerous thing. I also have been grain free for a long time now and at no time can I even have the smallest amount of corn gluten -I recently got glutened from a supplement that claimed to be grain free yet upon further research I found that it had erythritol (corn sugar) in it and that is what got me sick for 7 days straight. I am not hopeful to ever be able to add back into my diet any of the grain glutens, but perhaps those who were only gluten intolerant might be able to, but for me being celiac, I have no hope in that. Thank you for the article, I will add it to my collection of research as I am collecting everything I can find on this subject and posting it on X as well as other places.  I also don't use psuedo grains i.e. quinoa as that also reacts negatively with my gut, so I am 100% a cassava/tapioca/arrow root girl and that is my go to bread replacement. There are some new items made with chicpea/green peas that are sold as rice alternatives, i bought one to try but haven't yet. So food companies are getting creative, but like you said, I am fresh whole foods and don't buy many processed foods, I make my own cheese, ketchup, pickles, jams, etc.
    • Dora77
      There were small spots (stains) on the drinking area at the top of the energy drinks can from the store that looked as the same color as milk — maybe oat milk (Hafermilch) or a wheat-based drink (Weizendrink), but I’m not sure what it was. There were also some particles that looked like either flour or dust, but not many. Could it have been a gluten-containing drink spilled onto the can or just regular small stains which I shouldn‘t worry about? Do you watch out for stuff like that or am I overthinking? Would it cause damage to a celiac?
    • Scott Adams
      This is such an important discussion! While corn gluten (zein) is structurally different from wheat gluten, emerging research suggests some celiac and gluten-sensitive individuals may still react to it, whether due to cross-reactivity, inflammation, or other factors. For those with non-responsive celiac disease or ongoing symptoms, eliminating corn—especially processed derivatives like corn syrup—might be worth exploring under medical guidance. That said, corn’s broader health impact (GMOs, digestibility, nutritional profile) is a separate but valid concern. Like you mentioned, ‘gluten-free’ doesn’t automatically mean ‘healthy,’ and whole, unprocessed foods are often the safest bet. For those sensitive to corn, alternatives like quinoa, rice, or nutrient-dense starches (e.g., sweet potatoes) can help fill the gap. Always fascinating (and frustrating) how individualized this journey is—thanks for highlighting these nuances! Many people with celiac disease, especially those who are in the 0-2 year range of their recovery, have additional food intolerance issues which could be temporary. To figure this out you may need to keep a food diary and do an elimination diet over a few months. Some common food intolerance issues are dairy/casein, eggs, corn, oats, and soy. The good news is that after your gut heals (for most people who are 100% gluten-free this will take several months to two years) you may be able to slowly add some these items back into your diet after the damaged villi heal. This article may be helpful:    
×
×
  • Create New...