Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Can food intolerances cause a delayed reaction?


Aaron275

Recommended Posts

Aaron275 Enthusiast

Hi,

One day last week I ate eggs for breakfast. I seemed to tolerate them fine and had no noticeable reaction to them.

A few days later, I drank a can of Coca-Cola at about 4 pm. Then, the next morning I ate eggs again at about 11 am. This time I reacted to the eggs and felt bad for several hours.

Could this be a delayed reaction from the can of soda?

The fact that I was able to tolerate eggs the first time makes me think the soda is the problem. I know soda is terrible for me but I hadn't considered the possibility that it could be causing other food intolerances.

What do you think?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GFinDC Veteran
13 hours ago, Aaron275 said:

Hi,

One day last week I ate eggs for breakfast. I seemed to tolerate them fine and had no noticeable reaction to them.

A few days later, I drank a can of Coca-Cola at about 4 pm. Then, the next morning I ate eggs again at about 11 am. This time I reacted to the eggs and felt bad for several hours.

Could this be a delayed reaction from the can of soda?

The fact that I was able to tolerate eggs the first time makes me think the soda is the problem. I know soda is terrible for me but I hadn't considered the possibility that it could be causing other food intolerances.

What do you think?

If your stomach/digestion is upset, anything you put in it can make it react.

Aaron275 Enthusiast
7 hours ago, GFinDC said:

If your stomach/digestion is upset, anything you put in it can make it react.

I know, but I'm asking if a reaction can appear to be from one food, but really it's from another food I ate several hours ago?

Scott Adams Grand Master

Yes, I recently wrote an article about my experience with ALCAT food sensitivity testing, and I wrote questions to the Roger Deutsch, the founder of the company.

Quote

Q: Two items that I was surprised to see in my "Moderate" reaction list were white and brown rice, which have been daily staples and are in many gluten-free foods that I eat. I've never noticed any issues when I eat rice. Likewise, apples are in my "Severe" list, but I don't eat them often. Can you explain why some foods that I seem to have severe or moderate reactions to don't have noticeable effects after I eat them?

A: Keep in mind that the white blood cell reactivity (change in number and size) the ALCAT Test identifies, is an inflammatory response. (see scientific dossier attached page 4) Inflammation is the contributing factor to the most common chronic health problems we experience in the US. We don’t always feel inflammation but it is happening whether we feel it or not. IF symptoms are noticed from sensitivities, they can be noticed ~2-3 hours after ingesting the offending food or the next day or even 4 days later. (unlike the allergy response symptoms which would be noticed minutes after ingesting the offender up to 2 hours later).

The full article is at:

 

Aaron275 Enthusiast

Wow. So my food intolerances might be completely different to what I think they are, because the reaction doesn't always happen immediately?

This might explain a lot for me.

AlwaysLearning Collaborator

I used to worry that I might have a problem with eggs which would be horrible. But I couldn't figure out why eggs that I used in baking were not a problem, but my scrambled eggs were. Turns out I was reacting to the black pepper I was putting on my scrambled eggs. And it wasn't an allergic reaction, just a normal side effect of eating black pepper.

I can only speak for myself, but every food reaction I've ever had has appeared within the first 12 hours of eating a food, normally within the first 8. But I don't have any food allergies and your digestion speed might vary.

But the best tool I've ever used for narrowing down what my problem foods might be was keeping a food/symptom diary. You don't even have to do it every day because just doing it for a couple weeks will help your brain learn to remember what you ate. And no matter how long it takes for the problem to appear, you have a record that you can refer to, or refer back to old instances of similar reactions.

Eggs in particular can be problematic in a number of different ways. Some people are allergic, others intolerant, and they could also be contaminated with salmonella that could cause varying degrees of food poisoning. Or, you could have a completely different issue such as problems with your gallbladder and the cholesterol in the eggs is causing a flair up. Or it isn't the egg at all and something you're eating with it, such as my black pepper, the oil or butter you're using to cook it, the pan in which it is being cooked, and so on.

Anyway, I would not be too quick to jump to any conclusions, but just continue to look for answers. It took me a couple years to figure out my black pepper thing simply because I had been overlooking the pepper entirely. Even if you don't figure it out this week, have hope that you'll eventually get the answers you seek ... as long as you keep looking.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,986
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Vickie Clancy
    Newest Member
    Vickie Clancy
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Okay, it does make sense to continue the gluten challenge as long as you are already in the middle of it. But what will change if you rule it out? I mean, you have concluded that whatever label you want to give the condition, many of your symptoms improved when you went gluten free. Am I correct in that? According to how I understand your posting, the only symptom that hasn't responded to gluten free eating is the bone demineralization. Did I misunderstand? And if you do test positive, what will you do different than you are doing now? You have already been doing for years the main thing you should be doing and that is eating gluten free. Concerning how long you should stay on the gluten challenge, how many weeks are you into it already?
    • WildFlower1
      I mean that I will be re-taking the celiac blood test again while I am currently on the gluten challenge right now, but not sure how many weeks more to keep going, to ensure a false negative does not happen. Thank you.
    • WildFlower1
      Thank you for your help, I am currently in the middle of the gluten challenge. A bit over 6 weeks in. At 4 weeks I got the celiac blood tests and that is when they were negative. So to rule out the false negative, since I’m in the middle of the gluten challenge right now and will never do this again, I wanted to continue consuming gluten to the point to make sure the blood tests are not a false negative - which I did not receive a firm answer for how many weeks total.    My issue is, with these blood tests the doctors say “you are not celiac” and rule it out completely as a potential cause of my issues, when the symptoms scream of it. I want to rule out this 30 year mystery for my own health since I’m in the middle of it right now. Thank you!
    • trents
      I am a male and had developed osteopenia by age 50 which is when I finally got dx with celiac disease. I am sure I had it for at least 13 years before that because it was then I developed idiopathic elevated liver enzymes. I now have a little scoliosis and pronounced kyphosis (upper spine curvature).  All of your symptoms scream of celiac disease, even if the testing you have had done does not. You may be an atypical celiac, meaning the disease is not manifesting itself in your gut but is attacking other body systems. There is such a thing as sero negative celiac disease. But you still have not given me a satisfactory answer to my question of why do you need a differential dx between celiac disease and NCGS when either one would call for complete abstinence from gluten, which you have already been practicing except for short periods when you were undergoing a gluten challenge. Why do you want to put a toxic substance into your body for weeks when, even if it did produce a positive test result for celiac disease, neither you or your doctors would do anything different? Regardless of what doctors are recommending to you, it is your body it is affecting not theirs and they don't seem to have given you any good justification for starting another gluten challenge. Where you live, are doctors kings or something?
    • WildFlower1
      Sorry to put it clearly, at 15, infertility started (tried to word it nicely) meaning menstruation stopped. Which is in correlation to celiac I mean. Thank you. 
×
×
  • Create New...