Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Does this also seem incorrect to you guys?


Randommuwa

Recommended Posts

Randommuwa Apprentice

I have positive blood work, negative biopsy. Today was the first time I talked to my GI about the biopsy results and she tried to say my biopsy "proved" I didn't have celiacs. Which is already wrong itself, it can only confirm I have it, not that I don't. She said if I wanted to continue to pursue looking into it that we could. She said we can do genetic testing and that would "prove" if I had it or not..... Which also isn't right... 

 

I had to tell her to redo blood work (with a complete metabolic panel this time because she didn't do that the first time) just so when it comes back positive for the second time maybe she'd be more convinced it wasn't false. Is there anything else I should do? Do I just need a different doctor? She doesn't seem to understand her own field of work and the tests associated. 

 

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



frieze Community Regular

I vote a new doc.

Scott Adams Grand Master

It definitely sounds like your doctor needs to read up on the protocols for celiac disease screening. Can you share your blood test results with us, along with the cut off levels for a positive test? I wonder if a second blood test is necessary, but be sure to keep eating gluten until all testing is finished, otherwise you may end up with false negative results. 

Randommuwa Apprentice
2 minutes ago, Scott Adams said:

It definitely sounds like your doctor needs to read up on the protocols for celiac disease screening. Can you share your blood test results with us, along with the cut off levels for a positive test? I wonder if a second blood test is necessary, but be sure to keep eating gluten until all testing is finished, otherwise you may end up with false negative results. 

Yeah I've kept eating gluten to make sure my results are accurate. 

 

Blood work results:

Endomysial Abs (IgA):

Negative 

 

Gliadin Ab, IgA (Deamidated):

My Value: 21.4 U (Weak positive 20.0-30.0)

Standard Range: <20.0 (Negative) U

 

Tissue Transglutaminase IgA Ab: 

My Value: 5.7 U/mL (Weak Positive 4.0-10.0)

Standard Range: <4.0 (Negative) U/mL 

 

IgA: 

My Value: 234 mg/dL

Standard Range: 61 - 356 mg/dL

Scott Adams Grand Master

To me it looks like the most important test was positive: Tissue Transglutaminase IgA Ab, even though it is a "weak positive" it is still positive. If your doctor is willing to re-run the blood panel it may make sense to do it again, and you need to keep eating about 2 sliced of wheat bread daily for at least 6-8 weeks before the test, and at least 2 weeks before a biopsy.

If you think a positive celiac disease test will help you stay on a gluten-free diet, then it would make sense to get the diagnosis. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,166
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Ricciloren
    Newest Member
    Ricciloren
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.2k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • StaciField
      I am not taking anything except for the multivitamins that I purchased from the supermarket.
    • Yaya
    • Nicole boling
      The critic acid and sodium citrate is corn unfortunately and they don’t have to label corn because it’s not part of the top 9 allergen and not mandatory 😭
    • trents
      Yaya, from the JAMA study you refer to: "Taking 60,000 international units (IU) a day of vitamin D for several months has been shown to cause toxicity." No one on this forum is recommending  taking anywhere near that amount. We're talking about 5-10,000IU daily.
    • knitty kitty
      "Doses higher than the RDA are sometimes used to treat medical problems such as vitamin D deficiency, but these are given only under the care of a doctor for a specified time frame. Blood levels should be monitored while someone is taking high doses of vitamin D." Quoted from the Healthline article @Yaya linked above...  
×
×
  • Create New...