Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Negative Blood And Entero Lab Results?


erin24

Recommended Posts

erin24 Explorer

Has anyone ever had negative results on their blood test and entero lab results but still find the gluten-free diet alleviated their symptoms?

I am asking this b/c:

Currently, my blood work came back negative and I am contimplating getting the Entereo Lab test. I am wondering if the stool test came back negative, just how discouraged I should be. I know everyone on this site says "If you feel better on the diet, who cares if you're not officially diagnosed". While I totally agree with that I just can't help but think maybe it's not celiac disease that is causing all of these symptoms but something else. I guess if I feel better who cares really what it is but it is nice to have some confirmation about what is going on inside my body.

I am just a little annoyed that I don't have any concrete answers. Ohh well, I think I will order the Entero lab test.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



e&j0304 Enthusiast

My daughter had negative blood tests despite lots of symptoms. She never had the biopsy. We started the diet and she was so much better but we too wanted more confirmation so we ordered tests from enterolab. They were positive for gluten sensitivity.

My son also had symptoms of celiac disease. He also had bloodwork that came back neg and he had the biopsy done which was also negative. We ordered enterolab tests for him and those were negative too. HOWEVER...he had had chronic diarrhea since birth and was not gaining weight. Since starting the gluten free diet, his diarrhea is gone and he is gaining weight.

I really don't have any answers for you, but that's our experience. Good luck finding your answers. I truely know how frustrating all of the uncertainty can be.

Shannon

jnclelland Contributor
Has anyone ever had negative results on their blood test and entero lab results but still find the gluten-free diet alleviated their symptoms?

Yup, this is what happened to me. I think I should have done Enterolab sooner; I did it after 8 months gluten-free and my results were negative (although high enough in the negative range to wonder if they might have been slightly positive 8 months earlier). However, my gene test was positive for one celiac gene and one non-celiac gluten sensitivity gene. So, while I still feel frustrated at not having a diagnosis, I'm still glad I had the test, because:

1) Since my gene test was positive, that gives me confidence that there's something real going on here, and it's not all in my head. Probably I just got lucky and figured out I needed to be gluten-free before I suffered really serious damage - and that's a GOOD thing!

2) The positive gene test gives me something concrete to tell the doctor if I ever decide that my kids need to be tested. (They aren't showing any troublesome symptoms now, but who knows what may happen down the road?)

Jeanne

Clark Bent as Stupor-Man Contributor

I was in the same position as you a month or 2 ago. I had a blood test done for gluten antibodies right at the start of the year, and that came back negative. There were 2 antibody levels that had been tested, and neither of them were even in the high part of the normal range. My primary doctor had dismissed celiac disease before the blood test (apparently she thought it didn't cause headaches) and reluctantly ordered the blood test in the first place.

I went on a strict gluten-free diet along with eliminating many other foods after the blood test. I felt some improvement the first couple weeks and was very up and down the next month. I ordered the enterolab test in mid-Feb. to confirm that I was on the right path with the whole gluten-free thing. My results came back positive for nearly everything including gluten and casein. The positive results enabled me to do things I had been hesitating on (ie. getting new pots and pans, etc.).

I don't think it's necessary to get a diagnosis, but I wanted one, mostly because I was too up and down to know for sure that I was on the right path. If you feel better even if your enterolab results come back negative, I would stay on the diet. Easier said then done, but feeling better should supercede any lab result.

- charlie

Sandyo Apprentice

"I went on a strict gluten-free diet along with eliminating many other foods after the blood test. I felt some improvement the first couple weeks and was very up and down the next month. "

Thanks Charlie,

I'm glad to hear that someone else is having ups and downs. I also had a negative blood test but had felt better after going gluten free to 3 days before the blood test. Then I eat gluten for 3 days right before they drew the blood. This probably messed it up. So even though the blood test was negative, I've been gluten free for about 2 weeks now. But last week it was very up and down and I got discourged and eat some bread. Well, the next day I felt terrible. All my symptoms were back. I was starting to get relieve from Cronic Constipation for years and next next day....."c" was back! Incredible how fast it effected my BM. So that is enough for me.....but I had already ordered the enterolab test and am waiting for it's arrival. I'm going to stay gluten free for months and see if I level off.

Sandy

Claire Collaborator

May I suggest that if you get the Enterolab test you get the one that includes non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Claire

erin24 Explorer

Thanks for everyone's responses. It is good to know what everyone else has been through and the things you have tried since it seems that you are pretty much your own doctor with Celiac. Actaully, it seems that we are more like each other's doctors :) This message board has been more informative and helpful than all of my doctors combined. You guys will talk to me immediately and don't make me schedule appointments 2 months after I call. I guess I am a little bitter, huh?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,385
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Jenal
    Newest Member
    Jenal
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      If you have been eating the gluten equivalent of 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily for say, 4 weeks, I think a repeat blood test would be valid.
    • englishbunny
      it did include Total Immunoglobin A which was 135, and said to be in normal range. when i did the blood test in January I would say I was on a "light' gluten diet, but def not gluten free.  I didn't have any clue about the celiac thing then.  Since then I have been eating a tonne of gluten for the purpose of the endoscopy....so I'm debating just getting my blood test redone right away to see if it has changed so I'm not waiting another month...
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @englishbunny! Did your celiac panel include a test for "Total IGA"? That is a test for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, other IGA test resultls will likely be falsely low. Were you by any chance already practicing a reduced gluten free diet when the blood draw was done?
    • englishbunny
      I'm upset & confused and really need help finding a new gastro who specializes in celiac in California.  Also will welcome any insights on my results. I tested with an isolated positive for deamidated IGA a few months ago (it was 124.3, all other values on celiac panel <1.0), I also have low ferritin and Hashimotos. Mild gastro symptoms which don't seem to get significantly worse with gluten but I can't really tell... my main issues being extreme fatigue and joint pain. The celiac panel was done by my endocrinologist to try and get to the bottom of my fatigue and I was shocked to have a positive result. Just got negative biposy result from endoscopy. Doctor only took two biopsies from small intestine (from an area that appeared red), and both are normal. Problem is his Physician's Assistant can't give me an answer whether I have celiac or not, or what possible reason I might have for having positive antibodies if I don't have it. She wants me to retest bloods in a month and says in the meantime to either "eat gluten or not, it's up to you, but your bloodwork won't be accurate if you don't" I asked if it could be I have early stage celiac so the damage is patchy and missed by only having two samples taken, and she said doctor would've seen damaged areas when performing endoscopy (?) and that it's a good sign if my whole intestine isn't damaged all over, so even if there is spotty damage I am fine.  This doesn't exactly seem satisfactory, and seems to be contrary to so much of the reading and research I have done. I haven't seen the doctor except at my endoscopy, and he was pretty arrogant and didn't take much time to talk. I can't see him or even talk to him for another month. I'm really confused about what I should do. I don't want to just "wait and see" if I have celiac and do real damage in the meantime. Because I know celiac is more that just 'not eating bread' and if I am going to make such a huge lifestyle adjustment I need an actual diagnosis. So in summary I want to find another doctor in CA, preferably Los Angeles but I don't care at this stage if they can do telehealth! I just need some real answers from someone who doesn't talk in riddles. So recommendations would be highly welcomed. I have Blue Shield CA insurance, loads of gastros in LA don’t take insurance at all 😣
    • trents
      Okay, Lori, we can agree on the term "gluten-like". My concern here is that you and other celiacs who do experience celiac reactions to other grains besides wheat, barley and rye are trying to make this normative for the whole celiac community when it isn't. And using the term "gluten" to refer to these other grain proteins is going to be confusing to new celiacs trying to figure out what grains they actually do need to avoid and which they don't. Your experience is not normative so please don't proselytize as if it were.
×
×
  • Create New...