Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Testing in 15-month-old with little gluten exposure


greenbeanie

Recommended Posts

greenbeanie Enthusiast

Hello! I used to post a lot but haven't for the past several years. I have a daughter with biopsy-confirmed celiac who tested high positives on every test on the panel at age 4, and who had symptoms since infancy. She's now 12. I have been diagnosed with celiac myself by a GI but my situation was less clear-cut (long story). My daughter and I have an entirely gluten-free home and have both been totally fine on a strict gluten-free diet with no problems for many years now. 

I now have a toddler who just turned 15 months old and is showing early signs of celiac. His doctor doesn't think it's necessary to do any test except tTG-IgA and total serum IgA. My concern is that he's only had a very small amount of gluten exposure in his entire life and has definitely not been eating a "normal, gluten-containing diet". I've followed current recommendations for feeding at-risk kids and did introduce wheat at the normal time but only gave him small amounts occasionally when he first began solids. Most days he had none, but occasionally he'd have a single wheat cracker (eaten outside the home). At first it seemed okay, but after a while he started vomiting after eating wheat sometimes and just getting really fussy other times. So I backed off for a while, but I knew he was going to start daycare in a toddler room that serves wheat snacks this fall. I don't want to restrict his diet unnecessarily, and I also feel like I need to know if he has celiac or just an intolerance because celiac would require precautions for Play-doh, finger paint, dry pasta art, and other wheat-containing things at daycare whereas a simple intolerance would mean we probably didn't have to worry about that sort of thing.

So six weeks ago I started feeding him wheat every day to see how he'd react. He's had a single small wheat teething biscuit every day for about 6 weeks, with no gluten exposure aside from that. His personality changed and he got very fussy, then had diarrhea multiple times every day for over a month. But he's teething and eating a variety of other foods that might just be hard for his immature digestive system to process. So while this does does very suggestive of celiac, it could be other things and I'm trying not to make any assumptions. Anyhow, I feel strongly that the DGP test should be run as well as tTG, but his doctor will not order it. The DGP was always more sensitive to smaller and shorter-term exposures when my daughter was young. I realize that there's conflicting research on this, and I've read many of the actual studies from medical journals. But he fits the exact profile where DGP seems especially likely to be helpful: family history, symptoms, only short-term gluten exposure but strong reaction to it. I also showed the doctor that the University of Chicago Celiac Center and the Celiac Disease Foundation recommend including DGP for kids under 2, but she was not swayed.

I have not taken him for the tTG blood draw yet because from other comments it sounds like his doctor would take a negative tTG as evidence that no further evaluation is needed and would just recommend assuming it's an intolerance and avoiding gluten without worrying about small exposures. I have little confidence that a negative tTG alone would be meaningful when he's only had such a small amount of gluten for six weeks and has never been on a "normal, gluten-containing diet." Obviously his small intake could produce false negatives on other tests too, but at least checking DGP would increase the chances of picking up an early problem, since it tends to increase and decrease more quickly.

Sorry for the long post, but my dilemma is: Do I take him for the tTG test now and hope that he's been eating enough gluten for it to be meaningful? Try to feed him a more normal amount of gluten for a few weeks, then take him for the test? He had two teething biscuits today(doubling his usual amount) and he's been crying almost non-stop all morning, despite pain medication in case it was just teething pain. I can't imagine subjecting him to this for weeks longer! But I really feel like it would be a mistake to assume it's just an intolerance and remove gluten from his diet if the tTG comes back negative at this point, as that would prevent us from ever getting a clear answer about whether we need to be careful about small exposures at daycare. Does anyone have experience with this, especially with testing a symptomatic toddler who's only had a very small amount of gluten? 

Edited to add: Signature info is outdated but I can't find a way to edit/remove it from this post. 

Edited by greenbeanie
Outdated signature info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



frieze Community Regular

Get a new doc, one that does not have their head up their arse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
greenbeanie Enthusiast

Unfortunately we live in a rural area (of the U.S.) with a severe shortage of primary care doctors, especially pediatricians. Most are not taking new patients or have a months-long wait. I may wait out the waiting lists and switch in the future, but for now we’re unable to see another doctor in the short term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Scott Adams Grand Master

I'm sorry to hear about the doctor not ordering the DGP test, which is considered more accurate in children. Perhaps you can find a doctor who will order it for you via a phone/video appointment, which is more common now due to the pandemic?

You also probably know that if you have celiac disease that your children have an ~44% chance of also having it, so if you can't get the tests you need it may be better to just go gluten-free, as the symptoms you've described are certainly consistent with either CD or non-celiac gluten sensitivity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      125,812
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Shayron
    Newest Member
    Shayron
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.8k
    • Total Posts
      69k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • RMJ
      It will not undo all of the healing.  If it did, diagnosis of celiac disease would be much easier!  To have enough damage to see on an endoscopy requires several weeks of gluten ingestion. 
    • Jean Shifrin
      HI, I am new to this and am still in 'repair' mode, which I know will take time. But I'm wondering if anyone knows what happens if you ingest gluten after you have made a lot of progress in repairing your villi. Does anyone know if you just have a short-term issue? Or does an accidental ingestion of gluten derail all the work you've done and set you back to square one? Thanks.
    • Scott Adams
      Hydrolyzed wheat is wheat protein that has been broken down into smaller components through a chemical or enzymatic process called hydrolysis. This ingredient can be found in various products, including cosmetics, personal care items, and some food products. For people with celiac disease, hydrolyzed wheat is generally not safe to consume because it still contains gluten proteins, even in its broken-down form. Though hydrolysis reduces the size of these proteins, it doesn’t fully remove the components that trigger an autoimmune response in people with celiac disease. In food products, hydrolyzed wheat protein still poses a risk and should be avoided. With regard to the McDonald's French fries, the total amount of hydrolyzed wheat in the flavoring is small, and the amount that ends up in an order of fries is even smaller, and likely below 20ppm. McDonald’s states that the fries are gluten-free by ingredient and free from cross-contact with gluten-containing foods in their dedicated fryers. Third-party tests and statements by McDonald's confirm gluten levels are below the FDA threshold for gluten-free labeling (20 parts per million or less). So, while McDonald’s USA fries may be gluten-free based on testing, some people with celiac disease still approach them cautiously due to the past concerns and individual sensitivities.
    • trents
      Here is an excerpt from this article: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC82695:   Studies have shown that various peptidases of fungal, plant, animal, or bacterial origin are able to hydrolyze gluten into harmless peptides. According to SDS‐PAGE pattern, proteolytic enzymes hydrolyze gliadins (Heredia‐Sandoval et al., 2016; Scherf et al., 2018; Socha et al., 2019; Wei et al., 2018, 2020). Bacterial peptidase (Krishnareddy & Green, 2017), fungal peptidase (Koning et al., 2005), and prolyl endopeptidases (PEPs) (Amador et al., 2019; Janssen et al., 2015; Kerpes et al., 2016; Mamo & Assefa, 2018) thoroughly degrade gliadin fractions to decrease gluten concentration and influence celiac disease. Aspergillus niger derived PEP (AN‐PEP) were assessed in clinical cases for their impact on modifying immune responses to gluten in celiac patients (Lähdeaho et al., 2014). Guerdrum and Bamforth (2012) reported that PEP addition in brewing technology decreased the prolamin and all of the identified immunopathogenic gluten epitopes in beer production (Akeroyd et al., 2016). On the contrary, many of the recent investigations which employed enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), mass spectrometry, and Western blot analysis reported that PEP did not thoroughly destroy the whole gluten proteins (Allred et al., 2017; Colgrave et al., 2017; Fiedler et al., 2018; Panda et al., 2015), which indicates that beers treated with PEP are not safe for celiac disease patients. Anecdotally, this excerpt supports what we hear from the celiac community on this forum with regard to "gluten free" hydrolyzed wheat products and that is that some still react to them while many don't.
    • Scott Adams
      There aren't good studies that have been done on celiac disease remission, and I'm going from a distant memory of an older post here, but the longest remission that Dr. Stefano Guandalini from the University of Chicago Celiac Disease Center has witnessed was ~10 years, then the symptoms of celiac disease and the damage came back. The real issue though, is that you still could increase your risk of various related diseases and disorders by eating gluten, but again, celiac disease remission has not been studies enough to know what health risks you might face.
×
×
  • Create New...