Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Celiac genetic testing results - help


Caterina0909

Recommended Posts

Caterina0909 Apprentice

250180236_Screenshot2021-09-14at14_44_31.png.1e1e736cce5228e54c52f72b8f9137ec.png

 

Hi all

 

I received the results above - it was a genetic test for celiac. The result 'risk allele' - does anyone know what that means?

 

Thanks

 

Catherine 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



RMJ Mentor

I’m surprised it was presented this way, but here goes an attempt at an explanation.

When doing genetic testing, tests often look at SNPs, or single nucleotide polymorphisms.  This means instead of determining the DNA sequence of the entire gene, nucleotide by nucleotide,  they just look at the single nucleotide spots that commonly vary from person to person.  Most DNA is exactly the same in each human so this makes testing much simpler.

The rs numbers in the “marker” column are the positions on the DNA that were evaluated. The ones listed are six positions which are associated with celiac disease.

The letters in the “genotype” column are the DNA nucleotides found at those positions.

”Zygosity” refers to the fact that everyone has two copies of each gene, or two alleles, one from each parent. Homozygous means the two copies are the same, heterozygous means the two copies are different.

On one SNP you are heterozygous for a risk allele; you have one copy of one of the three possible risk alleles for the HLA DQ 2.2 version of the HLA gene, a gene involved in the immune system.  Because it is a risk allele, it does not mean that you will definitely get celiac disease, but you have a risk for celiac disease.  Even if someone has two copies of each risk allele for HLA DQ 2.2, risk alleles have what is called incomplete penetrance - the trait of celiac disease isn’t expressed in everyone with HLA DQ 2.2.

Please let me know if there is anything I said that doesn’t make sense!

 

Caterina0909 Apprentice
42 minutes ago, RMJ said:

I’m surprised it was presented this way, but here goes an attempt at an explanation.

When doing genetic testing, tests often look at SNPs, or single nucleotide polymorphisms.  This means instead of determining the DNA sequence of the entire gene, nucleotide by nucleotide,  they just look at the single nucleotide spots that commonly vary from person to person.  Most DNA is exactly the same in each human so this makes testing much simpler.

The rs numbers in the “marker” column are the positions on the DNA that were evaluated. The ones listed are six positions which are associated with celiac disease.

The letters in the “genotype” column are the DNA nucleotides found at those positions.

”Zygosity” refers to the fact that everyone has two copies of each gene, or two alleles, one from each parent. Homozygous means the two copies are the same, heterozygous means the two copies are different.

On one SNP you are heterozygous for a risk allele; you have one copy of one of the three possible risk alleles for the HLA DQ 2.2 version of the HLA gene, a gene involved in the immune system.  Because it is a risk allele, it does not mean that you will definitely get celiac disease, but you have a risk for celiac disease.  Even if someone has two copies of each risk allele for HLA DQ 2.2, risk alleles have what is called incomplete penetrance - the trait of celiac disease isn’t expressed in everyone with HLA DQ 2.2.

Please let me know if there is anything I said that doesn’t make sense!

 

That is a wonderful explanation. Thank-you. Would I have to have more than one risk allele to develop celiac disease? 
 

 

Just now, Caterina0909 said:

That is a wonderful explanation. Thank-you. Would I have to have more than one risk allele to develop celiac disease? 
 

 

Sorry… I should say, more than one Marker with a risk allele

RMJ Mentor

I just went and looked at the scientific journal article that describes all of this and I may have misled you a bit. I’m a scientist but not a geneticist!   It looks like with just one copy of DQ 2.2 you don’t have a risk for celiac disease.  You would also need a copy of DQ 2.5 or DQ7.  So in your case having DQ 2.2, you would need another marker to develop celiac disease, according to this article.

See the Table 1, and the legend to Figure 1.

Article on celiac risk alleles

Caterina0909 Apprentice
8 minutes ago, RMJ said:

I just went and looked at the scientific journal article that describes all of this and I may have misled you a bit. I’m a scientist but not a geneticist!   It looks like with just one copy of DQ 2.2 you don’t have a risk for celiac disease.  You would also need a copy of DQ 2.5 or DQ7.  So in your case having DQ 2.2, you would need another marker to develop celiac disease, according to this article.

See the Table 1, and the legend to Figure 1.

Article on celiac risk alleles

That’s a really helpful article. Thank-you. Can I bother you once more to ask if you know if the paragraph below applies to me? I am without the DQ2.5 and DQ8 gene but have half the DQ2.2 molecule? 

2DB33845-489A-43CB-A98E-D82A56606D65.webp

RMJ Mentor

I think it would, so maybe you do have some risk. I do find parts of the article and part of Table 1 confusing, like the number of copies.  The HLA molecule has multiple subunits which I think is confusing me.  I don’t know where they got the “genetic risk” scores.  I’ll see if I can find a reference for that.

Caterina0909 Apprentice
7 minutes ago, RMJ said:

I think it would, so maybe you do have some risk. I do find parts of the article and part of Table 1 confusing, like the number of copies.  The HLA molecule has multiple subunits which I think is confusing me.  I don’t know where they got the “genetic risk” scores.  I’ll see if I can find a reference for that.

You are a star. Honestly, thank-you so much for taking the time to reply. 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



RMJ Mentor

Here is the abstract of a more recent paper (2020) that concludes in the discussion that your results would mean you are not at risk.  Looks like the debate is ongoing!

Celiac disease risk stratification based on HLA-DQ heterodimer (HLA-DQA1 ~ DQB1) typing in a large cohort of adults with suspected celiac disease

Caterina0909 Apprentice
12 hours ago, RMJ said:

Here is the abstract of a more recent paper (2020) that concludes in the discussion that your results would mean you are not at risk.  Looks like the debate is ongoing!

Celiac disease risk stratification based on HLA-DQ heterodimer (HLA-DQA1 ~ DQB1) typing in a large cohort of adults with suspected celiac disease

Thanks - this is really interesting. I am so convinced I have celiac disease but not getting too far with a diagnosis.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,956
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    BLF
    Newest Member
    BLF
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Beverage
      I feel for you. I've had an interesting history with some vaccine, especially t-DAP. One time after just getting it, I remember walking from the pharmacy to my car, reaching for the door handle of my car as my last memory, then waking up slumped into my car with the door wide open hours later. Nobody even knew I was there. I did get a bad cut from rotting rusty wood and probably animal droppings, and it had been 10 years, so I got a booster recently, but took someone with me. My doc back then did say he was concerned about my reactions to vaccines, but we never talked about what alternatives there might be. What is your risk when you do get sick? For me, I almost always end up needing prednisone and antibiotics and have to crawl back to life for months after those are done, prednisone really messes me up, raises my blood pressure to stroke levels, and the antibiotics mess up my intestines really bad. I have to take mega doses of C and D and B's, especially flush niacin, and probiotics.  So preventing flu is critical for me since I always get a long term negative effect from the treatment. I did a lot of research, traditional and alternative medicine, and they all say high vitamin D levels are crucial to so many kinds of illnesses, including flu, cancer, etc.  People with high D during covid had much better outcomes.  I always tested low in D even with high oral supplementation of D3 and K2.  So last year I saved up and bought a real vitamin D lamp, not one of those cheapie ones that you can get on Amazon that don't work, seriously, those are junk. Wow what a difference with a real D Lamp. We haven't been sick all year, which is rare for me, even after being around several sick people or people that came down sick just after visiting. I use the lamp about every other day or if I've been in a group of people or around anyone sick.  I have not yet had my D levels retested since starting with it (will do that at annual check up later this year), but I have not gotten a cold or flu (knock on wood), feel better than usual for a cold wet winter in the NorthWest, and my hair is growing in like crazy, all signs of improved vitamin D levels. It doesn't take long to use, just a few seconds and first and gradually build up. I now do it for a count of 200, which is about 3 minutes. I don't remember all the details on how the body creates its own vitamin D, but I do remember that the body makes a reaction on the skin and you don't want to wash that off for a few hours.  So I do the D Lamp right after my shower, not before.  There are 2 reputable ones that I found in my research: Sperti Vitamin D Lamp uses florescent tubes, you stand and turn in front of it, be sure to get the VITAMIN D LAMP, not the tanning lamp:  https://www.sperti.com/product/sperti-vitamin-d-light-box/ Chroma Vitamin D Lamp is LED's, you can stand and turn in front of it or hold it in your hand and wave it over your body, always keeping it moving so you don't burn:  https://getchroma.co/products/d-light-vitamin-d-light-device-uvb-red-nir AND YOU MUST WEAR SPECIFIC EYE PROTECTION WHEN USING, KEEP ALL PETS AND OTHERS AWAY, THE GLASSES ARE PROVIDED WITH THE D LAMP. I got the Chroma D Lamp when they had a huge sale last year, it's a small start-up company in Seattle.  Sperti is a larger longer term well known, and you can sign up for a 10% discount on their web site.  If Chroma had not had the sale when I was going to buy one, the Sperti would have been fine. They both often have back orders on them, but they do deliver as promised. I have read various articles on the effectiveness of the flu vaccine for example, not always highly effective every year.  Since your risk with vaccines is high, or if your risk of bad illness if you get sick is high, maybe consider how to mitigate both in another way, perhaps a D Lamp. 
    • trents
      That's what came immediately to my mind as well, Bell's palsy. And don't assume every medical problem is connected to her celiac disease as there is still something known as coincidence. Get this checked out by medical professionals and push for some serious testing. Don't let them brush you off. Be appropriately assertive.
    • Mnofsinger
      Hi @CeliacMom502, As always, consult a medical professional on any advice you receive.  I experience have experienced this exact symptoms you're referring to and will receive them, typically after being accidentally glutened. I've recently been researching this (that's how I came across this posting), because I've been trying to nail down how long I've actually had the celiac genes "activated" or if I was just born with it. Now I wasn't diagnosed until 2023 with Celiac Disease, but not all these other health issues I've had previously point to it all connecting. In 2013 I ended up with Bell's Palsy that I had facial paralysis on one side of my face, where I couldn't even get a twitch for six months, but it took almost a year for "full recovery". I have now came to the conclusion that, because of the B12 vitamin deficiency caused by celiac disease (when not following a strict gluten free diet), caused me to have prolonged recovery from this, because the nerves were healing at a much lower rate> I'm not sure if your daughter has ever had Bell's Palsy, but ever since I have, some of my symptoms when I accidentally get glutened (including right now as I type this message 😄) include a migraine that goes across my eyes, and a shooting pain as you have described that will go across my left cheek and upper jaw, in addition to pain behind my left ear, and painful to the touch. Now, I did immediately go on a gluten free diet, and almost all these symptoms vanished after 3-4 months, but that time frame depends upon the "damage" already done previously.  Hope my situation helps even now this is now almost three years later from your message!  
    • Scott Adams
      It's nice to see celiac-safe options out there for guest homes.
    • Scott Adams
      Your situation involves interpreting elevated Deamidated Gliadin Peptide (DGP) IgG levels, which can indeed be confusing without clear symptoms or additional diagnostic tools like a biopsy. Here’s a possible approach to help clarify your next steps: Understanding DGP IgG: DGP IgG is a blood test often used to help diagnose celiac disease, particularly in individuals with IgA deficiency. However, since you’ve confirmed you don’t have IgA deficiency, the focus should shift to other celiac-specific tests, such as tissue transglutaminase IgA (tTG-IgA) and endomysial antibodies (EMA-IgA), which are more specific for celiac disease. Elevated DGP IgG alone is not diagnostic of celiac disease but may indicate gluten-related immune activity. Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS): You’re correct that NCGS does not typically show abnormalities in blood tests like celiac disease does. NCGS is diagnosed based on symptoms (e.g., bloating, fatigue, brain fog) that improve on a gluten-free diet, after celiac disease and wheat allergy have been ruled out. Since you don’t currently have symptoms, NCGS seems less likely in your case. Possible Next Steps: Monitor Symptoms: If you remain asymptomatic, it’s reasonable to continue eating gluten and retest after some time. This is because celiac disease can develop or become symptomatic later, and ongoing gluten consumption is necessary for accurate testing. Repeat Testing: Consider repeating the tTG-IgA test, as it is the most sensitive and specific for celiac disease. If this is also elevated, it strengthens the case for further investigation. Genetic Testing: If available, HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 genetic testing can help rule out celiac disease if negative, as nearly all celiac patients carry one or both of these genes. However, a positive result doesn’t confirm celiac disease, as these genes are common in the general population. Dietary Trial: If testing remains inconclusive and you develop symptoms, a supervised gluten-free diet trial might provide clarity. However, this should only be done after thorough testing, as going gluten-free prematurely can interfere with accurate diagnosis. Biopsy Limitation: Since a biopsy is not available in your town, you’ll need to rely on blood tests and clinical judgment. If your tests remain inconclusive but you develop symptoms, you may need to travel to a facility that can perform a biopsy for definitive diagnosis. In summary, if I were in your position, I would continue consuming gluten, monitor for symptoms, and retest with more specific celiac markers (tTG-IgA and EMA-IgA) in a few months. If symptoms develop or tests remain ambiguous, consulting a gastroenterologist for further guidance would be advisable. Always work with a healthcare provider to interpret results and tailor next steps to your specific situation.
×
×
  • Create New...