Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Views on the clarity of the labelling for 'free-from' or 'gluten free' products for people with coeliac disease


katievovnik

Recommended Posts

katievovnik Newbie

I am curious to know whether anyone else struggles with the clarity of labelling for gluten-free products, especially for someone with coeliac disease. 

I have recently found out that 'free-from' doesn't necessarily mean the product is free from gluten cross-contaminants and therefore, may still be unsafe for someone with the auto-immune disease.

I would love to know if anyone else has struggled with this and any other opinions or advice!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master

"Free from" is not one I have seen but judging from your spelling of "coeliac" it must be a UK thing.

cristiana Veteran

Hi Katie

Welcome to the forum!

The following may be helpful if you are posting from the UK where I live (I notice your spelling of "coeliac", my American friends here drop the "o" which to me makes much more sense!)

If you are based in the UK, have you tried joining Coeliac UK?  They  produce a Food and Drink Guide which lists safe products that are suitable for coeliacs.  I find this very helpful.   They also have an app you can take shopping with you which I am told is very good.

As I understand it, Coeliac UK checks that the food and drink which appears in this directory is safe for coeliacs to consume.  To qualify products must contain less than 20 parts per millon (20 ppm) of gluten.  This is deemed safe for most people with coeliac disease as in a day if you total what you eat from this list, it should still be under the accepted 10 mg daily limit, a level deemed safe for coeliac consumption.  But is thought that some coeliacs are super-sensitive and this may be too much for them.

Natascha's Law which is being introduced this month should put far more importance on correct labeling - I'm hoping for great things.

But of course ... this isn't much help if you aren't posting from the UK! Apologies if you are not.

Cristiana

 

 

 

 

cristiana Veteran
(edited)
12 minutes ago, trents said:

"Free from" is not one I have seen but judging from your spelling of "coeliac" it must be a UK thing.

Hi Trents!  Yes, Free From is used a lot in our main supermarket chains.  Usually one finds the gluten free products there but one has to be a bit wary and read the labeling.  I found some organic Dove flour (a brand which also makes excellent gluten free flour) in the Free From area in Sainsbury's.   To this day I'm not sure if it is Sainsbury's policy to put organic flour with the gluten free - I think it was an error - but I took it upon myself to move it to where the other organic products were.   Last time I checked the organic flour was still where it should be!  

Dairy Free products are also sold from this area in big supermarkets, as well as nut free, I think.  Often supermarkets try to create things like cakes, cereals, cookies etc that are dairy free, nut free, gluten free - kill several birds with one stone, as it were.

Edited by cristiana
trents Grand Master
(edited)
35 minutes ago, cristiana said:

As I understand it, Coeliac UK checks that the food and drink which appears in this directory is safe for coeliacs to consume.  To qualify products must contain less than 20 parts per millon (20 ppm) of gluten.  This is deemed safe for most people with coeliac disease as in a day if you total what you eat from this list, it should still be under the accepted 10 mg daily limit, a level deemed safe for coeliac consumption.

Cristiana, I'm not sure what you are trying to say here. You seem to be contradicting yourself by saying in one place that 20ppm is deemed safe but then immediately lower it to 10ppm in order to be safe. Could you clarify your intent here?

Edited by trents
cristiana Veteran

Thanks Trents.

Sorry for any confusion. I wrote 10 mg, not 10 ppm, but that is probably a rather confusing way of putting it.  I've found this which might be a bit clearer.

"Consuming a diet at 20 parts per million (ppm) is considered safe for those with celiac disease because it should put most people below the 10 mg threshold when you add up all the foods eaten in a day."

https://nationalceliac.org/celiac-disease-questions/understanding-gluten-levels/

trents Grand Master

That does help me understand what you were trying to say, cristiana. The article in the link (and reflected in your post) is distinguishing between concentration of gluten in food item and total gluten consumption over a day's time. That is a concept I don't think I have ever seen discussed anywhere else and certainly not on this forum. I think it is an important distinction but I'm not sure I agree entirely with the conclusion. The reason I say that is because it implies you can have two totally gluten free meals on a given day and then consume one that significantly exceeds 20 ppm and not have (for most celiacs) a reaction as long as the total amount of gluten in that meal did not exceed 50mg. I'm not sure that would bear out in the actual experience of most celiacs. But I could be wrong. The article in the link sites a study but I think more research probably needs to be done in this area. At this point, I tend to think you must pay attention to both the concentration and the total amount.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



RMJ Mentor
6 hours ago, trents said:

That does help me understand what you were trying to say, cristiana. The article in the link (and reflected in your post) is distinguishing between concentration of gluten in food item and total gluten consumption over a day's time. That is a concept I don't think I have ever seen discussed anywhere else and certainly not on this forum. I think it is an important distinction but I'm not sure I agree entirely with the conclusion. The reason I say that is because it implies you can have two totally gluten free meals on a given day and then consume one that significantly exceeds 20 ppm and not have (for most celiacs) a reaction as long as the total amount of gluten in that meal did not exceed 50mg. I'm not sure that would bear out in the actual experience of most celiacs. But I could be wrong. The article in the link sites a study but I think more research probably needs to be done in this area. At this point, I tend to think you must pay attention to both the concentration and the total amount.

In all papers I’ve seen where researchers study how much gluten someone with celiac disease can ingest they feed absolute amounts, mg or g, not ppm.  To get to recommendations an assumption is made of how many kg of food a person eats in a day and a calculation performed to convert acceptable total mg to ppm based on that many kg of food. When FDA came up with 20 ppm they also considered the level that analytical tests available at the time could detect.

katievovnik Newbie
23 hours ago, trents said:

"Free from" is not one I have seen but judging from your spelling of "coeliac" it must be a UK thing.

Yes this is a UK thing! Free-from refers to products which don't contain certain allergens such as dairy or gluten.

  • 3 months later...
LJ-Azura Rookie
On 10/6/2021 at 1:16 AM, katievovnik said:

I am curious to know whether anyone else struggles with the clarity of labelling for gluten-free products, especially for someone with coeliac disease. 

I have recently found out that 'free-from' doesn't necessarily mean the product is free from gluten cross-contaminants and therefore, may still be unsafe for someone with the auto-immune disease.

I would love to know if anyone else has struggled with this and any other opinions or advice!

In Australia we have "Free From.." as a category also. They seem to use this for many allergies etc. For example "Free From Gluten", "Free From Nuts", "Free From Sugar" etc etc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,816
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Shamrock HVAC Services
    Newest Member
    Shamrock HVAC Services
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.7k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Welcome to the forum, @Kiwifruit, I agree further testing is needed.  Disaccharidase deficiency is a symptom of Celiac disease.   On your test results, this line  "IgA: 0.9 g/l (norm 0.8 - 4.0)" is referring to Total IgA and it's very low.  People with low or deficient Total IgA should also have DGP IgG test done.  Low Total IgA means you are making low levels of tTg  IgA as well, leading to false negatives or "weak positives".  Maybe a DNA test for known Celiac genes.   Anemia, diabetes, and thiamine deficiency can cause test results like these.  Get checked for B12 deficiency anemia and have your iron (ferritin) checked.  Vitamin D deficiency is common, too.   Might be time to find a gastrointestinal doctor who is more familiar with diagnosing Celiac Disease.   Best wishes on your journey!  Please keep us posted on your progress.  
    • trents
      Yes, there is a trend in the medical community to forego the endoscopy/biopsy and grant an official celiac diagnosis based on high tTG-IGA antibody scores alone. This trend started in the UK and is spreading to the USA medical community. And yes, 5-10x the normal level is what I have been seeing as the threshold as well. Here is the relevant section dealing from the article above dealing with the importance of the total IGA test being ordered. See the embedded attachment.
    • hmkr
      Ok, interesting. Not what I was thinking that meant. I'm reading the article and trying to understand. I see this “According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy” My IgG is 90, which is 6 times. So to me that means it's highly likely I do have it. 
    • trents
      It just means you aren't IGA deficient, i.e., that IGA deficiency cannot have given you artificially low scores in the individual IGA celiac antibody tests. This is explained in the article Scott linked above.
    • hmkr
      Normal range: 70 - 400 mg/dL, a little above middle of the range. So what does that mean? Thank you! I will check out that page you linked. Appreciate it! 
×
×
  • Create New...