Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Views on the clarity of the labelling for 'free-from' or 'gluten free' products for people with coeliac disease

katievovnik
 Share

Recommended Posts

katievovnik Newbie
katievovnik
Posted

I am curious to know whether anyone else struggles with the clarity of labelling for gluten-free products, especially for someone with coeliac disease. 

I have recently found out that 'free-from' doesn't necessarily mean the product is free from gluten cross-contaminants and therefore, may still be unsafe for someone with the auto-immune disease.

I would love to know if anyone else has struggled with this and any other opinions or advice!

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


trents Grand Master
trents
Posted

"Free from" is not one I have seen but judging from your spelling of "coeliac" it must be a UK thing.

cristiana Veteran
cristiana
Posted

Hi Katie

Welcome to the forum!

The following may be helpful if you are posting from the UK where I live (I notice your spelling of "coeliac", my American friends here drop the "o" which to me makes much more sense!)

If you are based in the UK, have you tried joining Coeliac UK?  They  produce a Food and Drink Guide which lists safe products that are suitable for coeliacs.  I find this very helpful.   They also have an app you can take shopping with you which I am told is very good.

As I understand it, Coeliac UK checks that the food and drink which appears in this directory is safe for coeliacs to consume.  To qualify products must contain less than 20 parts per millon (20 ppm) of gluten.  This is deemed safe for most people with coeliac disease as in a day if you total what you eat from this list, it should still be under the accepted 10 mg daily limit, a level deemed safe for coeliac consumption.  But is thought that some coeliacs are super-sensitive and this may be too much for them.

Natascha's Law which is being introduced this month should put far more importance on correct labeling - I'm hoping for great things.

But of course ... this isn't much help if you aren't posting from the UK! Apologies if you are not.

Cristiana

 

 

 

 

cristiana Veteran
cristiana
Posted
(edited)
12 minutes ago, trents said:

"Free from" is not one I have seen but judging from your spelling of "coeliac" it must be a UK thing.

Hi Trents!  Yes, Free From is used a lot in our main supermarket chains.  Usually one finds the gluten free products there but one has to be a bit wary and read the labeling.  I found some organic Dove flour (a brand which also makes excellent gluten free flour) in the Free From area in Sainsbury's.   To this day I'm not sure if it is Sainsbury's policy to put organic flour with the gluten free - I think it was an error - but I took it upon myself to move it to where the other organic products were.   Last time I checked the organic flour was still where it should be!  

Dairy Free products are also sold from this area in big supermarkets, as well as nut free, I think.  Often supermarkets try to create things like cakes, cereals, cookies etc that are dairy free, nut free, gluten free - kill several birds with one stone, as it were.

Edited by cristiana
trents Grand Master
trents
Posted
(edited)
35 minutes ago, cristiana said:

As I understand it, Coeliac UK checks that the food and drink which appears in this directory is safe for coeliacs to consume.  To qualify products must contain less than 20 parts per millon (20 ppm) of gluten.  This is deemed safe for most people with coeliac disease as in a day if you total what you eat from this list, it should still be under the accepted 10 mg daily limit, a level deemed safe for coeliac consumption.

Cristiana, I'm not sure what you are trying to say here. You seem to be contradicting yourself by saying in one place that 20ppm is deemed safe but then immediately lower it to 10ppm in order to be safe. Could you clarify your intent here?

Edited by trents
cristiana Veteran
cristiana
Posted

Thanks Trents.

Sorry for any confusion. I wrote 10 mg, not 10 ppm, but that is probably a rather confusing way of putting it.  I've found this which might be a bit clearer.

"Consuming a diet at 20 parts per million (ppm) is considered safe for those with celiac disease because it should put most people below the 10 mg threshold when you add up all the foods eaten in a day."

https://nationalceliac.org/celiac-disease-questions/understanding-gluten-levels/

trents Grand Master
trents
Posted

That does help me understand what you were trying to say, cristiana. The article in the link (and reflected in your post) is distinguishing between concentration of gluten in food item and total gluten consumption over a day's time. That is a concept I don't think I have ever seen discussed anywhere else and certainly not on this forum. I think it is an important distinction but I'm not sure I agree entirely with the conclusion. The reason I say that is because it implies you can have two totally gluten free meals on a given day and then consume one that significantly exceeds 20 ppm and not have (for most celiacs) a reaction as long as the total amount of gluten in that meal did not exceed 50mg. I'm not sure that would bear out in the actual experience of most celiacs. But I could be wrong. The article in the link sites a study but I think more research probably needs to be done in this area. At this point, I tend to think you must pay attention to both the concentration and the total amount.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


RMJ Mentor
RMJ
Posted
6 hours ago, trents said:

That does help me understand what you were trying to say, cristiana. The article in the link (and reflected in your post) is distinguishing between concentration of gluten in food item and total gluten consumption over a day's time. That is a concept I don't think I have ever seen discussed anywhere else and certainly not on this forum. I think it is an important distinction but I'm not sure I agree entirely with the conclusion. The reason I say that is because it implies you can have two totally gluten free meals on a given day and then consume one that significantly exceeds 20 ppm and not have (for most celiacs) a reaction as long as the total amount of gluten in that meal did not exceed 50mg. I'm not sure that would bear out in the actual experience of most celiacs. But I could be wrong. The article in the link sites a study but I think more research probably needs to be done in this area. At this point, I tend to think you must pay attention to both the concentration and the total amount.

In all papers I’ve seen where researchers study how much gluten someone with celiac disease can ingest they feed absolute amounts, mg or g, not ppm.  To get to recommendations an assumption is made of how many kg of food a person eats in a day and a calculation performed to convert acceptable total mg to ppm based on that many kg of food. When FDA came up with 20 ppm they also considered the level that analytical tests available at the time could detect.

katievovnik Newbie
katievovnik
Posted
  • Author
23 hours ago, trents said:

"Free from" is not one I have seen but judging from your spelling of "coeliac" it must be a UK thing.

Yes this is a UK thing! Free-from refers to products which don't contain certain allergens such as dairy or gluten.

  • 3 months later...
LJ-Azura Rookie
LJ-Azura
Posted
On 10/6/2021 at 1:16 AM, katievovnik said:

I am curious to know whether anyone else struggles with the clarity of labelling for gluten-free products, especially for someone with coeliac disease. 

I have recently found out that 'free-from' doesn't necessarily mean the product is free from gluten cross-contaminants and therefore, may still be unsafe for someone with the auto-immune disease.

I would love to know if anyone else has struggled with this and any other opinions or advice!

In Australia we have "Free From.." as a category also. They seem to use this for many allergies etc. For example "Free From Gluten", "Free From Nuts", "Free From Sugar" etc etc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,203
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Barbara 1981
    Newest Member
    Barbara 1981
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.7k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Endoscopy

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Given your history of a high TTG (167) that decreased to 16 on a gluten-free diet, along with genetic confirmation of celiac disease, it’s likely the negative biopsy is a false negative due to not eating gluten before the endoscopy. Gluten is necessary to trigger the intestinal damage seen in celiac disease, and avoiding it can lead to healing and a normal biopsy despite ongoing immune activity (reflected in your still-elevated TTG). The inflammation observed during the endoscopy (“diffuse moderately erythematous mucosa”) could be residual damage, mild ongoing inflammation, or another condition like peptic duodenitis, but it’s consistent with celiac disease in context. Continued positive blood markers suggest ongoing gluten exposure, possibly from cross-contamination or hidden sources. Strict adherence to a gluten-free diet and follow-up testing are key to managing symptoms and reducing inflammation. Discuss these findings with your doctor to confirm the diagnosis and refine your dietary approach. This article has some detailed information on how to be 100% gluten-free, so it may be helpful (be sure to also read the comments section.):    
    • Scott Adams
      Biopsy results after 1,5 gfd

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Yes, it sounds like great progress, but what was the time frame between the two endoscopies? 
    • Scott Adams
      Help with results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Your symptoms—headaches, dizziness, nausea, irregular bowel movements, anemia, and menstrual changes—along with a family history of celiac disease, strongly suggest celiac disease could be the cause. The mild duodenal changes seen in your biopsy are consistent with early or mild celiac disease, though they could also be due to other factors. The improvement in bowel movements after cutting out gluten is a positive sign, but other symptoms like headaches and dizziness may take longer to resolve as your body heals. It’s important to continue a strict gluten-free diet and discuss further testing, such as celiac antibody blood tests or a follow-up biopsy, with your doctor to confirm the diagnosis. Many people experience a gradual improvement in symptoms over weeks to months, so patience and strict adherence to the diet are key. You’re not alone in this process, and support from celiac communities can be very helpful. This article has some detailed information on how to be 100% gluten-free, so it may be helpful (be sure to also read the comments section.):    
    • Scott Adams
      For people with celiac disease and corn intolerance from it: Is salt still okay for most people?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      For people with celiac disease and corn intolerance, most salts, including table salt with dextrose, are generally safe in small amounts, as the dextrose is typically highly processed and unlikely to contain problematic corn proteins. However, if you’re highly sensitive, you might consider switching to pure kosher or Himalayan salt, which don’t contain additives. While bringing your own salt to restaurants or avoiding seasoned foods can feel overwhelming, it’s a practical step if you’re concerned. Many people with corn intolerance tolerate trace amounts of dextrose in salt without issues, but individual sensitivity varies. If your current salt isn’t causing symptoms, it’s likely fine to continue using it, especially given your financial constraints and the challenges of managing dietary restrictions. Focus on what works for you and prioritize avoiding larger sources of corn, like cornstarch.
    • Scott Adams
      Stomach pains etc 2 weeks after start of gluten-free diet

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Your daughter’s ongoing stomach pains two weeks into a gluten-free diet could be due to her body still healing after months of gluten exposure, as recovery from celiac disease can take time. Her inconsistent eating habits and possible eating disorder behaviors may also delay healing. While she’s now eating gluten-free snacks, her limited intake and emotional withdrawal complicate the process. It’s positive that she’s trying, but recovery may take weeks to months. Addressing her depression and mental health is crucial, as celiac disease can impact mood, and proper nutrition may help. Patience and support are key, but if symptoms persist, consult her doctor to rule out accidental gluten exposure or other issues. Many people with celiac disease, especially those who are in the 0-2 year range of their recovery, have additional food intolerance issues which could be temporary. To figure this out you may need to keep a food diary and do an elimination diet over a few months. Some common food intolerance issues are dairy/casein, eggs, corn, oats, and soy. The good news is that after your gut heals (for most people who are 100% gluten-free this will take several months to two years) you may be able to slowly add some these items back into your diet after the damaged villi heal.  
×
×
  • Create New...