Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help with test results?


Nutmeg1186

Recommended Posts

Nutmeg1186 Newbie

Tests: (1) TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE ANTIBODY, IGG,IGA (11073) TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE AB, IGG
<1.0 U/mL
TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE AB, IGA <1.0 U/mL
Tests: (2) IMMUNOGLOBULIN A (539) IMMUNOGLOBULIN A 281 mg/dL
Tests: (3) ENDOMYSIAL ANTIBODY SCR (IGA) W/REFL TO TITER (15064) ENDOMYSIAL ANTIBODY SCR (IGA) W/REFL TO TITER
NEGATIVE NEGATIVE

 

I understand it’s a negative test and it’s not diagnostic with just this test alone but I was wondering if anyone could give me any insight into the numbers and what they mean? I have had all of the symptoms of celiac for several years now including DH. 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master

The lab report is oddly presented. I can't make heads or tales of the format. The only thing I can say for sure is that "negative" is found twice on the same line at the end of the report while there seem to be three tests that were run. Not sure which of those the two negatives apply to. And I do not see "positive" at all.

One thing I can state with confidence is that there is no known cause for DH other than celiac disease. Has your DH diagnosis been confirmed?

Were these tests run by dermatologist or some other kind of physician?

Nutmeg1186 Newbie
1 minute ago, trents said:

The lab report is oddly presented. I can't make heads or tales of the format. The only thing I can say for sure is that "negative" is found twice on the same line at the end of the report while there seem to be three tests that were run. Not sure which of those the two negatives apply to. And I do not see "positive" at all.

One thing I can state with confidence is that there is no known cause for DH other than celiac disease. Has your DH diagnosis been confirmed?

Were these tests run by dermatologist or some other kind of physician?

I tried to copy and paste from the PDF the doctor sent. I’ll try to break it down a little better 

TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE AB, IGG
<1.0 U/mL

TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE AB, IGA         <1.0 U/mL

IMMUNOGLOBULIN A 281 mg/dL (It says normal range is between 47-310)

ENDOMYSIAL ANTIBODY SCR (IGA) W/REFL TO TITER = NEGATIVE 

This blood work was done by my general practitioner. DH hasn’t been confirmed by a doc but I have done hours of my own research and Im 100% sure that’s what it is. I have 4 spots of clusters and DH describes them exactly. They itch like CRAZY and scab over then after they have healed it’s left a purple mark. The spot on my fingers look like raised red pinpoints and as it has healed it’s started to peel and crack

Nutmeg1186 Newbie

Just realized how to add a photo. Bear with me I’m a newbie 😂

1D5591DE-B082-47BA-8C85-DD7EE0EAF013.webp

trents Grand Master

The tTG-IGA is the most common test run  for celiac disease diagnosis and since it has such a small value I assume it to be negative, though you give no reference range for what is normal. It supposedly combines good sensitivity with good specificity.

The Immunoglobulin A I believe is just total IGA count and it is in the normal range. Low total IGA values can skew individual IGA values toward the negative side. So, that is not an issue.

The ENDOMYSIAL ANTIBODY SCR is the most specific test available for celiac disease and it is negative.

The TTG-IGG test is run for celiac disease that is run when total IGA is low. Your very low value would seem to indicate a negative result although again, you do not give a reference range.

 

Had you already begun eating gluten free when these tests were run? If so, that would likely explain the negative results.

The test report format is still very weird. Not your fault.

trents Grand Master

What are the large numbers in parentheses? Are they catalog numbers identifying the test or are they actual test values?

Nutmeg1186 Newbie
1 minute ago, trents said:

The tTG-IGA is the most common test run  for celiac disease diagnosis and since it has such a small value I assume it to be negative, though you give no reference range for what is normal. It supposedly combines good sensitivity with good specificity.

The Immunoglobulin A I believe is just total IGA count and it is in the normal range. Low total IGA values can skew individual IGA values toward the negative side. So, that is not an issue.

The ENDOMYSIAL ANTIBODY SCR is the most specific test available for celiac disease and it is negative.

The TTG-IGG test is run for celiac disease that is run when total IGA is low. Your very low value would seem to indicate a negative result although again, you do not give a reference range.

 

Had you already begun eating gluten free when these tests were run? If so, that would likely explain the negative results.

No I have been eating gluten like normal. I’m so confused because I can’t find a reference range anywhere on my results. I’m going to see a gastroenterologist soon and hopefully he can run his own tests or decipher these more clearly. Thanks so much for your feedback Trent! 

2 minutes ago, trents said:

What are the large numbers in parentheses? Are they catalog numbers identifying the test or are they actual test values?

I have no idea that was one of my questions as well


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master
(edited)

Realize that what these tests are measuring is antibodies produced by inflammation in response to gluten consumption. If you cut back significantly or eliminate gluten intake beforehand you sabotage the purpose of the test. That applies to the blood tests and the endoscopy/biopsy.

The official guidelines for a pretest gluten challenge is:

For the blood antibody test: daily consumption of an amount of gluten equivalent to two slices of wheat bread for 6-8 weeks leading up to the test.

For the endoscopy/biopsy: daily consumption of an amount of gluten equivalent to two slices of wheat bread for at least two weeks leading up to the test.

 

Many doctors, even GI docs, fail to tell their patients this or don't know to tell them.

Edited by trents
Nutmeg1186 Newbie
16 minutes ago, trents said:

Realize that what these tests are measuring is antibodies produced by inflammation in response to gluten consumption. If you cut back significantly or eliminate gluten intake beforehand you sabotage the purpose of the test. That applies to the blood tests and the endoscopy/biopsy.

The official guidelines for a pretest gluten challenge is:

For the blood antibody test: daily consumption of an amount of gluten equivalent to two slices of wheat bread for 6-8 weeks leading up to the test.

For the endoscopy/biopsy: daily consumption of an amount of gluten equivalent to two slices of wheat bread for at least two weeks leading up to the test.

 

Many doctors, even GI docs, fail to tell their patients this or don't know to tell them.

I have been eating like normal before I had the test done. Not necessarily doing a “gluten challenge”. That’s definitely something I’ll keep in mind before I see the gastrointestinal doctor. Thanks!

Scott Adams Grand Master

I just wanted to point out that even though your celiac disease screening indicates that you don't have it, you could still have non-celiac gluten sensitivity, which ~10x more people have than celiac disease, although there currently isn't a screening for it available (they are working on it). So if the reason you got this test was due to symptoms that might be associated with gluten consumption, then you still may want to try out a gluten-free diet for a few months to see if those symptoms go away.

Wheatwacked Veteran

Some people with DH will still have negative antibody results.  Get your DH biopsied by a doctor familiar with doing DH biopsies

Quote

DH is considered the specific cutaneous manifestation of celiac disease, and the most recent guidelines of celiac disease have stated that, in celiac patients with a proven DH, a duodenal biopsy is unnecessary for the diagnosis   https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4435051/ 

 

Nutmeg1186 Newbie
2 hours ago, Wheatwacked said:

Some people with DH will still have negative antibody results.  Get your DH biopsied by a doctor familiar with doing DH biopsies

 

I was wondering about that. I have an appointment with a gastroenterologist next week. I’ll ask if he can do one. Thanks!

Wheatwacked Veteran

A DH biopsy would be more in the realm of dermatology

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rejoicephd replied to Rejoicephd's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      12

      Struggling to get into a good pattern

    2. - trents replied to junell's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      1

      Help!

    3. - junell posted a topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      1

      Help!

    4. - cristiana replied to Rejoicephd's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      12

      Struggling to get into a good pattern

    5. - Rejoicephd replied to Rejoicephd's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      12

      Struggling to get into a good pattern


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,648
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Livinonaprayer
    Newest Member
    Livinonaprayer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rejoicephd
      Thank you @cristiana.  Its really helpful to hear your experience, thanks for sharing.  8 years is a long time!  And its also good to know that others have experienced worsening before it gets better.  I've just started doing the food diary recently, and I'll keep that going. It's at least helping me try to get a handle on this, and also helps increase my overall awareness of what I'm putting in my body. I will also message my GI doc in the meantime too.  Thanks, it's really helpful to talk through this.  
    • trents
      Yes, the development of additional food intolerances is a common spinoff of celiac disease. To ensure valid testing after beginning a "gluten challenge" you would need to be consuming at least 10g of gluten daily (about the amount in 4-6 slices of wheat bread) for at least two weeks. Many cannot follow through with this regimen, however, as their intolerance reactions are just too strong and present too much health risk.
    • junell
      I've been gluten free for 5 years, as well as being intolerant to gluten, my list of intolerances is growing.. from dairy, eggs, soya, yeast, to mushroom, garlic, onion, spinach and quite a few in-between, basically my diet is gluten-free cornflakes, rice, banana, almond milk and fish anything else causes bloating, severe abdominal pain, mucousy diarrhoea, lethargy, muscle and joint pain, kidney pain, headaches, and mouth ulcers. I've been told it's IBS, I think it's more than that... I've been sent to a gastroenterologist who tested for coeliac, if course it came back negative because, as I told him, I haven't eaten gluten for 5 years, he's asked me to eat gluten for 4 weeks and redo the blood test, so I've tried small amounts of crispbread for 3 days and am in agony, I can't do this for 4 weeks and then however long it'll take to recover. Has anyone got any suggestions, and is multiple food intolerances a common side effect of coeliac? I'm struggling! And struggling to be taken seriously 😒 
    • cristiana
      I think going back to your GI isn't a bad idea - my visits to the GI did not stop following my diagnosis as I had annoying issues on and off for some time.  Thankfully he is a fantastic GI, with  a great sense of humour, so it wasn't a chore to see him again although I'd rather not have had to, obviously!  But I needed my mind to be put at rest as my symptoms didn't seem to go away overnight as I'd hoped they would.  Initially I recall he recommended I went Dairy Free for three weeks, and he told me it would take that time to see an effect.  At that time, even lactose free milk went straight through me, so it is important, I would say, to even avoid that during a Dairy Free trial. My ongoing symptoms were bloating which did respond a bit to that trial.   However, within about 18 months there was a return to a very sore stomach, plus various aches and pains.   It turned out some gluten was sneaking in with my iron supplement (I was buying Floradix instead of Floravital), but I also think the dishwasher, the oven and eating out were contributors, too. Before my numbers normalised (from memory, about eight years!) I had several follow up appointments and a few more tests, but things gradually did get better.  Having read many accounts on this forum over the years, I don't think it is uncommon for symptoms to get a bit worse before getting better, that was certainly the case with me.  Your gut is damaged so you may well have issues digesting other food in the short term. But do try to be as scrupulously gluten free as you can possibly be as a first step, and I'd definitely try a three week Dairy Free trial.   Your villi because they are damaged are not able to create the lactase required to digest dairy at this time so you may well see some improvement if you come off dairy for a while.  Perhaps keeping a food diary of what you eat, where you eat it, whilst a bit onerous to do, will help identify foods that are causing issues.  For a while, apart from oats, I found peas, lentils and soya products hugely aggravating.  Things should calm down.
    • Rejoicephd
      Thankfully those are normal. B12 was on the low end of the normal range when I first got diagnosed. When I last got it checked, it had come up a lot (455 last time checked).
×
×
  • Create New...