Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

May contain ?


Tiwa

Recommended Posts

Tiwa Apprentice

When going gluten-free after getting a celiac diagnosis should you avoid food labeled “may contain traces of gluten”? 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ItsHarley99 Newbie

Okay, so personally I avoid any food that says that, some people who aren't that sensitive may be able to eat small bits of gluten and not feel the effects.  Not me, even just a tiny bit makes me cramp up and double over in pain. I try to check the label and make sure it has the Celiac Foundation certification or else I don't trust it usually.  I do the same thing wit nuts and tree nuts if it says may contain I avoid it. 

cristiana Veteran
(edited)

I try to avoid that, I've occasionally eaten something by mistake though.  It happened last week and I wondered why I felt so ill, and then saw the warning, which appeared much further down the packaging than the main ingredients list.

What one has to watch out for in my country (the UK) is that food labelling that says "may contain" can be located in a separate area from the ingredients, and a few times I've completed missed the warning.  I think "may contain" ingredients should be clearly displayed in the same area as the main ingredients.

Edited by cristiana
Tiwa Apprentice
Just now, cristiana said:

I try to avoid that, I've occasionally eaten something by mistake though.  It happened last week and I wondered why I felt so ill, and then saw the warning, which appeared much further down the packaging than the main ingredients list.

What one has to watch out for in my country (the UK) is that food labelling that says "may contain" can be located in a separate area from the ingredients, and I've completed missed the warning.  I think "may contain" ingredients should be clearly displayed in the same area as the main ingredients.

Yes, I agree. In my country, everything that has more than 20 ppm must be labeled with gluten. So “may contain” should have less than 20 ppm. I'm not sure if It's worth avoiding it the first months? Or if I'm safe enough anyways. 

cristiana Veteran
Just now, Tiwa said:

Yes, I agree. In my country, everything that has more than 20 ppm must be labeled with gluten. So “may contain” should have less than 20 ppm. I'm not sure if It's worth avoiding it the first months? Or if I'm safe enough anyways. 

That's really interesting, I didn't realise that about the 20 ppm.  I wonder if that is the same in the UK?  Anyway, I always have rated myself as an extra sensitive coeliac so perhaps that's why it does tend to affect me.

Tiwa Apprentice
Just now, cristiana said:

That's really interesting, I didn't realise that about the 20 ppm.  I wonder if that is the same in the UK?  Anyway, I always have rated myself as an extra sensitive coeliac so perhaps that's why it does tend to affect me.

Yes, some very sensitive celiacs do react, but most can tolerate it. But I think I'll avoid everything in the beginning just to be sure. :)

GF-Cate Enthusiast

The other thing to remember is that "may contain" statements may be on items that you're not expecting. For example, I recently almost used a bag of dried lentils without reading the label, and sure enough it had a "may contain" for wheat (I'm in the US - Goya brand).

Also packaged nuts in US almost always have a "may contain" statement, at least in my local grocery stores (my guess is because they get processed on the same lines as trail mixes - anyone know for sure?). 

Personally I don't tolerate "may contain" items and do not use them.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Sharib Apprentice
On 12/13/2021 at 12:33 PM, GF_Cate said:

The other thing to remember is that "may contain" statements may be on items that you're not expecting. For example, I recently almost used a bag of dried lentils without reading the label, and sure enough it had a "may contain" for wheat (I'm in the US - Goya brand).

Also packaged nuts in US almost always have a "may contain" statement, at least in my local grocery stores (my guess is because they get processed on the same lines as trail mixes - anyone know for sure?). 

Personally I don't tolerate "may contain" items and do not use them.

I have tried crackers that were labeled gluten free and my stomach was upset.  I’m sensitive to either the small amount of gluten and/or other additives.  I cook all my meals at home.  My Celiac is complicated with SIBO, H pylori, histamine issues and leaky gut.  It’s been a long road of treating each.  I am doing the supplement route to treat H pylori with a practitioner.  I treated the SIBO with supplements recently and it seems to be in check.  The gluten free way of life is tricky.  I love this site and all the information provided.  

trents Grand Master
On 12/13/2021 at 9:33 AM, GF_Cate said:

The other thing to remember is that "may contain" statements may be on items that you're not expecting. For example, I recently almost used a bag of dried lentils without reading the label, and sure enough it had a "may contain" for wheat (I'm in the US - Goya brand).

Also packaged nuts in US almost always have a "may contain" statement, at least in my local grocery stores (my guess is because they get processed on the same lines as trail mixes - anyone know for sure?). 

Personally I don't tolerate "may contain" items and do not use them.

According to Gluten Watchdog, lentils are the number one dried food for cross contamination with wheat.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,025
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    toyatang
    Newest Member
    toyatang
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      Hi @Karmmacalling I'm very sorry to hear you are feeling so unwell.  Can you tell us exactly what sort of pain you are experiencing and where the pain is?  Is it your lower abdomen, upper abdomen etc?  Do you have any other symptoms? Cristiana
    • trents
      The NIH article you link actually supports what I have been trying to explain to you: "Celiac disease (celiac disease) is an autoimmune-mediated enteropathy triggered by dietary gluten in genetically prone individuals. The current treatment for celiac disease is a strict lifelong gluten-free diet. However, in some celiac disease patients following a strict gluten-free diet, the symptoms do not remit. These cases may be refractory celiac disease or due to gluten contamination; however, the lack of response could be related to other dietary ingredients, such as maize, which is one of the most common alternatives to wheat used in the gluten-free diet. In some celiac disease patients, as a rare event, peptides from maize prolamins could induce a celiac-like immune response by similar or alternative pathogenic mechanisms to those used by wheat gluten peptides. This is supported by several shared features between wheat and maize prolamins and by some experimental results. Given that gluten peptides induce an immune response of the intestinal mucosa both in vivo and in vitro, peptides from maize prolamins could also be tested to determine whether they also induce a cellular immune response. Hypothetically, maize prolamins could be harmful for a very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients, especially those that are non-responsive, and if it is confirmed, they should follow, in addition to a gluten-free, a maize-free diet." Notice that those for whom it is suggested to follow a maize-free diet are a "very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients". Please don't try to make your own experience normative for the entire celiac community.  Notice also that the last part of the concluding sentence in the paragraph does not equate a gluten-free diet with a maize-free diet, it actually puts them in juxtaposition to one another. In other words, they are different but for a "limited subgroup of celiac disease patients" they produce the same or a similar reaction. You refer to celiac reactions to cereal grain prolamins as "allergic" reactions and "food sensitivity". For instance, you say, "NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing" and "IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. I need to remind you that celiac disease is not an allergy, it is an autoimmune disorder. Neither allergy testing nor food sensitivity testing can be used to diagnose celiac disease. Allergy testing and food sensitivity testing cannot detect the antibodies produced by celiac disease in reaction to gluten ingestion.  You say of me, "You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant . . ." Gluten intolerance is synonymous with celiac disease. You must be referring to gluten sensitivity or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). Actually, I have been officially diagnosed with celiac disease both by blood antibody testing and by endoscopy/positive biopsy. Reacting to all cereal grain prolamins does not define celiac disease. If you are intent on teaching the truth, please get it straight first.
    • Bebygirl01
      Perhaps you would still like to answer the questions I posed on this topic, because that is all I asked. I am curious to know the answers to those questions, I do not care about the background of Dr. Osborne as I am more aware of the situation than you are, and he is also one of the best known authors out there on Celiac disease. But did you even bother to read the three Research Papers I posted by NIH? You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant and not yet reacting to all glutens aka grains, but I AM one of those who react to ALL the glutens, and again, that is one of the two questions I originally posted on this matter. NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing. I started with the failed FDA explanation of what Gluten Free is and I stayed sick and got even sicker. It wasn't until I came across NIH's papers and went off all grains that I realized that in fact, I am Celiac and reacting to all the glutens. IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. Those who are just getting started with learning about grains etc., can take it easy by just being "grain free' and eating a lot of meat, vegetables, etc. or whole foods as God has intended, without buying so called gluten free garbage out there that is making them sick and the whole reason they are not better. I tried the stupid gluten free garbage and it didn't work, and that will make anyone want to give up, it is better to teach the entire truth and let the patient decide, rather than give them misinformation and lies.
    • Nicola McGuire
      Thank you so much I will speak to the doctor for dietician apt . Thank you for your advice Beth much appreciated 
    • Scott Adams
      Oh no, I'm sorry to hear about the accidental gluten! This article, and the comments below it, may be helpful:    
×
×
  • Create New...