Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Ambiguous Results?

BeegYoshi
 Share

Recommended Posts

BeegYoshi Newbie
BeegYoshi
Posted

I have been gluten free since I was a toddler since I had a very nasty reaction to gluten when solid foods (e.g. sandwiches, cookies) were being introduced to my diet. 

Only recently (~18 years gluten-free) have I decided to get tested for celiac as I have other health problems I want to figure out and this is sort of the first step to figuring out what's wrong. 

Around August of last year I got the blood test done following 3 weeks of a gluten diet and the results were ambiguous according to my doctor. I had very elevated IgG levels (89) but my IgA level was normal (0.5) and they said I was not IgA deficient. (This confuses me as I had thought .8-2.8 was the normal range for adults and 0.5 would make me deficient but I'm also not a doctor)

Following this I was told to have an upper endoscopy/biopsy done and I did 3 months of a gluten diet this time eating 2x as much gluten as I did before to ensure results (this was recommended by my gastroentrologist). That was about 2 months ago and I just got the results of that test back. They said my small intestine looks totally normal, they looked in several places and the villi are fine and there's no evidence of damage.

I asked what that meant for me and they essentially said that they can't be certain and all they can say is gluten definitely makes me feel bad so just keep on the gluten-free diet. They said I can try genetic testing if I want but given that it's $900 where I live that's not a possibility for me.

 

I'm kind of confused and frustrated, this whole ordeal took 6 months and I'm basically exactly where I started but now I'm out a few hundred dollars.

Has anyone had a similar experience or has any advice as to where to go from here?

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Scott Adams Grand Master
Scott Adams
Posted

Welcome to the forum! 

The standard recommendation for a gluten challenge would be to eat around 2 slices of wheat bread daily for 6-8 weeks before a blood test, and 2 weeks before an endoscopy, so it's not clear if you were eating enough before your blood tests. You mentioned that you "had very elevated IgG levels (89)," so you had one positive blood test for celiac disease. One positive test does mean that you could indeed have it, even though your biopsy was normal.

Either way, how did you feel when you ate gluten? Did you have any symptoms?

Around 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn't a test for NCGS. It sounds like you may be in this category, but only if you are having symptoms when eating gluten that go away when you go gluten-free.

trents Grand Master
trents
Posted

Ditto to what Scott said.

frieze Community Regular
frieze
Posted

Request the report from the pathologist that read the slides. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,209
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Sharon Camden
    Newest Member
    Sharon Camden
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.7k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      For people with celiac disease and corn intolerance from it: Is salt still okay for most people?

      By trents · Posted

      There is dextrose in table salt?
    • trents
      Gluten Free Beer - The Enzymatic Hydrolyzation Process Problem

      By trents · Posted

      Jason, I have a bone to pick with your terminology. There is "gluten intolerance" which I believe is synonymous with celiac disease and then there is "gluten sensitivity" which comes from Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or NCGS for short. It is true, however, that there is still a lot of inconsistency in the use of these terms.
    • Liquid lunch
      Medicinal mushrooms 🍄

      By Liquid lunch · Posted

      I can’t say this will work for everyone but for me the difference is incredible so might be worth trying. I’ve never been diagnosed celiac but via an elimination diet I realised I can’t eat any lectins, gluten soy and oats are particularly problematic. If I eat them I’m in bed for a week, then heavy bleeding and extreme pain for another, followed by a third week of bleeding on and off. My skin was a mess and it snowed when I brushed my hair. Since taking reishi and cordyceps mushroom tincture I can’t believe the difference, I’ve had a lot of help from this site so I want to return the favour. I took the tincture for my guts but the most apparent effect is that I feel like my brain works again, I can’t begin to describe how wonderful it is to be able to achieve basic things, I’ve barely been able to organise getting out of bed for so long, it feels like I haven’t been hit over the head with a mallet for the first time in years. Then I glutened myself, not necessarily gluten as so many things wipe me out but definitely ate something I shouldn’t have, I took a treble dose of the tincture and almost immediately felt much better so continued with the increased dose and three days (not weeks) later was back to feeling great, no bleeding involved. My skin is better than I can remember it ever being, I feel great 😊. I spend £1.50 a day on these but it’s worth every penny, I hope this helps someone else out there reading this. I wish I’d known about them 20 years ago. best wishes everyone 🍄 
    • Scott Adams
      Endoscopy

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Given your history of a high TTG (167) that decreased to 16 on a gluten-free diet, along with genetic confirmation of celiac disease, it’s likely the negative biopsy is a false negative due to not eating gluten before the endoscopy. Gluten is necessary to trigger the intestinal damage seen in celiac disease, and avoiding it can lead to healing and a normal biopsy despite ongoing immune activity (reflected in your still-elevated TTG). The inflammation observed during the endoscopy (“diffuse moderately erythematous mucosa”) could be residual damage, mild ongoing inflammation, or another condition like peptic duodenitis, but it’s consistent with celiac disease in context. Continued positive blood markers suggest ongoing gluten exposure, possibly from cross-contamination or hidden sources. Strict adherence to a gluten-free diet and follow-up testing are key to managing symptoms and reducing inflammation. Discuss these findings with your doctor to confirm the diagnosis and refine your dietary approach. This article has some detailed information on how to be 100% gluten-free, so it may be helpful (be sure to also read the comments section.):    
    • Scott Adams
      Biopsy results after 1,5 gfd

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Yes, it sounds like great progress, but what was the time frame between the two endoscopies? 
×
×
  • Create New...