Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

What could I be reacting to in this almond milk?


Aaron275

Recommended Posts

Aaron275 Enthusiast

Usually when I have a reaction to a food I can pinpoint an ingredient that might be causing the issue, but this has me completely stumped.

Ingredients:

Filtered Water
Activated Organic Almonds (7%) (Almonds, Water)
Organic Brown Rice
Sea Salt

That's it. The product states that there are no added gums, thickeners, preservatives, colors, or oils.

I've tried this almond milk a few times because I couldn't understand how it could possibly be an issue. I thought it had to be something else. But it's definitely this.

I will stop using it, but I am just wondering how it is possible that I am reacting to these ingredients? It all looks extremely benign.

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Aaron275 Enthusiast

Is it possible I could have an almond allergy?

These are the symptoms I got from the almond milk:

- Nausea

- Stomach cramps

- Loss of appetite

- Bloating in face and stomach

- Dizziness

- Headache

- Mood changes

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GodsGal Community Regular
2 hours ago, Aaron275 said:

Is it possible I could have an almond allergy?

These are the symptoms I got from the almond milk:

- Nausea

- Stomach cramps

- Loss of appetite

- Bloating in face and stomach

- Dizziness

- Headache

- Mood changes

Hi! I am not a doctor, so please don't take this as medical advice.

Have you pursued any allergy testing? If there is any facial swelling, then that could be cause for concern.

It is possible that you could have an allergy. I would suggest that you talk to your doctor. And, if you are not comfortable with what you are told, it is totally ok to get a second opinion.

Also, I am curious, have you tried different brands of almond milk? Have you checked into any potential cross contamination in production? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Aaron275 Enthusiast
7 hours ago, GodsGal said:

Hi! I am not a doctor, so please don't take this as medical advice.

Have you pursued any allergy testing? If there is any facial swelling, then that could be cause for concern.

It is possible that you could have an allergy. I would suggest that you talk to your doctor. And, if you are not comfortable with what you are told, it is totally ok to get a second opinion.

Also, I am curious, have you tried different brands of almond milk? Have you checked into any potential cross contamination in production? 

In the past I have taken a skin prick test for a peanut allergy and the result was negative. I have also had some blood tests done for food allergies but I was told that blood tests for food allergies are unreliable. I can't remember whether the blood test included tree nuts - I think it either wasn't included or the result was negative, because I would have remembered otherwise. I still have the results but would have to look for them.

I have tried a different brand of almond milk and I had issues with that as well, but it had lots of additives in it and I thought it was the additives that were causing the problem. That's why I switched to this one which claims to have no additives, but it didn't fix the issue. For cross contamination, the product only says "May contain traces of other tree nuts. Made in a factory that also handles milk and soy". It doesn't mention gluten.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GodsGal Community Regular
5 hours ago, Aaron275 said:

In the past I have taken a skin prick test for a peanut allergy and the result was negative. I have also had some blood tests done for food allergies but I was told that blood tests for food allergies are unreliable. I can't remember whether the blood test included tree nuts - I think it either wasn't included or the result was negative, because I would have remembered otherwise. I still have the results but would have to look for them.

I have tried a different brand of almond milk and I had issues with that as well, but it had lots of additives in it and I thought it was the additives that were causing the problem. That's why I switched to this one which claims to have no additives, but it didn't fix the issue. For cross contamination, the product only says "May contain traces of other tree nuts. Made in a factory that also handles milk and soy". It doesn't mention gluten

I think that it is a good idea to not use it. Honestly, I think that the only way to rule out a true allergy would be through skin testing. (I also have been told that blood allergy testing is not always accurate.) That being said, it is possible that it is an intolerance. I just have not heard of an intolerance causing facial changes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wheatwacked Veteran

https://lock-s-foils.com/almond_milk_is_crap.html

Can you eat plain almonds? Almond Breeze is proud to use activated almonds. How the heck do they activate an almond? Almonds are excellent for nutrition. 2 ounces has 100% RDA of real vitamin E and a bunch of others. Almond milk, not so much. Nutrition as advertising hype. See the link above.

100% pasture fed whole milk is about the same price as almond milk and tastes way better than regular milk. My brother pointed out that it tastes like ice cream. It also is less discomforting than the regular commercial milk. Regular milk uses feed supplements to increase milk fat and volume. But the added milk fats are c:16 fatty acids (bad) added to the normal c:18 fatty acids (good). You end up with way more omega 6 (inflammatory) than omega 3 (anti-inflammatory) Omega 3 is why fish oil works. For that matter, as a side note, choose Cod Liver Oil. It has the omega 3 plus a tablespoon gives a nice boost to natural vitamin A. When they reduce fat in milk it also takes out the vitamin A, so it has to be replaced with synthetic A for government standards. Homemade fermented pickles (not quick vinegar pickles like most commercial brands) can help replenish the gut flora that makes the lactase we need to digest lactose as adults. Milk can be the difference between Calcium deficient and not. Pickles only take a week to ferment.

The old joke about pregnant women craving ice cream and pickles may have a valid nutritional basis after all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Aaron275 Enthusiast
2 hours ago, Wheatwacked said:

Can you eat plain almonds?

I don't know, I've never tried them and I think I would prefer not to after this experience.

I've just made an appointment with an allergy specialist for later this month, so I guess I will find out then if it is an allergy or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Aaron275 Enthusiast

I forgot to mention, I have probably eaten small amounts of almonds in other products, but I have never eaten them whole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beaver Newbie

After eating raw almonds all my life, I felt really sick after eating them one evening and haven't touched them since.  I haven't tried almond milk though.  Have you tried a different brand in case their ingredients aren't quite as organic as they claim?

I did have a similar problem with oat milk that gave me bloating, stomach discomfort and diarrhoea.  There just happened to be a TV programme that mentioned some people had my problem with oat milk because of added inulin and specifically chicory root that doesn't always get listed in the ingredients.

I stopped using oat milk and now use cashew nut milk that is fine for tea and cereals but curdles in coffee.

@Wheatwacked

I concur what you say about feed supplements in cows milk that I gave up because of bloating and stomach discomfort.  I always thought it was bad soya they were being fed after feeling very ill after drinking soya milk that had the same funny smell and taste that I could sometimes sense in cows milk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wheatwacked Veteran

"Dairy products contain short, medium and long-chain SFA [Saturated Fatty Acid], which affect cardiovascular health differently. It is apparent that lauric (12:0), myristic (14:0) and palmitic (16:0) have adverse effects on LDL, which is considered an important risk factor for CVD [60]. When compared to carbohydrate consumption in humans, lauric acid, myristic acid and palmitic acid raised total cholesterol and LDL, whereas stearic acid (18:0) does not. SFA raises high-density lipoproteins (HDL) but these effects are greater as the fatty acid chain length decreases and so generally lauric acid has the most beneficial effect on cholesterol profile [61]. Based on these studies, lauric acid may be a heart-healthy SFA [56]. ...the controversial PURE study, which assessed the dietary intake of 135,335 subjects from 18 countries across five continents for 7.4 year and found that total fat and types of fat were not associated with CVD, myocardial infarction, or CVD mortality. Further still, SFA was inversely associated with stroke [65]. The PURE study investigators state that advice to restrict SFA “is largely based on selective emphasis on some observational and clinical data, despite the existence of several randomised trials and observational studies that do not support these conclusions” Dairy Fats and Cardiovascular Disease: Do We Really Need to Be Concerned? (nih.gov)   https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5867544/  

Quote

 

Compared with stearic acid, palmitic acid increased the yield of milk fat and improved feed efficiency across production level of cows compared with SA, PA increased the secretion of C16:0 (113 g/d) and its desaturation product, cis-9 C16:1 (4.5 g/d), into milk, whereas SA only modestly increased C18:0 secretion into milk (13 g/d) and did not have an effect on its desaturation product, cis-9 C18:1. These results would suggest that efficiency of incorporation of C16:0 into milk fat is greater than that of C18:0

Dietary supplementation with C16:0 improved milk fat concentration and yield as well as the efficiency of feed conversion into milk compared with C18:0 supplementation.  https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030213008436

 


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wheatwacked Veteran

Apparently only Ireland and New Zealand find grassfed more profitable than adding palmitic acid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Aaron275 Enthusiast

Hi everyone,

There's one more thing that I thought might be relevant here. I can't be completely sure, but I thought that when I used the almond milk the reaction began to happen as soon as it was in my mouth, before I had even swallowed it. I have never noticed this with any other food.

Could this also point towards an allergy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GodsGal Community Regular
On 2/13/2022 at 5:53 PM, Aaron275 said:

Hi everyone,

There's one more thing that I thought might be relevant here. I can't be completely sure, but I thought that when I used the almond milk the reaction began to happen as soon as it was in my mouth, before I had even swallowed it. I have never noticed this with any other food.

Could this also point towards an allergy?

I would think that it could. Have you seen the allergist yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Aaron275 Enthusiast
8 hours ago, GodsGal said:

I would think that it could. Have you seen the allergist yet?

Not yet. The appointment is Friday next week. I will let you know how it goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      125,803
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Emeraeld
    Newest Member
    Emeraeld
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.8k
    • Total Posts
      69k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • RMJ
      It will not undo all of the healing.  If it did, diagnosis of celiac disease would be much easier!  To have enough damage to see on an endoscopy requires several weeks of gluten ingestion. 
    • Jean Shifrin
      HI, I am new to this and am still in 'repair' mode, which I know will take time. But I'm wondering if anyone knows what happens if you ingest gluten after you have made a lot of progress in repairing your villi. Does anyone know if you just have a short-term issue? Or does an accidental ingestion of gluten derail all the work you've done and set you back to square one? Thanks.
    • Scott Adams
      Hydrolyzed wheat is wheat protein that has been broken down into smaller components through a chemical or enzymatic process called hydrolysis. This ingredient can be found in various products, including cosmetics, personal care items, and some food products. For people with celiac disease, hydrolyzed wheat is generally not safe to consume because it still contains gluten proteins, even in its broken-down form. Though hydrolysis reduces the size of these proteins, it doesn’t fully remove the components that trigger an autoimmune response in people with celiac disease. In food products, hydrolyzed wheat protein still poses a risk and should be avoided. With regard to the McDonald's French fries, the total amount of hydrolyzed wheat in the flavoring is small, and the amount that ends up in an order of fries is even smaller, and likely below 20ppm. McDonald’s states that the fries are gluten-free by ingredient and free from cross-contact with gluten-containing foods in their dedicated fryers. Third-party tests and statements by McDonald's confirm gluten levels are below the FDA threshold for gluten-free labeling (20 parts per million or less). So, while McDonald’s USA fries may be gluten-free based on testing, some people with celiac disease still approach them cautiously due to the past concerns and individual sensitivities.
    • trents
      Here is an excerpt from this article: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC82695:   Studies have shown that various peptidases of fungal, plant, animal, or bacterial origin are able to hydrolyze gluten into harmless peptides. According to SDS‐PAGE pattern, proteolytic enzymes hydrolyze gliadins (Heredia‐Sandoval et al., 2016; Scherf et al., 2018; Socha et al., 2019; Wei et al., 2018, 2020). Bacterial peptidase (Krishnareddy & Green, 2017), fungal peptidase (Koning et al., 2005), and prolyl endopeptidases (PEPs) (Amador et al., 2019; Janssen et al., 2015; Kerpes et al., 2016; Mamo & Assefa, 2018) thoroughly degrade gliadin fractions to decrease gluten concentration and influence celiac disease. Aspergillus niger derived PEP (AN‐PEP) were assessed in clinical cases for their impact on modifying immune responses to gluten in celiac patients (Lähdeaho et al., 2014). Guerdrum and Bamforth (2012) reported that PEP addition in brewing technology decreased the prolamin and all of the identified immunopathogenic gluten epitopes in beer production (Akeroyd et al., 2016). On the contrary, many of the recent investigations which employed enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), mass spectrometry, and Western blot analysis reported that PEP did not thoroughly destroy the whole gluten proteins (Allred et al., 2017; Colgrave et al., 2017; Fiedler et al., 2018; Panda et al., 2015), which indicates that beers treated with PEP are not safe for celiac disease patients. Anecdotally, this excerpt supports what we hear from the celiac community on this forum with regard to "gluten free" hydrolyzed wheat products and that is that some still react to them while many don't.
    • Scott Adams
      There aren't good studies that have been done on celiac disease remission, and I'm going from a distant memory of an older post here, but the longest remission that Dr. Stefano Guandalini from the University of Chicago Celiac Disease Center has witnessed was ~10 years, then the symptoms of celiac disease and the damage came back. The real issue though, is that you still could increase your risk of various related diseases and disorders by eating gluten, but again, celiac disease remission has not been studies enough to know what health risks you might face.
×
×
  • Create New...