Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Test Results-help


amymm

Recommended Posts

amymm Newbie

I got my test results from Prometheus labs. They are at the fore-front of Celiac testing. At least Celiac testing that is viewed as credible by doctors.

I tested negative on every test. However, they automatically test for the HLA DQ genes if you test negative. I tested positive for the DQ2 gene, but negative for the DQ8 gene.

What do you think? The test result stated that this doesn't eliminate at diagnosis of celiac. Should I go see another GI doctor? I had an endoscopy 2 1/2 years ago that show "mild plasma cell infiltrate of the lamina propia"-this could be the beginning of celiac. Of course with the negative test results-the doctor said it wasn't celiac. So I'm wondering if I should pursue another endoscopy.

Thanks for your input.

Amy, San Jose


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



WGibs Apprentice

I'm assuming you have some digestive or other symptoms that make you suspect celiac. Have you tried the gluten-free diet to see if it helps? You could have non-celiac gluten intolerance or sensitivity. The solution would be the same -- the gluten-free diet. Trying the diet is the easiest, and in some ways most meaningful, diagnostic tool. If you respond positively, then you have a solution to your problems, if not an official label from a doctor.

Just a word of warning: going gluten-free will skew subsequent test results, so you would have to go back on gluten if you really wanted more testing. I know alot of people only want to go gluten-free if they have an official diagnosis. Some docs will make a diagnosis based on positive dietary response, but many will not. For me, the important thing was finding a way to feel better. Going gluten-free did that for me, and it doesn't bother me too much that I don't have an official dx. Every time I have accidentally have gluten, I get major D and get patches of itchy red bumps. If I stay gluten-free, none of that happens. I consider that a virtual diagnosis.

amymm Newbie
I'm assuming you have some digestive or other symptoms that make you suspect celiac. Have you tried the gluten-free diet to see if it helps? You could have non-celiac gluten intolerance or sensitivity. The solution would be the same -- the gluten-free diet. Trying the diet is the easiest, and in some ways most meaningful, diagnostic tool. If you respond positively, then you have a solution to your problems, if not an official label from a doctor.

Just a word of warning: going gluten-free will skew subsequent test results, so you would have to go back on gluten if you really wanted more testing. I know alot of people only want to go gluten-free if they have an official diagnosis. Some docs will make a diagnosis based on positive dietary response, but many will not. For me, the important thing was finding a way to feel better. Going gluten-free did that for me, and it doesn't bother me too much that I don't have an official dx. Every time I have accidentally have gluten, I get major D and get patches of itchy red bumps. If I stay gluten-free, none of that happens. I consider that a virtual diagnosis.

I have symptoms galore, including GI symptoms. Have had them since the birth of my 2nd child in 2000. I know I can gluten-free on my own. I want to be taken seriously-as far as I can expect the medical establishment to do so, before I take matters into my own hands.

I'm also just looking for people who have experience with the gene testing and how seriously doctors take those test results.

Thanks for the feedback.

Amy, San Jose

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,387
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Tim Semas
    Newest Member
    Tim Semas
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      If you have been eating the gluten equivalent of 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily for say, 4 weeks, I think a repeat blood test would be valid.
    • englishbunny
      it did include Total Immunoglobin A which was 135, and said to be in normal range. when i did the blood test in January I would say I was on a "light' gluten diet, but def not gluten free.  I didn't have any clue about the celiac thing then.  Since then I have been eating a tonne of gluten for the purpose of the endoscopy....so I'm debating just getting my blood test redone right away to see if it has changed so I'm not waiting another month...
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @englishbunny! Did your celiac panel include a test for "Total IGA"? That is a test for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, other IGA test resultls will likely be falsely low. Were you by any chance already practicing a reduced gluten free diet when the blood draw was done?
    • englishbunny
      I'm upset & confused and really need help finding a new gastro who specializes in celiac in California.  Also will welcome any insights on my results. I tested with an isolated positive for deamidated IGA a few months ago (it was 124.3, all other values on celiac panel <1.0), I also have low ferritin and Hashimotos. Mild gastro symptoms which don't seem to get significantly worse with gluten but I can't really tell... my main issues being extreme fatigue and joint pain. The celiac panel was done by my endocrinologist to try and get to the bottom of my fatigue and I was shocked to have a positive result. Just got negative biposy result from endoscopy. Doctor only took two biopsies from small intestine (from an area that appeared red), and both are normal. Problem is his Physician's Assistant can't give me an answer whether I have celiac or not, or what possible reason I might have for having positive antibodies if I don't have it. She wants me to retest bloods in a month and says in the meantime to either "eat gluten or not, it's up to you, but your bloodwork won't be accurate if you don't" I asked if it could be I have early stage celiac so the damage is patchy and missed by only having two samples taken, and she said doctor would've seen damaged areas when performing endoscopy (?) and that it's a good sign if my whole intestine isn't damaged all over, so even if there is spotty damage I am fine.  This doesn't exactly seem satisfactory, and seems to be contrary to so much of the reading and research I have done. I haven't seen the doctor except at my endoscopy, and he was pretty arrogant and didn't take much time to talk. I can't see him or even talk to him for another month. I'm really confused about what I should do. I don't want to just "wait and see" if I have celiac and do real damage in the meantime. Because I know celiac is more that just 'not eating bread' and if I am going to make such a huge lifestyle adjustment I need an actual diagnosis. So in summary I want to find another doctor in CA, preferably Los Angeles but I don't care at this stage if they can do telehealth! I just need some real answers from someone who doesn't talk in riddles. So recommendations would be highly welcomed. I have Blue Shield CA insurance, loads of gastros in LA don’t take insurance at all 😣
    • trents
      Okay, Lori, we can agree on the term "gluten-like". My concern here is that you and other celiacs who do experience celiac reactions to other grains besides wheat, barley and rye are trying to make this normative for the whole celiac community when it isn't. And using the term "gluten" to refer to these other grain proteins is going to be confusing to new celiacs trying to figure out what grains they actually do need to avoid and which they don't. Your experience is not normative so please don't proselytize as if it were.
×
×
  • Create New...