Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Is a TTG IgA of 52 considered mild or borderline?


LCArseneault

Recommended Posts

LCArseneault Rookie

I’m just trying to figure out where my levels stand, if this is considered borderline, or if this is a clear positive? 

Has anyone with a similar level ever had a positive TTG and negative biopsy/told it wasn’t celiac? I’m currently waiting on the biopsy but it’s 3+ months for the scope where I am and debating just going gluten free now - the TTG was done as part of a recurrent pregnancy loss after our third miscarriage, and so doing whatever I can to improve our chances of getting and staying pregnant is really important to me… if it’s 3 + months before I can even START to heal my gut, it’ll be 6+ months before our chances improve and we’ve already been trying for a year. Everything else in our RPL workup has come back normal. Would be willing to do a scope after hypothetical baby…


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master

What was your tTG-IGA score? But to answer your question, yes. We sometimes do get forum participants who have positive blood work but negative biopsy. Seems to happen more often with children but we do get some adults who report this. I would assume this phenomenon indicates the celiac disease was caught in a very early stage before damage is done to the SB lining. Do you have other symptoms besides fertility issues that would suggest celiac disease?

Is your age a factor here with regard to wanting to go gluten-free before a biopsy can be arranged. Is the time window of child bearing age starting to close? Sorry, hope that question isn't too personal.

LCArseneault Rookie
15 minutes ago, trents said:

What was your tTG-IGA score? But to answer your question, yes. We sometimes do get forum participants who have positive blood work but negative biopsy. Seems to happen more often with children but we do get some adults who report this. I would assume this phenomenon indicates the celiac disease was caught in a very early stage before damage is done to the SB lining. Do you have other symptoms besides fertility issues that would suggest celiac disease?

Is your age a factor here with regard to wanting to go gluten-free before a biopsy can be arranged. Is the time window of child bearing age starting to close? Sorry, hope that question isn't too personal.

It was 52. I do have some GI symptoms (loose BMs once-twice a day, gassy, have had really itchy undiagnosed rashes on my legs on/off for years), my GI symptoms have worsened over the last few months but I've been so caught up in my fertility issues to really notice or care. 

It's not so much that my age is a factor, but we'd hoped to have an age gap of 2 years between kids, and our daughter is already two, and with our track record of initially taking over a year to get pregnant the first time and then losing 3 out of 4 of our pregnancies, taking any time off feels detrimental. 

Basically wondering how a level of 52 stands, is that considered borderline? Or is that fairly clear-cut? From what I'm reading the chances of a false positive are quite low. 

trents Grand Master

What was the reference range used by the lab? Different labs use different reference ranges for negative/positive.

LCArseneault Rookie
Just now, trents said:

What was the reference range used by the lab? Different labs use different reference ranges for negative/positive.

20 is considered the upper limit of normal at the lab it was done at. 

trents Grand Master
(edited)

Then I would not consider 52 an equivocal score. But there are some things besides celiac disease that can cause elevated tTG-IGA. But other causes are fairly uncommon.

You might google, "What can cause elevated tTG-IGA scores besides celiac disease?" and "What can cause villous atrophy besides celiac disease?" Some other diseases and some medications can damage villi and cause inflammation. Crohn's Disease is one, I believe.

Edited by trents
LCArseneault Rookie
1 hour ago, trents said:

Then I would not consider 52 an equivocal score. But there are some things besides celiac disease that can cause elevated tTG-IGA. But other causes are fairly uncommon.

You might google, "What can cause elevated tTG-IGA scores besides celiac disease?" and "What can cause villous atrophy besides celiac disease?" Some other diseases and some medications can damage villi and cause inflammation.

Thank you so much. For people who've gone gluten free already before their scope, what is the common amount of time before the scope they're instructed to eat gluten? 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master

The Mayo Clinic guideline for the prescope/biopsy gluten challenge is the amount of gluten equivalent to two slices of wheat bread daily for two weeks.

scanlanmd Apprentice
On 2/20/2022 at 7:15 AM, LCArseneault said:

I’m just trying to figure out where my levels stand, if this is considered borderline, or if this is a clear positive? 

Has anyone with a similar level ever had a positive TTG and negative biopsy/told it wasn’t celiac? I’m currently waiting on the biopsy but it’s 3+ months for the scope where I am and debating just going gluten free now - the TTG was done as part of a recurrent pregnancy loss after our third miscarriage, and so doing whatever I can to improve our chances of getting and staying pregnant is really important to me… if it’s 3 + months before I can even START to heal my gut, it’ll be 6+ months before our chances improve and we’ve already been trying for a year. Everything else in our RPL workup has come back normal. Would be willing to do a scope after hypothetical baby…

Hey there!

Newly diagnosed with a level of 60 (60 being indicated at the lab as being "high"). My doctor, along with other blood indications, diagnosed me as definitively having celiac disease. Keep in mind, I have struggled with symptoms for nearly a decade and have reduced MANY "allergy containing" foods prior to getting impromptu tested again. 

Due to the pandemic, getting in for a biopsy would take longer than usual where I am from, so I chose to begin the diet immediately. After almost 3 weeks of gluten-free life, I have been having solid bowel movements, something that I have not had in almost 10 years!! Of course, I still have much healing to do and many other symptoms to absolve, however, I am happy with my decision to begin the diet immediately (cross the biopsy road when I get to it).

I hope my experience may help you make the decision that is best for you!

Meg.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      125,880
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    schussb
    Newest Member
    schussb
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • gregoryC
      Just finished my second celebrity cruise. My first was on one of their oldest ships, it was awesome! Now we have sailed on the edge class. Wow! Not only do they have so many gluten-free options but the selection is mind blowing! Any given day you will have between 5 to 7 different gluten-free cakes to try. Yes that is right, one day at the coffee shop I had to choose between 5 gluten-free cakes not including the several puddings on display. So they gave me a small piece of each. 2 were great, 2 were just good, and 1 I did not enjoy. But never have I had the tough decision of which cake to eat?  These selections are from their normal options available for all guest. In the main dining room they always surprised me with some awesome desserts.  In my opinion the best pizza was on the Millennium class and best buffet on the Edge class. Although these two ship vary in size they are both consistent and serving high quality food from the main dinning room. The edge class gives you 4 “main” dining rooms (all included). I was unsure how this would work with my gluten-free diet? It worked great! I was able to order or see the next night’s menu for each of the four dinning venues finding that very little to no modifications needed to be made due to their extensive gluten free options.  The Millennium and Edge class ships provide the best gluten-free options from any of the cruise lines I have sailed with. You will find a larger selection and options on the edge class ships, however you will not be disappointed with the smaller Millennium class. Which is still my favorite cruise ship to date.   
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @ABP! We can't comment on the test numbers you give as you didn't include the range for negative. Different labs use different units and different ranges. There are no industry standards for this so we need more information. If your daughter doesn't have celiac disease she still could have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) which some experts believe can be a precursor to celiac disease and is 10x more common than celiac disease. However, there is no test for it yet but it does share many of the same symptoms with celiac disease. Both require complete abstinence from gluten.  It is seldom the case during testing where all tests are positive, even for those who do have celiac disease. This is no different than when diagnosing other medical conditions and that is why it is typical to run numbers of tests that come at things from different angles when seeking to arrive at a diagnosis. It seems like you are at the point, since you have had both blood antibody testing and endoscopy/biopsy done, that you need to trial the gluten free diet. If her symptoms improve then you know all you need to know, whatever you label you want to give it. But given that apparently at least one celiac antibody blood test is positive and she has classic celiac symptoms such as slow growth, constipation and bloating, my money would be on celiac disease as opposed to NCGS.
    • ABP
      My nine-year-old daughter has suffered with severe constipation and bloating for years as well as frequent mouth sores, and keratosis Polaris on her arms. She also has recently decreased on her growth curve her % going down gradually.  After seeing a gastroenterologist, her IgG GLIADIN (DEAMIDATED) AB (IGG) was 22.4 while her IGA was normal. Her TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE AB, IGA was 11.9.  Most recently her genetic test for celiac was positive.  After an endoscopy her tissue showed inflammation of the tissue as well as , increased intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) but there was no blunting of the change in the villi.    It seems that every result that we get one out of two things positive rather than all leading to an inconclusive diagnosis. While we do have another appointment with the doctor to go over the results. I'm curious based on this information what others think.    I would hate to have her eliminate gluten if not necessary- but also don't want to not remove if it is necessary.    Signed Confused and Concerned Mama
    • Scott Adams
      I guess using "GF" instead of "PL" would have been too easy! 😉
    • trents
      I was wrong, however, about there being no particular health concerns associated with high total IGA: https://www.inspire.com/resources/chronic-disease/understanding-high-iga-levels-causes-impacts/ So maybe the physician's "borderline" remark is relevant to that.
×
×
  • Create New...