Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Is a TTG IgA of 52 considered mild or borderline?


LCArseneault

Recommended Posts

LCArseneault Rookie

I’m just trying to figure out where my levels stand, if this is considered borderline, or if this is a clear positive? 

Has anyone with a similar level ever had a positive TTG and negative biopsy/told it wasn’t celiac? I’m currently waiting on the biopsy but it’s 3+ months for the scope where I am and debating just going gluten free now - the TTG was done as part of a recurrent pregnancy loss after our third miscarriage, and so doing whatever I can to improve our chances of getting and staying pregnant is really important to me… if it’s 3 + months before I can even START to heal my gut, it’ll be 6+ months before our chances improve and we’ve already been trying for a year. Everything else in our RPL workup has come back normal. Would be willing to do a scope after hypothetical baby…


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master

What was your tTG-IGA score? But to answer your question, yes. We sometimes do get forum participants who have positive blood work but negative biopsy. Seems to happen more often with children but we do get some adults who report this. I would assume this phenomenon indicates the celiac disease was caught in a very early stage before damage is done to the SB lining. Do you have other symptoms besides fertility issues that would suggest celiac disease?

Is your age a factor here with regard to wanting to go gluten-free before a biopsy can be arranged. Is the time window of child bearing age starting to close? Sorry, hope that question isn't too personal.

LCArseneault Rookie
15 minutes ago, trents said:

What was your tTG-IGA score? But to answer your question, yes. We sometimes do get forum participants who have positive blood work but negative biopsy. Seems to happen more often with children but we do get some adults who report this. I would assume this phenomenon indicates the celiac disease was caught in a very early stage before damage is done to the SB lining. Do you have other symptoms besides fertility issues that would suggest celiac disease?

Is your age a factor here with regard to wanting to go gluten-free before a biopsy can be arranged. Is the time window of child bearing age starting to close? Sorry, hope that question isn't too personal.

It was 52. I do have some GI symptoms (loose BMs once-twice a day, gassy, have had really itchy undiagnosed rashes on my legs on/off for years), my GI symptoms have worsened over the last few months but I've been so caught up in my fertility issues to really notice or care. 

It's not so much that my age is a factor, but we'd hoped to have an age gap of 2 years between kids, and our daughter is already two, and with our track record of initially taking over a year to get pregnant the first time and then losing 3 out of 4 of our pregnancies, taking any time off feels detrimental. 

Basically wondering how a level of 52 stands, is that considered borderline? Or is that fairly clear-cut? From what I'm reading the chances of a false positive are quite low. 

trents Grand Master

What was the reference range used by the lab? Different labs use different reference ranges for negative/positive.

LCArseneault Rookie
Just now, trents said:

What was the reference range used by the lab? Different labs use different reference ranges for negative/positive.

20 is considered the upper limit of normal at the lab it was done at. 

trents Grand Master
(edited)

Then I would not consider 52 an equivocal score. But there are some things besides celiac disease that can cause elevated tTG-IGA. But other causes are fairly uncommon.

You might google, "What can cause elevated tTG-IGA scores besides celiac disease?" and "What can cause villous atrophy besides celiac disease?" Some other diseases and some medications can damage villi and cause inflammation. Crohn's Disease is one, I believe.

Edited by trents
LCArseneault Rookie
1 hour ago, trents said:

Then I would not consider 52 an equivocal score. But there are some things besides celiac disease that can cause elevated tTG-IGA. But other causes are fairly uncommon.

You might google, "What can cause elevated tTG-IGA scores besides celiac disease?" and "What can cause villous atrophy besides celiac disease?" Some other diseases and some medications can damage villi and cause inflammation.

Thank you so much. For people who've gone gluten free already before their scope, what is the common amount of time before the scope they're instructed to eat gluten? 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master

The Mayo Clinic guideline for the prescope/biopsy gluten challenge is the amount of gluten equivalent to two slices of wheat bread daily for two weeks.

scanlanmd Apprentice
On 2/20/2022 at 7:15 AM, LCArseneault said:

I’m just trying to figure out where my levels stand, if this is considered borderline, or if this is a clear positive? 

Has anyone with a similar level ever had a positive TTG and negative biopsy/told it wasn’t celiac? I’m currently waiting on the biopsy but it’s 3+ months for the scope where I am and debating just going gluten free now - the TTG was done as part of a recurrent pregnancy loss after our third miscarriage, and so doing whatever I can to improve our chances of getting and staying pregnant is really important to me… if it’s 3 + months before I can even START to heal my gut, it’ll be 6+ months before our chances improve and we’ve already been trying for a year. Everything else in our RPL workup has come back normal. Would be willing to do a scope after hypothetical baby…

Hey there!

Newly diagnosed with a level of 60 (60 being indicated at the lab as being "high"). My doctor, along with other blood indications, diagnosed me as definitively having celiac disease. Keep in mind, I have struggled with symptoms for nearly a decade and have reduced MANY "allergy containing" foods prior to getting impromptu tested again. 

Due to the pandemic, getting in for a biopsy would take longer than usual where I am from, so I chose to begin the diet immediately. After almost 3 weeks of gluten-free life, I have been having solid bowel movements, something that I have not had in almost 10 years!! Of course, I still have much healing to do and many other symptoms to absolve, however, I am happy with my decision to begin the diet immediately (cross the biopsy road when I get to it).

I hope my experience may help you make the decision that is best for you!

Meg.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,016
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Chloelouise04
    Newest Member
    Chloelouise04
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Jmartes71
      Im so frustrated and still getting the run around trying to reprove my celiac disease which my past primary ignored for 25 years.I understand that theres a ray of medical that doctors are limited too but not listening and telling the patient ( me) that im not as sensitive as I think and NOT celiac!Correction Mr white coat its not what I think but for cause and affect and past test that are not sticking in my medical records.I get sick violently with foods consumed, not eating the foods will show Im fabulous. After many blood draws and going through doctors I have the HLA- DQ2 positive which I read in a study that Iran conducted that the severity in celiac is in that gene.Im glutenfree and dealing with related issues which core issue of celiac isn't addressed. My skin, right eye, left leg diagestive issues affected. I have high blood pressure because im in pain.Im waisting my time on trying to reprove that Im celiac which is not a disease I want, but unfortunately have.It  has taken over my life personally and professionally. How do I stop getting medically gaslight and get the help needed to bounce back if I ever do bounce back to normal? I thought I was in good care with " celiac specialist " but in her eyes Im good.Im NOT.Sibo positive, IBS, Chronic Fatigue just to name a few and its all related to what I like to call a ghost disease ( celiac) since doctors don't seem to take it seriously. 
    • trents
      @Martha Mitchell, your reaction to the lens implant with gluten sounds like it could be an allergic reaction rather than a celiac reaction. It is possible for a celiac to be also allergic to gluten as it is a protein component in wheat, barley and rye.
    • JoJo0611
    • Martha Mitchell
      Scott I also have different symptoms than most people. It affects me bad. Stomach ache, headache, nauseous, heart racing, whole body shaking, can't walk then my throat starts to close. It attacks my nervous system. The only thing that saves me is a 1/2 of Xanax...it calms down my nervous system 
    • Martha Mitchell
      Scott Adams. I was dealing with a DR that didn't care about me being celiac. I repeatedly told him that I was celiac and is everything gluten-free. He put an acrylic lens from j&j. I called the company to ask about gluten and was told yes that the acrylic they use has gluten....then they back tracked immediately and stopped talking to me. The Dr didn't care that I was having issues. It took me 6 months and a lot of sickness to get it removed.... which can only happen within 6 months. The Dr that took it out said that it was fused and that's why I lost vision. If they would have removed it right away everything would be fine. He put in a silicone one that was gluten-free and I've had no issues at all in the other eye. Do not do acrylic!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.