Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Poached eggs don't give me an upset tummy


trents

Recommended Posts

trents Grand Master

I have this puzzling experience with eggs. If I cook them in a pan as in scrambled eggs, hard boil them or bake them as in quiche, they make my tummy unhappy. So, I've come to realize that I have developed an egg intolerance.

However, if I poach them they don't bother me. I have one of those plastic dual cup egg poachers that you use in the microwave. To use it, you pierce the yolk sack with a sharp utensil and add a spritz of water, close it up and microwave it for 45 seconds (one egg) or a minute (two eggs). It works like a charm. But I got to wondering if there was some hydrolysis going on because of the water present during the cooking that changed the proteins to make them more digestible for me. Indeed, that seems to be a possible explanation for what is going on. I found this article: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1756464618302421

Here's the key statement:

"Results showed that poaching resulted in higher digestibility of lipids and proteins, compared to boiling or omelette preparations, under gastrointestinal conditions of EPI (pH 6, bile 1 mM)."

Edited by trents
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Wheatwacked Veteran

I've had the same thing with eggs. I boil water and crack the eggs in. It took me 40 years to learn to cook a potato in the microwave that did not turn into a rock and in my mind's eye I can see me cleaning exploded egg. Currently doing 3 jumbo (198 g) scrambled in Irish butter, for the choline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
trents Grand Master

I tried duck eggs scrambled but they still gave me an unhappy tummy. But both chicken eggs and duck eggs don't bother me when I poach them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wheatwacked Veteran

I think when you poach the max temp is <212 F. Hard boiling creates high temp steam inside the shell and frying or scrambling can get temps high enough to mess with the flavor?

I wondered but never looked. Could some people be dealing with cross contamination through their eggs?

Quote

You do not need to grind the whole grain when you choice-feed your hens. The birds will readily eat whole wheat, whole oats or whole barley  Choice-Feeding of Small Laying Hen Flocks

 

Edited by Wheatwacked
Link to comment
Share on other sites
trents Grand Master

I would not expect CC would happen with eggs.

My poacher is a clam shell device similar to this and microwaveable, similar to this one: https://smile.amazon.com/Nordic-Ware-64702-Microwave-Poacher/dp/B00004W4UR/ref=sr_1_9?crid=1NWYY31PFY37S&keywords=egg+poacher&qid=1649561891&sprefix=egg+poacher%2Caps%2C155&sr=8-9

 

You poke a hole in the yolk sack and add a little water to the cup when you put the egg in it. It latches shut. So there's pressure and steam. I like the flavor of eggs no matter how their cooked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Blue-Sky Enthusiast

If you have a pressure cooker you could experiment and see if that method works. Pressure cookers, I think should increase the pressure within the egg, since they will heat the egg up past the normal boiling point. You might be able to tell if it is pressure vs steam that is making it more digestible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
trents Grand Master

I think the hydrolysis from the water added to the poacher is critical, not just heat and pressure. Besides, using a pressure cooker just to cook eggs would be a lot of trouble. My poaching method uses the microwave. Very fast and simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      124,663
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Casey Stapel
    Newest Member
    Casey Stapel
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Ginger38
      Yes I figured out I couldn’t have gluten years ago when I was symptomatic and tested positive, but was misinformed and told I couldn’t have celiac but to go gluten free. I was already gluten free. I was never willing to go back on gluten and make myself so sick to have the biopsy especially when the biopsy isn’t 💯. But Now I have to have a procedure anyway and he told me he was doing the biopsy either way .. but I should consider the gluten challenge since I have never had the biopsy. He acted like it was super important to have this on paper.  I had no idea there were any possible negative drawbacks to having a formal diagnosis 🤦🏼‍♀️
    • Scott Adams
      While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like you will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if you should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS). Keep in mind that there are also drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications.  Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis.
    • Wheatwacked
      I take Clonidine for BP no gluten reaction.  It was originally prescribed for adolescence who could not take Ritalin.
    • Ginger38
      Basically because he was going to do the biopsy either way , so I agreed after him bugging me lol (after all this time of refusing) (and I’m already regretting) to do the gluten challenge. But yes he’s already told me even in if the biopsy is negative I still have to live as a celiac for the rest of my life bc he’s certain I’m celiac positive regardless of what the biopsy shows. But he can’t put it on paper if it’s negative so I really don’t know what the point is. I have all the symptoms and have had positive IgA antibodies every time I’ve been tested. They did decrease after starting a gluten free diet but never made it to zero.  Also my daughter is going to pediatric gastroenterology in a few months so I thought it may be helpful for her for me to have the procedure 🤷🏼‍♀️
    • Scott Adams
      You can search this site for prescriptions medications, but will need to know the manufacturer/maker if there is more than one, especially if you use a generic version of the medication: To see the ingredients you will need to click on the correct version of the medication and maker in the results, then scroll down to "Ingredients and Appearance" and click it, and then look at "Inactive Ingredients," as any gluten ingredients would likely appear there, rather than in the Active Ingredients area. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/   
×
×
  • Create New...