Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Test Results


Liam1047

Recommended Posts

Liam1047 Newbie

Hi all,

Not coeliac but in early stages of testing. Long story short I have digestive issues, brain fog, tiredness and body aches. Went to doctors and they have tested for coeliacs using IgA tTG. The results have come back just above the reference limit. I am in the UK and reference ranges for my doctors are 0.8 - 2.7 g/L; my level was 3.0.

this combined with symptoms, I am wondering if it is likely coeliac? Has anyone else tested positive but just above the upper reference limit?

Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master
(edited)
5 hours ago, Liam1047 said:

Hi all,

Not coeliac but in early stages of testing. Long story short I have digestive issues, brain fog, tiredness and body aches. Went to doctors and they have tested for coeliacs using IgA tTG. The results have come back just above the reference limit. I am in the UK and reference ranges for my doctors are 0.8 - 2.7 g/L; my level was 3.0.

this combined with symptoms, I am wondering if it is likely coeliac? Has anyone else tested positive but just above the upper reference limit?

Thanks!

Plenty of people have this pattern. Leading up to the blood draw, had you already begun cutting back on your gluten consumption? Is the tTG-IGA the only test your physician ordered? If he/she had run a "full celiac panel" you might have a more complete picture. The tTG-IGA is considered the best single test for celiac disease in that it combines good specificity with good sensitivity but some people's immune system responds atypically. So other tests can catch them when the tTG-IGA misses. 

https://celiac.org/about-celiac-disease/screening-and-diagnosis/screening/

Seems like a lot of people joining the forum from the UK are reporting difficulty getting proper testing done these days.

Edited by trents
Scott Adams Grand Master

Welcome to the forum!

You are above the limit, and this is a test that is very specific for celiac disease, so I'd assume that you have celiac disease. Even if your results were 2.6 on that test, I would say that you still could have celiac disease.

For some reason, and I believe it was around 5-7 years ago, we started seeing some labs include a zone called "weak positive," which seems to really just confuse people. We have also heard of doctors telling their patients that they are only "slightly positive" with results like yours. This approach may lead some people to not pursue a gluten-free diet until their situation gets worse.

Again, the reality of this test is that those without any autoimmune issues to gluten/gliadin should not have elevated levels at all, and should probably still be concerned with levels that are 2.0 and above. 

Wheatwacked Veteran
Liam1047 Newbie
17 hours ago, trents said:

Plenty of people have this pattern. Leading up to the blood draw, had you already begun cutting back on your gluten consumption? Is the tTG-IGA the only test your physician ordered? If he/she had run a "full celiac panel" you might have a more complete picture. The tTG-IGA is considered the best single test for celiac disease in that it combines good specificity with good sensitivity but some people's immune system responds atypically. So other tests can catch them when the tTG-IGA misses. 

https://celiac.org/about-celiac-disease/screening-and-diagnosis/screening/

Seems like a lot of people joining the forum from the UK are reporting difficulty getting proper testing done these days.

Thanks Trents - I hadn't been cutting back as I know that negates the point of the test! National guidelines in the UK do suggest everyone should have a full coeliac panel  so I am not sure why I have just been tested once, I'm chatting to my GP Monday to navigate a way ahead!

12 hours ago, Scott Adams said:

Welcome to the forum!

You are above the limit, and this is a test that is very specific for celiac disease, so I'd assume that you have celiac disease. Even if your results were 2.6 on that test, I would say that you still could have celiac disease.

For some reason, and I believe it was around 5-7 years ago, we started seeing some labs include a zone called "weak positive," which seems to really just confuse people. We have also heard of doctors telling their patients that they are only "slightly positive" with results like yours. This approach may lead some people to not pursue a gluten-free diet until their situation gets worse.

Again, the reality of this test is that those without any autoimmune issues to gluten/gliadin should not have elevated levels at all, and should probably still be concerned with levels that are 2.0 and above. 

Thank you Scott. I agree and see what you mean, I'd assume antibodies should be near zero if there was nothing going on. I'm booked in with my GP Monday to either get a full panel or straight to endoscopy (NHS Guidance pending). Some of my friends are coeliac and they took a while to get to the bottom of it as they were palmed of with borderline high levels. Going to up my gluten as much as I can in case another blood test is required!

2 hours ago, Wheatwacked said:

Not yet and not sure if they are going ahead at the moment, the NHS in England is still only prioritising this sort of health service to those who are in dire need (ie., suspected cancer) to reduce the chance of COVID infection and spread. It does have to be a gastroenterologist though who diagnoses this condition in the UK, so even if I don't have the endoscopy I'm going to ask about being referred onto secondary care at least!

Russ H Community Regular

Several other conditions are also associated with raised levels of anti-tTG2 antibodies including arthritis, IBS and type 1 diabetes, but the levels are not as high as often seen with coeliac disease. A high level is very specific for coeliac disease, but a low level could be coeliac or another condition and needs further investigation.

Be persistent because many GPs are not very knowledgeable about coeliac disease. You have several of the classical symptoms of coeliac disease as well as a positive antibody result. Most sufferers have at least one and often multiple deficiencies of vitamins and minerals at diagnosis. I would ask to at least get your haemoglobin and ferritin tested as iron deficiency anaemia is very common. It is worth taking a multivitamin and mineral supplement.

Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase Antibodies in Arthritic Patients: A Disease-specific Finding?

 

trents Grand Master
1 hour ago, Russ314 said:

Several other conditions are also associated with raised levels of anti-tTG2 antibodies including arthritis, IBS and type 1 diabetes, but the levels are not as high as often seen with coeliac disease. A high level is very specific for coeliac disease, but a low level could be coeliac or another condition and needs further investigation.

Be persistent because many GPs are not very knowledgeable about coeliac disease. You have several of the classical symptoms of coeliac disease as well as a positive antibody result. Most sufferers have at least one and often multiple deficiencies of vitamins and minerals at diagnosis. I would ask to at least get your haemoglobin and ferritin tested as iron deficiency anaemia is very common. It is worth taking a multivitamin and mineral supplement.

Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase Antibodies in Arthritic Patients: A Disease-specific Finding?

 

A little dated but nonetheless, a good find, Russ! I also note that four of the people in the test group who did have celiac disease did not have elevated tTG-IGA values. That agrees with the experience some of our forum participants of late and reinforces the value of getting a full celiac panel run rather than just the tTG-IGA.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,932
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Gideon Jungman
    Newest Member
    Gideon Jungman
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      71.4k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      I would ask for a total IGA test (aka, Immunoglobulin A (IgA) and other names as well) to check for IGA deficiency. That test should always be ordered along with the TTG IGA. If someone is IGA deficient, their individual celiac IGA test scores will be artificially low which can result in false negatives. Make sure you are eating generous amounts of gluten leading up to any testing or diagnostic procedure for celiac disease to ensure validity of the results. 10g of gluten daily for a period of at least 2 weeks is what current guidelines are recommending. That's the amount of gluten found in about 4-6 slices of wheat bread.
    • jlp1999
      There was not a total IGA test done, those were the only two ordered. I would say I was consuming a normal amount of gluten, I am not a huge bread or baked goods eater
    • trents
      Were you consuming generous amounts of gluten in the weeks leading up to the blood draw for the antibody testing? And was there a Total IGA test done to test for IGA deficiency?
    • jlp1999
      Thank you for the reply. It was the TTG IGA that was within normal limits
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @jlp1999! Which IGA test do you refer to as being normal? TTG-IGA? Total IGA? DGP-IGA? Yes, any positive on an IGA or an IGG test can be due to something other than celiac disease and this is especially true of weak positives. Villous atrophy can also be cause by other things besides celiac disease such as some medications, parasitic infections and even some foods (especially dairy from an intolerance to the dairy protein casein). But the likelihood of that being the case is much less than it being caused by celiac disease.
×
×
  • Create New...