Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

"Did you/or do you KNOW?"


Yvonne (Vonnie) Mostat, RN

Recommended Posts

Yvonne (Vonnie) Mostat, RN Collaborator

Latest study  published in JAMA, researchers screened 4,24,788 newborn infants for HLA (A genetic predisposition to the development of celiac disease),  Of these, 6, 757 participated,, representing 1.44% of the study population.  The results of this study indicated each additional gram of gluten consumption per day was associated with a 50% increased risk of celiac disease in genetically predisposed children at age 3.  However, because the results were based on such a small subset of the larger sample, the results may not be representative of the broader population.

The second study published in the American Journal of Gastroenterology, examined data collected from 1,875 at-risk children between 1993 and 2017. Of th4ese, 151 (8.5%) developed celiac disease autoimmunity (positive blood antibodies) and 85 (4.5% developed celiac disease (biopsy-verified or persistently high blood antibodies).  The researchers found the risk of celiac disease autoimmunity increased by 5% for each gram of gluten consumed between the ages of 1 and 2 years of age.  The risk of later developing celiac disease autoimmunity was found to be strongest for an increased gluten intake at 1 year of age. However, these results were also based on a small subset (3.3%) of the larger sample, focusing only on genetically at-risk children. Because of this, these results should not be generalized to recommendations for children irrespective of genetic risk.

 

Lastly, The AMerican Journal of Gastroenterology recently published a study examinining tyhe moBa-cohort. Unlike the previous two studies, this sstudy was population based and did not consider genetic risk  (HLA)O.  Of ccourse some 113,000 children initially enrolled.  67,608 were included in the study, 738 (1.1%) of whom were diagnosed with celiac disease. The rsearchers found that risk of celiac disease inceased by 3% with each gram of extra gluten intake per day, with gluten who were introducd to gluten at 6 months of age or older havng a significantly higher risk of celiac disease than those introduced at 4 - 6 months.

While the rsults of these three studies suggest that one extra clice of bread (about 2 grams of gluten) per daY SEEMS TO BE LINKED TO AN 20 - 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master
(edited)

Vonnie, the way this was presented was confusing to me.

"screened 4,24,788 newborn infants" There's a digit missing there somewhere between the first and second commas I believe.

"HLA" One or both genes that have been identified with celiac disease potential?

"While the rsults of these three studies suggest that one extra clice of bread (about 2 grams of gluten) per daY SEEMS TO BE LINKED TO AN 20 -" This is your last line. Looks like an incomplete thought or sentence.

Is there a summary conclusion that will tie together the findings of all three studies? Something like, if your infant has one or both celic potential genes, feeding them gluten before the age of xx increases the likelihood they will develop active celiac disease by xx%? I'm not sure what the application is here from the data.

You might want to go back and reread your post to correct typos.

Edited by trents

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,992
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    mee3
    Newest Member
    mee3
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.8k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • RMJ
      That is strange.  Other pages talk about testing. The one thing I like about GFCO is that the handbook for their certification process is available on their website.  I may not agree with the whole process, especially the reduced testing, but at least I can see what the process is. I wish the other certifying organizations would publish their processes. GFCO 2024 manual
    • RMJ
      GFCO does not require testing of each lot, so the “periodic laboratory analyses” fits their requirements. They say testing is done by certified bodies.  I’m not sure what that means for an Italian company. The GFCO requirement is less than 10 ppm.  Other gluten-free certifying companies may use other limits.
    • cvernon
      Thanks for the info on Nuts.com! Looks like they are certified by GFFP which has a 5ppm limit, which is awesome. I was looking on the GFFP website ( https://glutenfreefoodprogram.com/gluten-free-certification-manufacturing/ ) as I was curious about what their certification requirements are, and stumbled on an odd statement. On a page where they're explaining the benefits of getting a certification through them, it says "No mandatory gluten testing requirements." Ummm, what?! I've included screenshots and a link below to where that information is. I've also emailed GFFP to try and get additional info on what that statement actually means, and what requirements (testing, audits, ingredient tracing) if any manufacturers have to go through to obtain/retain a certification through them. They're endorsed by The National Celiac Association so you'd sure think that GFFP would be requiring 3rd party testing for their certification, but at this point not much would surprise me with these gluten-free certifying companies. https://glutenfreefoodprogram.com/gluten-free-certification-manufacturing/
    • Jsingh
      I second Nuts.com. Theirs seems to be good. My daughter can have their certified items without any problem. I don't even know how to process this!!
    • Jsingh
      I have written to them about sharing details of the lab that does testing for them. That way I can at least know the contamination threshold the lab tests for. For I had written to GFCO in regards to another brand that GFCO told me they do not have the info on the testing threshold for contamination on individual brands. They let the companies set that for themselves. Anyway, I am going to try La Tourangelle and see if that works.
×
×
  • Create New...